Top

International Urogynecology Journal

Published in:

01-04-2015 | Original Article

Anal sphincter complex: 2D and 3D endoanal and translabial ultrasound measurement variation in normal postpartum measurements

Authors: Kate V. Meriwether, Rebecca J. Hall, Lawrence M. Leeman, Laura Migliaccio, Clifford Qualls, Rebecca G. Rogers

Published in: International Urogynecology Journal | Issue 4/2015

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

Women may experience anal sphincter anatomy changes after vaginal birth (VB) or Cesarean delivery (CD). Therefore, accurate and acceptable imaging options to evaluate the anal sphincter complex (ASC) are needed. ASC measurements may differ between translabial (TLUS) and endoanal (EAUS) ultrasound imaging and between 2D and 3D US. The objective of this analysis was to describe measurement variation between these modalities.

Methods

Primiparous women underwent 2D and 3D TLUS imaging of the ASC 6 months after VB or CD. A subset of women also underwent EAUS measurements. Measurements included internal anal sphincter (IAS) thickness at proximal, mid, and distal levels and the external anal sphincter (EAS) at 3, 6, 9, and 12 o’clock positions, as well as bilateral thickness of the pubovisceralis muscle (PVM).

Results

There were 433 women presenting for US: 423 had TLUS and 64 had both TLUS and EAUS of the ASC. All IAS measurements were significantly thicker on TLUS than EAUS (all p < 0.01), while EAS measurements were significantly thicker on EAUS (p < 0.01). PVM measurements with 3D or 2D imaging were similar (p > 0.20). On both TLUS and EAUS, there were multiple sites where significant asymmetry existed in left versus right measurements.

Conclusions

US modality used to image the ASC introduces small but significant changes in measurements, and the direction of the bias depends on the muscle and location being imaged.

DeLancey JO (2005) The hidden epidemic of pelvic floor dysfunction: achievable goals for improved prevention and treatment. Am J Obstet Gynecol 192(5):1488–1495CrossRefPubMed

Patel DA, Xu X, Thomason AD, Ransom SB, Ivy JS, DeLancey JO (2006) Childbirth and pelvic floor dysfunction: an epidemiologic approach to the assessment of prevention opportunities at delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 195(1):23–28CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed

Oberwalder M, Connor J, Wexner SD (2003) Meta-analysis to determine the incidence of obstetric anal sphincter damage. Br J Surg 90(11):1333–1337CrossRefPubMed

Tubaro A, Koelbl H, Laterza R, Khullar V, de Nunzio C (2011) Ultrasound imaging of the pelvic floor: where are we going? Neurourol Urodyn 30(5):729–734. doi:10.1002/nau.21136 CrossRefPubMed

Faltin DL, Boulvain M, Floris LA, Irion O (2005) Diagnosis of anal sphincter tears to prevent fecal incontinence: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 106(1):6–13CrossRefPubMed

Valsky DV, Yagel S (2007) Three-dimensional transperineal ultrasonography of the pelvic floor: improving visualization for new clinical applications and better functional assessment. J Ultrasound Med 26(10):1373–1387, ReviewPubMed

Alexander AA, Miller LS, Liu JB, Feld RI, Goldberg BB (1994) High-resolution endoluminal sonography of the anal sphincter complex. J Ultrasound Med 13(4):281–284PubMed

Weinstein MM, Jung SA, Pretorius DH, Nager CW, den Boer DJ, Mittal RK (2007) The reliability of puborectalis muscle measurements with 3-dimensional ultrasound imaging. Am J Obstet Gynecol 197(1):68.e1–6CrossRef

Roos AM, Abdool Z, Sultan AH, Thakar R (2011) The diagnostic accuracy of endovaginal and transperineal ultrasound for detecting anal sphincter defects: the PREDICT study. Clin Radiol 66(7):597–604CrossRefPubMed

10.

Christensen AF, Nyhuus B, Nielsen MB, Christensen H (2005) Three-dimensional anal endosonography may improve diagnostic confidence of detecting damage to the anal sphincter complex. Br J Radiol 78(928):308–311CrossRefPubMed

11.

Abdool Z, Sultan AH, Thakar R (2012) Ultrasound imaging of the anal sphincter complex: a review. Br J Radiol 85(1015):865–875. doi:10.1259/bjr/27314678 CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed

12.

Valsky DV, Messing B, Petkova R, Savchev S, Rosenak D, Hochner-Celnikier D, Yagel S (2007) Postpartum evaluation of the anal sphincter by transperineal three-dimensional ultrasound in primiparous women after vaginal delivery and following surgical repair of third-degree tears by the overlapping technique. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 29(2):195–204CrossRefPubMed

13.

Hall RJ, Rogers RG, Saiz L, Qualls C (2007) Translabial ultrasound assessment of the anal sphincter complex: normal measurements of the internal and external anal sphincters at the proximal, mid-, and distal levels. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 18(8):881–888CrossRefPubMed

14.

Huang WC, Yang SH, Yang JM (2007) Three-dimensional transperineal sonographic characteristics of the anal sphincter complex in nulliparous women. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 30(2):210–220CrossRefPubMed

15.

