Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Digestive Diseases and Sciences 2/2017

01-02-2017 | Editorial

Predicting Suboptimal Bowel Preparation: Taking It Up a PEG

Author: Shaheel M. Sahebally

Published in: Digestive Diseases and Sciences | Issue 2/2017

Login to get access

Excerpt

The increased incidence of colorectal cancer (CRC) over the last decades has driven the widespread launch of population-based screening programs worldwide, for which colonoscopy has become the primary diagnostic tool. Optimal bowel preparation is a pre-requisite for accurate and safe colonoscopy, as it enables adequate mucosal visualization, increasing the diagnostic yield for colonic lesions, supported by the observation that polyp and adenoma detection rates are directly proportional to the quality of bowel preparation. Improved colonic cleansing is associated with a fivefold increase in cecal intubation rates as well as a twofold increase in adenoma detection [1]. …
Literature
1.
go back to reference Marmo R, Rotondano G, Riccio G, et al. Effective bowel cleansing before colonoscopy: a randomized study of split-dosage versus non-split dosage regimens of high-volume versus low-volume polyethylene glycol solutions. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010;72:313–320.CrossRefPubMed Marmo R, Rotondano G, Riccio G, et al. Effective bowel cleansing before colonoscopy: a randomized study of split-dosage versus non-split dosage regimens of high-volume versus low-volume polyethylene glycol solutions. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010;72:313–320.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Mahadev S, Green PH, Lebwohl B. Rates of suboptimal preparation for colonoscopy differ markedly between providers: impact on adenoma detection rates. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2015;49:746–750.CrossRefPubMed Mahadev S, Green PH, Lebwohl B. Rates of suboptimal preparation for colonoscopy differ markedly between providers: impact on adenoma detection rates. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2015;49:746–750.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Lebwohl B, Kastrinos F, Glick M, Rosenbaum AJ, Wang T, Neugut AI. The impact of suboptimal bowel preparation on adenoma miss rates and the factors associated with early repeat colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011;73:1207–1214.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Lebwohl B, Kastrinos F, Glick M, Rosenbaum AJ, Wang T, Neugut AI. The impact of suboptimal bowel preparation on adenoma miss rates and the factors associated with early repeat colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011;73:1207–1214.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
4.
go back to reference Johnson DA, Barkun AN, Cohen LB, et al. Optimizing adequacy of bowel cleansing for colonoscopy: recommendations from the US multi-society task force on colorectal cancer. Gastroenterology. 2014;147:903–924.CrossRefPubMed Johnson DA, Barkun AN, Cohen LB, et al. Optimizing adequacy of bowel cleansing for colonoscopy: recommendations from the US multi-society task force on colorectal cancer. Gastroenterology. 2014;147:903–924.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Yang HJ, Park SK, Yeom DH, et al. Randomized trial comparing oral sulfate solution with 4-L polyethylene glycol administered in a split-dose as preparation for colonoscopy. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016. doi:10.1111/jgh.13477. Yang HJ, Park SK, Yeom DH, et al. Randomized trial comparing oral sulfate solution with 4-L polyethylene glycol administered in a split-dose as preparation for colonoscopy. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016. doi:10.​1111/​jgh.​13477.
6.
go back to reference Choi HS, Chung JW, Lee JW, et al. Polyethylene glycol plus ascorbic acid is as effective as sodium picosulfate with magnesium citrate for bowel preparation: a randomized trial. J Dig Dis. 2016;17:268–273.CrossRefPubMed Choi HS, Chung JW, Lee JW, et al. Polyethylene glycol plus ascorbic acid is as effective as sodium picosulfate with magnesium citrate for bowel preparation: a randomized trial. J Dig Dis. 2016;17:268–273.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Cheng CL, Liu NJ, Tang JH, et al. Predictors of suboptimal bowel preparation using 3-litres of polyethylene glycol for an outpatient colonoscopy: a prospective observational study. Dig Dis Sci. (Epub ahead of print). doi:10.1007/s10620-016-4343-7. Cheng CL, Liu NJ, Tang JH, et al. Predictors of suboptimal bowel preparation using 3-litres of polyethylene glycol for an outpatient colonoscopy: a prospective observational study. Dig Dis Sci. (Epub ahead of print). doi:10.​1007/​s10620-016-4343-7.
8.
go back to reference Hassan C, Bretthauer M, Kaminski MF, et al. Bowel preparation for colonoscopy: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) guideline. Endoscopy. 2013;45:142–150.CrossRefPubMed Hassan C, Bretthauer M, Kaminski MF, et al. Bowel preparation for colonoscopy: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) guideline. Endoscopy. 2013;45:142–150.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Tan JJ, Tjandra JJ. Which is the optimal bowel preparation for colonoscopy—a meta-analysis. Colorectal Dis. 2006;8:247–258.CrossRefPubMed Tan JJ, Tjandra JJ. Which is the optimal bowel preparation for colonoscopy—a meta-analysis. Colorectal Dis. 2006;8:247–258.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Cheng CL, Kuo YL, Liu NJ, et al. Impact of bowel preparation with low-volume (2-liter) and intermediate-volume (3-liter) polyethylene glycol on colonoscopy quality: a prospective observational study. Digestion. 2015;92:156–164.CrossRefPubMed Cheng CL, Kuo YL, Liu NJ, et al. Impact of bowel preparation with low-volume (2-liter) and intermediate-volume (3-liter) polyethylene glycol on colonoscopy quality: a prospective observational study. Digestion. 2015;92:156–164.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Predicting Suboptimal Bowel Preparation: Taking It Up a PEG
Author
Shaheel M. Sahebally
Publication date
01-02-2017
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Digestive Diseases and Sciences / Issue 2/2017
Print ISSN: 0163-2116
Electronic ISSN: 1573-2568
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-016-4385-x

Other articles of this Issue 2/2017

Digestive Diseases and Sciences 2/2017 Go to the issue

Stanford Multidisciplinary Seminars

Radiofrequency Ablation of Cameron Lesions

Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

Year in Review: Pediatric cardiology

Watch Dr. Anne Marie Valente present the last year's highlights in pediatric and congenital heart disease in the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Pulmonary vascular disease

The last year's highlights in pulmonary vascular disease are presented by Dr. Jane Leopold in this official video from ACC.24.

Year in Review: Valvular heart disease

Watch Prof. William Zoghbi present the last year's highlights in valvular heart disease from the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discusses last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.