Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Current Sexual Health Reports 4/2018

01-12-2018 | Male and Female Surgical Interventions (A Burnett and C Carson, Section Editors)

Current Concepts in Scrotal Reconstructive Surgery

Authors: Sarah C. Krzastek, J. Tyler Roseman II, Ryan P. Smith, Raymond A. Costabile

Published in: Current Sexual Health Reports | Issue 4/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

Scrotal reconstruction may be required in any setting where the patient sustains loss of a large area of scrotal or penile skin, as in repair of scrotal lymphedema and the adult acquired buried penis. Massive scrotal lymphedema and adult acquired buried penis are two conditions closely linked to obesity and are largely refractory to non-operative management. The demand for surgical repair of these conditions is increasing.

Purpose of Review

The aim of this article is to provide an overview of the preoperative considerations, surgical techniques, and postoperative outcomes in the repair of scrotal lymphedema and adult buried penis.

Recent Findings

Scrotal lymphedema and adult buried penis are associated with significant medical comorbidities and can cause sexual and urinary dysfunction. Surgical repair requires a multidisciplinary approach. Skin grafts are often required. There is no consensus regarding optimal postoperative management of these surgical wounds. Consideration should be given to extended duration chemical prophylaxis of thromboembolic events. Though complications are common, patient quality of life is significantly improved following repair.

