Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Current Treatment Options in Cardiovascular Medicine 11/2015

01-11-2015 | Imaging (J Hung, Section Editor)

Assessment of Aortic Valve Disease: Role of Imaging Modalities

Authors: Romain Capoulade, PhD, Philippe Pibarot, DVM, PhD, FACC, FAHA, FESC, FASE

Published in: Current Treatment Options in Cardiovascular Medicine | Issue 11/2015

Login to get access

Opinion statement

Aortic valve disease, which includes aortic valve stenosis (AS) and/or regurgitation (AR), is the most prevalent cardiovascular disease after hypertension and coronary artery disease. Imaging modalities are essential for the staging and management of aortic valve disease. Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) is the primary imaging modality that is used in clinical practice to assess the aortic valve morphology, the severity of aortic valve disease, and its repercussions on left ventricular (LV) function and pulmonary arterial circulation. Exercise testing and exercise stress echocardiography should be considered in patients with asymptomatic severe aortic valve disease in order to enhance risk stratification and eventually recommend early valve replacement intervention. Three-dimensional (3D) imaging modalities including 3D echocardiography, multidetector computed tomography (MDCT), or cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) may help to improve the accuracy of the parameters of valve disease severity and LV function. Dobutamine stress echocardiography and, more recently, aortic valve calcium scoring by MDCT have been shown to be useful to confirm stenosis severity in the challenging subsets of patients with low-flow, low-gradient AS. In conclusion, we believe that 3D echocardiography, stress echocardiography, and MDCT are now ready for prime time in clinical practice, and a more systematic but rationale utilization of these modalities should thus be considered in patients with aortic valve disease. Other imaging modalities such as CMR for the assessment of myocardial fibrosis or positron emission tomography for the assessment of valve mineralization activity have been shown to be promising to predict disease progression and outcomes, but further research is necessary before implementation of these modalities into clinical practice.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Nkomo VT, Gardin JM, Skelton TN, Gottdiener JS, Scott CG, Enriquez-Sarano M. Burden of valvular heart diseases: a population-based study. Lancet. 2006;368:1005–11.CrossRefPubMed Nkomo VT, Gardin JM, Skelton TN, Gottdiener JS, Scott CG, Enriquez-Sarano M. Burden of valvular heart diseases: a population-based study. Lancet. 2006;368:1005–11.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Iung B, Vahanian A. Epidemiology of valvular heart disease in the adult. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2011;8:162–72.CrossRefPubMed Iung B, Vahanian A. Epidemiology of valvular heart disease in the adult. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2011;8:162–72.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Otto CM, Prendergast B. Aortic-valve stenosis—from patients at risk to severe valve obstruction. N Engl J Med. 2014;371:744–56.CrossRefPubMed Otto CM, Prendergast B. Aortic-valve stenosis—from patients at risk to severe valve obstruction. N Engl J Med. 2014;371:744–56.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Cramariuc D, Rieck AE, Staal EM, et al. Factors influencing left ventricular structure and stress-corrected systolic function in men and women with asymptomatic aortic valve stenosis (a SEAS Substudy). Am J Cardiol. 2008;101:510–5.CrossRefPubMed Cramariuc D, Rieck AE, Staal EM, et al. Factors influencing left ventricular structure and stress-corrected systolic function in men and women with asymptomatic aortic valve stenosis (a SEAS Substudy). Am J Cardiol. 2008;101:510–5.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Gerdts E. Left ventricular structure in different types of chronic pressure overload. Eur Heart J. 2008;10:E23–30.CrossRef Gerdts E. Left ventricular structure in different types of chronic pressure overload. Eur Heart J. 2008;10:E23–30.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Cioffi G, Faggiano P, Vizzardi E, et al. Prognostic value of inappropriately high left ventricular mass in asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis. Heart. 2011;97:301–7.CrossRefPubMed Cioffi G, Faggiano P, Vizzardi E, et al. Prognostic value of inappropriately high left ventricular mass in asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis. Heart. 2011;97:301–7.CrossRefPubMed
7.
8.•
go back to reference Michelena HI, Prakash SK, Della Corte A, et al. Bicuspid aortic valve: identifying knowledge gaps and rising to the challenge from the international bicuspid aortic valve consortium (BAVCon). Circulation. 2014;129:2691–704.This review article provides a good overview of bicuspid aortic valve syndrome, which is often associated with aortic stenosis or regurgitation. Michelena HI, Prakash SK, Della Corte A, et al. Bicuspid aortic valve: identifying knowledge gaps and rising to the challenge from the international bicuspid aortic valve consortium (BAVCon). Circulation. 2014;129:2691–704.This review article provides a good overview of bicuspid aortic valve syndrome, which is often associated with aortic stenosis or regurgitation.
9.••
go back to reference Nishimura RA, Otto CM, Bonow RO, et al. 2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;63:e57–e185.This is the most recent edition of the practice guidelines for the management of valvular heart diseases including aortic stenosis and aortic regurgitation Nishimura RA, Otto CM, Bonow RO, et al. 2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;63:e57–e185.This is the most recent edition of the practice guidelines for the management of valvular heart diseases including aortic stenosis and aortic regurgitation
