Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Reproductive Health 1/2021

Open Access 01-12-2021 | Anxiety | Commentary

A conceptual re-evaluation of reproductive coercion: centring intent, fear and control

Authors: Laura Tarzia, Kelsey Hegarty

Published in: Reproductive Health | Issue 1/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Reproductive coercion and abuse (RCA) is a hidden form of violence against women. It includes behaviours intended to control or dictate a woman’s reproductive autonomy, for the purpose of either preventing or promoting pregnancy.

Main text

In this commentary, we argue that there is a lack of conceptual clarity around RCA that is a barrier to developing a robust evidence base. Furthermore, we suggest that there is a poor understanding of the way that RCA intersects with other types of violence (intimate partner violence; sexual violence) and—as a result—inconsistent definition and measurement in research and healthcare practice. To address this, we propose a new way of understanding RCA that centres perpetrator intent and the presence of fear and/or control. Recommendations for future research are also discussed.

Conclusion

We suggest that IPV and SV are the mechanisms through which RCA is perpetrated. In other words, RCA cannot exist without some other form of co-occurring violence in a relationship. This has important implications for research, policy and healthcare practice including for screening and identification of women in reproductive healthcare settings.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Miller E, Decker M, McCauley H, Tancredi D, Levenson R, Waldman J, et al. Pregnancy coercion, intimate partner violence and unintended pregnancy. Contraception. 2010;81(4):316–22.CrossRef Miller E, Decker M, McCauley H, Tancredi D, Levenson R, Waldman J, et al. Pregnancy coercion, intimate partner violence and unintended pregnancy. Contraception. 2010;81(4):316–22.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Grace KT, Anderson JC. Reproductive coercion: a systematic review. TVA. 2018;19(4):371–90.PubMed Grace KT, Anderson JC. Reproductive coercion: a systematic review. TVA. 2018;19(4):371–90.PubMed
3.
go back to reference Silverman J, Raj A. Intimate partner violence and reproductive coercion: global barriers to women’s reproductive control. PLoS Med. 2014;11(9):e1001723.CrossRef Silverman J, Raj A. Intimate partner violence and reproductive coercion: global barriers to women’s reproductive control. PLoS Med. 2014;11(9):e1001723.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Clark LE, Allen RH, Goyal V, Raker C, Gottlieb AS. Reproductive coercion and co-occurring intimate partner violence in obstetrics and gynecology patients. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014;210(1):42.e1–8.PubMed Clark LE, Allen RH, Goyal V, Raker C, Gottlieb AS. Reproductive coercion and co-occurring intimate partner violence in obstetrics and gynecology patients. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014;210(1):42.e1–8.PubMed
5.
go back to reference Northridge JL, Silver EJ, Talib HJ, Coupey SM. Reproductive coercion in high school-aged girls: associations with reproductive health risk and intimate partner violence. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2017;30(6):603–8.CrossRef Northridge JL, Silver EJ, Talib HJ, Coupey SM. Reproductive coercion in high school-aged girls: associations with reproductive health risk and intimate partner violence. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2017;30(6):603–8.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Samankasikorn W, Alhusen J, Yan G, Schminkey D, Bullock L. Relationships of reproductive coercion and intimate partner violence to unintended pregnancy. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2018;48(1):50–8.CrossRef Samankasikorn W, Alhusen J, Yan G, Schminkey D, Bullock L. Relationships of reproductive coercion and intimate partner violence to unintended pregnancy. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2018;48(1):50–8.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Rowlands S, Walker S. Reproductive control by others: means, perpetrators and effects. BMJ Sex Reprod Health. 2019;45:61–7.CrossRef Rowlands S, Walker S. Reproductive control by others: means, perpetrators and effects. BMJ Sex Reprod Health. 2019;45:61–7.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference McCauley H, Falb K, Streich-Tilles T, Kpebo D, Gupta J. Mental health impacts of reproductive coercion among women in Cote d’Ivoire. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2014;127(1):55–9.CrossRef McCauley H, Falb K, Streich-Tilles T, Kpebo D, Gupta J. Mental health impacts of reproductive coercion among women in Cote d’Ivoire. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2014;127(1):55–9.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Gee R, Mitra N, Wan F, Chavkin D, Long J. Power over parity: intimate partner violence and issues of fertility control. