Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
BMC Public Health
Published in: BMC Public Health 1/2018

Open Access 01-12-2018 | Research article

Determinants of utilisation rates of preventive health services: evidence from Chile

Authors: Elena S. Rotarou, Dikaios Sakellariou

Published in: BMC Public Health | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Preventive health services play a vital role in population health. However, access to such services is not always equitably distributed. In this article, we examine the barriers affecting utilisation rates of preventive health services, using Chile as a case study.

Methods

We conducted a cross-sectional study analysing secondary data from 206,132 Chilean adults, taken from the 2015 National Socioeconomic Characterisation Survey of the Government of Chile. We carried out logistic regressions to explore the relationship between the dependent variable use of preventive services and various demographic and socioeconomic variables.

Results

Categories more likely to use preventive services were women (OR=1.16; 95%CI: 1.11–1.21) and inactive people (OR=1.41; 95%CI: 1.33–1.48). By contrast, single individuals (OR= 0.85 ; 95%CI: 0.80–0.91) and those affiliated with the private healthcare provider (OR= 0.89; 95%CI: 0.81–0.96) had fewer odds of undertaking preventive exams.

Conclusions

The findings underline the necessity of better information campaigns on the availability and necessity of preventive health services, addressing health inequality in accessing health services, and tackling lifestyle-related health risks. This is particularly important in countries – such as Chile – characterised by high income inequality and low utilisation rates of preventive health services.
Literature
1.
Cáceres CF, Mendoza W. Changing care and prevention needs for global public health: In pursuit of a comprehensive perspective. Glob Public Health. 2011;7(sup1):s29–45.CrossRef
2.
Nakanishi N, Tatara K, Fujiwara H. Do preventive health services reduce eventual demand for medical care? Soc Sci Med. 1996;43(6):999–1005.CrossRefPubMed
3.
4.
Baechler RR, Barra MR, Soto A. Índice de medicina preventiva. Una medida integradora de la cobertura de los programas preventivos. Rev Med Chil. 2007;135(6):777–82.CrossRef
5.
6.
Schülein S, Taylor KJ, Schriefer D, Blettner M, Kluga SJ. Participation in preventive health check-ups among 19,351 women in Germany. Prev Med Rep. 2017;6:23–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
Yen SM, Kung PT, Chiu LT, Tsai WC. Related factors and use of free preventive health services among adults with intellectual disabilities in Taiwan. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014;14:248.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
Labra M. La reinvención neoliberal de la inequidad en Chile. El caso de la salud. Cadernos de Saúde Pública. 2002;18(4):1041–52.CrossRefPubMed
9.
10.
Rotarou ES, Sakellariou D. Neoliberal reforms in health systems and the construction of long-lasting inequalities in health care: a case study from Chile. Health Policy. 2017;121(5):495–503.CrossRefPubMed
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
Trincado P. Visión global de la medicina preventiva en Chile. Revista Médica Clínica Las Condes. 2010;21(5):669–73.CrossRef
16.
17.
Ministry of Health. Guía clínica: Examen de medicina preventiva. Santiago: Ministry of Health; 2008.
18.
19.
20.
Universidad de Chile. Encuesta CASEN 2015: Manual de trabajo de campo; 2014. Santiago: Centro de Microdatos, Facultad de Economía y Negocios, Universidad de Chile.
21.
22.
Herrera, R., Larrañaga, O., and Telias, A. La Ficha de protección social. Working document 2010:3. PNUD-Chile.
23.
Vaida V, Partha G, Karmakar M. Gender differences in utilisation of preventive care services in the United States. J Womens Health. 2011;21(2):140–5.CrossRef
24.
Brunner-Ziegler S, Rieder A, Stein KV, Koppensteiner R, Hoffmann K, Dorner TE. Predictors of participation in preventive health examinations in Austria. BMC Public Health. 2013;13:1138.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
25.
Viera AJ, Thorpe JM, Garrett JM. Effects of sex, age, and visits on receipt of preventive healthcare services: a secondary analysis of national data. BMC Health Serv Res. 2006;6:15.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
26.
Qin L, Xu H. A cross-sectional study of the effect of health literacy on diabetes prevention and control among elderly individuals with prediabetes in rural China. BMJ Open. 2016;6:e011077.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