10.
go back to reference Vahanian A, Alfieri O, Andreotti F, et al. Guidelines on the management of valvular heart disease (version 2012). Joint task force on the management of valvular heart disease of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC); European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2012;33:2451–96.CrossRefPubMed Vahanian A, Alfieri O, Andreotti F, et al. Guidelines on the management of valvular heart disease (version 2012). Joint task force on the management of valvular heart disease of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC); European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2012;33:2451–96.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Pibarot P, Dumesnil JG. Aortic stenosis suspected to be severe despite low gradients. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014;7:545–51.CrossRefPubMed Pibarot P, Dumesnil JG. Aortic stenosis suspected to be severe despite low gradients. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014;7:545–51.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Minners J, Allgeier M, Gohlke-Baerwolf C, Kienzle RP, Neumann FJ, Jander N. Inconsistent grading of aortic valve stenosis by current guidelines: haemodynamic studies in patients with apparently normal left ventricular function. Heart. 2010;96:1463–8.CrossRefPubMed Minners J, Allgeier M, Gohlke-Baerwolf C, Kienzle RP, Neumann FJ, Jander N. Inconsistent grading of aortic valve stenosis by current guidelines: haemodynamic studies in patients with apparently normal left ventricular function. Heart. 2010;96:1463–8.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Dumesnil JG, Pibarot P, Carabello B. Paradoxical low flow and/or low gradient severe aortic stenosis despite preserved left ventricular ejection fraction: implications for diagnosis and treatment. Eur Heart J. 2010;31:281–9.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Dumesnil JG, Pibarot P, Carabello B. Paradoxical low flow and/or low gradient severe aortic stenosis despite preserved left ventricular ejection fraction: implications for diagnosis and treatment. Eur Heart J. 2010;31:281–9.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Lancellotti P, Donal E, Magne J, et al. Risk stratification in asymptomatic moderate to severe aortic stenosis: the importance of the valvular, arterial and ventricular interplay. Heart. 2010;96:1364–71.CrossRefPubMed Lancellotti P, Donal E, Magne J, et al. Risk stratification in asymptomatic moderate to severe aortic stenosis: the importance of the valvular, arterial and ventricular interplay. Heart. 2010;96:1364–71.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Ozkan A, Hachamovitch R, Kapadia SR, Tuzcu EM, Marwick TH. Impact of aortic valve replacement on outcome of symptomatic patients with severe aortic stenosis with low gradient and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction. Circulation. 2013;128:622–31.CrossRefPubMed Ozkan A, Hachamovitch R, Kapadia SR, Tuzcu EM, Marwick TH. Impact of aortic valve replacement on outcome of symptomatic patients with severe aortic stenosis with low gradient and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction. Circulation. 2013;128:622–31.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Mehrotra P, Jansen K, Flynn AW, et al. Differential left ventricular remodelling and longitudinal function distinguishes low flow from normal-flow preserved ejection fraction low-gradient severe aortic stenosis. Eur Heart J. 2013;34:1906–14.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Mehrotra P, Jansen K, Flynn AW, et al. Differential left ventricular remodelling and longitudinal function distinguishes low flow from normal-flow preserved ejection fraction low-gradient severe aortic stenosis. Eur Heart J. 2013;34:1906–14.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Clavel MA, Messika-Zeitoun D, Pibarot P, et al. The complex nature of discordant severe calcified aortic valve disease grading: new insights from combined Doppler-echocardiographic and computed tomographic study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;62:2329–38.CrossRefPubMed Clavel MA, Messika-Zeitoun D, Pibarot P, et al. The complex nature of discordant severe calcified aortic valve disease grading: new insights from combined Doppler-echocardiographic and computed tomographic study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;62:2329–38.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Gaspar T, Adawi S, Sachner R, et al. Three-dimensional imaging of the left ventricular outflow tract: impact on aortic valve area estimation by the continuity equation. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2012;25:749–57.CrossRefPubMed Gaspar T, Adawi S, Sachner R, et al. Three-dimensional imaging of the left ventricular outflow tract: impact on aortic valve area estimation by the continuity equation. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2012;25:749–57.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Chin CW, Khaw HJ, Luo E, et al. Echocardiography underestimates stroke volume and aortic valve area: implications for patients with small-area low-gradient aortic stenosis. Can J Cardiol. 2014;30:1064–72.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Chin CW, Khaw HJ, Luo E, et al. Echocardiography underestimates stroke volume and aortic valve area: implications for patients with small-area low-gradient aortic stenosis. Can J Cardiol. 2014;30:1064–72.