Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery
Published in: European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery 6/2015

01-12-2015 | Review Article

An update on the evaluation and treatment of syndesmotic injuries

Authors: S. Rammelt, P. Obruba

Published in: European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery | Issue 6/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

Injuries to the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis are frequent and continue to generate controversy.

Methods

The majority of purely ligamentous injuries (“high ankle sprains”) is not sassociated with a latent or frank tibiofibular diastasis and may be treated with an extended protocol of physical therapy. Relevant instability of the syndesmosis with diastasis results from rupture of two or more ligaments that require surgical stabilization. Syndesmosis disruptions are commonly associated with bony avulsions or malleolar fractures. Treatment consists in anatomic reduction of the distal fibula into the corresponding incisura of the distal tibia and stable fixation. Proposed means of fixation are refixation of bony syndesmotic avulsions, one or two tibiofibular screws and suture button. There is no consensus on how long to maintain fixation. Both syndesmotic screws and suture buttons need to be removed if symptomatic.

Results/Complications

The most frequent complication is syndesmotic malreduction and may be minimized with open reduction and intraoperative 3D scanning. Other complications include hardware failure, heterotopic ossification, tibiofibular synostosis, chronic instability and posttraumatic arthritis.

Conclusion

The single most important prognostic factor is anatomic reduction of the distal fibula into the tibial incisura.
Literature
1.
Ahl T, Dalen N, Lundberg A, et al. Mobility of the ankle mortise. A roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis. Acta Orthop Scand. 1987;58:401–2.PubMedCrossRef
2.
Ahmad J, Raikin SM, Pour AE, et al. Bioabsorbable screw fixation of the syndesmosis in unstable ankle injuries. Foot Ankle Int. 2009;30:99–105.PubMedCrossRef
3.
Alonso A, Khoury L, Adams R. Clinical tests for ankle syndesmosis injury: reliability and prediction of return to function. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1998;27:276–84.PubMedCrossRef
4.
Amendola A, Williams G, Foster D. Evidence-based approach to treatment of acute traumatic syndesmosis (high ankle) sprains. Sports Med Arthrosc. 2006;14:232–6.PubMedCrossRef
5.
Barnett CH, Napier JR. The axis of rotation at the ankle joint in man; its influence upon the form of the talus and the mobility of the fibula. J Anat. 1952;86:1–9.PubMedCentralPubMed
6.
Bartoniček J. Anatomy of the tibiofibular syndesmosis and its clinical relevance. Surg Radiol Anat. 2003;25:379–86.PubMedCrossRef
7.
Beumer A, Campo MM, Niesing R, et al. Screw fixation of the syndesmosis: a cadaver model comparing stainless steel and titanium screws and three and four cortical fixation. Injury. 2005;36:60–4.PubMedCrossRef
8.
Beumer A, Swierstra BA, Mulder PG. Clinical diagnosis of syndesmotic ankle instability: evaluation of stress tests behind the curtains. Acta Orthop Scand. 2002;73:667–9.PubMedCrossRef
9.
Beumer A, Valstar ER, Garling EH, et al. Kinematics of the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis: radiostereometry in 11 normal ankles. Acta Orthop Scand. 2003;74:337–43.PubMedCrossRef
10.
Beumer A, Van Hemert WL, Swierstra BA, et al. A biomechanical evaluation of clinical stress tests for syndesmotic ankle instability. Foot Ankle Int. 2003;24:358–63.PubMed
11.
Bible JE, Sivasubramaniam PG, Jahangir AA, et al. High-energy transsyndesmotic ankle fracture dislocation–the “Logsplitter” injury. J Orthop Trauma. 2014;28:200–4.PubMedCrossRef
