Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

LIVE: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)
Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Trials
Published in: Trials 1/2017

Open Access 01-12-2017 | Study protocol

An education intervention to improve health literacy and decision making about supporting self-care among older Australians: a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

Authors: Caroline A. Smith, Esther Chang, Gisselle Gallego, Lynda G. Balneaves

Published in: Trials | Issue 1/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Older Australians are high consumers of complementary and alternative medicines (CM). To help older people to take an active role in their health, we will develop and evaluate a novel educational intervention to support decision self-efficacy, and improve health literacy skills.

Methods

The primary hypothesis is that participants receiving a web/DVD plus booklet intervention compared with a booklet-only group will demonstrate an increase in decision self-efficacy. This study is a randomised controlled trial. One hundred and sixty-eight people aged 65 years and older will be recruited from community settings comprising retirement villages and community groups, based in Sydney, Australia. Participants will be randomly allocated to either the education intervention delivered by the Internet or a DVD plus booklet versus a control group (booklet only). The primary outcome measure is CM decision self-efficacy. Secondary outcomes are health literacy, knowledge and attitudes, and change in health-seeking behaviour. Participants’ views on the ease of using the resources, the length of the modules, the amount of information, and participant understanding of the modules will be assessed. Outcomes will be collected on completion of the intervention at 3 weeks, and at a 2-month follow up from trial entry.

Discussion

This trial has the potential to improve CM health literacy in older Australians. There are no educational resources designed to support decision self-efficacy and improve health literacy amongst older people related to CM.