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Clavel MA, Malouf J, Messika-Zeitoun D, Araoz PA, Michelena HI, Enriquez-Sarano M. Aortic valve area calculation in aortic stenosis by CT and Doppler echocardiography. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015;8:248–57.CrossRefPubMed Clavel MA, Malouf J, Messika-Zeitoun D, Araoz PA, Michelena HI, Enriquez-Sarano M. Aortic valve area calculation in aortic stenosis by CT and Doppler echocardiography. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015;8:248–57.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Michelena HI, Margaryan E, Miller FA, et al. Inconsistent echocardiographic grading of aortic stenosis: is the left ventricular outflow tract important? Heart. 2013;99:921–31.CrossRefPubMed Michelena HI, Margaryan E, Miller FA, et al. Inconsistent echocardiographic grading of aortic stenosis: is the left ventricular outflow tract important? Heart. 2013;99:921–31.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Jander N, Hochholzer W, Kaufmann BA, et al. Velocity ratio predicts outcomes in patients with low gradient severe aortic stenosis and preserved EF. Heart. 2014;100:1946–53.CrossRefPubMed Jander N, Hochholzer W, Kaufmann BA, et al. Velocity ratio predicts outcomes in patients with low gradient severe aortic stenosis and preserved EF. Heart. 2014;100:1946–53.CrossRefPubMed
24.••
go back to reference Baumgartner H, Hung J, Bermejo J, et al. Echocardiographic assessment of valve stenosis: EAE/ASE recommendations for clinical practice. Eur J Echocardiogr. 2009;10:1–25.This article reports the recommendations for the Doppler-echocardiographic assessment of aortic stenosis. Baumgartner H, Hung J, Bermejo J, et al. Echocardiographic assessment of valve stenosis: EAE/ASE recommendations for clinical practice. Eur J Echocardiogr. 2009;10:1–25.This article reports the recommendations for the Doppler-echocardiographic assessment of aortic stenosis.
25.
go back to reference Kang DH, Park SJ, Rim JH, et al. Early surgery versus conventional treatment in asymptomatic very severe aortic stenosis. Circulation. 2010;121:1502–9.CrossRefPubMed Kang DH, Park SJ, Rim JH, et al. Early surgery versus conventional treatment in asymptomatic very severe aortic stenosis. Circulation. 2010;121:1502–9.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Carabello BA. Aortic valve replacement should be operated on before symptom onset. Circulation. 2012;126:112–7.CrossRefPubMed Carabello BA. Aortic valve replacement should be operated on before symptom onset. Circulation. 2012;126:112–7.CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Shah PK. Severe aortic stenosis should not be operated on before symptom onset. Circulation. 2012;126:118–25.CrossRefPubMed Shah PK. Severe aortic stenosis should not be operated on before symptom onset. Circulation. 2012;126:118–25.CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Das P, Rimington H, Chambers J. Exercise testing to stratify risk in aortic stenosis. Eur Heart J. 2005;26:1309–13.CrossRefPubMed Das P, Rimington H, Chambers J. Exercise testing to stratify risk in aortic stenosis. Eur Heart J. 2005;26:1309–13.CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Lancellotti P, Lebois F, Simon M, Tombeux C, Chauvel C, Pierard LA. Prognostic importance of quantitative exercise Doppler echocardiography in asymptomatic valvular aortic stenosis. Circulation. 2005;112:I377–82.PubMed Lancellotti P, Lebois F, Simon M, Tombeux C, Chauvel C, Pierard LA. Prognostic importance of quantitative exercise Doppler echocardiography in asymptomatic valvular aortic stenosis. Circulation. 2005;112:I377–82.PubMed
30.
go back to reference Marechaux S, Hachicha Z, Bellouin A, et al. Usefulness of exercise stress echocardiography for risk stratification of true asymptomatic patients with aortic valve stenosis. Eur Heart J. 2010;31:1390–7.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Marechaux S, Hachicha Z, Bellouin A, et al. Usefulness of exercise stress echocardiography for risk stratification of true asymptomatic patients with aortic valve stenosis. Eur Heart J. 2010;31:1390–7.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Lancellotti P, Magne J, Donal E, et al. Determinants and prognostic significance of exercise pulmonary hypertension in asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis. Circulation. 2012;126:851–9.CrossRefPubMed Lancellotti P, Magne J, Donal E, et al. Determinants and prognostic significance of exercise pulmonary hypertension in asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis. Circulation. 2012;126:851–9.CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Rosenhek R, Binder T, Porenta G, et al. Predictors of outcome in severe, asymptomatic aortic stenosis. N Engl J Med. 2000;343:611–7.CrossRefPubMed Rosenhek R, Binder T, Porenta G, et al. Predictors of outcome in severe, asymptomatic aortic stenosis. N Engl J Med. 2000;343:611–7.CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference Messika-Zeitoun D, Bielak LF, Peyser PA, et al. Aortic valve calcification: determinants and progression in the population. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2007;27:642–8.CrossRefPubMed Messika-Zeitoun D, Bielak LF, Peyser PA, et al. Aortic valve calcification: determinants and progression in the population. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2007;27:642–8.CrossRefPubMed
34.
go back to reference Cueff C, Serfaty JM, Cimadevilla C, et al. Measurement of aortic valve calcification using multislice computed tomography: correlation with haemodynamic severity of aortic stenosis and clinical implication for patients with low ejection fraction. Heart. 2011;97:721–6.CrossRefPubMed Cueff C, Serfaty JM, Cimadevilla C, et al. Measurement of aortic valve calcification using multislice computed tomography: correlation with haemodynamic severity of aortic stenosis and clinical implication for patients with low ejection fraction. Heart. 2011;97:721–6.CrossRefPubMed
