Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 3/2017

01-09-2017 | Gynecologic Endocrinology and Reproductive Medicine

Anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH) and embryo quality assessed by time-lapse imaging (TLI): a cross-sectional observational study

Authors: P. Bhide, M. Escriba, A. Srikantharajah, H. Joshi, A. Gudi, A. Shah, G. Acharya, R. Homburg

Published in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics | Issue 3/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Serum anti-Mullerian hormone shows a strong positive correlation to the quantitative ovarian reserve but its correlation to embryo quality is unclear. This study assessed the association between serum AMH as a marker of ovarian reserve and embryo quality, using the technology of time-lapse imaging of the embryos in women undergoing in vitro fertilisation (IVF) treatment.

Methods

304 embryos from 198 women undergoing IVF were included in the study. Serum AMH was assessed for all women. Embryo quality was assessed with the known implantation data (KID) score generated by the time-lapse imaging system.

Results

There was no statistically significant difference in mean serum AMH among different KID score categories (p = 0.135). This remained non-significant after controlling for confounding variables (p = 0.305).

Conclusions

The results of our study show no significant association between serum AMH and embryo quality in women undergoing IVF treatment when embryo quality was assessed using the KID scores generated by time-lapse imaging which is a better method of embryo assessment rather than conventional morphological assessment.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Nelson SM, Yates RW, Fleming R (2007) Serum anti-mullerian hormone and FSH: prediction of live birth and extremes of response in stimulated cycles implications for individualization of therapy. Hum Reprod 22:2414–2421. doi:10.1093/humrep/dem204 CrossRefPubMed Nelson SM, Yates RW, Fleming R (2007) Serum anti-mullerian hormone and FSH: prediction of live birth and extremes of response in stimulated cycles implications for individualization of therapy. Hum Reprod 22:2414–2421. doi:10.​1093/​humrep/​dem204 CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Jayaprakasan K, Campbell B, Hopkisson J, Johnson I, Raine-Fenning N (2010) A prospective, comparative analysis of anti-Müllerian hormone, inhibin-b, and three-dimensional ultrasound determinants of ovarian reserve in the prediction of poor response to controlled ovarian stimulation. Fertil Steril 93:855–864. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.10.042 CrossRefPubMed Jayaprakasan K, Campbell B, Hopkisson J, Johnson I, Raine-Fenning N (2010) A prospective, comparative analysis of anti-Müllerian hormone, inhibin-b, and three-dimensional ultrasound determinants of ovarian reserve in the prediction of poor response to controlled ovarian stimulation. Fertil Steril 93:855–864. doi:10.​1016/​j.​fertnstert.​2008.​10.​042 CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference La Marca A, Nelson SM, Sighinolfi G, Manno M, Baraldi E, Roli L, Xella S, Marsella T, Tagliasacchi D, D’Amico R, Volpe A (2011) Anti-Müllerian hormone-based prediction model for a live birth in assisted reproduction. Reprod BioMed Online 22:341–349. doi:10.1016/j.rbmo.2010.11.005 CrossRefPubMed La Marca A, Nelson SM, Sighinolfi G, Manno M, Baraldi E, Roli L, Xella S, Marsella T, Tagliasacchi D, D’Amico R, Volpe A (2011) Anti-Müllerian hormone-based prediction model for a live birth in assisted reproduction. Reprod BioMed Online 22:341–349. doi:10.​1016/​j.​rbmo.​2010.​11.​005 CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Fong SL, Baart E, Martini E, Schipper I, Visser J, Themmen A, de Jong F, Fauser B, Laven J (2008) Anti-Müllerian hormone: a marker for oocyte quantity, oocyte quality and embryo quality? Reprod BioMed Online 16:664–670. doi:10.1016/s1472-6483(10)60480-4 CrossRef Fong SL, Baart E, Martini E, Schipper I, Visser J, Themmen A, de Jong F, Fauser B, Laven J (2008) Anti-Müllerian hormone: a marker for oocyte quantity, oocyte quality and embryo quality? Reprod BioMed Online 16:664–670. doi:10.