Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 1/2014

Open Access 01-12-2014 | Research article

Stroke patients’ utilisation of extrinsic feedback from computer-based technology in the home: a multiple case study realistic evaluation

Authors: Jack Parker, Susan Mawson, Gail Mountain, Nasrin Nasr, Huiru Zheng

Published in: BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making | Issue 1/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Evidence indicates that post − stroke rehabilitation improves function, independence and quality of life. A key aspect of rehabilitation is the provision of appropriate information and feedback to the learner.
Advances in information and communications technology (ICT) have allowed for the development of various systems to complement stroke rehabilitation that could be used in the home setting. These systems may increase the provision of rehabilitation a stroke survivor receives and carries out, as well as providing a learning platform that facilitates long-term self-managed rehabilitation and behaviour change. This paper describes the application of an innovative evaluative methodology to explore the utilisation of feedback for post-stroke upper-limb rehabilitation in the home.

Methods

Using the principles of realistic evaluation, this study aimed to test and refine intervention theories by exploring the complex interactions of contexts, mechanisms and outcomes that arise from technology deployment in the home. Methods included focus groups followed by multi-method case studies (n = 5) before, during and after the use of computer-based equipment. Data were analysed in relation to the context-mechanism-outcome hypotheses case by case. This was followed by a synthesis of the findings to answer the question, ‘what works for whom and in what circumstances and respects?’

Results

Data analysis reveals that to achieve desired outcomes through the use of ICT, key elements of computer feedback, such as accuracy, measurability, rewarding feedback, adaptability, and knowledge of results feedback, are required to trigger the theory-driven mechanisms underpinning the intervention. In addition, the pre-existing context and the personal and environmental contexts, such as previous experience of service delivery, personal goals, trust in the technology, and social circumstances may also enable or constrain the underpinning theory-driven mechanisms.