35.
go back to reference Le Ven F, Tizon-Marcos H, Fuchs C, Mathieu P, Pibarot P, Larose E. Valve tissue characterization by magnetic resonance imaging in calcific aortic valve disease. Can J Cardiol. 2014;30:1676–83.CrossRefPubMed Le Ven F, Tizon-Marcos H, Fuchs C, Mathieu P, Pibarot P, Larose E. Valve tissue characterization by magnetic resonance imaging in calcific aortic valve disease. Can J Cardiol. 2014;30:1676–83.CrossRefPubMed
36.
go back to reference Hyafil F, Messika-Zeitoun D, Burg S, et al. Detection of (18)fluoride sodium accumulation by positron emission tomography in calcified stenotic aortic valves. Am J Cardiol. 2012;109:1194–6.CrossRefPubMed Hyafil F, Messika-Zeitoun D, Burg S, et al. Detection of (18)fluoride sodium accumulation by positron emission tomography in calcified stenotic aortic valves. Am J Cardiol. 2012;109:1194–6.CrossRefPubMed
37.
go back to reference Dweck MR, Jenkins WS, Vesey AT, et al. 18F-NaF uptake is a marker of active calcification and disease progression in patients with aortic stenosis. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014;7:371–8.CrossRefPubMed Dweck MR, Jenkins WS, Vesey AT, et al. 18F-NaF uptake is a marker of active calcification and disease progression in patients with aortic stenosis. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014;7:371–8.CrossRefPubMed
38.
go back to reference Pibarot P, Dumesnil JG. Low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis with normal and depressed left ventricular ejection fraction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;60:1845–53.CrossRefPubMed Pibarot P, Dumesnil JG. Low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis with normal and depressed left ventricular ejection fraction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;60:1845–53.CrossRefPubMed
39.
go back to reference Clavel MA, Fuchs C, Burwash IG, et al. Predictors of outcomes in low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis: results of the multicenter TOPAS Study. Circulation. 2008;118:S234–42.CrossRefPubMed Clavel MA, Fuchs C, Burwash IG, et al. Predictors of outcomes in low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis: results of the multicenter TOPAS Study. Circulation. 2008;118:S234–42.CrossRefPubMed
40.
go back to reference Clavel MA, Burwash IG, Mundigler G, et al. Validation of conventional and simplified methods to calculate projected valve area at normal flow rate in patients with low flow, low gradient aortic stenosis: the multicenter TOPAS (True or Pseudo Severe Aortic Stenosis) study. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2010;23:380–6.CrossRefPubMed Clavel MA, Burwash IG, Mundigler G, et al. Validation of conventional and simplified methods to calculate projected valve area at normal flow rate in patients with low flow, low gradient aortic stenosis: the multicenter TOPAS (True or Pseudo Severe Aortic Stenosis) study. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2010;23:380–6.CrossRefPubMed
41.
go back to reference Fougères É, Tribouilloy C, Monchi M, et al. Outcomes of pseudo-severe aortic stenosis under conservative treatment. Eur Heart J. 2012;33:2426–33.CrossRefPubMed Fougères É, Tribouilloy C, Monchi M, et al. Outcomes of pseudo-severe aortic stenosis under conservative treatment. Eur Heart J. 2012;33:2426–33.CrossRefPubMed
42.
go back to reference deFilippi CR, Willett DL, Brickner E, et al. Usefulness of dobutamine echocardiography in distinguishing severe from nonsevere valvular aortic stenosis in patients with depressed left ventricular function and low transvalvular gradients. Am J Cardiol. 1995;75:191–4.CrossRefPubMed deFilippi CR, Willett DL, Brickner E, et al. Usefulness of dobutamine echocardiography in distinguishing severe from nonsevere valvular aortic stenosis in patients with depressed left ventricular function and low transvalvular gradients. Am J Cardiol. 1995;75:191–4.CrossRefPubMed
43.
go back to reference Clavel MA, Pibarot P, Messika-Zeitoun D, et al. Impact of aortic valve calcification, as measured by MDCT, on survival in patients with aortic stenosis: results of an international registry study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;64:1202–13.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Clavel MA, Pibarot P, Messika-Zeitoun D, et al. Impact of aortic valve calcification, as measured by MDCT, on survival in patients with aortic stenosis: results of an international registry study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;64:1202–13.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
44.
go back to reference Clavel MA, Ennezat PV, Maréchaux S, et al. Utility of stress echocardiography to confirm stenosis severity and predict outcome in patients with low flow, low gradient aortic stenosis and preserved LV ejection fraction. (abstr). Canadian Cardiovascular Society; 2011. Clavel MA, Ennezat PV, Maréchaux S, et al. Utility of stress echocardiography to confirm stenosis severity and predict outcome in patients with low flow, low gradient aortic stenosis and preserved LV ejection fraction. (abstr). Canadian Cardiovascular Society; 2011.
45.
go back to reference Orsinelli DA, Aurigemma GP, Battista S, Krendel S, Gaasch WH. Left ventricular hypertrophy and mortality after aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis. A high risk subgroup identified by preoperative relative wall thickness. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1993;22:1679–83.CrossRefPubMed Orsinelli DA, Aurigemma GP, Battista S, Krendel S, Gaasch WH. Left ventricular hypertrophy and mortality after aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis. A high risk subgroup identified by preoperative relative wall thickness. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1993;22:1679–83.CrossRefPubMed