12.
Boden SD, Labropoulos PA, Mccowin P, et al. Mechanical considerations for the syndesmosis screw. A cadaver study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1989;71:1548–55.PubMed
13.
Böstman OM. Distal tibiofibular synostosis after malleolar fractures treated using absorbable implants. Foot Ankle. 1993;14:38–43.PubMedCrossRef
14.
15.
Candal-Couto JJ, Burrow D, Bromage S, et al. Instability of the tibio-fibular syndesmosis: have we been pulling in the wrong direction? Injury. 2004;35:814–8.PubMedCrossRef
16.
Cedell CA. Supination-outward rotation injuries of the ankle. A clinical and roentgenological study with special reference to the operative treatment. Acta Orthop Scand. 1967;110:113.
17.
Chaput V. Les fractures malleolaires du cou-de-pieds et les accidents du travail. Paris: Masson; 1907.
18.
Chissell HR, Jones J. The influence of a diastasis screw on the outcome of Weber type-C ankle fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1995;77:435–8.PubMed
19.
Close JR. Some applications of the functional anatomy of the ankle joint. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1956;38:761–81.PubMed
20.
Cronier P, Steiger V, Rammelt S. Early open reduction and internal fixation of Pilon fractures. Fuß Sprunggel. 2012;10:12–26.CrossRef
21.
De Cesar PC, Avila EM, De Abreu MR. Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging to physical examination for syndesmotic injury after lateral ankle sprain. Foot Ankle Int. 2011;32:1110–4.PubMedCrossRef
22.
DeGroot H, Al-Omari AA, El Ghazaly SA. Outcomes of suture button repair of the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis. Foot Ankle Int. 2011;32:250–6.PubMedCrossRef
23.
Dikos GD, Heisler J, Choplin RH, et al. Normal tibiofibular relationships at the syndesmosis on axial CT imaging. J Orthop Trauma. 2012;26:433–8.PubMedCrossRef
24.
Ebraheim NA, Lu J, Yang H, et al. The fibular incisure of the tibia on CT scan: a cadaver study. Foot Ankle Int. 1998;19:318–21.PubMedCrossRef
25.
Ebraheim NA, Mekhail AO, Gargasz SS. Ankle fractures involving the fibula proximal to the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis. Foot Ankle Int. 1997;18:513–21.PubMedCrossRef
26.
27.
Egol KA, Pahk B, Walsh M, et al. Outcome after unstable ankle fracture: effect of syndesmotic stabilization. J Orthop Trauma. 2010;24:7–11.PubMedCrossRef
28.
Fick R Handbuch der Anatomie und Mechanik der Gelenke unter Berücksichtigung der bewegenden Muskeln. Part I: Anatomie der Gelenke Fischer; Jena 1904.
29.
Franke J, Von Recum J, Suda AJ, et al. Intraoperative three-dimensional imaging in the treatment of acute unstable syndesmotic injuries. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012;94:1386–90.PubMedCrossRef
30.
Frick H. Diagnosis, therapy and results of acute instability of the syndesmosis of the upper ankle joint (isolated anterior rupture of the syndesmosis) [in German]. Orthopäde. 1986;15:423–6.PubMed
31.
Gardner MJ, Brodsky A, Briggs SM, et al. Fixation of posterior malleolar fractures provides greater syndesmotic stability. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;447:165–71.PubMedCrossRef
32.
Gardner MJ, Demetrakopoulos D, Briggs SM, et al. Malreduction of the tibiofibular syndesmosis in ankle fractures. Foot Ankle Int. 2006;27:788–92.PubMed
33.
Gardner R, Yousri T, Holmes F, et al. Stabilization of the syndesmosis in the Maisonneuve fracture–a biomechanical study comparing 2-hole locking plate and quadricortical screw fixation. J Orthop Trauma. 2013;27:212–6.PubMedCrossRef
34.
Gerber JP, Williams GN, Scoville CR, et al. Persistent disability associated with ankle sprains: a prospective examination of an athletic population. Foot Ankle Int. 1998;19:653–60.PubMedCrossRef
35.
