Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Oral Health 1/2023

Open Access 01-12-2023 | Research

Assessing inter- and intra-examiner reliability of orthodontists in devising incisor position objectives on cephalograms: a comparative study between senior and junior practitioners

Authors: Xue Li, Zhenxing Tang, Yu Li, Xiaowen Niu, Fang Zhou

Published in: BMC Oral Health | Issue 1/2023

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Effective orthodontic treatment planning hinges on accurately defining incisor position objectives (IPO) in cephalograms. The purpose of this study was to estimate the inter-examiner and intra-examiner reliability of different orthodontists in devising IPOs on cephalograms.

Methods

Ten orthodontists, who were divided into to the senior group (N = 5) and the junior group (N = 5) based on their clinical experience, formulated IPOs for 60 pre-treatment cephalograms twice with an interval of 2 weeks, utilizing SmartOrtho software. The type and magnitude of movement were read directly in the software. A paired t-test assessed the absolute differences between the first and second IPO devising within each group and between the senior and junior groups in each time’s IPO devising. The intra-examiner and inter-examiner reliabilities were calculated.

Results

There were significant differences in all types of upper incisor movement and lower incisor protrusion/retraction movement between the first and second IPO devising of the senior group. The junior group exhibited significant differences in the twice the upper incisor extrusion/intrusion movement and upper incisor torque movement devising. Additionally, significant differences in all types of incisor movement between the senior and junior groups in each time’s IPO devising. Intra-examiner reliabilities were excellent for both two groups and moderate for the junior group in most types of incisor movement, respectively. The inter-examiner reliability between the two groups ranged from moderate to good across different types of incisor movement.