46.
go back to reference Duncan AI, Lowe BS, Garcia MJ, et al. Influence of concentric left ventricular remodeling on early mortality after aortic valve replacement. Ann Thorac Surg. 2008;85:2030–9.CrossRefPubMed Duncan AI, Lowe BS, Garcia MJ, et al. Influence of concentric left ventricular remodeling on early mortality after aortic valve replacement. Ann Thorac Surg. 2008;85:2030–9.CrossRefPubMed
47.
go back to reference Lindman BR, Stewart WJ, Pibarot P, et al. Early regression of severe left ventricular hypertrophy after transcatheter aortic valve replacement is associated with decreased hospitalizations. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2014;7:662–73.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Lindman BR, Stewart WJ, Pibarot P, et al. Early regression of severe left ventricular hypertrophy after transcatheter aortic valve replacement is associated with decreased hospitalizations. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2014;7:662–73.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
48.
go back to reference Rajappan K, Bellenger NG, Melina G, et al. Assessment of left ventricular mass regression after aortic valve replacement—cardiovascular magnetic resonance versus M-mode echocardiography. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2003;24:59–65.CrossRefPubMed Rajappan K, Bellenger NG, Melina G, et al. Assessment of left ventricular mass regression after aortic valve replacement—cardiovascular magnetic resonance versus M-mode echocardiography. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2003;24:59–65.CrossRefPubMed
49.
go back to reference Jakubovic BD, Wald R, Goldstein MB, et al. Comparative assessment of 2-dimensional echocardiography vs cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in measuring left ventricular mass in patients with and without end-stage renal disease. Can J Cardiol. 2013;29:384–90.CrossRefPubMed Jakubovic BD, Wald R, Goldstein MB, et al. Comparative assessment of 2-dimensional echocardiography vs cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in measuring left ventricular mass in patients with and without end-stage renal disease. Can J Cardiol. 2013;29:384–90.CrossRefPubMed
50.
go back to reference Weidemann F, Herrmann S, Stork S, et al. Impact of myocardial fibrosis in patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis. Circulation. 2009;120:577–84.CrossRefPubMed Weidemann F, Herrmann S, Stork S, et al. Impact of myocardial fibrosis in patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis. Circulation. 2009;120:577–84.CrossRefPubMed
51.
go back to reference Azevedo CF, Nigri M, Higuchi ML, et al. Prognostic significance of myocardial fibrosis quantification by histopathology and magnetic resonance imaging in patients with severe aortic valve disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;56:278–87.CrossRefPubMed Azevedo CF, Nigri M, Higuchi ML, et al. Prognostic significance of myocardial fibrosis quantification by histopathology and magnetic resonance imaging in patients with severe aortic valve disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;56:278–87.CrossRefPubMed
52.
go back to reference Dweck MR, Joshi S, Murigu T, et al. Midwall fibrosis is an independent predictor of mortality in patients with aortic stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;58:1271–9.CrossRefPubMed Dweck MR, Joshi S, Murigu T, et al. Midwall fibrosis is an independent predictor of mortality in patients with aortic stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;58:1271–9.CrossRefPubMed
53.
go back to reference Lee SP, Lee W, Lee JM, et al. Assessment of diffuse myocardial fibrosis by using MR imaging in asymptomatic patients with aortic stenosis. Radiology. 2015;274:359–69.CrossRefPubMed Lee SP, Lee W, Lee JM, et al. Assessment of diffuse myocardial fibrosis by using MR imaging in asymptomatic patients with aortic stenosis. Radiology. 2015;274:359–69.CrossRefPubMed
54.
go back to reference Dumesnil JG, Shoucri RM. Effect of the geometry of the left ventricle on the calculation of ejection fraction. Circulation. 1982;65:91–8.CrossRefPubMed Dumesnil JG, Shoucri RM. Effect of the geometry of the left ventricle on the calculation of ejection fraction. Circulation. 1982;65:91–8.CrossRefPubMed
55.
go back to reference Cramariuc D, Cioffi G, Rieck AE, et al. Low-flow aortic stenosis in asymptomatic patients: valvular arterial impedance and systolic function from the SEAS substudy. J Am Coll Cardiol Img. 2009;2:390–9.CrossRef Cramariuc D, Cioffi G, Rieck AE, et al. Low-flow aortic stenosis in asymptomatic patients: valvular arterial impedance and systolic function from the SEAS substudy. J Am Coll Cardiol Img. 2009;2:390–9.CrossRef
56.
go back to reference Kusunose K, Goodman A, Parikh R, et al. Incremental prognostic value of left ventricular global longitudinal strain in patients with aortic stenosis and preserved ejection fraction. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014;7:938–45.CrossRefPubMed Kusunose K, Goodman A, Parikh R, et al. Incremental prognostic value of left ventricular global longitudinal strain in patients with aortic stenosis and preserved ejection fraction. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014;7:938–45.CrossRefPubMed
57.
