Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Israel Journal of Health Policy Research 1/2016

Open Access 01-12-2016 | Original research article

Donation of surplus frozen pre-embryos to research in Israel: underlying motivations

Authors: Aviad Raz, Jonia Amer-Alshiek, Mor Goren-Margalit, Gal Jacobi, Alyssa Hochberg, Ami Amit, Foad Azem, Hadar Amir

Published in: Israel Journal of Health Policy Research | Issue 1/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The high number of IVF procedures performed in Israel has had an unforeseen consequence: accumulation of large amounts of surplus frozen embryos. After five years that the frozen embryos are kept for free, patients need to make an embryo disposition decision. One option is donation for research. The donation rate in Israel is very low. Our aim was to understand the attitudes, values and perceptions of female IVF patients that decided to donate their surplus frozen embryos to research.

Methods

The study setting was a tertiary IVF unit which during the 2000–2009 period treated 241 patients who had their frozen pre-embryos stored for more than five years. The study population consists of the 12 patients (from among the 241) who had decided to donate their excess frozen pre-embryos to research. In-depth interviews were carried out with 8 of those 12 patients.

Results

IVF patients who donated their surplus frozen pre-embryos to research viewed the frozen embryo as a valuable resource that does not have human identity yet. The majority expressed a gradualist approach to the human status of the embryo as requiring successful implantation and development in the uterus. All the respondents chose donation to research not because it was their first choice but because they did not want or were unable to use the pre-embryos in the future, in addition to not willing to thaw them. For many of the respondents, donation to research was accompanied by a sense of uncertainty. All would have preferred to donate their pre-embryos to infertile women or couples, an option which is currently prohibited in Israel.

