Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Medical Research Methodology 1/2020

Open Access 01-12-2020 | Research article

Applying an intersectionality lens to the theoretical domains framework: a tool for thinking about how intersecting social identities and structures of power influence behaviour

Authors: Cole Etherington, Isabel Braganca Rodrigues, Lora Giangregorio, Ian D. Graham, Alison M. Hoens, Danielle Kasperavicius, Christine Kelly, Julia E. Moore, Matteo Ponzano, Justin Presseau, Kathryn M. Sibley, Sharon Straus

Published in: BMC Medical Research Methodology | Issue 1/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

A key component of the implementation process is identifying potential barriers and facilitators that need to be addressed. The Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) is one of the most commonly used frameworks for this purpose. When applying the TDF, it is critical to understand the context in which behaviours occur. Intersectionality, which accounts for the interface between social identity factors (e.g. age, gender) and structures of power (e.g. ageism, sexism), offers a novel approach to understanding how context shapes individual decision-making and behaviour. We aimed to develop a tool to be used alongside applications of the TDF to incorporate an intersectionality lens when identifying implementation barriers and enablers.

Methods

An interdisciplinary Framework Committee (n = 17) prioritized the TDF as one of three models, theories, and frameworks (MTFs) to enhance with an intersectional lens through a modified Delphi approach. In collaboration with the wider Framework Committee, a subgroup considered all 14 TDF domains and iteratively developed recommendations for incorporating intersectionality considerations within the TDF and its domains. An iterative approach aimed at building consensus was used to finalize recommendations.

Results

Consensus on how to apply an intersectionality lens to the TDF was achieved after 12 rounds of revision. Two overarching considerations for using the intersectionality alongside the TDF were developed by the group as well as two to four prompts for each TDF domain to guide interview topic guides. Considerations and prompts were designed to assist users to reflect on how individual identities and structures of power may play a role in barriers and facilitators to behaviour change and subsequent intervention implementation.

