Skip to main content
Top

Open Access 27-02-2024 | Atrial Fibrillation

Safety of multi-access site venous closure following catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation and flutter

Authors: Sanjaya Gupta, Raghu Kolluri, Tiessa Simoes, Sandeep C. Pingle, Hong Nie, Michael S. Lloyd, Daniel Steinhaus, Stacy B. Westerman, Anand Shah, Jessica Kline, Soroosh Kiani

Published in: Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Following catheter ablation, vascular access management involves potential complications and prolonged recovery. Recently, suture-mediated closure (SMC) devices were approved for venous access procedures. The objective of this study is to evaluate the safety of a commercially available SMC for multiple access site venous closure by duplex ultrasound (DUS) in asymptomatic subjects with non-visible complications.

Methods

Thirty-six subjects (63 ± 10.7 years old, 12 female) were enrolled. Following catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation, all subjects had SMC of every venous access site. Subjects underwent DUS of femoral veins and arteries. DUS was performed at discharge, and again at 30 days. Subjects were evaluated for clinically apparent vascular complications.

Results

Mean procedure duration was 138.6 min, and the time to hemostasis was 3.1 min/access site and 9.5 min/subject. Median time to ambulation was 193.5 min, and median time to discharge was 5.95 h, with discharge as early as 2.4 h. A median of 2 sheaths/vein and a median of 2 SMC devices/vein were used. There were no major complications and a 16.7% (6/36) minor complication rate at discharge. All complications resolved at 30 days. The complication rate was not higher in patients with 2 SMC per access site as compared to the patients who just received 1 SMC per access site.

Conclusions

This study demonstrates the safety of multi-access closure using SMC, following catheter ablation procedures, for closure of sites that use sheath sizes from ≤ 8F to ≥ 15F and for those that use 2 or more SMCs per access site.