​1016/​s1472-6483(10)60480-4 CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Silberstein T, MacLaughlin DT, Shai I, Trimarchi JR, Lambert-Messerlian G, Seifer DB, Keefe DL, Blazar AS (2005) Mullerian inhibiting substance levels at the time of HCG administration in IVF cycles predict both ovarian reserve and embryo morphology. Hum Reprod 21:159–163. doi:10.1093/humrep/dei270 CrossRefPubMed Silberstein T, MacLaughlin DT, Shai I, Trimarchi JR, Lambert-Messerlian G, Seifer DB, Keefe DL, Blazar AS (2005) Mullerian inhibiting substance levels at the time of HCG administration in IVF cycles predict both ovarian reserve and embryo morphology. Hum Reprod 21:159–163. doi:10.​1093/​humrep/​dei270 CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Smneek J, Sweep F, Zielhuis G, Kremer J, Thomas C, Braat D (2007) Anti-Müllerian hormone predicts ovarian responsiveness, but not embryo quality or pregnancy, after in vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Fertil Steril 87:223–226. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.06.019 CrossRef Smneek J, Sweep F, Zielhuis G, Kremer J, Thomas C, Braat D (2007) Anti-Müllerian hormone predicts ovarian responsiveness, but not embryo quality or pregnancy, after in vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Fertil Steril 87:223–226. doi:10.​1016/​j.​fertnstert.​2006.​06.​019 CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Bolton VN, Leary C, Harbottle S, Cutting R, Harper JC (2015) How should we choose the “best” embryo? A commentary on behalf of the British fertility society and the association of clinical Embryologists. Human Fertil 18:156–164. doi:10.3109/14647273.2015.1072646 CrossRef Bolton VN, Leary C, Harbottle S, Cutting R, Harper JC (2015) How should we choose the “best” embryo? A commentary on behalf of the British fertility society and the association of clinical Embryologists. Human Fertil 18:156–164. doi:10.​3109/​14647273.​2015.​1072646 CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Meseguer M, Rubio I, Cruz M, Basile N, Marcos J, Requena A (2012) Embryo incubation and selection in a time-lapse monitoring system improves pregnancy outcome compared with a standard incubator: a retrospective cohort study. Fertil Steril 98(1481–1489):e10. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.08.016 Meseguer M, Rubio I, Cruz M, Basile N, Marcos J, Requena A (2012) Embryo incubation and selection in a time-lapse monitoring system improves pregnancy outcome compared with a standard incubator: a retrospective cohort study. Fertil Steril 98(1481–1489):e10. doi:10.​1016/​j.​fertnstert.​2012.​08.​016
13.
go back to reference Sahmay S, Demirayak G, Guralp O, Ocal P, Senturk LM, Oral E, Irez T (2012) Serum anti-Müllerian hormone, follicle stimulating hormone and antral follicle count measurement cannot predict pregnancy rates in IVF/ICSI cycles. J Assist Reprod Genet 29:589–595. doi:10.1007/s10815-012-9754-6 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Sahmay S, Demirayak G, Guralp O, Ocal P, Senturk LM, Oral E, Irez T (2012) Serum anti-Müllerian hormone, follicle stimulating hormone and antral follicle count measurement cannot predict pregnancy rates in IVF/ICSI cycles. J Assist Reprod Genet 29:589–595. doi:10.​1007/​s10815-012-9754-6 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
Metadata
Title
Anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH) and embryo quality assessed by time-lapse imaging (TLI): a cross-sectional observational study
Authors
P. Bhide
M. Escriba
A. Srikantharajah
H. Joshi
A. Gudi
A. Shah
G. Acharya
R. Homburg
Publication date
01-09-2017
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics / Issue 3/2017
Print ISSN: 0932-0067
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0711
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-017-4453-2

Other articles of this Issue 3/2017

Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 3/2017 Go to the issue