go back to reference Dahl JS, Eleid MF, Michelena HI, et al. Effect of left ventricular ejection fraction on postoperative outcome in patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing aortic valve replacement. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015;8. Dahl JS, Eleid MF, Michelena HI, et al. Effect of left ventricular ejection fraction on postoperative outcome in patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing aortic valve replacement. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015;8.
58.
go back to reference Pibarot P, Dumesnil JG. Longitudinal myocardial shortening in aortic stenosis: ready for prime time after 30 years of research? Heart. 2009;96:95–6. Pibarot P, Dumesnil JG. Longitudinal myocardial shortening in aortic stenosis: ready for prime time after 30 years of research? Heart. 2009;96:95–6.
59.
go back to reference Hachicha Z, Dumesnil JG, Bogaty P, Pibarot P. Paradoxical low flow, low gradient severe aortic stenosis despite preserved ejection fraction is associated with higher afterload and reduced survival. Circulation. 2007;115:2856–64.CrossRefPubMed Hachicha Z, Dumesnil JG, Bogaty P, Pibarot P. Paradoxical low flow, low gradient severe aortic stenosis despite preserved ejection fraction is associated with higher afterload and reduced survival. Circulation. 2007;115:2856–64.CrossRefPubMed
60.
go back to reference Eleid MF, Sorajja P, Michelena HI, Malouf JF, Scott CG, Pellikka PA. Flow-gradient patterns in severe aortic stenosis with preserved ejection fraction: clinical characteristics and predictors of survival. Circulation. 2013;128:1781–9.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Eleid MF, Sorajja P, Michelena HI, Malouf JF, Scott CG, Pellikka PA. Flow-gradient patterns in severe aortic stenosis with preserved ejection fraction: clinical characteristics and predictors of survival. Circulation. 2013;128:1781–9.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
61.
go back to reference Clavel MA, Dumesnil JG, Capoulade R, Mathieu P, Sénéchal M, Pibarot P. Outcome of patients with aortic stenosis, small valve area and low-flow, low-gradient despite preserved left ventricular ejection fraction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;60:1259–67.CrossRefPubMed Clavel MA, Dumesnil JG, Capoulade R, Mathieu P, Sénéchal M, Pibarot P. Outcome of patients with aortic stenosis, small valve area and low-flow, low-gradient despite preserved left ventricular ejection fraction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;60:1259–67.CrossRefPubMed
62.
go back to reference Clavel MA, Berthelot-Richer M, Le VF, et al. Impact of classic and paradoxical low flow on survival after aortic valve replacement for severe aortic stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015;65:645–53.CrossRefPubMed Clavel MA, Berthelot-Richer M, Le VF, et al. Impact of classic and paradoxical low flow on survival after aortic valve replacement for severe aortic stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015;65:645–53.CrossRefPubMed
63.
go back to reference Herrmann HC, Pibarot P, Hueter I, et al. Predictors of mortality and outcomes of therapy in low flow severe aortic stenosis: a PARTNER trial analysis. Circulation. 2013;127:2316–26.CrossRefPubMed Herrmann HC, Pibarot P, Hueter I, et al. Predictors of mortality and outcomes of therapy in low flow severe aortic stenosis: a PARTNER trial analysis. Circulation. 2013;127:2316–26.CrossRefPubMed
64.
go back to reference Le Ven F, Freeman M, Webb J, et al. Impact of low flow on the outcome of high risk patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;62:782–8.CrossRefPubMed Le Ven F, Freeman M, Webb J, et al. Impact of low flow on the outcome of high risk patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;62:782–8.CrossRefPubMed
65.
go back to reference Le Ven F, Thebault C, Dahou A, et al. Evolution and prognostic impact of low flow after transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Heart. 2015;101:1196–203.CrossRefPubMed Le Ven F, Thebault C, Dahou A, et al. Evolution and prognostic impact of low flow after transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Heart. 2015;101:1196–203.CrossRefPubMed
66.
go back to reference Monin JL, Quere JP, Monchi M, et al. Low-gradient aortic stenosis: operative risk stratification and predictors for long-term outcome: a multicenter study using dobutamine stress hemodynamics. Circulation. 2003;108:319–24.CrossRefPubMed Monin JL, Quere JP, Monchi M, et al. Low-gradient aortic stenosis: operative risk stratification and predictors for long-term outcome: a multicenter study using dobutamine stress hemodynamics. Circulation. 2003;108:319–24.CrossRefPubMed
67.
go back to reference Quere JP, Monin JL, Levy F, et al. Influence of preoperative left ventricular contractile reserve on postoperative ejection fraction in low-gradient aortic stenosis. Circulation. 2006;113:1738–44.CrossRefPubMed Quere JP, Monin JL, Levy F, et al. Influence of preoperative left ventricular contractile reserve on postoperative ejection fraction in low-gradient aortic stenosis. Circulation. 2006;113:1738–44.CrossRefPubMed
68.
go back to reference Tribouilloy C, Levy F, Rusinaru D, et al. Outcome after aortic valve replacement for low-flow/low-gradient aortic stenosis without contractile reserve on dobutamine stress echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;53:1865–73.CrossRefPubMed Tribouilloy C, Levy F, Rusinaru D, et al. Outcome after aortic valve replacement for low-flow/low-gradient aortic stenosis without contractile reserve on dobutamine stress echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;53:1865–73.CrossRefPubMed
69.