Conclusions

Findings suggest that the theory-driven mechanisms underpinning the utilisation of feedback from computer-based technology for home-based upper-limb post-stroke rehabilitation are dependent on key elements of computer feedback and the personal and environmental context. The identification of these elements may therefore inform the development of technology; therapy education and the subsequent adoption of technology and a self-management paradigm; long-term self-managed rehabilitation; and importantly, improvements in the physical and psychosocial aspects of recovery.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Strong K, Mathers C, Bonita R: Preventing stroke: saving lives around the world. Lancet Neurol. 2007, 6: 182-187.CrossRefPubMed Strong K, Mathers C, Bonita R: Preventing stroke: saving lives around the world. Lancet Neurol. 2007, 6: 182-187.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Saka Ö, Serra V, Samyshkin Y, McGuire A, Wolfe C: Cost-Effectiveness of stroke care followed by early supported discharge. Stroke. 2009, 40: 24-29.CrossRefPubMed Saka Ö, Serra V, Samyshkin Y, McGuire A, Wolfe C: Cost-Effectiveness of stroke care followed by early supported discharge. Stroke. 2009, 40: 24-29.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Kalra L, Ratan R: Recent advances in stroke rehabilitation. Stroke. 2006, 38: 235-237.CrossRef Kalra L, Ratan R: Recent advances in stroke rehabilitation. Stroke. 2006, 38: 235-237.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Krakauer JW: Motor learning: Its relevance to stroke recovery and neurorehabilitation. Curr Opin Neurol. 2006, 19: 84-90.CrossRefPubMed Krakauer JW: Motor learning: Its relevance to stroke recovery and neurorehabilitation. Curr Opin Neurol. 2006, 19: 84-90.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Barker RN, Brauer SG: Upper limb recovery after stroke: the stroke survivors’ perspective. Disabil Rehabil. 2005, 27 (20): 1213-1223.CrossRefPubMed Barker RN, Brauer SG: Upper limb recovery after stroke: the stroke survivors’ perspective. Disabil Rehabil. 2005, 27 (20): 1213-1223.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Langhorne P, Coupar F, Pollock A: Motor recovery after stroke: a systematic review. Lancet Neurol. 2009, 8: 741-754.CrossRefPubMed Langhorne P, Coupar F, Pollock A: Motor recovery after stroke: a systematic review. Lancet Neurol. 2009, 8: 741-754.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Langhorne P, Bernhardt J, Kwakkel G: Stroke care 2: stroke rehabilitation. Lancet. 2011, 377: 1693-1702.CrossRefPubMed Langhorne P, Bernhardt J, Kwakkel G: Stroke care 2: stroke rehabilitation. Lancet. 2011, 377: 1693-1702.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Party ISW: National Clinical Guidelines for Stroke: Improving Motor Control. 2012, London: Royal College of Physicians, 4 Party ISW: National Clinical Guidelines for Stroke: Improving Motor Control. 2012, London: Royal College of Physicians, 4
11.
go back to reference DoH: Innovation, Health and Wealth: Accelerating Adoption and Diffusion in the NHS. 2011, London: Department of Health DoH: Innovation, Health and Wealth: Accelerating Adoption and Diffusion in the NHS. 2011, London: Department of Health
12.
go back to reference Bunt L, Harris M: The Human Factor: How Transforming Healthcare to Involve the Public can Save Money and Save Lives. 2009, London: NESTA Bunt L, Harris M: The Human Factor: How Transforming Healthcare to Involve the Public can Save Money and Save Lives. 2009, London: NESTA
13.
go back to reference Jones F: Strategies to enhance chronic disease self-management: How can we apply this to stroke?. Disabil Rehabil. 2006, 28 (13): 841-847.CrossRefPubMed Jones F: Strategies to enhance chronic disease self-management: How can we apply this to stroke?. Disabil Rehabil. 2006, 28 (13): 841-847.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Kwakkel G, Kollen BJ, Krebs HI: Effects of robot-assisted therapy on upper limb recovery after stroke: a systematic review. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2008, 22: 111-121.CrossRefPubMed Kwakkel G, Kollen BJ, Krebs HI: Effects of robot-assisted therapy on upper limb recovery after stroke: a systematic review. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2008, 22: 111-121.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Henderson A, Korner-Bitensky N, Levin M: Virtual reality in stroke rehabilitation: a systematic review of its effectiveness for upper limb motor recovery. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2007, 14: 52-61.CrossRefPubMed Henderson A, Korner-Bitensky N, Levin M: Virtual reality in stroke rehabilitation: a systematic review of its effectiveness for upper limb motor recovery. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2007, 14: 52-61.