Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress 2023 EHA Congress 2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

A round-up of the ONWARDS phase 3 clinical trials evaluating the novel weekly insulin icodec in people with diabetes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
International Journal for Equity in Health
Published in: International Journal for Equity in Health 1/2019

Open Access 01-12-2019 | Review

Intersectionality-based quantitative health research and sex/gender sensitivity: a scoping review

Authors: Emily Mena, Gabriele Bolte, on behalf of the ADVANCE GENDER Study Group

Published in: International Journal for Equity in Health | Issue 1/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The implementation of a theoretical intersectionality framework into quantitative data analyses is gaining increasing interest in health research. The substantive foundation of intersectionality was established in the U.S., based on the claim of black feminists to broaden the scope of contemporary gender studies by considering the intersection between sex/gender and race/ethnicity more firmly. The aim of our scoping review with particular emphasis on sex/gender was to assess how intersectionality-informed studies in epidemiological research considered different social dimensions in their multivariable and multivariate analyses.

Methods

Following the PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR), we conducted a literature review in PubMed. Three distinct health-related fields were brought into focus: diabetes representing a frequent chronic disease, smoking as a wide-spread behavioural health determinant and physical activity as a central target for health promotion. Initially, we compared which and how different social dimensions were accounted for and how inter-categorical and intersectionality-informed analyses were conducted. Further, we assessed sex/gender sensitivity by comparing operationalisation of sex/gender, how sex/gender theories were used and which central theoretical sex/gender concepts were referred to when aiming at explanation of (intersectional) sex/gender differences.

Results

Our results suggest, that intersectionality-based analyses within the three selected health-related fields are mainly conducted in the U.S. and focused on the intersection between sex/gender and race/ethnicity by using them jointly as subgrouping variables and as parts of interaction terms in regression analyses. Income and education as proxies for social class as well as age are mainly used for adjustment in quantitative analyses. Other approaches for calculating interactions (i.a. synergy-index, CART-analysis) are an exception. Even though sex/gender was considered in every included study and Gender was the most frequent theoretical sex/gender concept referred to when theoretically explaining sex/gender differences, it was exclusively operationalised as binary and solution-linked sex/gender variables were hardly considered in quantitative analyses.

