Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology 1/2019

01-06-2019

Assessment of a novel radiation reduction protocol for pediatric and adult congenital device implantation

Authors: Bradley C. Clark, Christopher M. Janson, Scott R. Ceresnak, Frank A. Osei, William J. Bonney, Lynn Nappo, Robert H. Pass

Published in: Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology | Issue 1/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Device implantation requires fluoroscopic guidance, which carries inherent risks of ionizing radiation. We evaluated the impact of a low-dose fluoroscopic protocol on radiation exposure during device implantation.

Methods

All patients who underwent pacemaker or ICD implantation with new transvenous leads from July 2011 to January 2018 were included. A novel ALARA protocol consisting of ultra-low frame rates (2–3 frames/s), low dose/frame (6–18 mGy/frame), and use of the “air-gap” technique in patients < 20 kg was employed. Demographics, procedural data, and radiation exposure levels were collected and analyzed.

Results

Thirty patients underwent device implantation without additional catheterization, electrophysiology study, or ablation procedure (median age 15 years; range 5–50) with a total of 43 leads placed. Forty-seven percent of patients had a primary rhythm disturbance, 33% had cardiomyopathy, and 20% had congenital heart disease. Fifty percent were pacemakers (53% dual-chamber, 27% ventricle, 20% atrial) and 50% of devices implanted were ICDs (87% single-chamber). All implants were acutely successful with acceptable atrial and ventricular sensing and capture thresholds. The median fluoroscopy time was 11.5 min (inter-quartile range (IQR) 8.0–18.2), median air kerma dose 4.0 mGy (IQR 2.5–19.5), and median dose-area product 27.8 μGy/m2 (IQR 17.1–106.5). Median implant procedure time was 133 min. One patient required revision secondary to device migration without lead derangement 2 days post-procedure.

Conclusions

Use of a novel fluoroscopic protocol may help decrease radiation exposure to patients and staff without affecting efficacy or risk. These data may represent benchmarks against which future device implantation procedures can be compared.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Sutton NJ, Lamour J, La G, Pass RH. Pediatric patient radiation dosage during endomyocardial biopsies and right heart catheterization using a standard “ALARA” radiation reduction protocol in the modern fluoroscopic era. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2014;83(1):80–3. https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.25058. Sutton NJ, Lamour J, La G, Pass RH. Pediatric patient radiation dosage during endomyocardial biopsies and right heart catheterization using a standard “ALARA” radiation reduction protocol in the modern fluoroscopic era. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2014;83(1):80–3. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1002/​ccd.​25058.
5.
go back to reference Gerber TC, Carr JJ, Arai AE, Dixon RL, Ferrari VA, Gomes AS, et al. Ionizing radiation in cardiac imaging: a science advisory from the American Heart Association Committee on Cardiac Imaging of the Council on Clinical Cardiology and Committee on Cardiovascular Imaging and Intervention of the Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention. Circulation. 2009;119(7):1056–65. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.191650. Gerber TC, Carr JJ, Arai AE, Dixon RL, Ferrari VA, Gomes AS, et al. Ionizing radiation in cardiac imaging: a science advisory from the American Heart Association Committee on Cardiac Imaging of the Council on Clinical Cardiology and Committee on Cardiovascular Imaging and Intervention of the Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention. Circulation. 2009;119(7):1056–65. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1161/​CIRCULATIONAHA.​108.​191650.
7.
8.
go back to reference Drago F, Silvetti MS, Di Pino A, Grutter G, Bevilacqua M, Leibovich S. Exclusion of fluoroscopy during ablation treatment of right accessory pathway in children. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2002;13(8):778–82.CrossRefPubMed Drago F, Silvetti MS, Di Pino A, Grutter G, Bevilacqua M, Leibovich S. Exclusion of fluoroscopy during ablation treatment of right accessory pathway in children. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2002;13(8):778–82.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Bigelow AM, Smith G, Clark JM. Catheter ablation without fluoroscopy: current techniques and future direction. J Atr Fibrillation. 2014;6(6):7–12. Bigelow AM, Smith G, Clark JM. Catheter ablation without fluoroscopy: current techniques and future direction. J Atr Fibrillation. 2014;6(6):7–12.
16.
go back to reference Hill KD, Frush DP, Han BK, Abbott BG, Armstrong AK, DeKemp RA, et al. Radiation safety in children with congenital and acquired heart disease: a scientific position statement on multimodality dose optimization from the image gently alliance. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017;10(7):797–818. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2017.04.003. Hill KD, Frush DP, Han BK, Abbott BG, Armstrong AK, DeKemp RA, et al. Radiation safety in children with congenital and acquired heart disease: a scientific position statement on multimodality dose optimization from the image gently alliance. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017;10(7):797–818. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​j.​jcmg.​2017.​04.​003.​
Metadata
Title
Assessment of a novel radiation reduction protocol for pediatric and adult congenital device implantation
Authors
Bradley C. Clark
Christopher M. Janson
Scott R. Ceresnak
Frank A. Osei
William J. Bonney
Lynn Nappo
Robert H. Pass
Publication date
01-06-2019
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology / Issue 1/2019
Print ISSN: 1383-875X
Electronic ISSN: 1572-8595
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-018-0479-z

Other articles of this Issue 1/2019

Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology 1/2019 Go to the issue