Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Reproductive Health 1/2021

Open Access 01-12-2021 | Research

Perceptions of family, community and religious leaders and acceptability for minimal invasive tissue sampling to identify the cause of death in under-five deaths and stillbirths in North India: a qualitative study

Authors: Manoja Kumar Das, Narendra Kumar Arora, Gurkirat Kaur, Prikanksha Malik, Mahisha Kumari, Shipra Joshi, Reeta Rasaily, Harish Chellani, Harsha Gaikwad, Pradeep Debata, K. R. Meena

Published in: Reproductive Health | Issue 1/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Minimal invasive tissue sampling (MITS) has emerged as a suitable alternative to complete diagnostic autopsy (CDA) for determination of the cause of death (CoD), due to feasibility and acceptability issues. A formative research was conducted to document the perceptions of parents, community and religious leaders on acceptability of MITS.

Methods

This qualitative study was conducted at and around the Safdarjung Hospital, Delhi, India. Participants for in-depth interview included the parents who had either child or neonatal death or stillbirth and the key community and religious representatives. The focus group discussions (FGDs) involved community members. Process of obtaining consent for MITS was observed. Data were analyzed inductively manually for emerging themes and codes.

Results

A total of 104 interviews (parents of deceased children, neonates or stillbirths, n = 93; community members, n = 8 and religious leaders, n = 7), 8 FGDs (n = 72) were conducted and process of obtaining consent for MITS (n = 27) was observed. The participants were positive and expressed willingness to accept MITS. The key determinants for acceptance of MITS were: (1) understanding and willingness to know the cause of death or stillbirth, (2) experience of the healthcare received and trust, (3) the religious and sociocultural norms. Parents and community favored for MITS over CDA when needed, especially where in cases with past stillbirths and child deaths. The experience of treatment, attitude and communication from healthcare providers emerged as important for consent. The decision making process was collective involving the elders and family. No religious leader was against the procedure, as both, the respect for the deceased and need for medical care were satisfied.

