Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Public Health 1/2018

Open Access 01-12-2018 | Technical advance

Assessing food system vulnerabilities: a fault tree modeling approach

Authors: Gwen M. Chodur, Xilei Zhao, Erin Biehl, Judith Mitrani-Reiser, Roni Neff

Published in: BMC Public Health | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Food system function is vulnerable to disruption from a variety of sources. Disruption of the processes required for food provision may result in decreases in food security in affected communities. Currently, there are few tools that quantitatively predict or analyze food system vulnerabilities to contribute to food system resilience analysis. This work presents a prototype version of one such tool, a fault tree, which can be used conceptually and for future modeling work. Fault tree analysis is an engineering tool used to illustrate basic and intermediate factors that can cause overall system failures.

Methods

The fault tree defines food system functioning as food security at the community level and maps the components of the food system onto three main tenets of food security – accessibility, availability, and acceptability. Subtrees were populated using a top down approach guided by expertise, extant literature, and 36 stakeholder interviews.

Results

The food system is complex, requiring 12 subtrees to elaborate potential failures. Subtrees comprising accessibility include physical accessibility of the vending point and economic accessibility among community members. Food availability depends on the functioning of the food supply chain, or, in the case of individuals who rely on donated food, the food donation system. The food supply chain includes processing, wholesale operations, distribution systems, and retail center subtrees. Elements of acceptability include the medical appropriateness, nutritional adequacy, and cultural acceptability of food. Case studies of the effects of Winter Storm Jonas of 2016 and the 2013–2017 California drought in Baltimore City illustrate the utility of the fault tree model.

