Published in:
01-08-2020 | Arterial Diseases | ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Clinical effectiveness of an outpatient pathway for low-risk chest pain emergency department visits
Authors:
Besiana Liti, DO, Felix Krainski, MD, Andre Gabriel, MD, Brett Hiendlmeyr, MD, Akrivi Manola, MD, William Perucki, MD, Gene Pershwitz, MD, Ajay Kumar, MD, W. Lane Duvall, MD
Published in:
Journal of Nuclear Cardiology
|
Issue 4/2020
Login to get access
Abstract
Background
Studies suggest that patients who present with atypical chest pain and are low or low-intermediate risk can safely undergo a rapid rule-out for cardiac ischemia with serial ECGs and cardiac biomarkers followed by additional testing as needed. We sought to evaluate a novel Emergency Department (ED) protocol for patients to undergo their additional functional testing as an outpatient.
Methods
Patients presenting to the ED with atypical chest pain, normal ECG, and negative cardiac troponin felt to be low risk were referred for outpatient stress testing within 72 hours of presentation as part of a pilot program. We analyzed test characteristics, length of stay, and 30-day return visits to ED in the pilot group and compared results to a similar cohort assessed in the ED by a traditional chest pain observation protocol.
Results
A total of 156 patients were included over a 5-month period with 29.5% not returning for testing. There was a 70% reduction in length of stay for outpatient stress test protocol patients. All-cause and cardiac return visits to the ED were not significantly different between the outpatient cohort and the traditional chest pain unit group and were reduced by 47 and 75%, respectively, in patients who completed their outpatient testing. The provisional injection protocol resulted in a 81% reduction in radiation exposure when compared to traditional MPI stress protocols due to a greater utilization of exercise treadmill tests without imaging.
Conclusion
Outpatient stress testing is a reliable alternative to traditional chest pain observation with a significantly shorter length of stay, reduced healthcare costs, and improved radiation safety profile for patients when compared to traditional inpatient observation.