Conclusions

Largely, MITS appeared to be acceptable for identifying the causes of child deaths and stillbirths, if the parents and family are counseled appropriately considering the sociocultural and religious aspects. They perceived the quality of care, attitude and communication by the healthcare providers as critical factors for acceptance of MITS.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
2.
go back to reference Lawn JE, Blencowe H, Waiswa P, Amouzou A, Mathers C, Hogan D, et al. Stillbirths: rates, risk factors, and acceleration towards 2030. Lancet Lond Engl. 2016;387(10018):587–603.CrossRef Lawn JE, Blencowe H, Waiswa P, Amouzou A, Mathers C, Hogan D, et al. Stillbirths: rates, risk factors, and acceleration towards 2030. Lancet Lond Engl. 2016;387(10018):587–603.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Saleem S, Tikmani SS, McClure EM, Moore JL, Azam SI, Dhaded SM, et al. Trends and determinants of stillbirth in developing countries: results from the Global Network’s Population-Based Birth Registry. Reprod Health. 2018;15(Suppl 1):100.CrossRef Saleem S, Tikmani SS, McClure EM, Moore JL, Azam SI, Dhaded SM, et al. Trends and determinants of stillbirth in developing countries: results from the Global Network’s Population-Based Birth Registry. Reprod Health. 2018;15(Suppl 1):100.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Blencowe H, Cousens S, Jassir FB, Say L, Chou D, Mathers C, et al. National, regional, and worldwide estimates of stillbirth rates in 2015, with trends from 2000: a systematic analysis. Lancet Glob Health. 2016;4(2):e98-108.CrossRef Blencowe H, Cousens S, Jassir FB, Say L, Chou D, Mathers C, et al. National, regional, and worldwide estimates of stillbirth rates in 2015, with trends from 2000: a systematic analysis. Lancet Glob Health. 2016;4(2):e98-108.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Mathers CD, Fat DM, Inoue M, Rao C, Lopez AD. Counting the dead and what they died from: an assessment of the global status of cause of death data. Bull World Health Organ. 2005;83(3):171–7.PubMedPubMedCentral Mathers CD, Fat DM, Inoue M, Rao C, Lopez AD. Counting the dead and what they died from: an assessment of the global status of cause of death data. Bull World Health Organ. 2005;83(3):171–7.PubMedPubMedCentral
8.
go back to reference Deshmukh V, Lahariya C, Krishnamurthy S, Das M, Pandey R, Arora N. Taken to health care provider or not, under-five children die of preventable causes: findings from cross-sectional survey and social autopsy in Rural India. Indian J Community Med. 2016;41(2):108.CrossRef Deshmukh V, Lahariya C, Krishnamurthy S, Das M, Pandey R, Arora N. Taken to health care provider or not, under-five children die of preventable causes: findings from cross-sectional survey and social autopsy in Rural India. Indian J Community Med. 2016;41(2):108.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Gupta N, Bharti B, Singhi S, Kumar P, Thakur JS. Errors in filling WHO death certificate in children: lessons from 1251 death certificates. J Trop Pediatr. 2014;60(1):74–8.CrossRef Gupta N, Bharti B, Singhi S, Kumar P, Thakur JS. Errors in filling WHO death certificate in children: lessons from 1251 death certificates. J Trop Pediatr. 2014;60(1):74–8.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Lewis C, Hill M, Arthurs O, Hutchinson C, Chitty L, Sebire N. Factors affecting uptake of postmortem examination in the prenatal, perinatal and paediatric setting. BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 2018;125(2):172–81.CrossRef Lewis C, Hill M, Arthurs O, Hutchinson C, Chitty L, Sebire N. Factors affecting uptake of postmortem examination in the prenatal, perinatal and paediatric setting. BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 2018;125(2):172–81.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Lishimpi K, Chintu C, Lucas S, Mudenda V, Kaluwaji J, Story A, et al. Necropsies in African children: consent dilemmas for parents and guardians. Arch Dis Child. 2001;84(6):463–7.CrossRef Lishimpi K, Chintu C, Lucas S, Mudenda V, Kaluwaji J, Story A, et al. Necropsies in African children: consent dilemmas for parents and guardians. Arch Dis Child. 2001;84(6):463–7.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Ugiagbe EE, Osifo OD. Postmortem examinations on deceased neonates: a rarely utilized procedure in an African referral center. Pediatr Dev Pathol. 2012;15(1):1–4.CrossRef Ugiagbe EE, Osifo OD. Postmortem examinations on deceased neonates: a rarely utilized procedure in an African referral center. Pediatr Dev Pathol. 2012;15(1):1–4.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Fligner CL, Murray J, Roberts DJ. Synergism of verbal autopsy and diagnostic pathology autopsy for improved accuracy of mortality data. Popul Health Metr. 2011;1(9):25.CrossRef Fligner CL, Murray J, Roberts DJ. Synergism of verbal autopsy and diagnostic pathology autopsy for improved accuracy of mortality data. Popul Health Metr. 2011;1(9):25.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Turner GDH, Bunthi C, Wonodi CB, Morpeth SC, Molyneux CS, Zaki SR, et al. The role of postmortem studies in pneumonia etiology research. Clin Infect Dis. 2012;54(Suppl_2):165–71.CrossRef Turner GDH, Bunthi C, Wonodi CB, Morpeth SC, Molyneux CS, Zaki SR, et al. The role of postmortem studies in pneumonia etiology research. Clin Infect Dis. 2012;54(Suppl_2):165–71.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Soleman N, Chandramohan D, Shibuya K. Verbal autopsy: current practices and challenges. Bull World Health Organ. 