go back to reference Van Pelt NC, Stewart RA, Legget ME, et al. Longitudinal left ventricular contractile dysfunction after exercise in aortic stenosis. Heart. 2007;93:732–8.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Van Pelt NC, Stewart RA, Legget ME, et al. Longitudinal left ventricular contractile dysfunction after exercise in aortic stenosis. Heart. 2007;93:732–8.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
70.
go back to reference Donal E, Thebault C, O’Connor K, et al. Impact of aortic stenosis on longitudinal myocardial deformation during exercise. Eur J Echocardiogr. 2011;12:235–41.CrossRefPubMed Donal E, Thebault C, O’Connor K, et al. Impact of aortic stenosis on longitudinal myocardial deformation during exercise. Eur J Echocardiogr. 2011;12:235–41.CrossRefPubMed
71.
go back to reference Dahou A, Bartko PE, Capoulade R, et al. Usefulness of global left ventricular longitudinal strain for risk stratification in low ejection fraction, low-gradient aortic stenosis: results from the multicenter true or pseudo-severe aortic stenosis study. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015;8:e002117.CrossRefPubMed Dahou A, Bartko PE, Capoulade R, et al. Usefulness of global left ventricular longitudinal strain for risk stratification in low ejection fraction, low-gradient aortic stenosis: results from the multicenter true or pseudo-severe aortic stenosis study. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015;8:e002117.CrossRefPubMed
72.
go back to reference Nishimura RA, Otto CM, Bonow RO, et al. 2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: executive summary. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American heart association task force on practice guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;63:2438–88.CrossRefPubMed Nishimura RA, Otto CM, Bonow RO, et al. 2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: executive summary. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American heart association task force on practice guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;63:2438–88.CrossRefPubMed
73.••
go back to reference Lancellotti P, Tribouilloy C, Hagendorff A, et al. European Association of Echocardiography recommendations for the assessment of valvular regurgitation. Part 1: aortic and pulmonary regurgitation (native valve disease). Eur J Echocardiogr. 2010;11:223–44.This aritcle reports the recommendations for the Doppler-echocardiographic assessment of aortic regurgitation Lancellotti P, Tribouilloy C, Hagendorff A, et al. European Association of Echocardiography recommendations for the assessment of valvular regurgitation. Part 1: aortic and pulmonary regurgitation (native valve disease). Eur J Echocardiogr. 2010;11:223–44.This aritcle reports the recommendations for the Doppler-echocardiographic assessment of aortic regurgitation
74.
go back to reference Perez de Isla L, Zamorano J, Fernandez-Golfin C, et al. 3D color-Doppler echocardiography and chronic aortic regurgitation: a novel approach for severity assessment. Int J Cardiol. 2013;166:640–5.CrossRefPubMed Perez de Isla L, Zamorano J, Fernandez-Golfin C, et al. 3D color-Doppler echocardiography and chronic aortic regurgitation: a novel approach for severity assessment. Int J Cardiol. 2013;166:640–5.CrossRefPubMed
75.
go back to reference Tribouilloy C, Avinee P, Shen W, Rey J, Slama M, Lesbre J. End diastolic flow velocity just beneath aortic isthmus assessed by pulsed Doppler echocardiography: a new predictor of aortic regurgitant fraction. Br Heart J. 1991;65:37–40.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Tribouilloy C, Avinee P, Shen W, Rey J, Slama M, Lesbre J. End diastolic flow velocity just beneath aortic isthmus assessed by pulsed Doppler echocardiography: a new predictor of aortic regurgitant fraction. Br Heart J. 1991;65:37–40.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
76.
go back to reference Hashimoto J, Ito S. Aortic stiffness determines diastolic blood flow reversal in the descending thoracic aorta: potential implication for retrograde embolic stroke in hypertension. Hypertension. 2013;62:542–9.CrossRefPubMed Hashimoto J, Ito S. Aortic stiffness determines diastolic blood flow reversal in the descending thoracic aorta: potential implication for retrograde embolic stroke in hypertension. Hypertension. 2013;62:542–9.CrossRefPubMed
77.
go back to reference Detaint D, Messika-Zeitoun D, Maalouf J, et al. Quantitative echocardiographic determinants of clinical outcome in asymptomatic patients with aortic regurgitation: a prospective study. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2008;1:1–11.CrossRefPubMed Detaint D, Messika-Zeitoun D, Maalouf J, et al. Quantitative echocardiographic determinants of clinical outcome in asymptomatic patients with aortic regurgitation: a prospective study. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2008;1:1–11.CrossRefPubMed
78.
go back to reference Messika-Zeitoun D, Detaint D, Leye M, et al. Comparison of semiquantitative and quantitative assessment of severity of aortic regurgitation: clinical implications. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2011;24:1246–52.CrossRefPubMed Messika-Zeitoun D, Detaint D, Leye M, et al. Comparison of semiquantitative and quantitative assessment of severity of aortic regurgitation: clinical implications. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2011;24:1246–52.CrossRefPubMed
79.
go back to reference Kusunose K, Cremer PC, Tsutsui RS, et al. Regurgitant volume informs rate of progressive cardiac dysfunction in asymptomatic patients with chronic aortic or mitral regurgitation. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015;8:14–23.CrossRefPubMed Kusunose K, Cremer PC, Tsutsui RS, et al. Regurgitant volume informs rate of progressive cardiac dysfunction in asymptomatic patients with chronic aortic or mitral regurgitation. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015;8:14–23.CrossRefPubMed