Conclusions

Through an expert-consensus approach, we developed a tool for applying an intersectionality lens alongside the TDF. Considering the role of intersecting social factors when identifying barriers and facilitators to implementing research evidence may result in more targeted and effective interventions that better reflect the realities of those involved.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Canadian Institutes of Health Research. Knowledge translation. 2016. Canadian Institutes of Health Research. Knowledge translation. 2016.
3.
go back to reference Brehaut JC, Eva KW. Building theories of knowledge translation interventions: use the entire menu of constructs. Implement Sci. 2012;7:114.CrossRef Brehaut JC, Eva KW. Building theories of knowledge translation interventions: use the entire menu of constructs. Implement Sci. 2012;7:114.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Squires JE, Graham I, Bashir K, Nadalin-Penno L, Lavis J, Francis J, et al. Understanding context: A concept analysis. J Adv Nurs. 2019;75(12):3448-70. Squires JE, Graham I, Bashir K, Nadalin-Penno L, Lavis J, Francis J, et al. Understanding context: A concept analysis. J Adv Nurs. 2019;75(12):3448-70.
7.
go back to reference Nilsen P, Bernhardsson S. Context matters in implementation science: a scoping review of determinant frameworks that describe contextual determinants for implementation outcomes. BMC Health Serv Res. 2019;19:1–21.CrossRef Nilsen P, Bernhardsson S. Context matters in implementation science: a scoping review of determinant frameworks that describe contextual determinants for implementation outcomes. BMC Health Serv Res. 2019;19:1–21.CrossRef
9.
10.
go back to reference Jordan-zachery JS. The Palgrave handbook of Intersectionality in public policy; 2019. Jordan-zachery JS. The Palgrave handbook of Intersectionality in public policy; 2019.
11.
go back to reference Mena E, Bolte G. Intersectionality-based quantitative health research and sex/gender sensitivity: a scoping review. Int J Equity Health. 2019;18:1–11.CrossRef Mena E, Bolte G. Intersectionality-based quantitative health research and sex/gender sensitivity: a scoping review. Int J Equity Health. 2019;18:1–11.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Hankivsky O, Cormier R. Intersectionality and public policy: some lessons from existing models. Polit Res Q. 2011;64:217–29.CrossRef Hankivsky O, Cormier R. Intersectionality and public policy: some lessons from existing models. Polit Res Q. 2011;64:217–29.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Crenshaw K. Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Rev. 1993;43:1241–99.CrossRef Crenshaw K. Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Rev. 1993;43:1241–99.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference McCall L. The complexity of intersectionality. J Women Cult Soc. 2005;30:1771–800.CrossRef McCall L. The complexity of intersectionality. J Women Cult Soc. 2005;30:1771–800.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Collins PH. Black feminist thought: knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment. New York: Routledge; 2000. Collins PH. Black feminist thought: knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment. New York: Routledge; 2000.
19.
go back to reference Arcaya MC, Arcaya AL, Subramanian SV. Inequalities in health: definitions, concepts, and theories. Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2015;38:261–71.PubMed Arcaya MC, Arcaya AL, Subramanian SV. Inequalities in health: definitions, concepts, and theories. Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2015;38:261–71.PubMed
25.
go back to reference Hankivsky O. Rethinking care ethics: on the promise and potential of an intersectional analysis. Am Polit Sci Rev. 2014;108:252–64.CrossRef Hankivsky O. Rethinking care ethics: on the promise and potential of an intersectional analysis. Am Polit Sci Rev. 2014;108:252–64.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Rice C, Harrison E, Friedman M. Doing justice to Intersectionality in research. Cult Stud Crit Methodol. 2019;19(6):1–31. Rice C, Harrison E, Friedman M. Doing justice to Intersectionality in research. Cult Stud Crit Methodol. 2019;19(6):1–31.
28.
go back to reference Marshall M, De Silva D, Cruickshank L, Shand J, Wei L, Anderson J. What we know about designing an effective improvement intervention (but too often fail to put into practice). BMJ Qual Saf. 2017;26:578–82.CrossRef Marshall M, De Silva D, Cruickshank L, Shand J, Wei L, Anderson J. What we know about designing an effective improvement intervention (but too often fail to put into practice). BMJ Qual Saf. 2017;26:578–82.CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Cane J, O’Connor D, Michie S. Validation of the theoretical domains framework for use in behaviour change and implementation research. Implement Sci. 2012;7:37.CrossRef Cane J, O’Connor D, Michie S. Validation of the theoretical domains framework for use in behaviour change and implementation research. Implement Sci. 2012;7:37.CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Graham ID, Logan J, Harrison MB, Straus SE, Tetroe J, Caswell W, et al. Lost in knowledge translation: time for a map? J Contin Educ Heal Prof. 2006;26:13–24.CrossRef Graham ID, Logan J, Harrison MB, Straus SE, Tetroe J, Caswell W, et al. Lost in knowledge translation: time for a map? J Contin Educ Heal Prof. 2006;26:13–24.CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Humphrey-Murto S, Varpio L, Wood TJ, Gonsalves C, Ufholz LA, Mascioli K, et al. The use of the Delphi and other consensus group methods in medical education research: a review. Acad Med. 2017;92:1491–8.CrossRef Humphrey-Murto S, Varpio L, Wood TJ, Gonsalves C, Ufholz LA, Mascioli K, et al. The use of the Delphi and other consensus group methods in medical education research: a review. Acad Med. 2017;92:1491–8.CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Damschroder LJ, Aron DC, Keith RE, Kirsh SR, Alexander JA, Lowery JC. Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implement Sci. 2009;4:1–15.CrossRef Damschroder LJ, Aron DC, Keith RE, Kirsh SR, Alexander JA, Lowery JC. Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implement Sci. 2009;4:1–15.CrossRef
38.
go back to reference Birken SA, Rohweder CL, Powell BJ, Shea CM, Scott J, Leeman J, et al. T-CaST: an implementation theory comparison and selection tool. Implement Sci. 2018;13:1–10. Birken SA, Rohweder CL, Powell BJ, Shea CM, Scott J, Leeman J, et al. T-CaST: an implementation theory comparison and selection tool. Implement Sci. 2018;13:1–10.
42.
go back to reference Flottorp SA, Oxman AD, Krause J, Musila NR, Wensing M, Godycki-Cwirko M, et al. A checklist for identifying determinants of practice: a systematic review and synthesis of frameworks and taxonomies of factors that prevent or enable improvements in healthcare professional practice. Implement Sci. 2013;8:8–35. Flottorp SA, Oxman AD, Krause J, Musila NR, Wensing M, Godycki-Cwirko M, et al. A checklist for identifying determinants of practice: a systematic review and synthesis of frameworks and taxonomies of factors that prevent or enable improvements in healthcare professional practice. Implement Sci. 2013;8:8–35.
43.
go back to reference Richardson M, Khouja CL, Sutcliffe K, Thomas J. Using the theoretical domains framework and the behavioural change wheel in an overarching synthesis of systematic reviews. BMJ Open. 2019;9:1–16.CrossRef Richardson M, Khouja CL, Sutcliffe K, Thomas J. Using the theoretical domains framework and the behavioural change wheel in an overarching synthesis of systematic reviews. BMJ Open. 2019;9:1–16.CrossRef
45.
go back to reference Nilsen P. Making sense of implementation theories, models and frameworks. Implement Sci. 2015;10:1–13.CrossRef Nilsen P. Making sense of implementation theories, models and frameworks. Implement Sci. 2015;10:1–13.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Applying an intersectionality lens to the theoretical domains framework: a tool for thinking about how intersecting social identities and structures of power influence behaviour
Authors
Cole Etherington
Isabel Braganca Rodrigues
Lora Giangregorio
Ian D. Graham
Alison M. Hoens
Danielle Kasperavicius
Christine Kelly
Julia E. Moore
Matteo Ponzano
Justin Presseau
Kathryn M. Sibley
Sharon Straus
Publication date
01-12-2020
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Medical Research Methodology / Issue 1/2020
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2288
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-020-01056-1

Other articles of this Issue 1/2020

BMC Medical Research Methodology 1/2020 Go to the issue