Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Current Sexual Health Reports 4/2018

01-12-2018 | Sexual Orientation and Identity (E Coleman and J Vencill, Section Editors)

An Updated Review of the Literature on LGBTQ+ Intimate Partner Violence

Authors: Melissa Decker, Heather L. Littleton, Katie M. Edwards

Published in: Current Sexual Health Reports | Issue 4/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose of Review

This paper reviews the LGBTQ+ intimate partner violence (IPV) literature published since 2015.

Recent Findings

Though LGBTQ+ IPV mirrors heterosexual cisgender IPV in most ways, sexual and gender minorities face higher rates of IPV, potentially worse outcomes, and different IPV trajectories. Therefore, shared risk factors cannot fully explain these differences. Researchers attribute this variability to minority stress, such as sexuality-based discrimination and internalized homophobia, which explain differences in IPV among LGBTQ+ individuals and heterosexual cisgender individuals. Indeed, recent findings support the importance of minority stress factors, especially internalized homophobia, as risk factors for IPV.

Summary

Future research should focus on identifying protective factors against IPV within the LGBTQ+ community, as well as improving understanding of the variables that influence IPV at various levels of the social ecological model. Strategies for the prevention and intervention of LGBTQ+ IPV remain under-researched and poorly understood. Reducing minority stress is likely to be a key part of IPV prevention and intervention among LGBTQ+ persons.
Literature
1.
go back to reference •• Edwards KM, Sylaska KM, Neal AM. Intimate partner violence among sexual minority populations: a critical review of the literature and agenda for future research. Psychol Violence. 2015;5:112–21. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038656 This systematic review of the IPV literature on sexual minority populations provides a comprehensive examination of published empirical work in the field from 1999 to 2015.CrossRef •• Edwards KM, Sylaska KM, Neal AM. Intimate partner violence among sexual minority populations: a critical review of the literature and agenda for future research. Psychol Violence. 2015;5:112–21. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1037/​a0038656 This systematic review of the IPV literature on sexual minority populations provides a comprehensive examination of published empirical work in the field from 1999 to 2015.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Langenderfer-Magruder L, Whitfield DL, Walls NE, Kattari SK, Ramos D. Experiences of intimate partner violence and subsequent police reporting among lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer adults in Colorado: comparing rates of cisgender and transgender victimization. J. Interpers. Violence. 2015;31:855–71. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260514556767.CrossRef Langenderfer-Magruder L, Whitfield DL, Walls NE, Kattari SK, Ramos D. Experiences of intimate partner violence and subsequent police reporting among lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer adults in Colorado: comparing rates of cisgender and transgender victimization. J. Interpers. Violence. 2015;31:855–71. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1177/​0886260514556767​.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Straus MA, Douglas EM. A short form of the Revised Conflict Tactics Scales, and typologies for severity and mutuality. Violence Vict. 2004;19:507–20.CrossRef Straus MA, Douglas EM. A short form of the Revised Conflict Tactics Scales, and typologies for severity and mutuality. Violence Vict. 2004;19:507–20.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference McCauley HL, Silverman JG, Decker MR, Agénor M, Borrero S, Tancredi DJ, et al. Sexual and reproductive health indicators and intimate partner violence victimization among female family planning clinic patients who have sex with women and men. J Women's Health. 2015;24:621–9. https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2014.5032.CrossRef McCauley HL, Silverman JG, Decker MR, Agénor M, Borrero S, Tancredi DJ, et al. Sexual and reproductive health indicators and intimate partner violence victimization among female family planning clinic patients who have sex with women and men. J Women's Health. 2015;24:621–9. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1089/​jwh.​2014.​5032.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference • Coston BM. Power and inequality: intimate partner violence against bisexual and non-monosexual women in the United States. J Interpers Violence 2017;1–25. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260517726415. This study incorporates an examination of the influence of social power and sexual identity versus behavior on IPV victimization. • Coston BM. Power and inequality: intimate partner violence against bisexual and non-monosexual women in the United States. J Interpers Violence 2017;1–25. doi:https://​doi.​org/​10.​1177/​0886260517726415​. This study incorporates an examination of the influence of social power and sexual identity versus behavior on IPV victimization.
13.
go back to reference Straus MA, Hamby SL, Boney-McCoy S, Sugarman DB. The Revised Conflict Tactics Scales (CTS2): development and preliminary psychometric data. J Fam Issues. 1996;17:283–316.CrossRef Straus MA, Hamby SL, Boney-McCoy S, Sugarman DB. The Revised Conflict Tactics Scales (CTS2): development and preliminary psychometric data. J Fam Issues. 1996;17:283–316.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Koss MP, Gidycz CA. Sexual Experiences Survey: reliability and validity. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1985;53:422–3.CrossRef Koss MP, Gidycz CA. Sexual Experiences Survey: reliability and validity. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1985;53:422–3.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Black MC, Basile KC, Breiding MJ, Smith SG, Walters ML, Merrick MT, et al. The National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey (NISVS): 2010 summary report. Atlanta, GA: National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2011. Black MC, Basile KC, Breiding MJ, Smith SG, Walters ML, Merrick MT, et al. The National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey (NISVS): 2010 summary report. Atlanta, GA: National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2011.