Grass R, Rammelt S, Biewener A, et al. Peroneus longus ligamentoplasty for chronic instability of the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis. Foot Ankle Int. 2003;24:392–7.PubMed
36.
Grenier S, Benoit B, Rouleau DM, et al. APTF: anteroposterior tibiofibular ratio, a new reliable measure to assess syndesmotic reduction. J Orthop Trauma. 2013;27:207–11.PubMedCrossRef
37.
Hamid N, Loeffler BJ, Braddy W, et al. Outcome after fixation of ankle fractures with an injury to the syndesmosis: the effect of the syndesmosis screw. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009;91:1069–73.PubMedCrossRef
38.
Han SH, Lee JW, Kim S, et al. Chronic tibiofibular syndesmosis injury: the diagnostic efficiency of magnetic resonance imaging and comparative analysis of operative treatment. Foot Ankle Int. 2007;28:336–42.PubMedCrossRef
39.
Hansen M, Le L, Wertheimer S, et al. Syndesmosis fixation: analysis of shear stress via axial load on 3.5-mm and 4.5-mm quadricortical syndesmotic screws. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2006;45:65–9.PubMedCrossRef
40.
Harper MC, Keller TS. A radiographic evaluation of the tibiofibular syndesmosis. Foot Ankle. 1989;10:156–60.PubMedCrossRef
41.
Heim U. Malleolar fractures [in German]. Unfallheilkunde. 1983;86:248–58.PubMed
42.
Heineck J, Serra A, Haupt C, et al. Accuracy of corrective osteotomies in fibular malunion: a cadaver model. Foot Ankle Int. 2009;30:773–7.PubMedCrossRef
43.
Henkemeyer U, Püschel R, Burri C. Experimentelle Untersuchungen zur Biomechanik der Syndesmose. Langenbecks Arch Chir Suppl Forum. 1975; 369–371.
44.
Hinds RM, Lazaro LE, Burket JC, et al. Risk factors for posttraumatic synostosis and outcomes following operative treatment of ankle fractures. Foot Ankle Int. 2014;35:141–7.PubMedCrossRef
45.
Höcker K, Pachucki A. The fibular incisure of the tibia. The cross-sectional position of the fibula in distal syndesmosis [in German]. Unfallchirurg. 1989;92:401–6.PubMed
46.
Hoefnagels EM, Waites MD, Wing ID, et al. Biomechanical comparison of the interosseous tibiofibular ligament and the anterior tibiofibular ligament. Foot Ankle Int. 2007;28:602–4.PubMedCrossRef
47.
Høiness P, Stromsøe K. Tricortical versus quadricortical syndesmosis fixation in ankle fractures: a prospective, randomized study comparing two methods of syndesmosis fixation. J Orthop Trauma. 2004;18:331–7.PubMedCrossRef
48.
Hopkinson WJ, St Pierre P, Ryan JB, et al. Syndesmosis sprains of the ankle. Foot Ankle. 1990;10:325–30.PubMedCrossRef
49.
Hovis WD, Kaiser BW, Watson JT, et al. Treatment of syndesmotic disruptions of the ankle with bioabsorbable screw fixation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002;84-A:26–31.PubMed
50.
Huber T, Schmoelz W, Bolderl A. Motion of the fibula relative to the tibia and its alterations with syndesmosis screws: A cadaver study. Foot Ankle Surg. 2012;18:203–9.PubMedCrossRef
51.
Jend HH, Ney R, Schottle H. Movements of the fibula [German]. Unfallchirurg. 1987;90:144–7.PubMed
52.
Karapinar H, Kalenderer O, Karapinar L, et al. Effects of three- or four-cortex syndesmotic fixation in ankle fractures. J Am Podiat Med Assoc. 2007;97:457–9.CrossRef
53.
Kärrholm J, Hansson LI, Selvik G. Mobility of the lateral malleolus. A roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis. Acta Orthop Scand. 1985;56:479–83.PubMedCrossRef
54.
Kennedy JG, Soffe KE, Dalla Vedova P, et al. Evaluation of the syndesmotic screw in low Weber C ankle fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2000;14:359–66.PubMedCrossRef
55.
Kiter E, Bozkurt M. The crossed-leg test for examination of ankle syndesmosis injuries. Foot Ankle Int. 2005;26:187–8.PubMed
56.
Klitzman R, Zhao H, Zhang LQ, et al. Suture-button versus screw fixation of the syndesmosis: a biomechanical analysis. Foot Ankle Int. 2010;31:69–75.PubMedCrossRef
