Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 5/2008

01-09-2008 | Original Article

Areola-Nipple Perception Threshold to Faradic Electricity: A New Measure of Sensibility of the Breasts

Authors: Arturo Prado, Patricio Andrades, Susana Benitez, Franciso Parada

Published in: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery | Issue 5/2008

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

We describe a new method to study the sensibility of the nipple-areola complex of the breast with faradic electricity delivered through an electromyographic device used to monitor peripheral nerve conduction.

Methods

The objective results of faradic pulses (2–50 mA per pulse) delivered to the nipple-areola complex of the breast through a Nihon-Kohden II machine (Evoked potential/Electromyographs, Nihon-Kohden Co., Japan) were evaluated in normal volunteers to get a basal measure that was defined by the patient as “a soft electric discharge.” The measures were recorded and their output discharges averaged (at least 5 to each complex).

Results

Twenty-eight volunteers with normal breasts, 28 patients with breast hypertrophy before and after breast reduction, and 28 patients before and after breast augmentation were studied. The faradic pulses were perceived from 1.5 to 3.5 mA in the areola and from 3 to 5.5 mA in the nipple in the control group and from 4.5 to 7.0 mA in the areola and from 6.5 to 9.5 mA in the nipple in the breast hypertrophy group with no significant changes before and after surgery. In the breast augmentation group the faradic pulses were very similar to the volunteers that had normal breasts, but 13 months after breast augmentation with silicone gel prosthesis, a difference was found because all the patients had a higher threshold and three cases had lost sensibility of the nipple-areola complex.