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009;201(2):148.e1-e7.CrossRef Gee R, Mitra N, Wan F, Chavkin D, Long J. Power over parity: intimate partner violence and issues of fertility control. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009;201(2):148.e1-e7.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Katz J, Poleshuck E, Beach B, Olin R. Reproductive coercion by male sexual partners: associations with partner violence and college women’s sexual health. J Interpers Violence. 2017;32(21):3301–20.CrossRef Katz J, Poleshuck E, Beach B, Olin R. Reproductive coercion by male sexual partners: associations with partner violence and college women’s sexual health. J Interpers Violence. 2017;32(21):3301–20.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Kazmerski T, McCauley H, Jones K, Borrero S, Silverman J, Decker M, et al. Use of reproductive and sexual health services among female family planning clinic clients exposed to partner violence and reproductive coercion. Matern Child Health J. 2015;19(7):1490–6.CrossRef Kazmerski T, McCauley H, Jones K, Borrero S, Silverman J, Decker M, et al. Use of reproductive and sexual health services among female family planning clinic clients exposed to partner violence and reproductive coercion. Matern Child Health J. 2015;19(7):1490–6.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Grace KT, Fleming C. A systematic review of reproductive coercion in international settings. World Med Health Policy. 2016;8(4):382–408.CrossRef Grace KT, Fleming C. A systematic review of reproductive coercion in international settings. World Med Health Policy. 2016;8(4):382–408.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Fay K, Yee L. Reproductive coercion and women’s health. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2018;63:517–25.CrossRef Fay K, Yee L. Reproductive coercion and women’s health. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2018;63:517–25.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Swan L, Mennicke A, Kim Y. Reproductive coercion and interpersonal violence victimization experiences among college students. J Interpers Violence. 2020;Online first:1–23. Swan L, Mennicke A, Kim Y. Reproductive coercion and interpersonal violence victimization experiences among college students. J Interpers Violence. 2020;Online first:1–23.
15.
go back to reference Grace KT, Perrin N, Clough A, Miller E, Glass N. Correlates of reproductive coercion among college women in abusive relationships: baseline data from the college safety study. J Am Coll Health. 2020;Online first. Grace KT, Perrin N, Clough A, Miller E, Glass N. Correlates of reproductive coercion among college women in abusive relationships: baseline data from the college safety study. J Am Coll Health. 2020;Online first.
16.
go back to reference Tarzia L, Srinivasan S, Marino J, Hegarty K. Exploring the gray areas between “stealthing” and reproductive coercion and abuse. Women Health. 2020;60(10):1174–84.CrossRef Tarzia L, Srinivasan S, Marino J, Hegarty K. Exploring the gray areas between “stealthing” and reproductive coercion and abuse. Women Health. 2020;60(10):1174–84.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Tarzia L, Wellington M, Marino J, Hegarty K. “A huge, hidden problem”: Australian health practitioners’ views and understandings of reproductive coercion. Qual Health Res. 2018;29(10):1395–407.CrossRef Tarzia L, Wellington M, Marino J, Hegarty K. “A huge, hidden problem”: Australian health practitioners’ views and understandings of reproductive coercion. Qual Health Res. 2018;29(10):1395–407.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Tarzia L, Wellington M, Marino J, Hegarty K. How do health practitioners in a large Australian public hospital identify and respond to reproductive abuse? A qualitative study. Aust N Z J Public Health. 2019;43(5):457–63.CrossRef Tarzia L, Wellington M, Marino J, Hegarty K. How do health practitioners in a large Australian public hospital identify and respond to reproductive abuse? A qualitative study. Aust N Z J Public Health. 2019;43(5):457–63.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Srinivasan S, Marino J, Hegarty K, Tarzia L. Women’s expectations of healthcare providers in the context of reproductive abuse in Australia. Cult Health Sex. 2019;22(5):489–503.CrossRef Srinivasan S, Marino J, Hegarty K, Tarzia L. Women’s expectations of healthcare providers in the context of reproductive abuse in Australia. Cult Health Sex. 2019;22(5):489–503.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Douglas H, Sheeran N, Tarzia L. Reproductive coercion and legal recognition: views of domestic violence support workers and lawyers. Int J Crime Justice Soc Democr. 2020;Online first. Douglas H, Sheeran N, Tarzia L. Reproductive coercion and legal recognition: views of domestic violence support workers and lawyers. Int J Crime Justice Soc Democr. 2020;Online first.
21.