57.
Knops SP, Kohn MA, Hansen EN, et al. Rotational malreduction of the syndesmosis: reliability and accuracy of computed tomography measurement methods. Foot Ankle Int. 2013;34:1403–10.PubMedCrossRef
58.
Kukreti S, Faraj A, Miles JN. Does position of syndesmotic screw affect functional and radiological outcome in ankle fractures? Injury. 2005;36:1121–4.PubMedCrossRef
59.
Lauge-Hansen N. Fractures of the ankle II: combined experimental/surgical and experimental roentgenologic investigation. Arch Surg. 1950;60:957–85.PubMedCrossRef
60.
Lepojärvi S, Pakarinen H, Savola O, et al. Posterior translation of the fibula may indicate malreduction: CT study of normal variation in uninjured ankles. J Orthop Trauma. 2014;28:205–9.PubMedCrossRef
61.
Lutz W. Zur Struktur der unteren Tibiofibularverbindung und der Membrana interossea cruris. Anat Entwicklungsgesch. 1942;111:315.CrossRef
62.
Maisonneuve MJG. Recherches sur la fracture du peroné. Arch Gén de Med. 1840;7:165–87.
63.
Manjoo A, Sanders DW, Tieszer C, et al. Functional and radiographic results of patients with syndesmotic screw fixation: implications for screw removal. J Orthop Trauma. 2010;24:2–6.PubMedCrossRef
64.
Markolf KL, Jackson S, Mcallister DR. Force and displacement measurements of the distal fibula during simulated ankle loading tests for high ankle sprains. Foot Ankle Int. 2012;33:779–86.PubMedCrossRef
65.
Marmor M, Hansen E, Han HK, et al. Limitations of standard fluoroscopy in detecting rotational malreduction of the syndesmosis in an ankle fracture model. Foot Ankle Int. 2011;32:616–22.PubMedCrossRef
66.
McBryde A, Chiasson B, Wilhelm A, et al. Syndesmotic screw placement: a biomechanical analysis. Foot Ankle Int. 1997;18:262–6.PubMedCrossRef
67.
McKeon KE, Wright RW, Johnson JE, et al. Vascular anatomy of the tibiofibular syndesmosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012;94:931–8.PubMedCrossRef
68.
Mendelsohn ES, Hoshino CM, Harris TG, et al. The effect of obesity on early failure after operative syndesmosis injuries. J Orthop Trauma. 2013;27:201–6.PubMedCrossRef
69.
Miller AN, Carroll EA, Parker RJ, et al. Direct visualization for syndesmotic stabilization of ankle fractures. Foot Ankle Int. 2009;30:419–26.PubMedCrossRef
70.
Miller AN, Carroll EA, Parker RJ, et al. Posterior malleolar stabilization of syndesmotic injuries is equivalent to screw fixation. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468:1129–35.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
71.
Miller AN, Paul O, Boraiah S, et al. Functional outcomes after syndesmotic screw fixation and removal. J Orthop Trauma. 2010;24:12–6.PubMedCrossRef
72.
Moore JA Jr, Shank JR, Morgan SJ, et al. Syndesmosis fixation: a comparison of three and four cortices of screw fixation without hardware removal. Foot Ankle Int. 2006;27:567–72.PubMed
73.
Muhle C, Frank LR, Rand T, et al. Tibiofibular syndesmosis: high-resolution MRI using a local gradient coil. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1998;22:938–44.PubMedCrossRef
74.
Mukhopadhyay S, Metcalfe A, Guha AR, et al. Malreduction of syndesmosis–are we considering the anatomical variation? Injury. 2011;42:1073–6.PubMedCrossRef
75.
Naqvi GA, Cunningham P, Lynch B, et al. Fixation of ankle syndesmotic injuries: comparison of tightrope fixation and syndesmotic screw fixation for accuracy of syndesmotic reduction. Am J Sports Med. 2012;40:2828–35.PubMedCrossRef
76.
Nielson JH, Gardner MJ, Peterson MG, et al. Radiographic measurements do not predict syndesmotic injury in ankle fractures: an MRI study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005;436:216–21.PubMedCrossRef
77.
Ogilvie-Harris DJ, Gilbart MK, Chorney K. Chronic pain following ankle sprains in athletes: the role of arthroscopic surgery. Arthroscopy. 1997;13:564–74.PubMedCrossRef