20.
go back to reference • Stephenson R, Finneran C. Minority stress and intimate partner violence among gay and bisexual men in Atlanta. Am J Mens Health. 2017;11:952–61. https://doi.org/10.1177/1557988316677506 This study addresses many of the concerns raised in earlier literature reviews on the topic of LGBTQ+ IPV, in that it strongly ties to theory, the authors measure IPV victimization and perpetration concurrently, and the IPV measure used was designed specifically for gay men.CrossRefPubMed • Stephenson R, Finneran C. Minority stress and intimate partner violence among gay and bisexual men in Atlanta. Am J Mens Health. 2017;11:952–61. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1177/​1557988316677506​ This study addresses many of the concerns raised in earlier literature reviews on the topic of LGBTQ+ IPV, in that it strongly ties to theory, the authors measure IPV victimization and perpetration concurrently, and the IPV measure used was designed specifically for gay men.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference •• Edwards KM, Littleton HL, Sylaska KM, Krossman AL, Craig M. College campus community readiness to address intimate partner violence among LGBTQ+ young adults: a conceptual and empirical examination. Am J Community Psychol. 2016;58:16–26. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajcp.12068 This study examines risk of IPV perpetration and victimization at the community level.CrossRef •• Edwards KM, Littleton HL, Sylaska KM, Krossman AL, Craig M. College campus community readiness to address intimate partner violence among LGBTQ+ young adults: a conceptual and empirical examination. Am J Community Psychol. 2016;58:16–26. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1002/​ajcp.​12068 This study examines risk of IPV perpetration and victimization at the community level.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference •• Martin-Storey A, Fromme K. Trajectories of dating violence: differences by sexual minority status and gender. J Adolesc. 2016;49:28–37 This study compares IPV trajectories of same-sex versus opposite-sex couples. •• Martin-Storey A, Fromme K. Trajectories of dating violence: differences by sexual minority status and gender. J Adolesc. 2016;49:28–37 This study compares IPV trajectories of same-sex versus opposite-sex couples.
26.
go back to reference • Whitton SW, Newcomb ME, Messinger AM, Byck G, Mustanski B. A longitudinal study of IPV victimization among sexual minority youth. J. Interpers. Violence. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260516646093. This longitudinal study compares victimization between sexual minority youth and their heterosexual peers. • Whitton SW, Newcomb ME, Messinger AM, Byck G, Mustanski B. A longitudinal study of IPV victimization among sexual minority youth. J. Interpers. Violence. 2016. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1177/​0886260516646093​. This longitudinal study compares victimization between sexual minority youth and their heterosexual peers.
27.
go back to reference • Martin-Storey A, Fromme K. Mediating factors explaining the association between sexual minority status and dating violence. J Interpers Violence 2017;1–28. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260517726971. This longitudinal study of LGBQ+ youth examines multiple mediating risk factors between sexual minority identity and IPV across several sexual minority identities. • Martin-Storey A, Fromme K. Mediating factors explaining the association between sexual minority status and dating violence. J Interpers Violence 2017;1–28. doi:https://​doi.​org/​10.​1177/​0886260517726971​. This longitudinal study of LGBQ+ youth examines multiple mediating risk factors between sexual minority identity and IPV across several sexual minority identities.
31.
33.
go back to reference Foshee VA, Linder GF, Bauman KE, Langwick SA, Arriaga XB, Heath JL, et al. The Safe Dates Project: theoretical basis, evaluation design, and selected baseline findings. American Am J Prev Med. 1996;12:39–47.CrossRef Foshee VA, Linder GF, Bauman KE, Langwick SA, Arriaga XB, Heath JL, et al. The Safe Dates Project: theoretical basis, evaluation design, and selected baseline findings. American Am J Prev Med. 1996;12:39–47.CrossRef
40.
go back to reference Mason TB, Lewis RJ, Gargurevich M, Kelley ML. Minority stress and intimate partner violence perpetration among lesbians: negative affect, hazardous drinking, and intrusiveness as mediators. Psychol Sex Orientat Gend Divers. 2016;3:236–46. https://doi.org/10.1037/sgd0000165.CrossRef Mason TB, Lewis RJ, Gargurevich M, Kelley ML. Minority stress and intimate partner violence perpetration among lesbians: negative affect, hazardous drinking, and intrusiveness as mediators. Psychol Sex Orientat Gend Divers. 2016;3:236–46. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1037/​sgd0000165.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
An Updated Review of the Literature on LGBTQ+ Intimate Partner Violence
Authors
Melissa Decker
Heather L. Littleton
Katie M. Edwards
Publication date
01-12-2018
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Current Sexual Health Reports / Issue 4/2018
Print ISSN: 1548-3584
Electronic ISSN: 1548-3592
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11930-018-0173-2

Other articles of this Issue 4/2018

Current Sexual Health Reports 4/2018 Go to the issue

Female Sexual Dysfunction and Disorders (T Lorenz and R Nappi, Section Editors)

Impact of Infertility on the Sexuality of Couples: an Overview

Medical Comorbidities (A Goldstein, M Miner and S Parish, Section Editors)

Genito Pelvic Vaginal Laxity: Classification, Etiology, Symptomatology, and Treatment Considerations

Male Sexual Dysfunction and Disorders (A Pastuszak and N Gupta, Section Editors)

Contemporary Review of BPH Medical and Surgical Treatments on Sexual Function

Female Sexual Dysfunction and Disorders (T Lorenz and R Nappi, Section Editors)

Interactions of Sleep and Female Sexual Function: a Review

Male and Female Surgical Interventions (A Burnett and C Carson, Section Editors)

Current Concepts in Scrotal Reconstructive Surgery