Lee JH, Pretorius DH, Weinstein M, Guaderrama NM, Nager CW, Mittal RK (2007) Transperineal three-dimensional ultrasound in evaluating anal sphincter muscles. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 30(2):201–209CrossRefPubMed

16.

Weinstein MM, Pretorius DH, Jung SA, Nager CW, Mittal RK (2009) Transperineal three-dimensional ultrasound imaging for detection of anatomic defects in the anal sphincter complex muscles. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 7(2):205–211CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed

17.

Meriwether KV, Hall RJ, Lawrence L, Migliaccio L, Qualls C, Rogers RG (2014) Postpartum translabial 2D and 3D ultrasound measurements of the anal sphincter complex in primiparous women delivering by vaginal birth versus Cesarean delivery. Int Urogynecol J 25(3):329–336 [PMID24105408]CrossRefPubMed

18.

Rogers R, Leeman L, Borders N, Qualls C, Fullilove A, Teaf D, Hall R, Bedrick E, Albers L. Contribution of the second stage of labour to pelvic floor dysfunction: a prospective cohort comparison of nulliparous women. BJOG. 2014 Feb 19. [Epub ahead of print]

19.

Delancey JO, Toglia MR, Perucchini D (1997) Internal and external anal sphincter anatomy as it relates to midline obstetrical lacerations. Obstet Gynecol 90(6):924–927CrossRefPubMed

20.

Dietz HP (2010) Pelvic floor ultrasound: a review. Am J Obstet Gynecol 202(4):321–334CrossRefPubMed

21.

Rociu E, Stoker J, Eijkemans MJ, Schouten WR, Laméris JS (1999) Fecal incontinence: endoanal US versus endoanal MR imaging. Radiology 212(2):453–458CrossRefPubMed

22.

Braekken IH, Majida M, Ellstrøm-Engh M, Dietz HP, Umek W, Bø K (2008) Test-retest and intra-observer repeatability of two-, three- and four-dimensional perineal ultrasound of pelvic floor muscle anatomy and function. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 19(2):227–235CrossRefPubMed

23.

Roche B, Deléaval J, Fransioli A, Marti MC (2001) Comparison of transanal and external perineal ultrasonography. Eur Radiol 11(7):1165–1170CrossRefPubMed

24.

Speksnijder L, Rousian M, Steegers EA, Van Der Spek PJ, Koning AH, Steensma AB (2012) Agreement and reliability of pelvic floor measurements during contraction using three-dimensional pelvic floor ultrasound and virtual reality. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 40(1):87–92. doi:10.1002/uog.10129 CrossRefPubMed

25.

Rociu E, Stoker J, Eijkemans MJ, Lameris JS (2000) Normal anal sphincter anatomy and age- and sex-related variations at high-spatial-resolution endoanal MR imaging. Radiology 217(2):395–401CrossRefPubMed

26.

Mayooran V, Deen KI, Wijesinghe PS, Pathmeswaran A (2005) Endosonographic characteristics of the anal sphincter complex in primigravid Sri Lankan women. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 90(3):245–250CrossRefPubMed

27.

Titi MA, Jenkins JT, Urie A, Molloy RG (2009) Perineum compression during EAUS enhances visualization of anterior anal sphincter defects. Color Dis 11(6):625–630CrossRef

28.

Starck M, Bohe M, Fortling B, Valentin L (2005) Endosonography of the anal sphincter in women of different ages and parity. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 25(2):169–176CrossRefPubMed

29.

Ismail SI, Shek KL, Dietz HP (2010) Unilateral coronal diameters of the levator hiatus: baseline data for the automated detection of avulsion of the levator ani muscle. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 36(3):375–378CrossRefPubMed

30.

Hoyte L, Jakab M, Warfield SK, Shott S, Flesh G, Fielding JR (2004) Levator ani thickness variations in symptomatic and asymptomatic women using magnetic resonance-based 3-dimensional color mapping. Am J Obstet Gynecol 191(3):856–861CrossRefPubMed

Title: Anal sphincter complex: 2D and 3D endoanal and translabial ultrasound measurement variation in normal postpartum measurements
Authors: Kate V. Meriwether
Rebecca J. Hall
Lawrence M. Leeman
Laura Migliaccio
Clifford Qualls
Rebecca G. Rogers
Publication date: 01-04-2015
Publisher: Springer London
Published in: International Urogynecology Journal / Issue 4/2015
Print ISSN: 0937-3462
Electronic ISSN: 1433-3023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-014-2524-5

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Anal sphincter complex: 2D and 3D endoanal and translabial ultrasound measurement variation in normal postpartum measurements

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 4/2015

Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) surgery among Danish women hysterectomized for benign conditions: age at hysterectomy, age at subsequent POP operation, and risk of POP after hysterectomy

Biomechanical pregnant pelvic system model and numerical simulation of childbirth: impact of delivery on the uterosacral ligaments, preliminary results

Perineorrhaphy quantitative assessment (Pe-QA)

Vaginal hysterectomy and training

Abdominovaginal fistula after incomplete removal of an intravaginal slingplasty

Dutch evidence statement for pelvic physical therapy in patients with anal incontinence