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Mountain GA, Ware PM, Hammerton J, Mawson SJ, Zheng J, Davies R, Black N, Zhou H, Hu H, Harris N, Eccleston C: The SMART Project: A User Led Approach to Developing Applications for Domiciliary Stroke Rehabilitation. Designing Accessible Technology. Edited by: Clarkson P, Langdon J, Robinson P. 2006, London: Springer, 135-144.CrossRef Mountain GA, Ware PM, Hammerton J, Mawson SJ, Zheng J, Davies R, Black N, Zhou H, Hu H, Harris N, Eccleston C: The SMART Project: A User Led Approach to Developing Applications for Domiciliary Stroke Rehabilitation. Designing Accessible Technology. Edited by: Clarkson P, Langdon J, Robinson P. 2006, London: Springer, 135-144.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Mountain G, Wilson S, Eccleston C, Mawson S, Hammerton J, Ware T, Zheng H, Davies R, Black N, Harris N, Stone T, Hu H: Developing and testing a telerehabilitation system for people following stroke: issues of usability. J Eng Des. 2010, 21 (2): 223-236.CrossRef Mountain G, Wilson S, Eccleston C, Mawson S, Hammerton J, Ware T, Zheng H, Davies R, Black N, Harris N, Stone T, Hu H: Developing and testing a telerehabilitation system for people following stroke: issues of usability. J Eng Des. 2010, 21 (2): 223-236.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Mawson S, Mountain G: The SMART rehabilitation system for stroke self-management: issues and challenges for evidence-based health technology research. J Phys Ther Educ. 2011, 25 (1): 48-53. Mawson S, Mountain G: The SMART rehabilitation system for stroke self-management: issues and challenges for evidence-based health technology research. J Phys Ther Educ. 2011, 25 (1): 48-53.
19.
go back to reference Parker J, Mountain GA, Hammerton J: An Investigation into Stroke Patients’ Utilisation of Feedback from Computer-Based Technology. Designing Inclusive Interactions. Edited by: Langdon P, Clarkson J, Robinson P. 2010, London: Springer, 167-176.CrossRef Parker J, Mountain GA, Hammerton J: An Investigation into Stroke Patients’ Utilisation of Feedback from Computer-Based Technology. Designing Inclusive Interactions. Edited by: Langdon P, Clarkson J, Robinson P. 2010, London: Springer, 167-176.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Loureiro RCV, Harwin WS, Nagai K, Johnson M: Advances in upper limb stroke rehabilitation: a technology push. Med Biol Eng Comput. 2011, 49: 1103-1118.CrossRefPubMed Loureiro RCV, Harwin WS, Nagai K, Johnson M: Advances in upper limb stroke rehabilitation: a technology push. Med Biol Eng Comput. 2011, 49: 1103-1118.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Magill RA: Augmented Feedback. Motor Learning and Control: Concepts and Applications. 2007, London: McGraw Hill, 331-359. 8 Magill RA: Augmented Feedback. Motor Learning and Control: Concepts and Applications. 2007, London: McGraw Hill, 331-359. 8
23.
go back to reference Mawson S, Nasr N, Parker J, Mountain G, Hawley M, Zheng H, Davies R: Developing a personalised self-management rehabilitation system for post-stroke rehabilitation; utilising a user-centred design methodology. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2013, Early Online: 1–8 Mawson S, Nasr N, Parker J, Mountain G, Hawley M, Zheng H, Davies R: Developing a personalised self-management rehabilitation system for post-stroke rehabilitation; utilising a user-centred design methodology. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2013, Early Online: 1–8
24.
go back to reference Willmann RD, Lanfermann G, Saini P, Timmermans A, Te Vrugt J, Winter S: Home stroke rehabilitation for the upper limbs. IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2007, 4015-4017. Willmann RD, Lanfermann G, Saini P, Timmermans A, Te Vrugt J, Winter S: Home stroke rehabilitation for the upper limbs. IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2007, 4015-4017.
25.
go back to reference Zhou H, Hu H: Inertial sensors for motion detection of human upper limbs. Sens Rev. 2007, 27 (2): 151-158.CrossRef Zhou H, Hu H: Inertial sensors for motion detection of human upper limbs. Sens Rev. 2007, 27 (2): 151-158.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Parker J: PhD thesis. Stroke Patients’ Utilisation of Extrinsic Feedback from Computer-Based Technology in the Home. 2012, Sheffield UK: Sheffield Hallam University Parker J: PhD thesis. Stroke Patients’ Utilisation of Extrinsic Feedback from Computer-Based Technology in the Home. 2012, Sheffield UK: Sheffield Hallam University
27.
go back to reference Pawson R, Tilley N: Realistic Evaluation. 1997, London: Sage Pawson R, Tilley N: Realistic Evaluation. 1997, London: Sage
29.
go back to reference Carr JH, Shepherd RB: Neurological Rehabilitation; Optimising Motor Performance. 1998, Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann Carr JH, Shepherd RB: Neurological Rehabilitation; Optimising Motor Performance. 1998, Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann
30.
go back to reference Carr JH, Shepherd RB: Enhancing physical activity and brain reorganization after stroke. Neurol Res Int. 2011, doi:10.1155/2011/515938 Carr JH, Shepherd RB: Enhancing physical activity and brain reorganization after stroke. Neurol Res Int. 2011, doi:10.1155/2011/515938
31.
go back to reference Kleim JA, Jones TA: Principles of experience-dependent neural plasticity: implications for rehabilitation after brain damage. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2008, 51: S225-S239.CrossRefPubMed Kleim JA, Jones TA: Principles of experience-dependent neural plasticity: implications for rehabilitation after brain damage. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2008, 51: S225-S239.CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Fontana A, Frey JH: The Interview: From Structured Questions to Negotiated Text. Handbook of Qualitative Research. Edited by: Denzin NK, Lincoln YS. 2000, Thousand Oaks, California: Sage, 645-672. 2 Fontana A, Frey JH: The Interview: From Structured Questions to Negotiated Text. Handbook of Qualitative Research. Edited by: Denzin NK, Lincoln YS. 2000, Thousand Oaks, California: Sage, 645-672. 2
33.
go back to reference Vaughn S, Schumm JS, Singagub J: Focus Group Interviews in Education and Psychology. 1996, London: SageCrossRef Vaughn S, Schumm JS, Singagub J: Focus Group Interviews in Education and Psychology. 1996, London: SageCrossRef
34.
go back to reference Taylor CM: Interviewing. Qualitative Research in Healthcare. Edited by: Holloway I. 2005, London: Open University Press, 37-53. Taylor CM: Interviewing. Qualitative Research in Healthcare. Edited by: Holloway I. 2005, London: Open University Press, 37-53.
35.
go back to reference Britten N: Qualitative Interviews. Qualitative Research in Healthcare. Edited by: Holloway I. 2006, London: Open University Press, 12-20.CrossRef Britten N: Qualitative Interviews. Qualitative Research in Healthcare. Edited by: Holloway I. 2006, London: Open University Press, 12-20.CrossRef
36.
go back to reference Bowling A: Unstructured and Structured Observational Studies. Research Methods in Health: Investigating Health and Health Services. 2009, Berkshire, England: McGraw-Hill Open University Press, 383-405. 3 Bowling A: Unstructured and Structured Observational Studies. Research Methods in Health: Investigating Health and Health Services. 2009, Berkshire, England: McGraw-Hill Open University Press, 383-405. 3
37.
go back to reference Wallace S: Observing Method: Recognising the Significance of Belief, Discipline, Position and Documentation in Observational Studies. Qualitative Research in Healthcare. Edited by: Holloway I. 2005, London: Open University Press, 71-85. Wallace S: Observing Method: Recognising the Significance of Belief, Discipline, Position and Documentation in Observational Studies. Qualitative Research in Healthcare. Edited by: Holloway I. 2005, London: Open University Press, 71-85.
38.
go back to reference Stake R: The art of Case Study Research. 1995, Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Stake R: The art of Case Study Research. 1995, Thousand Oaks, California: Sage
39.
go back to reference Yin RK: Case Study Research: Design and Methods. 2003, London: SAGE Publications, 3 Yin RK: Case Study Research: Design and Methods. 2003, London: SAGE Publications, 3
40.
go back to reference Enderby PM, Wood VA, Wade DT, Langton Hewer R: The Frenchay Aphasia Screening Test: a short, simple test for aphasia appropriate for nonspecialists. Int J Rehabil Med. 1987, 8: 166-170.CrossRef Enderby PM, Wood VA, Wade DT, Langton Hewer R: The Frenchay Aphasia Screening Test: a short, simple test for aphasia appropriate for nonspecialists. Int J Rehabil Med. 1987, 8: 166-170.CrossRef
41.
go back to reference Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR: ‘Mini-mental state’. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res. 1975, 12: 189-98.CrossRefPubMed Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR: ‘Mini-mental state’. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res. 1975, 12: 189-98.CrossRefPubMed
42.
go back to reference Nouri FM, Lincoln NB: An extended activities of daily living index for stroke patients. Clin Rehabil. 1987, 1: 301-305.CrossRef Nouri FM, Lincoln NB: An extended activities of daily living index for stroke patients. Clin Rehabil. 1987, 1: 301-305.CrossRef
43.
go back to reference Harwood RH, Ebrahim S: A comparison of the responsiveness of the Nottingham extended activities of daily living scale, London handicap scale and SF-36. Disabil Rehabil. 2000, 22 (17): 786-793.CrossRefPubMed Harwood RH, Ebrahim S: A comparison of the responsiveness of the Nottingham extended activities of daily living scale, London handicap scale and SF-36. Disabil Rehabil. 2000, 22 (17): 786-793.CrossRefPubMed