Conclusion

FTA of potential routes to food system failure provides a tool that allows for consideration of the entirety of the food system; has potential to provide a quantitative assessment of food system failure and recovery; and is able to capture short-term and long-term hazards in a single framework. This systems modeling approach highlights an extensive list of vulnerability points throughout the food system, and underscores the message that reducing food system vulnerabilities requires action at all levels to protect communities from the risks of short-term and long-term threats to food security.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Cutter SL, Barnes L, Berry M, Burton C, Evans E, Tate T, et al. A place-based model for understanding community resilience to natural disasters. Glob Environ Change. 2008;18(4):598–606.CrossRef Cutter SL, Barnes L, Berry M, Burton C, Evans E, Tate T, et al. A place-based model for understanding community resilience to natural disasters. Glob Environ Change. 2008;18(4):598–606.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Links JM, Schwartz BS, Lin SE, Kanarek N, Mitrani-Reiser J, Sell TK, et al. COPEWELL: a conceptual framework and system dynamics model for predicting community functioning and resilience after disasters. Disaster Med Public Health Prep 2017; Jun. 21:1–11. Links JM, Schwartz BS, Lin SE, Kanarek N, Mitrani-Reiser J, Sell TK, et al. COPEWELL: a conceptual framework and system dynamics model for predicting community functioning and resilience after disasters. Disaster Med Public Health Prep 2017; Jun. 21:1–11.
3.
go back to reference James SW, Friel S. An integrated approach to identifying and characterising resilient urban food systems to promote population health in a changing climate. Public Health Nutr. 2015;18(13):2498–508.CrossRefPubMed James SW, Friel S. An integrated approach to identifying and characterising resilient urban food systems to promote population health in a changing climate. Public Health Nutr. 2015;18(13):2498–508.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference The City of Calgary. Calgary Eats! Progress Report; 2014. p. 2015. The City of Calgary. Calgary Eats! Progress Report; 2014. p. 2015.
5.
go back to reference The Initiative for a Competitive Inner City. Resilient food systems, Resilient Cities: Recommendations for the City of Boston.; 2015. The Initiative for a Competitive Inner City. Resilient food systems, Resilient Cities: Recommendations for the City of Boston.; 2015.
6.
go back to reference Bradbear C, Friel S. Integrating climate change, food prices and population health. Food Policy. 2013;43:56–66.CrossRef Bradbear C, Friel S. Integrating climate change, food prices and population health. Food Policy. 2013;43:56–66.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Chebolu-Subramanian V, Gaukler GM. Product contamination in a multi-stage food supply chain. Eur J Oper Res. 2015;244:164–75.CrossRef Chebolu-Subramanian V, Gaukler GM. Product contamination in a multi-stage food supply chain. Eur J Oper Res. 2015;244:164–75.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Lagi M, Bar-Yam Y, Bertrand KZ, Bar-Yam Y. Accurate market price formation model with both supply-demand and trend-following for global food prices providing policy recommendations. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2015;112(45):E6119–28.CrossRefPubMed Lagi M, Bar-Yam Y, Bertrand KZ, Bar-Yam Y. Accurate market price formation model with both supply-demand and trend-following for global food prices providing policy recommendations. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2015;112(45):E6119–28.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Huff AG, Beyeler WE, Kelley NS, McNitt JA. How resilient is the United States' food system to pandemics? J Environ Stud Sci. 2015;5:337–47.CrossRef Huff AG, Beyeler WE, Kelley NS, McNitt JA. How resilient is the United States' food system to pandemics? J Environ Stud Sci. 2015;5:337–47.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Wheeler T, von Braun J. Climate change impacts on global food security. Science. 2013;341(6145):508–13.CrossRefPubMed Wheeler T, von Braun J. Climate change impacts on global food security. Science. 2013;341(6145):508–13.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Toth A, Rendall S, Reitsma F. Resilient food systems: a qualitative tool for measuring food resilience. Urban Ecosyst. 2016;19(1):19–43.CrossRef Toth A, Rendall S, Reitsma F. Resilient food systems: a qualitative tool for measuring food resilience. Urban Ecosyst. 2016;19(1):19–43.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Institute of Medicine and National Research Council. 2015. A Framework for Assessing Effects of the Food System. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/18846. Institute of Medicine and National Research Council. 2015. A Framework for Assessing Effects of the Food System. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://​doi.​org/​10.​17226/​18846.​
13.