27.
Labeit A, Peinemann F, Baker R. Utilisation of preventative health check-ups in the UK: findings from individual-level repeated cross-sectional data from 1992 to 2008. BMJ Open. 2013;3:e003387.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
28.
Teo CH, Ng CJ, Booth A, White A. Barriers and facilitators to health screening in men: a systematic review. Soc Sci Med. 2016;165:168–76.CrossRefPubMed
29.
CDC. Cancer screening – United States, 2010. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2012;61(3):41–5.
30.
31.
Moser K, Patnick J, Beral V. Inequalities in reported use of breast and cervical screening in great Britain: analysis of cross sectional survey data. BMJ. 2009;338:b2025.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
32.
Steinberg BS, Weinick RM. Health-related behaviours and the benefits of marriage for elderly persons. Gerontologist. 1998;38(5):618–27.CrossRef
33.
Van Jaarsveld CH, Miles A, Edwards R, Wardle J. Marriage and cancer prevention: does marital status and inviting both spouses together influence colorectal cancer screening participation? J Med Screen. 2006;13(4):172–6.CrossRefPubMed
34.
Blumberg SJ, Vahratian A, Blumberg JH. Marriage, cohabitation, and men’s use of preventive health care services. NCHS data brief, no. 154. Washington DC: US Department of Health and Human Services, centers for disease control and Prevention; 2006.
35.
Garrido-Cumbrera M, Borrell C, Palencia L, Espelt A, Rodríguez-Sanz M, Pasarín MI, Kunst A. Social class inequalities in the utilization of health care and preventive services in Spain, a country with a national health system. Int JHealth Serv. 2010;40(3):525–42.CrossRef
36.
37.
38.
Fernandez DM, Larson JL, Zikmund-Fisher BJ. Associations between health literacy and preventive health behaviours among older adults: findings from the health and retirement study. BMC Public Health. 2016;16:596.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
39.
Lange F. The role of education in complex health decisions: evidence from cancer screening. JHealth Econ. 2011;30(1):43–54.CrossRef
40.
41.
Mehrotra A, Zaslavsky AM, Ayanian JZ. Preventive health examinations and preventive gynaecological examinations in the United States. Arch Intern Med. 2007;167(17):1876–83.CrossRefPubMed
42.
43.
Continelli T, McGinnis S, Holmes T. The effect of local primary care physician supply on the utilization of preventive health services in the United States. Health Place. 2010;16(5):942–51.CrossRefPubMed
44.
Wardle J, Robb K, Vernon S, Waller J. Screening for prevention and early diagnosis of cancer. Am Psychol. 2015;70(2):119–33.CrossRefPubMed
45.
Wallace LS, DeVoe JE, Bennett IM, Roskos SE, Fryer GE Jr. Perceptions of healthcare providers’ communication skills: do they differ between urban and non-urban residents? Health Place. 2008;14(4):653–60.CrossRefPubMed
46.
Frontier Economics-Marmot Review. Estimating the costs of health inequalities – a report prepared for the marmot review. London: Frontier Economics; 2010.
Metadata
Title
Determinants of utilisation rates of preventive health services: evidence from Chile
Authors
Elena S. Rotarou
Dikaios Sakellariou
Publication date
01-12-2018
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Public Health / Issue 1/2018
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2458
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-5763-4

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

BMC Public Health 1/2018 Go to the issue

Research article

Predictors of working beyond retirement in older workers with and without a chronic disease - results from data linkage of Dutch questionnaire and registry data

Study protocol

Improving the healthcare response to domestic violence and abuse in primary care: protocol for a mixed method evaluation of the implementation of a complex intervention

Research article

Trends of socioeconomic inequality in using maternal health care services in Lao People’s Democratic Republic from year 2000 to 2012

Study protocol

Care–physical activity initiatives in the neighbourhood: study protocol for mixed-methods research on participation, effective elements, impact, and funding methods

Research article

Digital Media-based Health Intervention on the promotion of Women’s physical activity: a quasi-experimental study

Research article

Examining diffusion to understand the how of SASA!, a violence against women and HIV prevention intervention in Uganda