go back to reference Tarzia L, Douglas H, Sheeran N. Reproductive coercion and abuse against women from minority ethnic backgrounds: views of service providers in Australia. Cult Health Sex. 2021;Online first. Tarzia L, Douglas H, Sheeran N. Reproductive coercion and abuse against women from minority ethnic backgrounds: views of service providers in Australia. Cult Health Sex. 2021;Online first.
22.
go back to reference Dejoy G. State reproductive coercion as structural violence. Columbia Soc Work Rev. 2019;17(1):36–53. Dejoy G. State reproductive coercion as structural violence. Columbia Soc Work Rev. 2019;17(1):36–53.
23.
go back to reference Hayes P. Reproductive coercion and the Australian state: a new chapter? Aust Community Psychol. 2016;28(1):90–100. Hayes P. Reproductive coercion and the Australian state: a new chapter? Aust Community Psychol. 2016;28(1):90–100.
24.
go back to reference Park J, Nordstrom S, Weber K, Irwin T. Reproductive coercion: uncloaking an imbalance of social power. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;214(1):74–8.CrossRef Park J, Nordstrom S, Weber K, Irwin T. Reproductive coercion: uncloaking an imbalance of social power. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;214(1):74–8.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Anderson S. Coercion. In: Zalta E, editor. The stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Winter 2017 edition. Online edition 2017. Anderson S. Coercion. In: Zalta E, editor. The stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Winter 2017 edition. Online edition 2017.
26.
go back to reference Gilmore L, Malcolm L. “Best for everyone concerned” or “Only as a last resort”? VIews of Australian doctors about sterilisation of men and women with intellectual disability. J Intellect Dev Disabil. 2014;39(2):177–87.CrossRef Gilmore L, Malcolm L. “Best for everyone concerned” or “Only as a last resort”? VIews of Australian doctors about sterilisation of men and women with intellectual disability. J Intellect Dev Disabil. 2014;39(2):177–87.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Steele L. Disability, abnormality and criminal law: sterilisation as lawful and “good” violence. Griffith Law Rev. 2014;23(3):467–97.CrossRef Steele L. Disability, abnormality and criminal law: sterilisation as lawful and “good” violence. Griffith Law Rev. 2014;23(3):467–97.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Elliott L. Victims of violence: the forced sterilisation of women and girls with disabilities in Australia. Laws. 2017;6(3):8.CrossRef Elliott L. Victims of violence: the forced sterilisation of women and girls with disabilities in Australia. Laws. 2017;6(3):8.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Weaver H. The colonial context of violence: reflections on violence in the lives of native American Women. J Interpers Violence. 2009;24(9):1552–63.CrossRef Weaver H. The colonial context of violence: reflections on violence in the lives of native American Women. J Interpers Violence. 2009;24(9):1552–63.CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Stote K. The coercive sterilization of aboriginal women in Canada. Am Indian Cult Res J. 2012;36(3):117–50.CrossRef Stote K. The coercive sterilization of aboriginal women in Canada. Am Indian Cult Res J. 2012;36(3):117–50.CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Takai A. Rape and forced pregnancy as genocide before the Bangladesh Tribunal. Temple Int Comp Law J. 2011;25:393–422. Takai A. Rape and forced pregnancy as genocide before the Bangladesh Tribunal. Temple Int Comp Law J. 2011;25:393–422.
32.
go back to reference Sifris R. The involuntary sterilisation of marginalised women: power, discrimination, and intersectionality. Griffith Law Rev. 2016;25(1):45–70.CrossRef Sifris R. The involuntary sterilisation of marginalised women: power, discrimination, and intersectionality. Griffith Law Rev. 2016;25(1):45–70.CrossRef
33.
go back to reference World Health Organization. Global and regional estimates of violence against women: prevalence and health effects of intimate partner violence and non-partner sexual violence. Geneva: WHO; 2013. World Health Organization. Global and regional estimates of violence against women: prevalence and health effects of intimate partner violence and non-partner sexual violence. Geneva: WHO; 2013.
34.
go back to reference Grace KT, Alexander K, Jeffers N, Miller E, Decker M, Campbell J, et al. Experiences of reproductive coercion among latina women and strategies for minimizing harm: “The Path Makes Us Strong”. J Midwifery Women’s Health. 2020;65(2):248–56.CrossRef Grace KT, Alexander K, Jeffers N, Miller E, Decker M, Campbell J, et al. Experiences of reproductive coercion among latina women and strategies for minimizing harm: “The Path Makes Us Strong”. J Midwifery Women’s Health. 2020;65(2):248–56.CrossRef
35.
