Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Medical Imaging 1/2019

Open Access 01-12-2019 | Arthrography | Research article

Potential use of a diluted high-relaxivity gadolinium-based intra-articular contrast agent for magnetic resonance arthrography: an in-vitro study

Authors: Carmelo Messina, Domenico Albano, Davide Orlandi, Vito Chianca, Angelo Corazza, Federica Ferrari, Salvatore Gitto, Luca Maria Sconfienza

Published in: BMC Medical Imaging | Issue 1/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Magnetic resonance arthrography (MRA) requires intra-articular injection of gadolinium-based diluted paramagnetic contrast material. To our knowledge, gadobenate dimeglumine (Gd-BOPTA) has never been used for intra-articular applications. Our aim was to test in vitro different concentrations of Gd-BOPTA to be potentially used to perform MRA.

Methods

Gd-BOPTA was diluted in saline (NaCl 0.9%) to achieve different concentrations (4 mmol/l; 2 mmol/l; 1 mmol/l; 0.67 mmol/l; 0.5 mmol/l). Six sets of five sterile pipes were prepared with 5 ml of each solution, five sets added with 0.5 ml of fresh synovial fluid. Two separate pipes were prepared with 5 ml of gadopentetate dimeglumine (Gd-DTPA) at 2 mmol/l, one pipe added with 0.5 ml of synovial fluid. Pipes were imaged using a T1-weighted sequence at 1.5 T. For each pipe, signal intensity (SI) in arbitrary units (au) was measured.

Results

SI reproducibility range was 86–99%. Mean Gd-BOPTA SI in pipes containing synovial fluid increased from 1236 ± 8au (0.5 mmol/l) up to 1610 ± 44au (1 mmol/l) and down to 1405 ± 33au (4 mmol/l). Mean Gd-BOPTA SI in pipes without synovial fluid increased from 1184 ± 29au (0.5 mmol/l) up to 1530 ± 38au (1 mmol/l), and down to 1347 ± 39au (4 mmol/l). SI of pipes without synovial fluid was lower than that of pipes with synovial fluid for both Gd-BOPTA and Gd-DTPA (P ≤ 0.002). Regarding pipes with synovial fluid, mean Gd-DTPA SI at 2 mmol/l was 1246 ± 27au. Compared with Gd-BOPTA, SI was not different at 0.5 mmol/l (− 0.2%, P = 0.587) while it was higher (P < 0.001) at all other concentrations (range + 13.3%[4 mmol/l] − + 28.3%[1 mmol/l]). Regarding pipes without synovial fluid, mean Gd-DTPA SI at 2 mmol/l was 1275 ± 56au. Compared with Gd-BOPTA, SI was lower at 0.5 mmol/l (− 6.8%,P < 0.001), while it was higher (P < 0.001) at all other concentrations (range + 6.1%[4 mmol/l] − + 19.6% [1 mmol/l]).