Summary

The demand for surgical repairs of scrotal lymphedema and adult buried penis are increasing. Though patients have significant comorbidities and surgical repair may be complex, patient outcomes are good and quality of life can be greatly improved.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Eswara JR, McDougal WS. Long-term outcomes of surgical management for nonmalignant perineal disease. J Urol. 2013;190:2139–43.CrossRef Eswara JR, McDougal WS. Long-term outcomes of surgical management for nonmalignant perineal disease. J Urol. 2013;190:2139–43.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference McDougal WS. Lymphedema of the external genitalia. J Urol. 2003;170:711–6.CrossRef McDougal WS. Lymphedema of the external genitalia. J Urol. 2003;170:711–6.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Greene AK. Diagnosis and management of obesity-induced lymphedema. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016;138:111e–8e.CrossRef Greene AK. Diagnosis and management of obesity-induced lymphedema. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016;138:111e–8e.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference •• Wisenbaugh E, Moskowitz D, Gelman J. Reconstruction of massive localized lymphedema of the scrotum: results, complications, and quality of life improvements. Urology. 2018;112:176–80 Cases of massive scrotal lymphedema are rare . This is the largest series described, and this article nicely outlines the surgical technique employed in repair of this disease along with patient outcomes. Though this group did not use a validated questionnaire to assess postoperative quality of life improvements, patients reported significant improvements. Postoperative complications are frequent, which is likely due to the high risk patient population and accompanying medical comorbidities in this group of patients . CrossRef •• Wisenbaugh E, Moskowitz D, Gelman J. Reconstruction of massive localized lymphedema of the scrotum: results, complications, and quality of life improvements. Urology. 2018;112:176–80 Cases of massive scrotal lymphedema are rare . This is the largest series described, and this article nicely outlines the surgical technique employed in repair of this disease along with patient outcomes. Though this group did not use a validated questionnaire to assess postoperative quality of life improvements, patients reported significant improvements. Postoperative complications are frequent, which is likely due to the high risk patient population and accompanying medical comorbidities in this group of patients . CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Mirastschijski U. Classification and treatment of the adult buried penis. Ann Plast Surg. 2018;80:653–9.CrossRef Mirastschijski U. Classification and treatment of the adult buried penis. Ann Plast Surg. 2018;80:653–9.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference •• Jun MS, Gallegos MA, Santucci RA. Contemporary management of adult-acquired buried penis. BJU Int. 2018;122:713–5. https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.14230. While reports on patient outcomes is limited in this report, this study describes the operative techniques commonly used for repair of the adult acquired buried penis in great detail, with additional description of stages of repair based on complexity . CrossRefPubMed •• Jun MS, Gallegos MA, Santucci RA. Contemporary management of adult-acquired buried penis. BJU Int. 2018;122:713–5. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1111/​bju.​14230. While reports on patient outcomes is limited in this report, this study describes the operative techniques commonly used for repair of the adult acquired buried penis in great detail, with additional description of stages of repair based on complexity . CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Sturm R, Hattori A. Morbid obesity rates continue to rise rapidly in the United States. Int J Obes. 2013;37:889–91.CrossRef Sturm R, Hattori A. Morbid obesity rates continue to rise rapidly in the United States. Int J Obes. 2013;37:889–91.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Strother MC, Skokan AJ, Sterling ME, Butler PD, Kovell RC. Adult buried penis repair with Escutcheonectomy and split-thickness skin grafting. J Sex Med. 2018;15:1198–204.CrossRef Strother MC, Skokan AJ, Sterling ME, Butler PD, Kovell RC. Adult buried penis repair with Escutcheonectomy and split-thickness skin grafting. J Sex Med. 2018;15:1198–204.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Wolf JS Jr, Bennett CJ, Dmochowski RR, et al. Urologic Surgery Antimicrobial Prophylaxis Best Practice Policy Panel. Best practice policy statement on urologic surgery antimicrobial prophylaxis. J Urol. 2008;179(4):1379–90.CrossRef Wolf JS Jr, Bennett CJ, Dmochowski RR, et al. Urologic Surgery Antimicrobial Prophylaxis Best Practice Policy Panel. Best practice policy statement on urologic surgery antimicrobial prophylaxis. J Urol. 2008;179(4):1379–90.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Garaffa G, Christopher N, Ralph DJ. The management of genital lymphoedema. BJU Int. 2008;102:480–4.CrossRef Garaffa G, Christopher N, Ralph DJ. The management of genital lymphoedema. BJU Int. 2008;102:480–4.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Thejeswi P, Prabhu S, Augustine AJ, Ram S. Giant scrotal lymphoedema - a case report. Int J Surg Case Rep. 2012;3:269–71.CrossRef Thejeswi P, Prabhu S, Augustine AJ, Ram S. Giant scrotal lymphoedema - a case report. Int J Surg Case Rep. 2012;3:269–71.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Alter GJ. Surgical techniques: surgery to correct hidden penis. J Sex Med. 2006;3:939–42.CrossRef Alter GJ. Surgical techniques: surgery to correct hidden penis. J Sex Med. 2006;3:939–42.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Liaw A, Rickborn L, McClung C. Incidence of urethral stricture in patients with adult acquired buried penis. Adv Urol. 2017;2017:7056173.CrossRef Liaw A, Rickborn L, McClung C. Incidence of urethral stricture in patients with adult acquired buried penis. Adv Urol. 2017;2017:7056173.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Tang S-H, Kamat D, Santucci RA. Modern management of adult-acquired buried penis. Urology. 2008;72:124–7.CrossRef Tang S-H, Kamat D, Santucci RA. Modern management of adult-acquired buried penis. Urology. 2008;72:124–7.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference • Figler BD, Chery L, Friedrich JB, et al. Limited panniculectomy for adult buried penis repair. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015;136:1090–2. The technique described by Figler et al. for limited panniculectomy preserves a 2cm strip of skin cephalad to the penile base. This dermis is approximated to the pubic symphysis which adequately prevents penile retraction while reducing the amount of tissue excised . CrossRef • Figler BD, Chery L, Friedrich JB, et al. Limited panniculectomy for adult buried penis repair. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015;136:1090–2. The technique described by Figler et al. for limited panniculectomy preserves a 2cm strip of skin cephalad to the penile base. This dermis is approximated to the pubic symphysis which adequately prevents penile retraction while reducing the amount of tissue excised . CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Voznesensky MA, Lawrence WT, Keith JN, Erickson BA. Patient-reported social, psychological, and urologic outcomes after adult buried penis repair. Urology. 2017;103:240–4.CrossRef Voznesensky MA, Lawrence WT, Keith JN, Erickson BA. Patient-reported social, psychological, and urologic outcomes after adult buried penis repair. Urology. 2017;103:240–4.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Fuller TW, Theisen KM, Shah A, Rusilko PJ. Surgical management of adult-acquired buried penis. Curr Urol Rep. 2018;19:22.CrossRef Fuller TW, Theisen KM, Shah A, Rusilko PJ. Surgical management of adult-acquired buried penis. Curr Urol Rep. 2018;19:22.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Westerman ME, Tausch TJ, Zhao LC, Siegel JA, Starke N, Klein AK, et al. Ventral slit scrotal flap: a new outpatient surgical option for reconstruction of adult buried penis syndrome. Urology. 2015;85:1501–4.CrossRef Westerman ME, Tausch TJ, Zhao LC, Siegel JA, Starke N, Klein AK, et al. Ventral slit scrotal flap: a new outpatient surgical option for reconstruction of adult buried penis syndrome. Urology. 2015;85:1501–4.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference •• Theisen KM, Fuller TW, Rusilko P. Surgical management of adult-acquired buried penis: impact on urinary and sexual quality of life outcomes. Urology. 2018;116:180–4 Using a validated questionnaire, this group demonstrated that repair of adult acquired buried penis results in significant improvements in sexual and urinary function . CrossRef •• Theisen KM, Fuller TW, Rusilko P. Surgical management of adult-acquired buried penis: impact on urinary and sexual quality of life outcomes. Urology. 2018;116:180–4 Using a validated questionnaire, this group demonstrated that repair of adult acquired buried penis results in significant improvements in sexual and urinary function . CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Nasca MR, Innocenzi D, Micali G. Penile cancer among patients with genital lichen sclerosus. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1999;41:911–4.CrossRef Nasca MR, Innocenzi D, Micali G. Penile cancer among patients with genital lichen sclerosus. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1999;41:911–4.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Current Concepts in Scrotal Reconstructive Surgery
Authors
Sarah C. Krzastek
J. Tyler Roseman II
Ryan P. Smith
Raymond A. Costabile
Publication date
01-12-2018
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Current Sexual Health Reports / Issue 4/2018
Print ISSN: 1548-3584
Electronic ISSN: 1548-3592
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11930-018-0183-0

Other articles of this Issue 4/2018

Current Sexual Health Reports 4/2018 Go to the issue

Current Controversies (PJ Kleinplatz and C Moser, Section Editors)

Can Pedophiles Change? Response to Opening Arguments and Conclusions

Preclinical and Psychophysiology (F Guaracci and L Marson, Section Editors)

Vocal Signals of Sexual Motivation in Male and Female Rodents

Male Sexual Dysfunction and Disorders (A Pastuszak and N Gupta, Section Editors)

Penile Rehabilitation: the “Up”-date

Sexual Orientation and Identity (E Coleman and J Vencill, Section Editors)

Neurocognitive Mechanisms in Compulsive Sexual Behavior Disorder

Medical Comorbidities (A Goldstein, M Miner and S Parish, Section Editors)

Genito Pelvic Vaginal Laxity: Classification, Etiology, Symptomatology, and Treatment Considerations