Conclusion

In normal breasts the areola had a lower threshold for faradic pulses compared to the nipple. Hypertrophic breasts had a higher threshold to the faradic stimulation than normal subjects in the pre- and postoperative period. Hypoplastic breasts before breast augmentation had a perception threshold similar to that of the normal volunteers but after breast augmentation this perception was much higher.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Dellon ES, Mourey R, Dellon AL (1992) Human pressure perception values for constant and moving one- and two-point discrimination. Plast Reconstr Surg 90:112–117PubMed Dellon ES, Mourey R, Dellon AL (1992) Human pressure perception values for constant and moving one- and two-point discrimination. Plast Reconstr Surg 90:112–117PubMed
2.
go back to reference Tairych GV, Kuzbari R, Rigel S, Todoroff BP, Schneider B, Deutinger M (1998) Normal cutaneous sensibility of the breast. Plast Reconstr Surg 102:701–704PubMedCrossRef Tairych GV, Kuzbari R, Rigel S, Todoroff BP, Schneider B, Deutinger M (1998) Normal cutaneous sensibility of the breast. Plast Reconstr Surg 102:701–704PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Terzis JK, Vincent MP, Wilkins LM, Rutledge K, Deane LM (1987) Breast sensibility: a neurophysiological appraisal in the normal breast. Ann Plast Surg 19:318–322PubMedCrossRef Terzis JK, Vincent MP, Wilkins LM, Rutledge K, Deane LM (1987) Breast sensibility: a neurophysiological appraisal in the normal breast. Ann Plast Surg 19:318–322PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Dellon ES, Crone S, Mourey R, Dellon AL (1993) Comparison of the Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments with the pressure specifying sensory device. Restor Neurol Neurosci 5:323–329 Dellon ES, Crone S, Mourey R, Dellon AL (1993) Comparison of the Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments with the pressure specifying sensory device. Restor Neurol Neurosci 5:323–329
5.
6.
go back to reference Mofid MM, Dellon AL, Elias JJ, Nahabedian MY (2002) Quantitation of breast sensibility following reduction mammaplasty: a comparison of inferior and medial pedicle techniques. Plast Reconstr Surg 109:2283–2288PubMedCrossRef Mofid MM, Dellon AL, Elias JJ, Nahabedian MY (2002) Quantitation of breast sensibility following reduction mammaplasty: a comparison of inferior and medial pedicle techniques. Plast Reconstr Surg 109:2283–2288PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Santanelli F, Paolini G, Bittarelli D, Nofroni I (2007) Computer-assisted evaluation of nipple-areola complex sensibility in macromastia and following superolateral pedicle reduction mammaplasty: a statistical analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg 119:1679–1683PubMedCrossRef Santanelli F, Paolini G, Bittarelli D, Nofroni I (2007) Computer-assisted evaluation of nipple-areola complex sensibility in macromastia and following superolateral pedicle reduction mammaplasty: a statistical analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg 119:1679–1683PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference DelVecchyo C, Caloca J Jr, Caloca J, Gomez-Jauregui J (2004) Evaluation of breast sensibility using dermatomal somatosensory evoked potentials. Plast Reconstr Surg 113:1975–1983PubMed DelVecchyo C, Caloca J Jr, Caloca J, Gomez-Jauregui J (2004) Evaluation of breast sensibility using dermatomal somatosensory evoked potentials. Plast Reconstr Surg 113:1975–1983PubMed
9.
go back to reference Farina MA, Newby BG, Alani HM (1980) Innervation of the nipple-areola complex. Plast Reconstr Surg 66:497–501PubMedCrossRef Farina MA, Newby BG, Alani HM (1980) Innervation of the nipple-areola complex. Plast Reconstr Surg 66:497–501PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Jaspars JJ, Posma AN, van Immerseel AA, Gittenberger-de Groot AC (1997) The cutaneous innervation of the female breast and nipple-areola complex: implications for surgery. Br J Plast Surg 50:249–259PubMedCrossRef Jaspars JJ, Posma AN, van Immerseel AA, Gittenberger-de Groot AC (1997) The cutaneous innervation of the female breast and nipple-areola complex: implications for surgery. Br J Plast Surg 50:249–259PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Sarhadi NS, Shaw Dunn J, Lee FD, Soutar DS (1996) An anatomical study of the nerve supply of the breast, including the nipple and areola. Br J Plast Surg 49:156–164PubMedCrossRef Sarhadi NS, Shaw Dunn J, Lee FD, Soutar DS (1996) An anatomical study of the nerve supply of the breast, including the nipple and areola. Br J Plast Surg 49:156–164PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Schlenz I, Kuzbari R, Gruber H, Holle J (2000) The sensitivity of the nipple-areola complex: an anatomic study. Plast Reconstr Surg 105:905–909PubMedCrossRef Schlenz I, Kuzbari R, Gruber H, Holle J (2000) The sensitivity of the nipple-areola complex: an anatomic study. Plast Reconstr Surg 105:905–909PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Freilinger G, Holle J, Sulzgruber SC (1978) Distribution of motor and sensory fibers in the intercostal nerves. Significance in reconstructive surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 62:240–244PubMedCrossRef Freilinger G, Holle J, Sulzgruber SC (1978) Distribution of motor and sensory fibers in the intercostal nerves. Significance in reconstructive surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 62:240–244PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Craig RD, Sykes PA (1970) Nipple sensitivity following reduction mammaplasty. Br J Plast Surg 23:165–172PubMedCrossRef Craig RD, Sykes PA (1970) Nipple sensitivity following reduction mammaplasty. Br J Plast Surg 23:165–172PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Dellon AL (2003) Invited discussion: sensibility of the breast following reduction mammaplasty. Ann Plast Surg 51:6–9PubMedCrossRef Dellon AL (2003) Invited discussion: sensibility of the breast following reduction mammaplasty. Ann Plast Surg 51:6–9PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Ferreira MC, Costa MP, Cunha MS, Sakae E, Fels KW (2003) Sensibility of the breast after reduction mammaplasty. Ann Plast Surg 51:1–5PubMedCrossRef Ferreira MC, Costa MP, Cunha MS, Sakae E, Fels KW (2003) Sensibility of the breast after reduction mammaplasty. Ann Plast Surg 51:1–5PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Godwin Y, Valassiadou K, Lewis S, Denley H (2004) Investigation into the possible cause of subjective decreased sensory perception in the