Conclusions

In vitro, Gd-BOPTA at 1 mmol/ had a + 28% SI increase in comparison to Gd-DTPA 2 mmol/l. SI similar to Gd-DTPA can be obtained using one fourth concentration of Gd-BOPTA.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Steinbach LS, Palmer WE, Schweitzer ME. Special focus session. MR arthrography. Radiographics. 2002;22:1223–1246.CrossRef Steinbach LS, Palmer WE, Schweitzer ME. Special focus session. MR arthrography. Radiographics. 2002;22:1223–1246.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Magee T, Williams D, Mani N. Shoulder MR arthrography: which patient group benefits most? AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2004;183:969–74.CrossRef Magee T, Williams D, Mani N. Shoulder MR arthrography: which patient group benefits most? AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2004;183:969–74.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Albano D, Chianca V, Zappia M, Russo R, Romano S, Sconfienza LM, et al. Imaging of usual and unusual complication of rotator cuff repair. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2019;43:359–66.CrossRef Albano D, Chianca V, Zappia M, Russo R, Romano S, Sconfienza LM, et al. Imaging of usual and unusual complication of rotator cuff repair. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2019;43:359–66.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Bellelli A, Silvestri E, Barile A, Albano D, Aliprandi A, Caudana R, et al. Position paper on magnetic resonance imaging protocols in the musculoskeletal system (excluding the spine) by the Italian College of Musculoskeletal Radiology. Radiol Med. 2019;124:522–38.CrossRef Bellelli A, Silvestri E, Barile A, Albano D, Aliprandi A, Caudana R, et al. Position paper on magnetic resonance imaging protocols in the musculoskeletal system (excluding the spine) by the Italian College of Musculoskeletal Radiology. Radiol Med. 2019;124:522–38.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Helgason JW, Chandnani VP, Yu JS. MR arthrography: a review of current technique and applications. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1997;168:1473–80.CrossRef Helgason JW, Chandnani VP, Yu JS. MR arthrography: a review of current technique and applications. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1997;168:1473–80.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Sconfienza LM, Albano D, Messina C, Silvestri E, Tagliafico AS. How, when, why in magnetic resonance arthrography: an international survey by the European Society of Musculoskeletal Radiology (ESSR). Eur Radiol. 2018;28:2356–68.CrossRef Sconfienza LM, Albano D, Messina C, Silvestri E, Tagliafico AS. How, when, why in magnetic resonance arthrography: an international survey by the European Society of Musculoskeletal Radiology (ESSR). Eur Radiol. 2018;28:2356–68.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Pintaske J, Martirosian P, Graf H, Erb G, Lodemann KP, Claussen CD, et al. Relaxivity of Gadopentetate Dimeglumine (Magnevist), Gadobutrol (Gadovist), and Gadobenate Dimeglumine (MultiHance) in human blood plasma at 0.2, 1.5, and 3 tesla. Invest Radiol. 2006;41:213-21.Kanda T. the new restrictions on the use of linear gadolinium-based contrast agents in Japan. Magn Reson Med Sci. 2019;18:1–3.CrossRef Pintaske J, Martirosian P, Graf H, Erb G, Lodemann KP, Claussen CD, et al. Relaxivity of Gadopentetate Dimeglumine (Magnevist), Gadobutrol (Gadovist), and Gadobenate Dimeglumine (MultiHance) in human blood plasma at 0.2, 1.5, and 3 tesla. Invest Radiol. 2006;41:213-21.Kanda T. the new restrictions on the use of linear gadolinium-based contrast agents in Japan. Magn Reson Med Sci. 2019;18:1–3.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Kohn MD, Sassoon AA, Fernando ND. Classifications in brief: Kellgren-Lawrence classification of osteoarthritis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016;474:1886–93.CrossRef Kohn MD, Sassoon AA, Fernando ND. Classifications in brief: Kellgren-Lawrence classification of osteoarthritis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016;474:1886–93.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Cavagna FM, Maggioni F, Castelli PM, Daprà M, Imperatori LG, Lorusso V, et al. Gadolinium chelates with weak binding to serum proteins. A new class of high-efficiency, general purpose contrast agents for magnetic resonance imaging. Investig Radiol. 1997;32:780–96.CrossRef Cavagna FM, Maggioni F, Castelli PM, Daprà M, Imperatori LG, Lorusso V, et al. Gadolinium chelates with weak binding to serum proteins. A new class of high-efficiency, general purpose contrast agents for magnetic resonance imaging. Investig Radiol. 1997;32:780–96.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Johansson L, Kirchin MA, Ahlström H. Gadobenate dimeglumine (MultiHance) in MR angiography: an in-vitro phantom comparison with gadopentetate dimeglumine (Magnevist) at different concentrations. Acta Radiol. 2012;53:1112–7.CrossRef Johansson L, Kirchin MA, Ahlström H. Gadobenate dimeglumine (MultiHance) in MR angiography: an in-vitro phantom comparison with gadopentetate dimeglumine (Magnevist) at different concentrations. Acta Radiol. 2012;53:1112–7.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Rumboldt Z, Rowley HA, Steinberg F, Maldjian JA, Ruscalleda J, Gustafsson L, et al. Multicenter, double-blind, randomized, intra-individual crossover comparison of gadobenate dimeglumine and gadopentetate dimeglumine in MRI of brain tumors at 3 tesla. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2009;29:760–7.CrossRef Rumboldt Z, Rowley HA, Steinberg F, Maldjian JA, Ruscalleda J, Gustafsson L, et al. Multicenter, double-blind, randomized, intra-individual crossover comparison of gadobenate dimeglumine and gadopentetate dimeglumine in MRI of brain tumors at 3 tesla. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2009;29:760–7.