go back to reference Allen T, Prosperi P. Modeling sustainable food systems. Environ Manag. 2016;57(5):956–75.CrossRef Allen T, Prosperi P. Modeling sustainable food systems. Environ Manag. 2016;57(5):956–75.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Tendall DM, Joerin J, Kopainsky B, Edwards P, Shreck A, Le QB, et al. Food system resilience: defining the concept. Glob Food Sec. 2015;6:17–23.CrossRef Tendall DM, Joerin J, Kopainsky B, Edwards P, Shreck A, Le QB, et al. Food system resilience: defining the concept. Glob Food Sec. 2015;6:17–23.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Risebro HL, Doria MF, Andersson Y, Medema G, Osborn K, Schlosser O, et al. Fault tree analysis of the causes of waterborne outbreaks. J Water Health. 2007;5(S1):1–18.CrossRefPubMed Risebro HL, Doria MF, Andersson Y, Medema G, Osborn K, Schlosser O, et al. Fault tree analysis of the causes of waterborne outbreaks. J Water Health. 2007;5(S1):1–18.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Jacques CC, McIntosh J, Giovinazzi S, Kirsch TD, Wilson T, Mitrani-Reiser J. Resilience of the Canterbury hospital system to the 2011 Christchurch earthquake. Earthquake Spectra. 2014;30(1):533–54.CrossRef Jacques CC, McIntosh J, Giovinazzi S, Kirsch TD, Wilson T, Mitrani-Reiser J. Resilience of the Canterbury hospital system to the 2011 Christchurch earthquake. Earthquake Spectra. 2014;30(1):533–54.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Watson HA. Launch control safety study. Bell Labs 1961. Watson HA. Launch control safety study. Bell Labs 1961.
18.
go back to reference Lee WS, Grosh DL, Tillman FA, Lie CH. Fault tree analysis, methods and applications #2013: a review. IEEE Trans Reliab. 1985;R-34(3):194–203.CrossRef Lee WS, Grosh DL, Tillman FA, Lie CH. Fault tree analysis, methods and applications #2013: a review. IEEE Trans Reliab. 1985;R-34(3):194–203.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference FAO. An Introduction to the Basic Components of Food Security: FAO; 2008. FAO. An Introduction to the Basic Components of Food Security: FAO; 2008.
20.
go back to reference Hammelman C, Hayes-Conroy A. Understanding cultural acceptability in urban food policy. J Plan Lit. 2015;30(1):37–48.CrossRef Hammelman C, Hayes-Conroy A. Understanding cultural acceptability in urban food policy. J Plan Lit. 2015;30(1):37–48.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Biehl E, Buzogany S, Huang A, Chodur G, Neff R. Baltimore Food System Resilience Advisory Report; 2017. Biehl E, Buzogany S, Huang A, Chodur G, Neff R. Baltimore Food System Resilience Advisory Report; 2017.
22.
go back to reference Feeding America. Nourishing healthy futures: 2016 Annual Report: Feeding America; 2016. Feeding America. Nourishing healthy futures: 2016 Annual Report: Feeding America; 2016.
23.
go back to reference California Department of Food and Agriculture. California Agricultural Statistics Review 2015–2016. 2016. California Department of Food and Agriculture. California Agricultural Statistics Review 2015–2016. 2016.
24.
go back to reference State of Emergency Declaration, California, January 17, 2014. State of Emergency Declaration, California, January 17, 2014.
25.
go back to reference Medellin-Azuara J, MacEwan D, Howitt RE, Sumner DA, Lund JR. Economic analysis of the 2016 California drought on agriculture. Center for Watershed Sciences. Davis, CA: UC Davis; 2016. Medellin-Azuara J, MacEwan D, Howitt RE, Sumner DA, Lund JR. Economic analysis of the 2016 California drought on agriculture. Center for Watershed Sciences. Davis, CA: UC Davis; 2016.
26.
go back to reference California Exec Order B-40-17, April 17, 2017. California Exec Order B-40-17, April 17, 2017.
27.
go back to reference Candy S, Biggs C, Larsen L, Turner G. Modelling food system resilience: a scenario-based simulation modeling approach to explore future shocks and adaptations in the Australian food system. J Environ Stud Sci. 2015;5(4):712–31.CrossRef Candy S, Biggs C, Larsen L, Turner G. Modelling food system resilience: a scenario-based simulation modeling approach to explore future shocks and adaptations in the Australian food system. J Environ Stud Sci. 2015;5(4):712–31.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Coleman-Jensen A, Rabbitt M, Gregory C, Singh A. Household Food Security in the United States in 2015; 2016. Report No.: ERR-215. Coleman-Jensen A, Rabbitt M, Gregory C, Singh A. Household Food Security in the United States in 2015; 2016. Report No.: ERR-215.
29.
go back to reference Committee on a Framework for Assessing the Health E, and Social Effects of the Food System; Food and Nutrition Board; Board of Agriculture and Natural Resources; Institute of Medicine; National Research Council. A framework for assessing effects of the food system; 2015 2015. Committee on a Framework for Assessing the Health E, and Social Effects of the Food System; Food and Nutrition Board; Board of Agriculture and Natural Resources; Institute of Medicine; National Research Council. A framework for assessing effects of the food system; 2015 2015.
Metadata
Title
Assessing food system vulnerabilities: a fault tree modeling approach
Authors
Gwen M. Chodur
Xilei Zhao
Erin Biehl
Judith Mitrani-Reiser
Roni Neff
Publication date
01-12-2018
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Public Health / Issue 1/2018
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2458
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-5563-x

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

BMC Public Health 1/2018 Go to the issue