2006;84(3):239–45.CrossRef Soleman N, Chandramohan D, Shibuya K. Verbal autopsy: current practices and challenges. Bull World Health Organ. 2006;84(3):239–45.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference King G, Lu Y. Verbal autopsy methods with multiple causes of death. Stat Sci. 2008;23(1):78–91.CrossRef King G, Lu Y. Verbal autopsy methods with multiple causes of death. Stat Sci. 2008;23(1):78–91.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Thomas L-M, D’Ambruoso L, Balabanova D. Verbal autopsy in health policy and systems: a literature review. BMJ Glob Health. 2018;3(2): e000639.CrossRef Thomas L-M, D’Ambruoso L, Balabanova D. Verbal autopsy in health policy and systems: a literature review. BMJ Glob Health. 2018;3(2): e000639.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Bassat Q, Ordi J, Vila J, Ismail MR, Carrilho C, Lacerda M, et al. Development of a post-mortem procedure to reduce the uncertainty regarding causes of death in developing countries. Lancet Glob Health. 2013;1(3):e125–6.CrossRef Bassat Q, Ordi J, Vila J, Ismail MR, Carrilho C, Lacerda M, et al. Development of a post-mortem procedure to reduce the uncertainty regarding causes of death in developing countries. Lancet Glob Health. 2013;1(3):e125–6.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Castillo P, Ussene E, Ismail MR, Jordao D, Lovane L, Carrilho C, et al. Pathological methods applied to the investigation of causes of death in developing countries: minimally invasive autopsy approach. PLoS ONE. 2015;10(6): e0132057.CrossRef Castillo P, Ussene E, Ismail MR, Jordao D, Lovane L, Carrilho C, et al. Pathological methods applied to the investigation of causes of death in developing countries: minimally invasive autopsy approach. PLoS ONE. 2015;10(6): e0132057.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Gillio-Meina C, Zielke HR, Fraser DD. Translational research in pediatrics IV: solid tissue collection and processing. Pediatrics. 2016;137(1): e20150490.CrossRef Gillio-Meina C, Zielke HR, Fraser DD. Translational research in pediatrics IV: solid tissue collection and processing. Pediatrics. 2016;137(1): e20150490.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Weustink AC, Hunink MGM, van Dijke CF, Renken NS, Krestin GP, Oosterhuis JW. Minimally invasive autopsy: an alternative to conventional autopsy? Radiology. 2009;250(3):897–904.CrossRef Weustink AC, Hunink MGM, van Dijke CF, Renken NS, Krestin GP, Oosterhuis JW. Minimally invasive autopsy: an alternative to conventional autopsy? Radiology. 2009;250(3):897–904.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Byass P. Minimally invasive autopsy: a new paradigm for understanding global health? PLOS Med. 2016;13(11): e1002173.CrossRef Byass P. Minimally invasive autopsy: a new paradigm for understanding global health? PLOS Med. 2016;13(11): e1002173.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Ben-Sasi K, Chitty LS, Franck LS, Thayyil S, Judge-Kronis L, Taylor AM, et al. Acceptability of a minimally invasive perinatal/paediatric autopsy: healthcare professionals’ views and implications for practice. Prenat Diagn. 2013;33(4):307–12.CrossRef Ben-Sasi K, Chitty LS, Franck LS, Thayyil S, Judge-Kronis L, Taylor AM, et al. Acceptability of a minimally invasive perinatal/paediatric autopsy: healthcare professionals’ views and implications for practice. Prenat Diagn. 2013;33(4):307–12.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Behera C, Rautji R, Dogra TD. Relatives’ attitudes towards medico-legal investigation and forensic autopsy: a study from South Delhi. Med Sci Law. 2008;48(2):159–62.CrossRef Behera C, Rautji R, Dogra TD. Relatives’ attitudes towards medico-legal investigation and forensic autopsy: a study from South Delhi. Med Sci Law. 2008;48(2):159–62.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Singh A, Bhardwaj A, Chopra M, Mithra P, Rathinam R, Siddique A. Perceptions of relatives toward medico-legal investigation and forensic autopsy: a cross-sectional survey from rural Haryana. J Med Soc. 2013;27(3):173.CrossRef Singh A, Bhardwaj A, Chopra M, Mithra P, Rathinam R, Siddique A. Perceptions of relatives toward medico-legal investigation and forensic autopsy: a cross-sectional survey from rural Haryana. J Med Soc. 2013;27(3):173.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Maixenchs M, Anselmo R, Zielinski-Gutiérrez E, Odhiambo FO, Akello C, Ondire M, et al. Willingness to know the cause of death and hypothetical acceptability of the minimally invasive autopsy in six diverse African and Asian settings: a mixed methods socio-behavioural study. PLOS Med. 2016;13(11):1002172.CrossRef Maixenchs M, Anselmo R, Zielinski-Gutiérrez E, Odhiambo FO, Akello C, Ondire M, et al. Willingness to know the cause of death and hypothetical acceptability of the minimally invasive autopsy in six diverse African and Asian settings: a mixed methods socio-behavioural study. PLOS Med. 2016;13(11):1002172.CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Maixenchs M, Anselmo R, Sanz A, Castillo P, Macete E, Carrilho C, et al. Healthcare providers’ views and perceptions on post-mortem procedures for cause of death determination in Southern Mozambique. PLoS ONE. 2018;13(7): e0200058.CrossRef Maixenchs M, Anselmo R, Sanz A, Castillo P, Macete E, Carrilho C, et al. Healthcare providers’ views and perceptions on post-mortem procedures for cause of death determination in Southern Mozambique. PLoS ONE. 2018;13(7): e0200058.CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Ngwenya N, Coplan D, Nzenze S, Myburgh N, Madhi S. Community acceptability of minimally invasive autopsy (MIA) in children under five years of age in Soweto, South Africa. Anthropol S Afr. 2017;40(2):108–21. Ngwenya N, Coplan D, Nzenze S, Myburgh N, Madhi S. Community acceptability of minimally invasive autopsy (MIA) in children under five years of age in Soweto, South Africa. Anthropol S Afr. 2017;40(2):108–21.