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Prokop M, Schneider G, Vanzulli A, Goyen M, Ruehm SG, Douek P, et al. Contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the renal arteries: blinded multicenter crossover comparison of gadobenate dimeglumine and gadopentetate dimeglumine. Radiology. 2005;234:399–408.CrossRef Prokop M, Schneider G, Vanzulli A, Goyen M, Ruehm SG, Douek P, et al. Contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the renal arteries: blinded multicenter crossover comparison of gadobenate dimeglumine and gadopentetate dimeglumine. Radiology. 2005;234:399–408.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Schneider G, Maas R, Schultze Kool L, Rummeny E, Gehl HB, Lodemann KP, et al. Low-dose gadobenate dimeglumine versus standard dose gadopentetate dimeglumine for contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the liver. Investig Radiol. 2003;38:85–94.CrossRef Schneider G, Maas R, Schultze Kool L, Rummeny E, Gehl HB, Lodemann KP, et al. Low-dose gadobenate dimeglumine versus standard dose gadopentetate dimeglumine for contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the liver. Investig Radiol. 2003;38:85–94.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Martincich L, Faivre-Pierret M, Zechmann CM, Corcione S, van den Bosch HC, Peng WJ, et al. Multicenter, double-blind, randomized, intraindividual crossover comparison of gadobenate dimeglumine and gadopentetate dimeglumine for breast MR imaging (DETECT trial). Radiology. 2011;258:396–408.CrossRef Martincich L, Faivre-Pierret M, Zechmann CM, Corcione S, van den Bosch HC, Peng WJ, et al. Multicenter, double-blind, randomized, intraindividual crossover comparison of gadobenate dimeglumine and gadopentetate dimeglumine for breast MR imaging (DETECT trial). Radiology. 2011;258:396–408.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Doniselli FM, Albano D, Chianca V, Cimmino MA, Sconfienza LM. Gadolinium accumulation after contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging: what rheumatologists should know. Clin Rheumatol. 2017;36:977–80.CrossRef Doniselli FM, Albano D, Chianca V, Cimmino MA, Sconfienza LM. Gadolinium accumulation after contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging: what rheumatologists should know. Clin Rheumatol. 2017;36:977–80.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Savarino E, Chianca V, Bodini G, Albano D, Messina C, Tontini GE, et al. Gadolinium accumulation after contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging: which implications in patients with Crohn’s disease? Dig Liver Dis. 2017;49:728–30.CrossRef Savarino E, Chianca V, Bodini G, Albano D, Messina C, Tontini GE, et al. Gadolinium accumulation after contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging: which implications in patients with Crohn’s disease? Dig Liver Dis. 2017;49:728–30.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Kralik SF, Singhal KK, Frank MS, Ladd LM. Evaluation of gadolinium deposition in the brain after MR arthrography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2018;211:1063–7.CrossRef Kralik SF, Singhal KK, Frank MS, Ladd LM. Evaluation of gadolinium deposition in the brain after MR arthrography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2018;211:1063–7.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Wiener E, Woertler K, Weirich G, Rummeny EJ, Settles M. Contrast enhanced cartilage imaging: comparison of ionic and non-ionic contrast agents. Eur J Radiol. 2007;63:110–9.CrossRef Wiener E, Woertler K, Weirich G, Rummeny EJ, Settles M. Contrast enhanced cartilage imaging: comparison of ionic and non-ionic contrast agents. Eur J Radiol. 2007;63:110–9.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Fritz J, U-Thainual P, Ungi T, Flammang AJ, Fichtinger G, Iordachita II, et al. Augmented reality visualization with use of image overlay technology for MR imaging guided interventions: assessment of performance in cadaveric shoulder and hip arthrography at 1.5 T. Radiology. 2012;265:254–9.CrossRef Fritz J, U-Thainual P, Ungi T, Flammang AJ, Fichtinger G, Iordachita II, et al. Augmented reality visualization with use of image overlay technology for MR imaging guided interventions: assessment of performance in cadaveric shoulder and hip arthrography at 1.5 T. Radiology. 2012;265:254–9.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Nouha MR, Schweitzer ME, Ragattec RR. Contrast visibility for indirect MR arthrography with different protein contents and agent relaxivities at different field strengths: an in vitro model. Eur J Radiol. 2011;80:559–64.CrossRef Nouha MR, Schweitzer ME, Ragattec RR. Contrast visibility for indirect MR arthrography with different protein contents and agent relaxivities at different field strengths: an in vitro model. Eur J Radiol. 2011;80:559–64.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Magarelli N, Simone F, Amelia R, Leone A, Bosello S, D'Antona G, et al. MR imaging of atlantoaxial joint in early rheumatoid arthritis. Radiol Med. 2012;115:1111–20.CrossRef Magarelli N, Simone F, Amelia R, Leone A, Bosello S, D'Antona G, et al. MR imaging of atlantoaxial joint in early rheumatoid arthritis. Radiol Med. 2012;115:1111–20.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Potential use of a diluted high-relaxivity gadolinium-based intra-articular contrast agent for magnetic resonance arthrography: an in-vitro study
Authors
Carmelo Messina
Domenico Albano
Davide Orlandi
Vito Chianca
Angelo Corazza
Federica Ferrari
Salvatore Gitto
Luca Maria Sconfienza
Publication date
01-12-2019
Publisher
BioMed Central
Keyword
Arthrography
Published in
BMC Medical Imaging / Issue 1/2019
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2342
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12880-019-0387-4

Other articles of this Issue 1/2019

BMC Medical Imaging 1/2019 Go to the issue