Conclusions

Among orthodontists, both senior and junior practitioners displayed the best inter-examiner reliability in lower incisor extrusion/intrusion movement. In terms of intra-examiner reliability, senior orthodontists had better intra-examiner reliability in upper incisor position objectives devising than the junior orthodontists. Furthermore, senior orthodontists tended to adopt a more recessive, intrusive, and lingually torqued incisor position approach compared to junior orthodontists.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Downs WB. Variations in facial relationships; their significance in treatment and prognosis. Am J Orthod. 1948;34(10):812–40.CrossRefPubMed Downs WB. Variations in facial relationships; their significance in treatment and prognosis. Am J Orthod. 1948;34(10):812–40.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Tweed CH. The diagnostic facial triangle in the control of treatment objectives. Am J Orthod. 1969;55(6):651–7.CrossRefPubMed Tweed CH. The diagnostic facial triangle in the control of treatment objectives. Am J Orthod. 1969;55(6):651–7.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Iwasawa T, Moro T, Nakamura K. Tweed triangle and soft-tissue consideration of Japanese with normal occlusion and good facial profile. Am J Orthod. 1977;72(2):119–27.CrossRefPubMed Iwasawa T, Moro T, Nakamura K. Tweed triangle and soft-tissue consideration of Japanese with normal occlusion and good facial profile. Am J Orthod. 1977;72(2):119–27.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Kowalski CJ, Walker GF. The Tweed triangle in a large sample of normal individuals. J Dent Res. 1971;50(6):1690.CrossRefPubMed Kowalski CJ, Walker GF. The Tweed triangle in a large sample of normal individuals. J Dent Res. 1971;50(6):1690.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Choy OW. [Steiner’s cephalometric analyses in clinical practice]. Orthod Fr. 1964;35:74–9.PubMed Choy OW. [Steiner’s cephalometric analyses in clinical practice]. Orthod Fr. 1964;35:74–9.PubMed
8.
go back to reference Servoss JM. Derivation of acceptable arrangements in the Steiner analysis. Angle Orthod. 1971;41(2):146–9.PubMed Servoss JM. Derivation of acceptable arrangements in the Steiner analysis. Angle Orthod. 1971;41(2):146–9.PubMed
9.
go back to reference Andrews WA. AP relationship of the maxillary central incisors to the forehead in adult white females. Angle Orthod. 2008;78(4):662–9.CrossRefPubMed Andrews WA. AP relationship of the maxillary central incisors to the forehead in adult white females. Angle Orthod. 2008;78(4):662–9.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Sheng Y, Guo HM, Bai YX, Li S. Dehiscence and fenestration in anterior teeth: comparison before and after orthodontic treatment. J Orofac Orthop. 2020;81(1):1–9.CrossRefPubMed Sheng Y, Guo HM, Bai YX, Li S. Dehiscence and fenestration in anterior teeth: comparison before and after orthodontic treatment. J Orofac Orthop. 2020;81(1):1–9.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Lund H, Gröndahl K, Gröndahl HG. Cone beam computed tomography evaluations of marginal alveolar bone before and after orthodontic treatment combined with premolar extractions. Eur J Oral Sc. 2012;120(3):201–11.CrossRef Lund H, Gröndahl K, Gröndahl HG. Cone beam computed tomography evaluations of marginal alveolar bone before and after orthodontic treatment combined with premolar extractions. Eur J Oral Sc. 2012;120(3):201–11.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Han G, Huang S, Von den Hoff JW, Zeng X, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM. Root resorption after orthodontic intrusion and extrusion: an intraindividual study. Angle Orthod. 2005;75(6):912–8.PubMed Han G, Huang S, Von den Hoff JW, Zeng X, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM. Root resorption after orthodontic intrusion and extrusion: an intraindividual study. Angle Orthod. 2005;75(6):912–8.PubMed
13.
go back to reference Segal GR, Schiffman PH, Tuncay OC. Meta analysis of the treatment-related factors of external apical root resorption. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2004;7(2):71–8.CrossRefPubMed Segal GR, Schiffman PH, Tuncay OC. Meta analysis of the treatment-related factors of external apical root resorption. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2004;7(2):71–8.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Grauer D, Proffit WR. Accuracy in tooth positioning with a fully customized lingual orthodontic appliance. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011;140(3):433–43.CrossRefPubMed Grauer D, Proffit WR. Accuracy in tooth positioning with a fully customized lingual orthodontic appliance. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011;140(3):433–43.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Pauls A, Nienkemper M, Schwestka-Polly R, Wiechmann D. Therapeutic accuracy of the completely customized lingual appliance WIN: a retrospective cohort study. J Orofac Orthop. 2017;78(1):52–61.CrossRefPubMed Pauls A, Nienkemper M, Schwestka-Polly R, Wiechmann D. Therapeutic accuracy of the completely customized lingual appliance WIN: a retrospective cohort study. J Orofac Orthop. 2017;78(1):52–61.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Larson BE, Vaubel CJ, Grünheid T. Effectiveness of computer-assisted orthodontic treatment technology to achieve predicted outcomes. Angle Orthod. 2013;83(4):557–62. Larson BE, Vaubel CJ, Grünheid T. Effectiveness of computer-assisted orthodontic treatment technology to achieve predicted outcomes. Angle Orthod. 2013;83(4):557–62.
17.
go back to reference Soheilifar S, Soheilifar S, Afrasiabi Z, Soheilifar S, Tapak L, Naghdi N. Prediction accuracy of Dolphin software for soft-tissue profile in Class I patients undergoing fixed orthodontic treatment. J World Fed Orthod. 2022;11(1):29–35.PubMed Soheilifar S, Soheilifar S, Afrasiabi Z, Soheilifar S, Tapak L, Naghdi N. Prediction accuracy of Dolphin software for soft-tissue profile in Class I patients undergoing fixed orthodontic treatment. J World Fed Orthod. 2022;11(1):29–35.PubMed
18.
go back to reference Beglin FM, Firestone AR, Vig KW, Beck FM, Kuthy RA, Wade D. A comparison of the reliability and validity of 3 occlusal indexes of orthodontic treatment need. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2001;120(3):240–6.CrossRefPubMed Beglin FM, Firestone AR, Vig KW, Beck FM, Kuthy RA, Wade D. A comparison of the reliability and validity of 3 occlusal indexes of orthodontic treatment need. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2001;120(3):240–6.CrossRefPubMed
19.
20.
go back to reference Al-Nimri KS. Changes in mandibular incisor position in Class II Division 1 malocclusion treated with premolar extractions. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003;124(6):708–13. Al-Nimri KS. Changes in mandibular incisor position in Class II Division 1 malocclusion treated with premolar extractions. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003;124(6):708–13.
21.
go back to reference Kokich VO Jr, Kinzer GA. Managing congenitally missing lateral incisors. Part I: canine substitution. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2005;17(1):5–10.CrossRef  Kokich VO Jr, Kinzer GA. Managing congenitally missing lateral incisors. Part I: canine substitution. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2005;17(1):5–10.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Assessing inter- and intra-examiner reliability of orthodontists in devising incisor position objectives on cephalograms: a comparative study between senior and junior practitioners
Authors
Xue Li
Zhenxing Tang
Yu Li
Xiaowen Niu
Fang Zhou
Publication date
01-12-2023
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Oral Health / Issue 1/2023
Electronic ISSN: 1472-6831
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-023-03638-z

Other articles of this Issue 1/2023

BMC Oral Health 1/2023 Go to the issue