Graphical abstract

Literature
1.
go back to reference Velagic V, Mugnai G, Pasara V, et al. Use of figure of eight suture for groin closure with no heparin reversal in patients undergoing cryoballoon ablation for atrial fibrillation. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2021;60:433–8.CrossRefPubMed Velagic V, Mugnai G, Pasara V, et al. Use of figure of eight suture for groin closure with no heparin reversal in patients undergoing cryoballoon ablation for atrial fibrillation. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2021;60:433–8.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Yasar SJ, Bickel T, Zhang S, et al. Heparin reversal with protamine sulfate is not required in atrial fibrillation ablation with suture hemostasis. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2019;30:2811–7.CrossRefPubMed Yasar SJ, Bickel T, Zhang S, et al. Heparin reversal with protamine sulfate is not required in atrial fibrillation ablation with suture hemostasis. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2019;30:2811–7.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Lakshmanadoss U, Wong WS, Kutinsky I, Khalid MR, Williamson B, Haines DE. Figure-of-eight suture for venous hemostasis in fully anticoagulated patients after atrial fibrillation catheter ablation. Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J. 2017;17:134–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Lakshmanadoss U, Wong WS, Kutinsky I, Khalid MR, Williamson B, Haines DE. Figure-of-eight suture for venous hemostasis in fully anticoagulated patients after atrial fibrillation catheter ablation. Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J. 2017;17:134–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
4.
go back to reference Natale A, Mohanty S, Liu PY, et al. Venous vascular closure system versus manual compression following multiple access electrophysiology procedures: the AMBULATE trial. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2020;6:111–24.CrossRefPubMed Natale A, Mohanty S, Liu PY, et al. Venous vascular closure system versus manual compression following multiple access electrophysiology procedures: the AMBULATE trial. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2020;6:111–24.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Al-Ahmad A, Mittal S, DeLurgio D, et al. Results from the prospective, multicenter AMBULATE-CAP trial: reduced use of urinary catheters and protamine with hemostasis via the mid-bore venous vascular closure system (VASCADE(R) MVP) following multi-access cardiac ablation procedures. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2021;32:191–9.CrossRefPubMed Al-Ahmad A, Mittal S, DeLurgio D, et al. Results from the prospective, multicenter AMBULATE-CAP trial: reduced use of urinary catheters and protamine with hemostasis via the mid-bore venous vascular closure system (VASCADE(R) MVP) following multi-access cardiac ablation procedures. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2021;32:191–9.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Mohammed M, Nona P, Abou Asala E, et al. Preclosure of large bore venous access sites in patients undergoing transcatheter mitral replacement and repair. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2022;100:163–8.CrossRefPubMed Mohammed M, Nona P, Abou Asala E, et al. Preclosure of large bore venous access sites in patients undergoing transcatheter mitral replacement and repair. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2022;100:163–8.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Kiani S, Eggebeen J, El-Chami MF, et al. Percutaneous vascular closure compared with manual compression in atrial fibrillation ablation. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2022;8:803–5.CrossRefPubMed Kiani S, Eggebeen J, El-Chami MF, et al. Percutaneous vascular closure compared with manual compression in atrial fibrillation ablation. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2022;8:803–5.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Mohammed M, Ramirez R, Steinhaus DA, et al. Comparative outcomes of vascular access closure methods following atrial fibrillation/flutter catheter ablation: insights from VAscular Closure for Cardiac Ablation Registry. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2022;64:301–10.CrossRefPubMed Mohammed M, Ramirez R, Steinhaus DA, et al. Comparative outcomes of vascular access closure methods following atrial fibrillation/flutter catheter ablation: insights from VAscular Closure for Cardiac Ablation Registry. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2022;64:301–10.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Mohanty S, Trivedi C, Beheiry S, et al. Venous access-site closure with vascular closure device vs. manual compression in patients undergoing catheter ablation or left atrial appendage occlusion under uninterrupted anticoagulation: a multicentre experience on efficacy and complications. Europace. 2019;21:1048–1054. Mohanty S, Trivedi C, Beheiry S, et al. Venous access-site closure with vascular closure device vs. manual compression in patients undergoing catheter ablation or left atrial appendage occlusion under uninterrupted anticoagulation: a multicentre experience on efficacy and complications. Europace. 2019;21:1048–1054.
10.
go back to reference Facchini FR. Percutaneous arterial access: redefining the possibilities using suture-mediated closure (Perclose). Tech Vasc Interv Radiol. 2003;6:72–5.CrossRefPubMed Facchini FR. Percutaneous arterial access: redefining the possibilities using suture-mediated closure (Perclose). Tech Vasc Interv Radiol. 2003;6:72–5.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Deshmukh A, Patel NJ, Pant S, et al. In-hospital complications associated with catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in the United States between 2000 and 2010: analysis of 93 801 procedures. Circulation. 2013;128:2104–12.CrossRefPubMed Deshmukh A, Patel NJ, Pant S, et al. In-hospital complications associated with catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in the United States between 2000 and 2010: analysis of 93 801 procedures. Circulation. 2013;128:2104–12.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Ellis ER, Culler SD, Simon AW, Reynolds MR. Trends in utilization and complications of catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation in Medicare beneficiaries. Heart Rhythm. 2009;6:1267–73.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Ellis ER, Culler SD, Simon AW, Reynolds MR. Trends in utilization and complications of catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation in Medicare beneficiaries. Heart Rhythm. 2009;6:1267–73.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