Conclusions

The moral reasoning behind decisions that patients make regarding excess pre-embryos is important for health care practitioners to consider when offering decision-making alternatives and counseling. For our respondents, the scarcity of donating excess frozen pre-embryos to research may reflect patients' preference for embryo donation to infertile couples. Recommended ways to increase donation to research may include public education and awareness, as well as targeted communication with IVF patients by multi-professional IVF unit teams comprised of a medical doctor and a professional trained in bioethics.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Ivry T. The pregnancy manifesto: notes on how to extract reproduction from the petri dish. Med Anthropol. 2015;34:3.CrossRef Ivry T. The pregnancy manifesto: notes on how to extract reproduction from the petri dish. Med Anthropol. 2015;34:3.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Samorinha C, Pereira M, Machado H, et al. Factors associated with the donation and non-donation of embryos for research: a systematic review. Hum Reprod Update. 2014;20:641–55.CrossRefPubMed Samorinha C, Pereira M, Machado H, et al. Factors associated with the donation and non-donation of embryos for research: a systematic review. Hum Reprod Update. 2014;20:641–55.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Bjuresten K, Hovatta O. Donation of embryos for stem cell research — how many couples consent? Hum Reprod. 2003;18:1353–5.CrossRefPubMed Bjuresten K, Hovatta O. Donation of embryos for stem cell research — how many couples consent? Hum Reprod. 2003;18:1353–5.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference McMahon CA, Gibson F, Cohen J, et al. Mothers conceiving through in vitro fertilization: siblings, setbacks, and embryo dilemmas. Reprod Technol. 2000;10:131–5. McMahon CA, Gibson F, Cohen J, et al. Mothers conceiving through in vitro fertilization: siblings, setbacks, and embryo dilemmas. Reprod Technol. 2000;10:131–5.
6.
go back to reference Burton P, Sanders K. Patient attitudes to donation of embryos for research in Western Australia. MJA. 2004;180:559–61.PubMed Burton P, Sanders K. Patient attitudes to donation of embryos for research in Western Australia. MJA. 2004;180:559–61.PubMed
7.
go back to reference Nachtigall RD, Becker G, Friese C, et al. Parents' conceptualization of their frozen embryos complicates the disposition decision. Fertil Steril. 2005;84:431–4.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Nachtigall RD, Becker G, Friese C, et al. Parents' conceptualization of their frozen embryos complicates the disposition decision. Fertil Steril. 2005;84:431–4.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
go back to reference de Lacey SL. Why some patients donate frozen embryos to research and why their reasons are important. Fertil Steril. 2009;92 Suppl 3:S34.CrossRef de Lacey SL. Why some patients donate frozen embryos to research and why their reasons are important. Fertil Steril. 2009;92 Suppl 3:S34.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Strauss A, Corbin J. Basics of qualitative research: grounded theory procedures and techniques. London: SAGE Publications; 1990. Strauss A, Corbin J. Basics of qualitative research: grounded theory procedures and techniques. London: SAGE Publications; 1990.
10.
go back to reference Hug K. Motivation to donate or not donate surplus embryos for stem-cell research: literature review. Fertil Steril. 2008;89:263–77.CrossRefPubMed Hug K. Motivation to donate or not donate surplus embryos for stem-cell research: literature review. Fertil Steril. 2008;89:263–77.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference de Lacey S, Rogers W, Braunack-Mayer A, Avery J, Smith D, Richards B. Perceptions of embryo status and embryo use in an Australian community. RBM Online. 2012;24:727–44.PubMed de Lacey S, Rogers W, Braunack-Mayer A, Avery J, Smith D, Richards B. Perceptions of embryo status and embryo use in an Australian community. RBM Online. 2012;24:727–44.PubMed
12.
go back to reference Provoost V, Pennings G, De Sutter P, Gerris J, de Velde AV, De Lissnyder E, Dhont M. Infertility patients’ beliefs about their embryos and their disposition preferences. Hum Reprod. 2009;24:896–905.CrossRefPubMed Provoost V, Pennings G, De Sutter P, Gerris J, de Velde AV, De Lissnyder E, Dhont M. Infertility patients’ beliefs about their embryos and their disposition preferences. Hum Reprod. 2009;24:896–905.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Rosner F. Modern medicine and Jewish ethics. NY: Yeshiva University Press; 2001. Rosner F. Modern medicine and Jewish ethics. NY: Yeshiva University Press; 2001.
14.
go back to reference Kaplan LJ, Tong R. Controlling Our reproductive destiny: a technological and philosophical perspective. Cambridge: MIT Press; 1996. Kaplan LJ, Tong R. Controlling Our reproductive destiny: a technological and philosophical perspective. Cambridge: MIT Press; 1996.
15.
go back to reference Rimon-Zarfaty N, Raz AE, Hashiloni-Dolev Y. When does a fetus become a person? An Israeli viewpoint. Fam Plann Reprod Health Care. 2011;37:216–24.CrossRef Rimon-Zarfaty N, Raz AE, Hashiloni-Dolev Y. When does a fetus become a person? An Israeli viewpoint. Fam Plann Reprod Health Care. 2011;37:216–24.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Beck Fruchter R, Shalev E. Deserted embryos or excess fertilized eggs: searching for a solution to a frozen-burning question. Harefua. 2015;154:646–9 (in Hebrew). Beck Fruchter R, Shalev E. Deserted embryos or excess fertilized eggs: searching for a solution to a frozen-burning question. Harefua. 2015;154:646–9 (in Hebrew).
17.
go back to reference Hammarberg K, Tinney L. Deciding the fate of supernumerary frozen embryos: a survey of couples’ decisions and the factors influencing their choice. Fertil Steril. 2006;86:86–91.CrossRefPubMed Hammarberg K, Tinney L. Deciding the fate of supernumerary frozen embryos: a survey of couples’ decisions and the factors influencing their choice. Fertil Steril. 2006;86:86–91.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Hashiloni-Dolev Y, Shalom Y. Attitudes of fertility patients concerning the moral standing and proper use of frozen embryos. Med Law Bioethics. 2010;3:175–211 (in Hebrew). Hashiloni-Dolev Y, Shalom Y. Attitudes of fertility patients concerning the moral standing and proper use of frozen embryos. Med Law Bioethics. 2010;3:175–211 (in Hebrew).
19.
20.
go back to reference Israeli Fertility Association. Position paper on access to abandoned excess frozen fertilized eggs. 2014 (in Hebrew). Israeli Fertility Association. Position paper on access to abandoned excess frozen fertilized eggs. 2014 (in Hebrew).
21.
go back to reference Wånggren K, Baban M, Svanberg AS. Attitudes toward embryo donation among staff at in in vitro fertilization clinics. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2014;93:765–70.CrossRefPubMed Wånggren K, Baban M, Svanberg AS. Attitudes toward embryo donation among staff at in in vitro fertilization clinics. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2014;93:765–70.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Wånggren K, Prag F, Skoog Svanberg A. Attitudes toward embryo donation in Swedish women and men of reproductive age. Ups J Med Sci. 2013;118:187–95.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Wånggren K, Prag F, Skoog Svanberg A. Attitudes toward embryo donation in Swedish women and men of reproductive age. Ups J Med Sci. 2013;118:187–95.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
23.
go back to reference Wånggren K, Alden J, Bergh T, Skoog Svanberg A. Attitudes toward embryo donation among infertile couples with frozen embryos. Hum Reprod. 2013;28:2432–9.CrossRefPubMed Wånggren K, Alden J, Bergh T, Skoog Svanberg A. Attitudes toward embryo donation among infertile couples with frozen embryos. Hum Reprod. 2013;28:2432–9.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Donation of surplus frozen pre-embryos to research in Israel: underlying motivations
Authors
Aviad Raz
Jonia Amer-Alshiek
Mor Goren-Margalit
Gal Jacobi
Alyssa Hochberg
Ami Amit
Foad Azem
Hadar Amir
Publication date
01-12-2016
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Israel Journal of Health Policy Research / Issue 1/2016
Electronic ISSN: 2045-4015
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13584-016-0085-4

Other articles of this Issue 1/2016

Israel Journal of Health Policy Research 1/2016 Go to the issue