go back to reference Cusack C. Comparative sexology: nonconsensual insemination in the United States and the European Union. Sexologies. 2014;23:e19–23.CrossRef Cusack C. Comparative sexology: nonconsensual insemination in the United States and the European Union. Sexologies. 2014;23:e19–23.CrossRef
36.
go back to reference Black MC, Basile KC, Breiding MJ, Smith S, Walters ML, Merrick MT, et al. The National Intimate Partner and sexual violence survey: 2010 summary report. Atlanta: National Center for Injury Prevention and Control Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2010. Black MC, Basile KC, Breiding MJ, Smith S, Walters ML, Merrick MT, et al. The National Intimate Partner and sexual violence survey: 2010 summary report. Atlanta: National Center for Injury Prevention and Control Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2010.
37.
go back to reference Davis K. “Stealthing”: factors associated with young men’s nonconsensual condom removal. Health Psychol. 2019;38:997–1000.CrossRef Davis K. “Stealthing”: factors associated with young men’s nonconsensual condom removal. Health Psychol. 2019;38:997–1000.CrossRef
38.
go back to reference Brodsky A. “Rape-adjacent”: imagining legal responses to nonconsensual condom removal. Columbia J Gend Law. 2017;32(2):183–210. Brodsky A. “Rape-adjacent”: imagining legal responses to nonconsensual condom removal. Columbia J Gend Law. 2017;32(2):183–210.
39.
go back to reference Rushwan H. Female genital mutilation (FGM) management during pregnancy, childbirth and the postpartum period. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2000;70(1):99–104.CrossRef Rushwan H. Female genital mutilation (FGM) management during pregnancy, childbirth and the postpartum period. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2000;70(1):99–104.CrossRef
40.
go back to reference Salihu H, August E, Salemi J, Weldeselasse H, Sarro Y, Alio A. The association between female genital mutilation and intimate partner violence. BJOG. 2012;119(13):1597–605.CrossRef Salihu H, August E, Salemi J, Weldeselasse H, Sarro Y, Alio A. The association between female genital mutilation and intimate partner violence. BJOG. 2012;119(13):1597–605.CrossRef
41.
go back to reference Berg R, Denison E. A tradition in transition: factors perpetuating and hindering the continuance of female genital mutilation/cutting (FGM/C) summarized in a systematic review. Health Care Women Int. 2013;34(10):837–59.CrossRef Berg R, Denison E. A tradition in transition: factors perpetuating and hindering the continuance of female genital mutilation/cutting (FGM/C) summarized in a systematic review. Health Care Women Int. 2013;34(10):837–59.CrossRef
42.
go back to reference Basile KC, Smith S, Liu Y, Miller E, Kresnow M. Prevalence of intimate partner reproductive coercion in the United States: racial and ethnic differences. J Interpers Violence. 2019;Online first. Basile KC, Smith S, Liu Y, Miller E, Kresnow M. Prevalence of intimate partner reproductive coercion in the United States: racial and ethnic differences. J Interpers Violence. 2019;Online first.
43.
go back to reference McCauley H, Silverman J, Jones K, Tancredi D, Decker MR, McCormick M, et al. Psychometric properties and refinement of the Reproductive Coercion Scale. Contraception. 2017;95(3):292–8.CrossRef McCauley H, Silverman J, Jones K, Tancredi D, Decker MR, McCormick M, et al. Psychometric properties and refinement of the Reproductive Coercion Scale. Contraception. 2017;95(3):292–8.CrossRef
44.
go back to reference de Bocanegra H, Rostovtseva D, Khera S, Godhwani N. Birth control sabotage and forced sex: experiences reported by women in domestic violence shelters. Violence Against Women. 2010;16(5):601–12.CrossRef de Bocanegra H, Rostovtseva D, Khera S, Godhwani N. Birth control sabotage and forced sex: experiences reported by women in domestic violence shelters. Violence Against Women. 2010;16(5):601–12.CrossRef
45.
go back to reference Buchanan F, Humphreys C. Coercive control during pregnancy, birthing and postpartum: women’s experiences and perspectives on health practitioners’ responses. J Fam Violence. 2020;36:325–35.CrossRef Buchanan F, Humphreys C. Coercive control during pregnancy, birthing and postpartum: women’s experiences and perspectives on health practitioners’ responses. J Fam Violence. 2020;36:325–35.CrossRef
46.
go back to reference World Health Organization. Responding to intimate partner violence and sexual violence against women: WHO clinical and policy guidelines. Geneva: WHO; 2013. World Health Organization. Responding to intimate partner violence and sexual violence against women: WHO clinical and policy guidelines. Geneva: WHO; 2013.
Metadata
Title
A conceptual re-evaluation of reproductive coercion: centring intent, fear and control
Authors
Laura Tarzia
Kelsey Hegarty
Publication date
01-12-2021
Publisher
BioMed Central
Keyword
Anxiety
Published in
Reproductive Health / Issue 1/2021
Electronic ISSN: 1742-4755
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-021-01143-6

Other articles of this Issue 1/2021

Reproductive Health 1/2021 Go to the issue