go back to reference Patel NJ, Deshmukh A, Pau D, et al. Contemporary utilization and safety outcomes of catheter ablation of atrial flutter in the United States: analysis of 89,638 procedures. Heart Rhythm. 2016;13:1317–25.CrossRefPubMed Patel NJ, Deshmukh A, Pau D, et al. Contemporary utilization and safety outcomes of catheter ablation of atrial flutter in the United States: analysis of 89,638 procedures. Heart Rhythm. 2016;13:1317–25.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Tripathi B, Arora S, Kumar V, et al. Temporal trends of in-hospital complications associated with catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in the United States: an update from Nationwide Inpatient Sample database (2011–2014). J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2018;29:715–24.CrossRefPubMed Tripathi B, Arora S, Kumar V, et al. Temporal trends of in-hospital complications associated with catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in the United States: an update from Nationwide Inpatient Sample database (2011–2014). J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2018;29:715–24.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Abhishek F, Heist EK, Barrett C, et al. Effectiveness of a strategy to reduce major vascular complications from catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2011;30:211–5.CrossRefPubMed Abhishek F, Heist EK, Barrett C, et al. Effectiveness of a strategy to reduce major vascular complications from catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2011;30:211–5.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Foerschner L, Erhard N, Dorfmeister S, et al. Ultrasound-guided access reduces vascular complications in patients undergoing catheter ablation for cardiac arrhythmias. J Clin Med. 2022;11(22):6766.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Foerschner L, Erhard N, Dorfmeister S, et al. Ultrasound-guided access reduces vascular complications in patients undergoing catheter ablation for cardiac arrhythmias. J Clin Med. 2022;11(22):6766.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
17.
go back to reference Pellegrino PL, Di Monaco A, Santoro F, et al. Near zero vascular complications using echo-guided puncture during catheter ablation of arrhythmias: a retrospective study and literature review. J Arrhythm. 2022;38:395–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Pellegrino PL, Di Monaco A, Santoro F, et al. Near zero vascular complications using echo-guided puncture during catheter ablation of arrhythmias: a retrospective study and literature review. J Arrhythm. 2022;38:395–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
18.
go back to reference Sharma PS, Padala SK, Gunda S, Koneru JN, Ellenbogen KA. Vascular complications during catheter ablation of cardiac arrhythmias: a comparison between vascular ultrasound guided access and conventional vascular access. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2016;27:1160–6.CrossRefPubMed Sharma PS, Padala SK, Gunda S, Koneru JN, Ellenbogen KA. Vascular complications during catheter ablation of cardiac arrhythmias: a comparison between vascular ultrasound guided access and conventional vascular access. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2016;27:1160–6.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Triantafyllou K, Karkos CD, Fragakis N, Antoniadis AP, Meletidou M, Vassilikos V. Ultrasound-guided versus anatomic landmark-guided vascular access in cardiac electrophysiology procedures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J. 2022;22:145–53.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Triantafyllou K, Karkos CD, Fragakis N, Antoniadis AP, Meletidou M, Vassilikos V. Ultrasound-guided versus anatomic landmark-guided vascular access in cardiac electrophysiology procedures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J. 2022;22:145–53.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
20.
go back to reference Wynn GJ, Haq I, Hung J, et al. Improving safety in catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation: a prospective study of the use of ultrasound to guide vascular access. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2014;25:680–5.CrossRefPubMed Wynn GJ, Haq I, Hung J, et al. Improving safety in catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation: a prospective study of the use of ultrasound to guide vascular access. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2014;25:680–5.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Freedman BL, Yang S, Shim D, d’Avila A, Waks JW, Tung P. Feasibility and safety of same-day discharge and shortened bedrest after atrial fibrillation ablation. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2022;65:209–17.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Freedman BL, Yang S, Shim D, d’Avila A, Waks JW, Tung P. Feasibility and safety of same-day discharge and shortened bedrest after atrial fibrillation ablation. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2022;65:209–17.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
Safety of multi-access site venous closure following catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation and flutter
Authors
Sanjaya Gupta
Raghu Kolluri
Tiessa Simoes
Sandeep C. Pingle
Hong Nie
Michael S. Lloyd
Daniel Steinhaus
Stacy B. Westerman
Anand Shah
Jessica Kline
Soroosh Kiani
Publication date
27-02-2024
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology
Print ISSN: 1383-875X
Electronic ISSN: 1572-8595
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-024-01773-3