78.
Ogilvie-Harris DJ, Reed SC, Hedman TP. Disruption of the ankle syndesmosis: biomechanical study of the ligamentous restraints. Arthroscopy. 1994;10:558–60.PubMedCrossRef
79.
Olson KM, Dairyko GH Jr, Toolan BC. Salvage of chronic instability of the syndesmosis with distal tibiofibular arthrodesis: functional and radiographic results. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011;93:66–72.PubMed
80.
Ostrum RF, De Meo P, Subramanian R. A critical analysis of the anterior-posterior radiographic anatomy of the ankle syndesmosis. Foot Ankle Int. 1995;16:128–31.PubMedCrossRef
81.
Ovaska MT, Makinen TJ, Madanat R, et al. A comprehensive analysis of patients with malreduced ankle fractures undergoing re-operation. Int Orthop. 2014;38:83–8.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
82.
Pakarinen H, Flinkkila T, Ohtonen P, et al. Intraoperative assessment of the stability of the distal tibiofibular joint in supination-external rotation injuries of the ankle: sensitivity, specificity, and reliability of two clinical tests. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011;93:2057–61.PubMedCrossRef
83.
Pakarinen HJ, Flinkkila TE, Ohtonen PP, et al. Syndesmotic fixation in supination-external rotation ankle fractures: a prospective randomized study. Foot Ankle Int. 2011;32:1103–9.PubMedCrossRef
84.
Pelton K, Thordarson DB, Barnwell J. Open versus closed treatment of the fibula in Maissoneuve injuries. Foot Ankle Int. 2010;31:604–8.PubMedCrossRef
85.
Peter RE, Harrington RM, Henley MB, et al. Biomechanical effects of internal fixation of the distal tibiofibular syndesmotic joint: comparison of two fixation techniques. J Orthop Trauma. 1994;8:215–9.PubMedCrossRef
86.
Phillips WA, Schwartz HS, Keller CS, et al. A prospective, randomized study of the management of severe ankle fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1985;67:67–78.PubMed
87.
Phisitkul P, Ebinger T, Goetz J, et al. Forceps reduction of the syndesmosis in rotational ankle fractures: a cadaveric study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012;94:2256–61.PubMedCrossRef
88.
Purvis GD. Displaced, unstable ankle fractures: classification, incidence, and management of a consecutive series. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1982;165:91–8.PubMed
89.
Rammelt S, Heim D, Hofbauer LC, et al. Problems and controversies in the treatment of ankle fractures [German]. Unfallchirurg. 2011;114:847–60.PubMedCrossRef
90.
Rammelt S, Zwipp H, Grass R. Injuries to the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis: an evidence-based approach to acute and chronic lesions. Foot Ankle Clin. 2008;13:611–33.PubMedCrossRef
91.
Rammelt S, Zwipp H, Mittlmeier T. Operative treatment of pronation fracture–dislocations of the ankle [German]. Operat Orthop Traumatol. 2013;25:273–91.CrossRef
92.
Reimann R, Anderhuber F. Kompensationsbewegungen der Fibula, die durch die Keilform der Torchlea tali erzwungen werden. Acta Anat. 1980;108:60–7.PubMedCrossRef
93.
Ruan Z, Luo C, Shi Z, et al. Intraoperative reduction of distal tibiofibular joint aided by three-dimensional fluoroscopy. Technol Health Care. 2011;19:161–6.PubMed
94.
95.
Sagi HC, Shah AR, Sanders RW. The functional consequence of syndesmotic joint malreduction at a minimum 2-year follow-up. J Orthop Trauma. 2012;26:439–43.PubMedCrossRef
96.
Sarsam IM, Hughes SP. The role of the anterior tibio-fibular ligament in talar rotation: an anatomical study. Injury. 1988;19:62–4.PubMedCrossRef
97.
Sauer HD, Jungfer E, Jungbluth KH. Experimentelle Untersuchungen zur Reißfestigkeit des Bandapparates am menschlichen Sprunggelenk. Hefte Unfallheilkd. 1978;131:37–42.PubMed
98.