44.
go back to reference Harwood RH, Ebrahim S: The validity, reliability and responsiveness of the Nottingham Extended Activities of Daily Living scale in patients undergoing total hip replacement. Disabil Rehabil. 2002, 24 (7): 371-377.CrossRefPubMed Harwood RH, Ebrahim S: The validity, reliability and responsiveness of the Nottingham Extended Activities of Daily Living scale in patients undergoing total hip replacement. Disabil Rehabil. 2002, 24 (7): 371-377.CrossRefPubMed
45.
go back to reference Pope C, Mays N: Qualitative Methods in Health Research. Qualitative Research in Healthcare. Edited by: Pope C, Mays N. 2006, Oxford UK: BMJ Books; Blackwell Publishing Ltd, 1-11. 3CrossRef Pope C, Mays N: Qualitative Methods in Health Research. Qualitative Research in Healthcare. Edited by: Pope C, Mays N. 2006, Oxford UK: BMJ Books; Blackwell Publishing Ltd, 1-11. 3CrossRef
46.
go back to reference Miles MB, Huberman MA: Qualitative Data Analysis. 1998, California: Sage Miles MB, Huberman MA: Qualitative Data Analysis. 1998, California: Sage
47.
go back to reference Patton M: Utilization-Focused Evaluation. 2008, Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications Patton M: Utilization-Focused Evaluation. 2008, Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications
50.
go back to reference Nudo RJ: The Mechanisms and Neurophysiology of Recovery from Stroke. Stroke Recovery and Rehabilitation. Edited by: Stein J, Harvey RL, Macko RF, Winstein CJ, Zorowitz RD. 2009, New York: Demos Medical, 123-134. Nudo RJ: The Mechanisms and Neurophysiology of Recovery from Stroke. Stroke Recovery and Rehabilitation. Edited by: Stein J, Harvey RL, Macko RF, Winstein CJ, Zorowitz RD. 2009, New York: Demos Medical, 123-134.
51.
go back to reference Parker J, Mountain GA, Hammerton J: A review of the evidence underpinning the use of visual and auditory feedback for computer technology in post-stroke upper-limb rehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2011, 6: 465-472.CrossRefPubMed Parker J, Mountain GA, Hammerton J: A review of the evidence underpinning the use of visual and auditory feedback for computer technology in post-stroke upper-limb rehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2011, 6: 465-472.CrossRefPubMed
52.
go back to reference Subramanian SK, Massie CL, Malcolm MP, Levin MF: Does provision of extrinsic feedback result in improved motor learning in the upper limb poststroke? A systematic review of the evidence. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2010, 24 (2): 113-124.CrossRefPubMed Subramanian SK, Massie CL, Malcolm MP, Levin MF: Does provision of extrinsic feedback result in improved motor learning in the upper limb poststroke? A systematic review of the evidence. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2010, 24 (2): 113-124.CrossRefPubMed
53.
go back to reference Van Vliet P, Wulf G: Extrinsic feedback for motor learning after stroke: What is the evidence?. Disabil Rehabil. 2006, 28 (13–14): 831-840.CrossRefPubMed Van Vliet P, Wulf G: Extrinsic feedback for motor learning after stroke: What is the evidence?. Disabil Rehabil. 2006, 28 (13–14): 831-840.CrossRefPubMed
54.
go back to reference Bandura A: The Nature and Structure of Self-Efficacy. Self-efficacy: The Exercise of Control. Edited by: Bandura A. 1997, New York: W.H. Freeman and Company Bandura A: The Nature and Structure of Self-Efficacy. Self-efficacy: The Exercise of Control. Edited by: Bandura A. 1997, New York: W.H. Freeman and Company
55.
go back to reference Bandura A: Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. 1986, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc Bandura A: Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. 1986, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc
56.
go back to reference Lorig K, Holman H: Self-management education: History, definition, outcomes and mechanisms. Ann Behav Med. 2003, 26 (1): 1-7.CrossRefPubMed Lorig K, Holman H: Self-management education: History, definition, outcomes and mechanisms. Ann Behav Med. 2003, 26 (1): 1-7.CrossRefPubMed
58.
go back to reference MRC: Developing and Evaluating Complex Interventions: New Guidance. 2008, London: Medical Research Council MRC: Developing and Evaluating Complex Interventions: New Guidance. 2008, London: Medical Research Council
Metadata
Title
Stroke patients’ utilisation of extrinsic feedback from computer-based technology in the home: a multiple case study realistic evaluation
Authors
Jack Parker
Susan Mawson
Gail Mountain
Nasrin Nasr
Huiru Zheng
Publication date
01-12-2014
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making / Issue 1/2014
Electronic ISSN: 1472-6947
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6947-14-46

Other articles of this Issue 1/2014

BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 1/2014 Go to the issue