Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Israel Journal of Health Policy Research 1/2016

Open Access 01-12-2016 | Original research article

Physician-facilitated designation of proxy decision-makers: family physician perceptions

Authors: Gideon Lifshitz, Matan J. Cohen, Hila Shmilovitz, Mayer Brezis, Amnon Lahad, Arie Ben-Yehuda

Published in: Israel Journal of Health Policy Research | Issue 1/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Among the challenges encountered during the care of patients at the end-of-life (EOL), eliciting preferences of patients with whom there is no ability to communicate is common and stressful for all those concerned and charged with patient care. Legal facilities available include patient delegation of proxy decision-makers (PDM) prior to communication incapacity. We sought to estimate family physician awareness and attitude with regard to these aspects of patient care.

Methods

A telephone survey of family physicians in the Jerusalem, Israel, district using a standard questionnaire.

Results

74 family physicians responded to the survey. The response rate was 42 % and the cooperation rate was 66 %. Most of the respondents, (64 %), reported knowing that the PDM delegation facility exists, though only 24 % claimed to have suggested to their patients that they consider this option. Approximately three-quarters, (78 %), treat patients with whom they discussed other aspects of severe disease, disability or EOL. None of the physicians working predominantly with religiously observant groups reported suggesting PDM delegation.

Conclusions

There is an apparent gap between family physician knowledge and their performance to empower the persistence of patient autonomy, should communication ability cease. System-wide interventions to increase EOL communication skills, starting at medical school and henceforth, are necessary in order to promote better EOL care and meaningful resource use.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Heffner JE, Fahy B, Hilling L, Barbieri C. Attitudes regarding advance directives among patients in pulmonary rehabilitation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1996;154(6 Pt 1):1735–40.CrossRefPubMed Heffner JE, Fahy B, Hilling L, Barbieri C. Attitudes regarding advance directives among patients in pulmonary rehabilitation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1996;154(6 Pt 1):1735–40.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Emanuel LL, Barry MJ, Stoeckle JD, Ettelson LM, Emanuel EJ. Advance directives for medical care--a case for greater use. N Engl J Med. 1991;324(13):889–95.CrossRefPubMed Emanuel LL, Barry MJ, Stoeckle JD, Ettelson LM, Emanuel EJ. Advance directives for medical care--a case for greater use. N Engl J Med. 1991;324(13):889–95.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Morrison RS, Meier DE. High rates of advance care planning in New York City’s elderly population. Arch Intern Med. 2004;164(22):2421–6.CrossRefPubMed Morrison RS, Meier DE. High rates of advance care planning in New York City’s elderly population. Arch Intern Med. 2004;164(22):2421–6.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Covinsky KE, Fuller JD, Yaffe K, Johnston CB, Hamel MB, Lynn J, et al. Communication and decision-making in seriously ill patients: findings of the SUPPORT project. The Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatments. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2000;48(5 Suppl):S187–93.CrossRefPubMed Covinsky KE, Fuller JD, Yaffe K, Johnston CB, Hamel MB, Lynn J, et al. Communication and decision-making in seriously ill patients: findings of the SUPPORT project. The Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatments. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2000;48(5 Suppl):S187–93.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Davidson KW, Hackler C, Caradine DR, McCord RS. Physicians’ attitudes on advance directives. JAMA. 1989;262(17):2415–9.CrossRefPubMed Davidson KW, Hackler C, Caradine DR, McCord RS. Physicians’ attitudes on advance directives. JAMA. 1989;262(17):2415–9.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Singer PA, Choudhry S, Armstrong J. Public opinion regarding consent to treatment. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1993;41(2):112–6.CrossRefPubMed Singer PA, Choudhry S, Armstrong J. Public opinion regarding consent to treatment. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1993;41(2):112–6.CrossRefPubMed
8.
9.
