Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

LIVE: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)
Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
BMC Health Services Research
Published in: BMC Health Services Research 1/2017

Open Access 01-12-2017 | Research article

A Qualitative study of language barriers between South African health care providers and cross-border migrants

Authors: Jo Hunter-Adams, Hanna-Andrea Rother

Published in: BMC Health Services Research | Issue 1/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Communication with health care providers represents an essential part of access to health care for the over 230 million cross-border migrants around the world. In this article, we explore the complexity of health communication from the perspective of cross-border migrants seeking antenatal care in Cape Town, South Africa in order to highlight the importance of high quality medical interpretation.

Methods

As part of a broader study of migrant maternal and infant nutrition, we conducted a secondary data analysis of semi-structured in-depth interviews (N = 23) with Congolese (n = 7), Somali (n = 8) and Zimbabwean (n = 8) women living in Cape Town, as well as nine focus group discussions (including men: n = 3 and women: n = 6) were conducted with migrant Somalis, Congolese, and Zimbabweans (N = 48). We first used content analysis to gather all data related to language and communication. We then analysed this data thematically.

Results

Zimbabwean participants described how the inability to speak the local South African language (IsiXhosa) gave rise to labelling and stereotyping by healthcare staff. Congolese and Somali participants described medical procedures, including tubal ligation, which were performed without consent. Partners often tried to play the role of interpreter, which resulted in loss of income and non-professional medical interpretation. Participants’ highlighted fears over unwanted procedures or being unable to access care. Challenges of communication without a common language (and without professional medical interpretation), rather than outright denial of care by healthcare professionals, mediated these encounters.

Conclusion

Although there are several factors impeding cross-border migrants’ access to health care, effective communication is a prerequisite for quality care. Free-to-patient professional medical interpretation would not only benefit migrant populations but would benefit the broader community where language and health literacy are barriers to accessing health care. Novel approaches to language access may include technology-enabled professional interpretation.
Footnotes
1
The term “coloured” has roots in apartheid racial categories, and refers to individuals of mixed ancestry, including European, African and Asian ancestry.
 