32.
go back to reference Das MK, Arora NK, Rasaily R, Chellani H, Gaikwad H, Banke K. Exploring family, community and healthcare provider perceptions and acceptability for minimal invasive tissue sampling to identify the cause of death in under-five deaths and stillbirths in North India: a qualitative study protocol. Reprod Health. 2019;16(1):3.CrossRef Das MK, Arora NK, Rasaily R, Chellani H, Gaikwad H, Banke K. Exploring family, community and healthcare provider perceptions and acceptability for minimal invasive tissue sampling to identify the cause of death in under-five deaths and stillbirths in North India: a qualitative study protocol. Reprod Health. 2019;16(1):3.CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Feroz A, Ibrahim MN, McClure EM, Ali AS, Tikmani SS, Reza S, et al. Perceptions of parents and religious leaders regarding minimal invasive tissue sampling to identify the cause of death in stillbirths and neonates: results from a qualitative study. Reprod Health. 2019;16(1):53.CrossRef Feroz A, Ibrahim MN, McClure EM, Ali AS, Tikmani SS, Reza S, et al. Perceptions of parents and religious leaders regarding minimal invasive tissue sampling to identify the cause of death in stillbirths and neonates: results from a qualitative study. Reprod Health. 2019;16(1):53.CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Maixenchs M, Anselmo R, Martínez Pérez G, Oruko K, Agnandji ST, Angoissa Minsoko PC, et al. Socio-anthropological methods to study the feasibility and acceptability of the minimally invasive autopsy from the perspective of local communities: lessons learnt from a large multi-centre study. Glob Health Action. 2019;12(1):1559496.CrossRef Maixenchs M, Anselmo R, Martínez Pérez G, Oruko K, Agnandji ST, Angoissa Minsoko PC, et al. Socio-anthropological methods to study the feasibility and acceptability of the minimally invasive autopsy from the perspective of local communities: lessons learnt from a large multi-centre study. Glob Health Action. 2019;12(1):1559496.CrossRef
35.
go back to reference Lewis C, Latif Z, Hill M, Riddington M, Lakhanpaul M, Arthurs OJ, et al. “We might get a lot more families who will agree”: Muslim and Jewish perspectives on less invasive perinatal and paediatric autopsy. PLoS ONE. 2018;13(8): e0202023.CrossRef Lewis C, Latif Z, Hill M, Riddington M, Lakhanpaul M, Arthurs OJ, et al. “We might get a lot more families who will agree”: Muslim and Jewish perspectives on less invasive perinatal and paediatric autopsy. PLoS ONE. 2018;13(8): e0202023.CrossRef
36.
go back to reference Kang X, Cos T, Guizani M, Cannie MM, Segers V, Jani JC. Parental acceptance of minimally invasive fetal and neonatal autopsy compared with conventional autopsy: parental acceptance of MIA in fetuses and neonates. Prenat Diagn. 2014;34(11):1106–10.CrossRef Kang X, Cos T, Guizani M, Cannie MM, Segers V, Jani JC. Parental acceptance of minimally invasive fetal and neonatal autopsy compared with conventional autopsy: parental acceptance of MIA in fetuses and neonates. Prenat Diagn. 2014;34(11):1106–10.CrossRef
37.
go back to reference Meaney S, Gallagher S, Lutomski JE, O’Donoghue K. Parental decision making around perinatal autopsy: a qualitative investigation. Health Expect. 2015;18(6):3160–71.CrossRef Meaney S, Gallagher S, Lutomski JE, O’Donoghue K. Parental decision making around perinatal autopsy: a qualitative investigation. Health Expect. 2015;18(6):3160–71.CrossRef
38.
go back to reference Gurley ES, Parveen S, Islam MS, Hossain MJ, Nahar N, Homaira N, et al. Family and community concerns about post-mortem needle biopsies in a Muslim society. BMC Med Ethics. 2011;13(12):10.CrossRef Gurley ES, Parveen S, Islam MS, Hossain MJ, Nahar N, Homaira N, et al. Family and community concerns about post-mortem needle biopsies in a Muslim society. BMC Med Ethics. 2011;13(12):10.CrossRef
39.
go back to reference Banyini AV, Rees D, Gilbert L. “Even if I were to consent, my family will never agree”: exploring autopsy services for posthumous occupational lung disease compensation among mineworkers in South Africa. Glob Health Action. 2013;6(1):19518.CrossRef Banyini AV, Rees D, Gilbert L. “Even if I were to consent, my family will never agree”: exploring autopsy services for posthumous occupational lung disease compensation among mineworkers in South Africa. Glob Health Action. 2013;6(1):19518.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Perceptions of family, community and religious leaders and acceptability for minimal invasive tissue sampling to identify the cause of death in under-five deaths and stillbirths in North India: a qualitative study
Authors
Manoja Kumar Das
Narendra Kumar Arora
Gurkirat Kaur
Prikanksha Malik
Mahisha Kumari
Shipra Joshi
Reeta Rasaily
Harish Chellani
Harsha Gaikwad
Pradeep Debata
K. R. Meena
Publication date
01-12-2021
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Reproductive Health / Issue 1/2021
Electronic ISSN: 1742-4755
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-021-01218-4

Other articles of this Issue 1/2021

Reproductive Health 1/2021 Go to the issue