nipple-areola complex of women with macromastia. Plast Reconstr Surg 113:1598–1606PubMedCrossRef Godwin Y, Valassiadou K, Lewis S, Denley H (2004) Investigation into the possible cause of subjective decreased sensory perception in the nipple-areola complex of women with macromastia. Plast Reconstr Surg 113:1598–1606PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Gonzalez F, Brown FE, Gold ME, Walton RL, Shafer B (1993) Preoperative and postoperative nipple-areola sensibility in patients undergoing reduction mammaplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 92:809–814. discussion 815–808PubMedCrossRef Gonzalez F, Brown FE, Gold ME, Walton RL, Shafer B (1993) Preoperative and postoperative nipple-areola sensibility in patients undergoing reduction mammaplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 92:809–814. discussion 815–808PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Greuse M, Hamdi M, DeMey A (2001) Breast sensitivity after vertical mammaplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 107:970–976PubMedCrossRef Greuse M, Hamdi M, DeMey A (2001) Breast sensitivity after vertical mammaplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 107:970–976PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Hamdi M, Blondeel P, Van de Sijpe K, Van Landuyt K, Monstrey S (2003) Evaluation of nipple-areola complex sensitivity after the latero-central glandular pedicle technique in breast reduction. Br J Plast Surg 56:360–364PubMedCrossRef Hamdi M, Blondeel P, Van de Sijpe K, Van Landuyt K, Monstrey S (2003) Evaluation of nipple-areola complex sensitivity after the latero-central glandular pedicle technique in breast reduction. Br J Plast Surg 56:360–364PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Hamdi M, Greuse M, De Mey A, Webster MH (2001) A prospective quantitative comparison of breast sensation after superior and inferior pedicle mammaplasty. Br J Plast Surg 54:39–42PubMedCrossRef Hamdi M, Greuse M, De Mey A, Webster MH (2001) A prospective quantitative comparison of breast sensation after superior and inferior pedicle mammaplasty. Br J Plast Surg 54:39–42PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Kuzbari R, Schlenz I (2007) Reduction mammaplasty and sensitivity of the nipple-areola complex: sensuality versus sexuality? Ann Plast Surg 58:3–11PubMedCrossRef Kuzbari R, Schlenz I (2007) Reduction mammaplasty and sensitivity of the nipple-areola complex: sensuality versus sexuality? Ann Plast Surg 58:3–11PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Schlenz I, Rigel S, Schemper M, Kuzbari R (2005) Alteration of nipple and areola sensitivity by reduction mammaplasty: a prospective comparison of five techniques. Plast Reconstr Surg 115:743–751. discussion 752–744PubMedCrossRef Schlenz I, Rigel S, Schemper M, Kuzbari R (2005) Alteration of nipple and areola sensitivity by reduction mammaplasty: a prospective comparison of five techniques. Plast Reconstr Surg 115:743–751. discussion 752–744PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Slezak S, Dellon AL (1993) Quantitation of sensibility in gigantomastia and alteration following reduction mammaplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 91:1265–1269PubMedCrossRef Slezak S, Dellon AL (1993) Quantitation of sensibility in gigantomastia and alteration following reduction mammaplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 91:1265–1269PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Wechselberger G, Stoss S, Schoeller T, Oehlbauer M, Piza-Katzer H (2001) An analysis of breast sensation following inferior pedicle mammaplasty and the effect of the volume of resected tissue. Aesthetic Plast Surg 25:443–446PubMedCrossRef Wechselberger G, Stoss S, Schoeller T, Oehlbauer M, Piza-Katzer H (2001) An analysis of breast sensation following inferior pedicle mammaplasty and the effect of the volume of resected tissue. Aesthetic Plast Surg 25:443–446PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Courtiss EH, Goldwyn RM (1976) Breast sensation before and after plastic surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 58:1–13PubMedCrossRef Courtiss EH, Goldwyn RM (1976) Breast sensation before and after plastic surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 58:1–13PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Banbury J, Yetman R, Lucas A, Papay F, Graves K, Zins JE (2004) Prospective analysis of the outcome of subpectoral breast augmentation: sensory changes, muscle function, and body image. Plast Reconstr Surg 113:701–707. discussion 708–711PubMedCrossRef Banbury J, Yetman R, Lucas A, Papay F, Graves K, Zins JE (2004) Prospective analysis of the outcome of subpectoral breast augmentation: sensory changes, muscle function, and body image. Plast Reconstr Surg 113:701–707. discussion 708–711PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Nahabedian MY (2006) Effect of augmentation mammaplasty on breast sensation: discussion. Plast Reconstr Surg 117:84–85CrossRef Nahabedian MY (2006) Effect of augmentation mammaplasty on breast sensation: discussion. Plast Reconstr Surg 117:84–85CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Okwueze MI, Spear ME, Zwyghuizen AM, Braun SA, Ajmal N, Nanney LB, Hagan KF, Wolfort SF, Shack RB (2006) Effect of augmentation mammaplasty on breast sensation. Plast Reconstr Surg 117:73–83. discussion 84–75PubMedCrossRef Okwueze MI, Spear ME, Zwyghuizen AM, Braun SA, Ajmal N, Nanney LB, Hagan KF, Wolfort SF, Shack RB (2006) Effect of augmentation mammaplasty on breast sensation. Plast Reconstr Surg 117:73–83. discussion 84–75PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Pitanguy I, Vaena M, Radwanski HN, Nunes D, Vargas AF (2007) Relative implant volume and sensibility alterations after breast augmentation. Aesthetic Plast Surg 31:238–243PubMedCrossRef Pitanguy I, Vaena M, Radwanski HN, Nunes D, Vargas AF (2007) Relative implant volume and sensibility alterations after breast augmentation. Aesthetic Plast Surg 31:238–243PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Areola-Nipple Perception Threshold to Faradic Electricity: A New Measure of Sensibility of the Breasts
Authors
Arturo Prado
Patricio Andrades
Susana Benitez
Franciso Parada
Publication date
01-09-2008
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery / Issue 5/2008
Print ISSN: 0364-216X
Electronic ISSN: 1432-5241
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-008-9148-4

Other articles of this Issue 5/2008

Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 5/2008 Go to the issue