Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
European Spine Journal
Published in: European Spine Journal 9/2014

01-09-2014 | Author's Reply

Answer to the Letter to the Editor concerning “Is the 4 mm height of the vertebral artery groove really a limitation of C1 pedicle screw insertion” by Da-Geng Huang, et al. Eur Spine J (2014) 23(5):1109–1114

Authors: Da-Geng Huang, Ding-Jun Hao

Published in: European Spine Journal | Issue 9/2014

Login to get access

Excerpt

Dear Editor, …
Literature
1.
Blagg SE, Don AS, Robertson PA (2009) Anatomic determination of optimal entry point and direction for C1 lateral mass screw placement. J Spinal Disord Tech 22:233–239PubMedCrossRef
2.
Qian LX, Hao DJ, He BR, Jiang YH (2013) Morphology of the atlas pedicle revisited: a morphometric CT-based study on 120 patients. Eur Spine J 22:1142–1146PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
3.
Lin JM, Hipp JA, Reitman CA (2013) C1 lateral mass screw placement via the posterior arch: a technique comparison and anatomic analysis. Spine J 13:1549–1555PubMedCrossRef
4.
Huang DG, He SM, Pan JW, Hui H, Hu HM, He BR, Li H, Zhang XF, Hao DJ (2014) Is the 4 mm height of the vertebral artery groove really a limitation of C1 pedicle screw insertion? Eur Spine J 23:1109–1114PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Answer to the Letter to the Editor concerning “Is the 4 mm height of the vertebral artery groove really a limitation of C1 pedicle screw insertion” by Da-Geng Huang, et al. Eur Spine J (2014) 23(5):1109–1114
Authors
Da-Geng Huang
Ding-Jun Hao
Publication date
01-09-2014
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Spine Journal / Issue 9/2014
Print ISSN: 0940-6719
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0932
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-014-3439-z

Other articles of this Issue 9/2014

European Spine Journal 9/2014 Go to the issue

Author's Reply

Answer to the Letter to the Editor of R.E.E. Omaña et al. concerning “Anterior pedicle screw fixation of C2: an anatomic analysis of axis morphology and simulated surgical fixation” by Zeng-Hui Wu et al. Eur Spine J (2014) 23:356–361

Editorial

Reaching a milestone

Erratum

Erratum to: Surgical technique and effectiveness of microendoscopic discectomy for large uncontained lumbar disc herniations: a prospective, randomized, controlled study with 8 years of follow-up

Letter to the Editor

Letter to the Editor concerning “Is the 4 mm height of the vertebral artery groove really a limitation of C1 pedicle screw insertion?” (by Da-Geng Huang, Si-Min He, Jun-Wei Pan, et al. Eur Spine J, 2014, 23(5):1109–1114)

Original Article

Short-term follow-up of disc cell therapy in a porcine nucleotomy model with an albumin–hyaluronan hydrogel: in vivo and in vitro results of metabolic disc cell activity and implant distribution

Open Operating Theatre (OOT)

Osteoporotic L1 burst fracture treated by short-segment percutaneous stabilization with cement-augmented screws and kyphoplasty (hybrid technique)