go back to reference Meier DE, Fuss BR, O’Rourke D, Baskin SA, Lewis M, Morrison RS. Marked improvement in recognition and completion of health care proxies. A randomized controlled trial of counseling by hospital patient representatives. Arch Intern Med. 1996;156(11):1227–32.CrossRefPubMed Meier DE, Fuss BR, O’Rourke D, Baskin SA, Lewis M, Morrison RS. Marked improvement in recognition and completion of health care proxies. A randomized controlled trial of counseling by hospital patient representatives. Arch Intern Med. 1996;156(11):1227–32.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Rubin SM, Strull WM, Fialkow MF, Weiss SJ, Lo B. Increasing the completion of the durable power of attorney for health care. A randomized, controlled trial. JAMA. 1994;271(3):209–12.CrossRefPubMed Rubin SM, Strull WM, Fialkow MF, Weiss SJ, Lo B. Increasing the completion of the durable power of attorney for health care. A randomized, controlled trial. JAMA. 1994;271(3):209–12.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Teno J, Lynn J, Wenger N, Phillips RS, Murphy DP, Connors Jr AF, et al. Advance directives for seriously ill hospitalized patients: effectiveness with the patient self-determination act and the SUPPORT intervention. SUPPORT Investigators. Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatment. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1997;45(4):500–7.CrossRefPubMed Teno J, Lynn J, Wenger N, Phillips RS, Murphy DP, Connors Jr AF, et al. Advance directives for seriously ill hospitalized patients: effectiveness with the patient self-determination act and the SUPPORT intervention. SUPPORT Investigators. Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatment. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1997;45(4):500–7.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Reilly BM, Magnussen CR, Ross J, Ash J, Papa L, Wagner M. Can we talk? Inpatient discussions about advance directives in a community hospital. Attending physicians’ attitudes, their inpatients’ wishes, and reported experience. Arch Intern Med. 1994;154(20):2299–308.CrossRefPubMed Reilly BM, Magnussen CR, Ross J, Ash J, Papa L, Wagner M. Can we talk? Inpatient discussions about advance directives in a community hospital. Attending physicians’ attitudes, their inpatients’ wishes, and reported experience. Arch Intern Med. 1994;154(20):2299–308.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Steinberg A, Sprung CL. The dying patient: new Israeli legislation. Intensive Care Med. 2006;32(8):1234–7.CrossRefPubMed Steinberg A, Sprung CL. The dying patient: new Israeli legislation. Intensive Care Med. 2006;32(8):1234–7.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Doron D, Wexler ID, Shabtai E, Corn BW. Israeli Dying Patient Act: physician knowledge and attitudes. Am J Clin Oncol. 2014;37(6):597–602.CrossRefPubMed Doron D, Wexler ID, Shabtai E, Corn BW. Israeli Dying Patient Act: physician knowledge and attitudes. Am J Clin Oncol. 2014;37(6):597–602.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Shvartzman P, Reuven Y, Halperin M, Menahem S. Advance Directives-The Israeli Experience. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2015;49(6):1097–101.CrossRefPubMed Shvartzman P, Reuven Y, Halperin M, Menahem S. Advance Directives-The Israeli Experience. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2015;49(6):1097–101.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Shaulov A, Frankel M, Rubinow A, Maaravi Y, Brezis M. Preparedness for End of Life-a Survey of Jerusalem District Nursing Homes. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2015;63(10):2114–9.CrossRefPubMed Shaulov A, Frankel M, Rubinow A, Maaravi Y, Brezis M. Preparedness for End of Life-a Survey of Jerusalem District Nursing Homes. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2015;63(10):2114–9.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Nissanholtz-Gannot R, Rosen B. Monitoring quality in Israeli primary care: The primary care physicians’ perspective. Isr J Health Policy Res. 2012;1(1):26.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Nissanholtz-Gannot R, Rosen B. Monitoring quality in Israeli primary care: The primary care physicians’ perspective. Isr J Health Policy Res. 2012;1(1):26.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
19.
go back to reference Shemesh AA, Rotem N, Gorg M, Haklai Z, Horev T. Employment Characteristics of Physicians in Israel, Israel Central Bureau of Statistics and the Ministry of Health. 2012. Shemesh AA, Rotem N, Gorg M, Haklai Z, Horev T. Employment Characteristics of Physicians in Israel, Israel Central Bureau of Statistics and the Ministry of Health. 2012.
Metadata
Title
Physician-facilitated designation of proxy decision-makers: family physician perceptions
Authors
Gideon Lifshitz
Matan J. Cohen
Hila Shmilovitz
Mayer Brezis
Amnon Lahad
Arie Ben-Yehuda
Publication date
01-12-2016
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Israel Journal of Health Policy Research / Issue 1/2016
Electronic ISSN: 2045-4015
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13584-016-0059-6

Other articles of this Issue 1/2016

Israel Journal of Health Policy Research 1/2016 Go to the issue