2
Not her real name
 
Literature
1.
Urquia ML, Gagnon AJ. Glossary: migration and health. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2011;65:467–72.CrossRefPubMed
2.
Republic of South Africa. Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, Act 108 of 1996. Government Gazette, 378; 1996.
3.
Republic of South Africa. Refugees Act, Act 130 of 1998. Government Gazette, 383; 1998.
4.
Statistics South Africa. Census 2011: statistical release. 2012.
5.
Misago JP, Monson T, Polzer T, Landau LB. Violence Against Foreign Nationals in South Africa: Understanding Causes and Evaluating Responses. 2010.
6.
7.
Campbell EH. Urban refugees in nairobi: Problems of protection, mechanisms of survival, and possibilities for integration. J Refug Stud. 2006;19:396–413.CrossRef
8.
Grabska K. Marginalization in urban spaces of the global south: Urban refugees in Cairo. J Refug Stud. 2006;19:287–307.CrossRef
9.
Vearey J, Nunez L. Migration and Health in South Africa–A review of the current situation and recommendations for achieving the World Health Assembly Resolution on the Health of Migrants. Pretoria, South Africa. 2010.
10.
Crush J, Tawodzera G. Medical Xenophobia and Zimbabwean Migrant Access to Public Health Services in South Africa. J Ethn Migr Stud. 2014;40:655–70.CrossRef
11.
12.
13.
14.
Wilkinson S. Focus groups in feminist research. Womens Stud Int Forum. 1998;21:111–25.CrossRef
15.
Sadler GR, Lee HC, Lim RSH, Fullerton J. Recruitment of hard-to-reach population subgroups via adaptations of the snowball sampling strategy. Nurs Heal Sci. 2010;12:369–74.CrossRef
16.
Human Rights Watch. ‘Stop Making Excuses’: Accountability for Maternal Health in South Africa. 2011.
17.
Human Rights Watch. No Healing Here: Violence, Discrimination and Barriers to Health for Migrants in South Africa. 2009.
18.
Squires A. Methodological challenges in cross-language qualitative research: A research review. Int J Nurs Stud. 2009;46:277–87.CrossRefPubMed
19.
Temple B, Young A. Qualitative research and translation dilemmas. Qual Res. 2004;4:161–78.CrossRef
20.
Larkin PJ, Dierckx de Casterlé B, Schotsmans P. Multilingual translation issues in qualitative research: reflections on a metaphorical process. Qual Health Res. 2007;17:468–76.CrossRefPubMed
21.
Boyatzis RE. Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code development. Sage; 1998.
22.
Fereday J. Demonstrating Rigor Using Thematic Analysis : A Hybrid Approach of Inductive and Deductive Coding and Theme Development. 2006. p. 80–92.
23.
Crabtree B, Miller W. Doing qualitative research. Sage Publications; 1999. p. 163–77.
24.
Hsieh H-F, Shannon SE. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res. 2005;15:1277–88.CrossRefPubMed
25.
Ziebland S, Hunt K. Using secondary analysis of qualitative data of patient experiences of health care to inform health services research and policy. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2014;19:177–82.CrossRefPubMed
26.
Gladstone BM, Volpe T, Boydell KM. Issues encountered in a qualitative secondary analysis of help-seeking in the prodrome to psychosis. J Behav Heal Serv Res. 2007;34:431–42.CrossRef
27.
Deumert A. ‘It would be nice if they could give us more language’ - Serving South Africa’s multilingual patient base. Soc Sci Med. 2010;71:53–61.CrossRefPubMed
28.
Drennan G, Swartz L. The paradoxical use of interpreting in psychiatry. Soc Sci Med. 2002;54:1853–66.CrossRefPubMed
29.
Lindholm M, Hargraves JL, Ferguson WJ, Reed G. Professional language interpretation and inpatient length of stay and readmission rates. J Gen Intern Med. 2012;27:1294–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
30.
Jacobs EA, Shepard DS, Suaya JA, Stone E-L. Overcoming language barriers in health care: costs and benefits of interpreter services. Am J Public Health. 2004;94:866–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
31.
Ku L, Flores G. Pay now or pay later: Providing interpreter services in health care. Health Aff. 2005;24:435–44.CrossRef
32.
Haricharan HJ, Heap M, Coomans F, & London L. Can we talk about the right to healthcare without language? A critique of key international human rights law, drawing on the experiences of a Deaf woman in Cape Town, South Africa. Disabil Soc. 2012;1–13. doi:10.​1080/​09687599.​2012.​699277
33.
Schlemmer A, Mash B. The effects of a language barrier in a South African district hospital. S Afr Med J. 2006;96(10):1084–7.PubMed
34.
Penn C. Factors affecting the success of mediated medical interviews in South Africa. Curr Allergy Clin Immunol. 2007;20:66–72.
35.
Flores G, Abreu M, Barone CP, Bachur R, Lin H. Errors of medical interpretation and their potential clinical consequences: A comparison of professional versus ad hoc versus no interpreters. Ann Emerg Med. 2012;60:545–53.CrossRefPubMed
36.
Azarmina P, Wallace P. Remote interpretation in medical encounters: a systematic review. J Telemed Telecare. 2005;11:140–5.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
A Qualitative study of language barriers between South African health care providers and cross-border migrants
Authors
Jo Hunter-Adams
Hanna-Andrea Rother
Publication date
01-12-2017
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Health Services Research / Issue 1/2017
Electronic ISSN: 1472-6963
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-017-2042-5

Other articles of this Issue 1/2017

BMC Health Services Research 1/2017 Go to the issue

Research article

Medication-related calls received by a national telenursing triage and advice service in Australia: a retrospective cohort study

Study protocol

Developing a framework to guide the de-adoption of low-value clinical practices in acute care medicine: a study protocol

Research article

Associations between degrees of task delegation and job satisfaction of general practitioners and their staff: a cross-sectional study

Research article

Readmission and mortality in patients discharged with a diagnosis of medical observation and evaluation (Z03*-codes) from an acute admission unit in Denmark: a prospective cohort study

Research article

Implementation and use of standardized outcome measures by physical therapists in Saudi Arabia: barriers, facilitators and perceptions

Research article

Sustainability of health information systems: a three-country qualitative study in southern Africa