80.
go back to reference Thavendiranathan P, Liu S, Datta S, et al. Automated quantification of mitral inflow and aortic outflow stroke volumes by three-dimensional real-time volume color-flow Doppler transthoracic echocardiography: comparison with pulsed-wave Doppler and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2012;25:56–65.CrossRefPubMed Thavendiranathan P, Liu S, Datta S, et al. Automated quantification of mitral inflow and aortic outflow stroke volumes by three-dimensional real-time volume color-flow Doppler transthoracic echocardiography: comparison with pulsed-wave Doppler and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2012;25:56–65.CrossRefPubMed
81.
go back to reference Croft C, Lipscomb K, Mathis K, et al. Limitations of qualitative angiographic grading in aortic or mitral regurgitation. Am J Cardiol. 1984;53:1593–8.CrossRefPubMed Croft C, Lipscomb K, Mathis K, et al. Limitations of qualitative angiographic grading in aortic or mitral regurgitation. Am J Cardiol. 1984;53:1593–8.CrossRefPubMed
82.
go back to reference Schultz CJ, Tzikas A, Moelker A, et al. Correlates on MSCT of paravalvular aortic regurgitation after transcatheter aortic valve implantation using the Medtronic CoreValve prosthesis. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2011;78:446–55.PubMed Schultz CJ, Tzikas A, Moelker A, et al. Correlates on MSCT of paravalvular aortic regurgitation after transcatheter aortic valve implantation using the Medtronic CoreValve prosthesis. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2011;78:446–55.PubMed
83.
go back to reference Cawley PJ, Hamilton-Craig C, Owens DS, et al. Prospective comparison of valve regurgitation quantitation by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and transthoracic echocardiography. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013;6:48–57.CrossRefPubMed Cawley PJ, Hamilton-Craig C, Owens DS, et al. Prospective comparison of valve regurgitation quantitation by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and transthoracic echocardiography. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013;6:48–57.CrossRefPubMed
84.
go back to reference Gabriel RS, Renapurkar R, Bolen MA, et al. Comparison of severity of aortic regurgitation by cardiovascular magnetic resonance versus transthoracic echocardiography. Am J Cardiol. 2011;108:1014–20.CrossRefPubMed Gabriel RS, Renapurkar R, Bolen MA, et al. Comparison of severity of aortic regurgitation by cardiovascular magnetic resonance versus transthoracic echocardiography. Am J Cardiol. 2011;108:1014–20.CrossRefPubMed
85.
go back to reference Myerson SG, d’Arcy J, Mohiaddin R, et al. Aortic regurgitation quantification using cardiovascular magnetic resonance: association with clinical outcome. Circulation. 2012;126:1452–60.CrossRefPubMed Myerson SG, d’Arcy J, Mohiaddin R, et al. Aortic regurgitation quantification using cardiovascular magnetic resonance: association with clinical outcome. Circulation. 2012;126:1452–60.CrossRefPubMed
86.
go back to reference Helin LM, Tamas E, Nylander E. Preoperative longitudinal left ventricular function by tissue Doppler echocardiography at rest and during exercise is valuable in timing of aortic valve surgery in male aortic regurgitation patients. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2010;23:387–95.CrossRefPubMed Helin LM, Tamas E, Nylander E. Preoperative longitudinal left ventricular function by tissue Doppler echocardiography at rest and during exercise is valuable in timing of aortic valve surgery in male aortic regurgitation patients. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2010;23:387–95.CrossRefPubMed
87.
go back to reference Smedsrud MK, Pettersen E, Gjesdal O, et al. Detection of left ventricular dysfunction by global longitudinal systolic strain in patients with chronic aortic regurgitation. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2011;24:1253–9.CrossRefPubMed Smedsrud MK, Pettersen E, Gjesdal O, et al. Detection of left ventricular dysfunction by global longitudinal systolic strain in patients with chronic aortic regurgitation. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2011;24:1253–9.CrossRefPubMed
88.
go back to reference Di SG, Rea A, Mormile A, et al. Usefulness of bidimensional strain imaging for predicting outcome in asymptomatic patients aged ≤ 16 years with isolated moderate to severe aortic regurgitation. Am J Cardiol. 2012;110:1051–5.CrossRef Di SG, Rea A, Mormile A, et al. Usefulness of bidimensional strain imaging for predicting outcome in asymptomatic patients aged ≤ 16 years with isolated moderate to severe aortic regurgitation. Am J Cardiol. 2012;110:1051–5.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Assessment of Aortic Valve Disease: Role of Imaging Modalities
Authors
Romain Capoulade, PhD
Philippe Pibarot, DVM, PhD, FACC, FAHA, FESC, FASE
Publication date
01-11-2015
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Current Treatment Options in Cardiovascular Medicine / Issue 11/2015
Print ISSN: 1092-8464
Electronic ISSN: 1534-3189
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11936-015-0409-7

Other articles of this Issue 11/2015

Current Treatment Options in Cardiovascular Medicine 11/2015 Go to the issue

Pediatric Congenital Heart Disease (G Singh, Section Editor)

Contraception and Pregnancy Planning in Women With Congenital Heart Disease

Adult Congenital Heart Disease (A Bhatt and K Niwa, Section Editors)

Transcatheter Advances in the Treatment of Adult and Congenital Valvular Heart Disease

Pediatric Congenital Heart Disease (G Singh, Section Editor)

Fontan Liver Disease: Review of an Emerging Epidemic and Management Options