Schepers T. Acute distal tibiofibular syndesmosis injury: a systematic review of suture-button versus syndesmotic screw repair. Int Orthop. 2012;36:1199–206.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
99.
100.
Scranton PE Jr, Mcmaster JG, Kelly E. Dynamic fibular function: a new concept. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1976;118:76–81.PubMed
101.
Seitz WH Jr, Bachner EJ, Abram LJ, et al. Repair of the tibiofibular syndesmosis with a flexible implant. J Orthop Trauma. 1991;5:78–82.PubMedCrossRef
102.
Shah AS, Kadakia AR, Tan GJ, et al. Radiographic evaluation of the normal distal tibiofibular syndesmosis. Foot Ankle Int. 2012;33:870–6.PubMedCrossRef
103.
Sikka RS, Fetzer GB, Sugarman E, et al. Correlating MRI findings with disability in syndesmotic sprains of NFL players. Foot Ankle Int. 2012;33:371–8.PubMedCrossRef
104.
Song DJ, Lanzi JT, Groth AT, et al. The effect of syndesmosis screw removal on the reduction of the distal tibiofibular joint: a prospective radiographic study. Foot Ankle Int. 2014;35:543–8.PubMedCrossRef
105.
SooHoo NF, Krenek L, Eagan MJ, et al. Complication rates following open reduction and internal fixation of ankle fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009;91:1042–9.PubMedCrossRef
106.
Stoffel K, Wysocki D, Baddour E, et al. Comparison of two intraoperative assessment methods for injuries to the ankle syndesmosis. A cadaveric study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009;91:2646–52.PubMedCrossRef
107.
Storey P, Gadd RJ, Blundell C, et al. Complications of suture button ankle syndesmosis stabilization with modifications of surgical technique. Foot Ankle Int. 2012;33:717–21.PubMedCrossRef
108.
109.
Summers HD, Sinclair MK, Stover MD. A reliable method for intraoperative evaluation of syndesmotic reduction. J Orthop Trauma. 2013;27:196–200.PubMedCrossRef
110.
Svensson OK, Lundberg A, Walheirn G, et al. In vivo fibular motions during various movements of the ankle. Clin Biomech. 1989;4:155–60.CrossRef
111.
Takao M, Ochi M, Oae K, et al. Diagnosis of a tear of the tibiofibular syndesmosis. The role of arthroscopy of the ankle. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2003;85:324–9.PubMedCrossRef
112.
Tang CW, Roidis N, Vaishnav S, et al. Position of the distal fibular fragment in pronation and supination ankle fractures: a CT evaluation. Foot Ankle Int. 2003;24:561–6.PubMedCrossRef
113.
Taylor DC, Englehardt DL, Bassett FH 3rd. Syndesmosis sprains of the ankle. The influence of heterotopic ossification. Am J Sports Med. 1992;20:146–50.PubMedCrossRef
114.
Teramoto A, Kura H, Uchiyama E, et al. Three-dimensional analysis of ankle instability after tibiofibular syndesmosis injuries: a biomechanical experimental study. Am J Sports Med. 2008;36:348–52.PubMedCrossRef
115.
Thompson MC, Gesink DS. Biomechanical comparison of syndesmosis fixation with 3.5- and 4.5-millimeter stainless steel screws. Foot Ankle Int. 2000;21:736–41.PubMed
116.
Thordarson DB, Motamed S, Hedman T, et al. The effect of fibular malreduction on contact pressures in an ankle fracture malunion model. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1997;79:1809–15.PubMed
117.
Thordarson DB, Samuelson M, Shepherd LE, et al. Bioabsorbable versus stainless steel screw fixation of the syndesmosis in pronation-lateral rotation ankle fractures: a prospective randomized trial. Foot Ankle Int. 2001;22:335–8.PubMed
118.
Thornes B, Shannon F, Guiney AM, et al. Suture-button syndesmosis fixation: accelerated rehabilitation and improved outcomes. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005;431:207–12.PubMedCrossRef
119.
Thornes B, Walsh A, Hislop M, et al. Suture-endobutton fixation of ankle tibio-fibular diastasis: a cadaver study. Foot Ankle Int. 2003;24:142–6.PubMed
120.