Conclusion

The systematic integration of solution-linked variables indicating modifiable aspects of sex/gender-related living conditions and disadvantages could improve sex/gender sensitivity as part of intersectionality-based quantitative data analysis in health research.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
Bauer GR. Incorporating intersectionality theory into population health research methodology: challenges and the potential to advance health equity. Soc Sci Med. 2014;110:10–7.PubMedCrossRef
2.
Dubrow JK. How can we account for intersectionality in quantitative analysis of survey data? Empirical illustration for Central and Eastern Europe. ASK Res Meth. 2008;17:85–100.
3.
Seng JS, Lopez WD, Sperlich M, Hamama L, Reed Meldrum CD. Marginalized identities, discrimination burden, and mental health: empirical exploration of an interpersonal-level approach to modeling intersectionality. Soc Sci Med. 2012;75(12):2437–45.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
4.
Veenstra G. Race, gender, class, and sexual orientation: intersecting axes of inequality and self-rated health in Canada. Int J Equity Health. 2011;10:3.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
5.
Bauer GR, Scheim AI. Advancing quantitative intersectionality research methods: Intracategorical and intercategorical approaches to shared and differential constructs. Soc Sci Med. 2019;226:260–2.PubMedCrossRef
6.
Lizotte DJ, Mahendran M, Churchill SM, Bauer GR. Math versus meaning in MAIHDA: a commentary on multilevel statistical models for quantitative intersectionality. Soc Sci Med. 2019;112500.(in press).
7.
Merlo J. Multilevel analytical approaches in social epidemiology: measures of health variation compared with traditional measures of association. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2003;57(8):550.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
8.
Evans CR. Modeling the intersectionality of processes in the social production of health inequalities. Soc Sci Med. 2019;226:249–53.PubMedCrossRef
9.
Evans CR, Erickson N. Intersectionality and depression in adolescence and early adulthood: a MAIHDA analysis of the national longitudinal study of adolescent to adult health, 1995-2008. Soc Sci Med. 2019;220:1–11.PubMedCrossRef
10.
Axelsson Fisk S, Mulinari S, Wemrell M, Leckie G, Perez Vicente R, Merlo J. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in Sweden: an intersectional multilevel analysis of individual heterogeneity and discriminatory accuracy. SSM - Population Health. 2018;4:334–46.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
11.
Lofters A, O’Campo P. Differences that matter. In: O’Campo P, Dunn JR, editors. Rethinking social epidemiology: towards a science of change. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands; 2012. p. 93–109.CrossRef
12.
Östlin P, Schrecker T, Sadana R, et al. Priorities for Research on Equity and Health: Towards an Equity-Focused Health Research Agenda. PLoS Med. 2011;8(11):e1001115.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
13.
Sen G, Östlin P. Gender equity in health: the shifting frontiers of evidence and action. New York: Routledge; 2010.
14.
Annandale E, Hunt K. Gender inequalities in health. Buckingham: Open University Press; 2000.
15.
Heise L, Greene ME, Opper N, Stavropoulou M, Harper C, Nascimento M, et al. Gender inequality and restrictive gender norms: framing the challenges to health. Lancet. 2019;393(10189):2440–54.PubMedCrossRef
16.
Shields SA. Gender: an Intersectionality perspective. Sex Roles. 2008;59(5):301–11.CrossRef
17.
Whittle KL, Inhorn MC. Rethinking difference: a feminist reframing of gender/race/class for the improvement of Women's Health Research. Int J Health Serv. 2001;31(1):147–65.PubMedCrossRef
18.
Hankivsky O. Women’s health, men’s health, and gender and health: implications of intersectionality. Soc Sci Med. 2012;74(11):1712–20.PubMedCrossRef
19.
Hammarström A, Johansson K, Annandale E, Ahlgren C, Aléx L, Christianson M, et al. Central gender theoretical concepts in health research: the state of the art. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2014;68(2):185.PubMedCrossRef
20.
Aldrich MC, Hidalgo B, Widome R, Briss P, Brownson RC, Teutsch SM. The role of epidemiology in evidence-based policy making: a case study of tobacco use in youth. Ann Epidemiol. 2015;25(5):360–5.PubMedCrossRef
21.
Pöge K, Rommel A, Mena E, Holmberg C, Saß A-C, Bolte G. AdvanceGender – joint project for sex/gender-sensitive and intersectional research and health reporting [in German]. Bundesgesundheitsbl Gesundheitsforsch Gesundheitsschutz. 2019;62(1):102–7.CrossRef
22.
McCall L. The complexity of intersectionality. Signs J Women Cult Soc. 2005;30(31):1771–802.CrossRef
23.
Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, et al. PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): checklist and explanation. Ann Intern Med. 2018;169(7):467–73.PubMedCrossRef
24.
25.
O'Neill J, Tabish H, Welch V, et al. Applying an equity lens to interventions: using PROGRESS ensures consideration of socially stratifying factors to illuminate inequities in health. J Clin Epidemiol. 2014;67(1):56–64.PubMedCrossRef
26.
Johnson JL, Greaves L, Repta R. Better science with sex and gender: a primer for health research. Women’s Health Research Network Vancouver: Vancouver; 2007.
27.
Pelletier R, Ditto B, Pilote L. A composite measure of gender and its association with risk factors in patients with premature acute coronary syndrome. Psychosom Med. 2015;77(5):517–26.PubMedCrossRef
28.
Bauer GR, Scheim AI. Methods for analytic intercategorical intersectionality in quantitative research: discrimination as a mediator of health inequalities. Soc Sci Med. 2019;226:236–45.PubMedCrossRef
29.
Krieger N. Racial and gender discrimination: risk factors for high blood pressure? Soc Sci Med. 1990;30(12):1273–81.PubMedCrossRef
30.
31.
Bowleg L. The problem with the phrase women and minorities: Intersectionality—an important theoretical framework for public health. Am J Public Health. 2012;102(7):1267–73.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
32.
O’Campo P, Dunn JR. Introduction. In: O’Campo P, Dunn JR, editors. Rethinking social Epidemioloy: towards a science of change. Dodrecht: Springer Netherlands; 2012. p. 93–109.CrossRef
33.
34.
Bolte G, Lahn U. Gender in public health research on health inequalities: potentials and limitations of an intersectionality approach [in German]. Gender. 2015;2:51–67.CrossRef
35.
36.
37.
38.
Crenshaw KW. Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. In: Mykitiuk R, Fineman MA, editors. The public nature of private violence. New York: Routledge; 1994/2005. p. 93–118.
39.
Harawa NT, Ford CL. The foundation of modern racial categories and implications for research on black/white disparities in health. Ethn Dis. 2009;19(2):209–17.PubMed
40.
Simon P. Collecting ethnic statistics in Europe: a review. Ethn Racial Stud. 2012;35(8):1366–91.CrossRef
41.
42.
King D. Multiple jeopardy, multiple consciousness: the context of a black feminist ideology. Signs. 1988;14(1):42–72.CrossRef
43.
Purdie-Vaughns V, Eibach RP. Intersectional invisibility: the distinctive advantages and disadvantages of multiple subordinate-group identities. Sex Roles. 2008;59(5):377–91.CrossRef
44.
Lemon SC, Roy J, Clark MA, Friedmann PD, Rakowski W. Classification and regression tree analysis in public health: methodological review and comparison with logistic regression. Ann Behav Med. 2003;26(3):172–81.PubMedCrossRef
45.
Bauer GR, Braimoh J, Scheim AI, Dharma C. Transgender-inclusive measures of sex/gender for population surveys: mixed-methods evaluation and recommendations. PLoS One. 2017;12(5):e0178043.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
46.
Tate CC, Ledbetter JN, Youssef CP. A two-question method for assessing gender categories in the social and medical sciences. J Sex Res. 2013;50(8):767–76.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Intersectionality-based quantitative health research and sex/gender sensitivity: a scoping review
Authors
Emily Mena
Gabriele Bolte
on behalf of the ADVANCE GENDER Study Group
Publication date
01-12-2019
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
International Journal for Equity in Health / Issue 1/2019
Electronic ISSN: 1475-9276
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-019-1098-8

Other articles of this Issue 1/2019

International Journal for Equity in Health 1/2019 Go to the issue

Research

Can social network analysis help to include marginalised young women in structural support programmes in Botswana? A mixed methods study

Research

Risky sexual behaviour and contraceptive use in contexts of displacement: insights from a cross-sectional survey of female adolescent refugees in Ghana

Research

Gender variations in the relationship between social capital and mental health outcomes among the Indigenous populations of Canada

Research

Long-term out of pocket expenditure of people with cancer: comparing health service cost and use for indigenous and non-indigenous people with cancer in Australia

Research

Widespread and widely widening? Examining absolute socioeconomic health inequalities in northern Sweden across twelve health indicators

Review

Languishing in the crossroad? A scoping review of intersectional inequalities in mental health