Tornetta P 3rd, Axelrad TW, Sibai TA, et al. Treatment of the stress positive ligamentous SE4 ankle fracture: incidence of syndesmotic injury and clinical decision making. J Orthop Trauma. 2012;26:659–61.PubMedCrossRef
121.
Van Den Bekerom MP, Haverkamp D, Kerkhoffs GM, et al. Syndesmotic stabilization in pronation external rotation ankle fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468:991–5.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
122.
Vasarhelyi A, Lubitz J, Gierer P, et al. Detection of fibular torsional deformities after surgery for ankle fractures with a novel CT method. Foot Ankle Int. 2006;27:1115–21.PubMed
123.
Verim O, Er MS, Altinel L, et al. Biomechanical evaluation of syndesmotic screw position: a finite-element analysis. J Orthop Trauma. 2014;28:210–5.PubMedCrossRef
124.
125.
Weber BG. Verletzungen des oberen Sprunggelenkes. In: Aktuelle Probleme in der Chirurgie. Bern: Huber; 1966.
126.
Weber M. Trimalleolar fractures with impaction of the posteromedial tibial plafond: implications for talar stability. Foot Ankle Int. 2004;25:716–27.PubMed
127.
Weening B, Bhandari M. Predictors of functional outcome following transsyndesmotic screw fixation of ankle fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2005;19:102–8.PubMedCrossRef
128.
Wikerøy AK, Høiness PR, Andreassen GS, et al. No difference in functional and radiographic results 8.4 years after quadricortical compared with tricortical syndesmosis fixation in ankle fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2010;24:17–23.PubMedCrossRef
129.
Williams GN, Jones MH, Amendola A. Syndesmotic ankle sprains in athletes. Am J Sports Med. 2007;35:1197–207.PubMedCrossRef
130.
Wilson FC Jr, Skilbred LA. Long-term results in the treatment of displaced bimalleolar fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1966;48:1065–78.PubMed
131.
Wolf BR, Amendola A. Syndesmosis injuries in the athlete: when and how to operate. Curr Opin Orthop. 2002;31:151–4.CrossRef
132.
Xenos JS, Hopkinson WJ, Mulligan ME, et al. The tibiofibular syndesmosis. Evaluation of the ligamentous structures, methods of fixation, and radiographic assessment. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1995;77:847–56.PubMed
133.
Zalavras C, Thordarson D. Ankle syndesmotic injury. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2007;15:330–9.PubMed
134.
Zindrick MR, Hopkins DE, Knight GW, et al. The effect of lateral talar shift upon the biomechanics of the ankle joint. Orthop Trans. 1985;9:332–3.
135.
136.
Zwipp H, Rammelt S, Grass R. Ligamentous injuries about the ankle and subtalar joints. Clin Podiatr Med Surg. 2002;19:195–229.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
An update on the evaluation and treatment of syndesmotic injuries
Authors
S. Rammelt
P. Obruba
Publication date
01-12-2015
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery / Issue 6/2015
Print ISSN: 1863-9933
Electronic ISSN: 1863-9941
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-014-0466-8

Other articles of this Issue 6/2015

European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery 6/2015 Go to the issue

Original Article

The accuracy of physical examination in identifying significant pathologies in penetrating thoracic trauma

Review Article

Assessment of elevated compartment pressures by pressure-related ultrasound: a cadaveric model

Original Article

The impact of body mass index on severity, patterns and outcomes after traumatic brain injuries caused by low level falls

Original Article

When do anterior external or internal fixators provide additional stability in an unstable (Tile C) pelvic fracture? A biomechanical study

Original Article

Decreased muscle strength is associated with impaired long-term functional outcome after intramedullary nailing of femoral shaft fracture

Review Article

Peroneal tendon dislocation