Trial registration

Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR), ACTRN12616000135​415. Registered on 5 February 2016.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Australia’s health 2012. In: Cat no AUS 156. Cat. no. AUS 156 edn. Canberra; 2012.
2.
Ding D, Grunseit AC, Chau JY, Vo K, Byles J, Bauman AE. Retirement - a transition to a healthier lifestyle? Evidence from a large Australian study. Am J Prev Med. 2016;51:170–8.CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zhang A, Xue CC, Lin V, Story DF. Complementary and alternative medicine use by older Australians. Ann NY Acad Sci. 2007;1114:204–15.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Goh LY, Vitry AI, Semple SJ, Esterman A, Luszcz MA. Self medication with over the counter drugs and complementary medications in South Australia’s elderly population. BMC Complement Alt Med. 2009;9:42.CrossRef
5.
Britt HC, Harrison C, Miller GC, Knox SA. Prevalence and patterns of multimorbidity in Australia. Med J Aust. 2008;189:72–7.PubMed
6.
Anderson EZ. Complementary therapies and older adults. Topics Geriatr Rehabil. 2009;25:320–8.CrossRef
7.
Yen L, Jowsey T, McRae IS. Consultations with complementary and alternative medicine practitioners by older Australians: results from a national survey. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2013;13:73.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
Andrew G. Private complementary medicine and older people: service use and user empowerment. Ageing Soc. 2002;22(3):343–68.CrossRef
9.
Williamson AT, Fletcher PC, Dawson KA. Complementary and alternative medicine: use in an older population. J Gerontol Nurs. 2003;29(5):20–8.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Cartwright T. “Getting on with life”: The experience of older people using complementary health care. Soc Sci Med. 2007;64:1692–703.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Nutbeam D. Health literacy as a public health goal: a challenge for contemporary health education and communication strategies into the 21st century. Health Promot Int. 2000;15(3):259–67.CrossRef
12.
Berkman N, Sheridan S, Donahue K, Halpern D, Crotty K. Low health literacy and health outcomes: an updated systematic review. Ann Intern Med. 2011;155(2):97–107.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Tu HT, Cohen GR. Striking jump in consumers seeking health care information. In: Tracking report No 20. Washington DC: Centre for studying Health System Change; 2008.
14.
Osbourne R, Batterham R, Elsworth G, Hawkins M, Buchbinder R. The grounded psychometric development and initial validation of the Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ). BMC Public Health. 2013;13:658.CrossRef
15.
Atkin PA, Veitch PC, Veitch EM, Ogle SJ. The epidemiology of serious adverse drug reactions among the elderly. Drugs Aging. 1999;14:141–52.CrossRefPubMed
16.
McLean AJ, Le Couteur DG. Aging biology and geriatric clinical pharmacology. Pharmacol Rev. 2004;56:163–84.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Heft MW, Mariotti AJ. Geriatric pharmacology. Dent Clin North Am. 2002;46:868–85.CrossRef
18.
Braun LA, Tiralongo E, Wilkinson JM, Poole S, Spitzer O, Bailey M, Dooley M. Adverse reactions to complementary medicines: the Australia pharmacy experience. Int J Pharm Pract. 2010;18:242–4.CrossRefPubMed
19.
Elmer GW, Lafferty WE, Tyree PT, Lind BK. Potential interactions between complementary/alternative products and conventional medicines in a Medicare population. Ann Pharmacother. 2007;41(10):1617–24.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
20.
Robinson A, McGrail MR. Disclosure of CAM use to medical practitioners: a review of qualitative and quantitative studies. Complement Ther Med. 2004;12:90–8.CrossRefPubMed
21.
Smith CA, Chang E, Brownhill S, Barr K. Complementary medicine health literacy among a population of older Australians. Evid Based Complement Altern Med. 2016;2016:5672050.CrossRef
22.
Aspinall EE, Beschnett A, Ellwoood AF. Health literacy for older adults: using evidence to build a model educational programme. Med Ref Serv Q. 2012;31(3):302–14.CrossRefPubMed
23.
de Achaval S, Fraenkel L, Volk RJ, Cox V, Suarez-Almazor ME. Impact of educational and patient decision aids on decisional conflict associated with total knee arthroplasty. Arthritis Care Res. 2012;64(2):229–37.CrossRef
24.
Ciciriello S, Johnston RV, Osborne RH, Wicks I, de Kroo T, Clerehan R, O'Neill C, Buchbinder R. Multimedia educational interventions for consumers about prescribed and over-the-counter medications. Cochrane Database Sys Rev. 2013(4):Art. No.: CD008416.
25.
Wofford JL, Currin D, Michielutte R, Wofford MM. The multimedia computer for low-literacy patient education: a pilot project of cancer risk perceptions. Med Gen Med. 2001;3:23.
26.
Kalyuga S, Chandler P, Sweller J. Incorporating learner experience into the design of multimedia instruction. J Educ Psychol. 2000;92:21–36.CrossRef
27.
Moreno R, Mayer RE. Cognitive principals of multimedia learning: the role of modality and contiguity. J Educ Psychol. 1999;91:358–68.CrossRef
28.
Balneaves LG, Truant TL, Verhoef MJ, Ross B, Porcino AJ, Wong M, Brazier AS. The Complementary medicine Education and Outcomes (CAMEO) programme: a foundation for patient and health professional education and decision support programmes. Patient Educ Couns. 2012;89:461–8.CrossRefPubMed
29.
Belkora J, Miller M, Crawford B, Coyne K, Stauffer M, Buzaglo J, Blakeney N, Michaels M, Golant M. Evaluation of the question listing at the cancer support community. Transl Behav Med. 2013;3(2):167–17.CrossRef
30.
O'Connor AM. User manual-Decision self efficacy scale. Ottawa: Ottawa Hospital Research Instiutute; 1995.
31.
Bennett C, Graham ID, Kristjansson E, Kearing SA, Clay KF, O'Connor AM. Validation of a preparation for decision making scale. Patient Educ Couns. 2010;78:130–3.CrossRefPubMed
32.
33.
Altman DG, Schulz KF, Moher D, Egger M, Davidoff F, Elbourne D, CONSORT GROUP (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials), et al. The revised CONSORT statement for reporting randomized trials: explanation and elaboration. Ann Intern Med. 2001;134:663–94.CrossRefPubMed
34.
Boutron I, Moher D, Altman DG, Schulz KF, Ravaud P, et al. Extending the CONSORT statement to randomized trials of nonpharmacological treatment: explanation and elaboration. Ann Intern Med. 2008;148:295–309.CrossRefPubMed
35.
Sidak Z. Rectangular confidence regions for the means of multivariate normal distributions. JASA. 1967;62:626–33.
36.
Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D, for the CONSORT Group. CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomized trials. Ann Intern Med. 2010;152:726–32.
Metadata
Title
An education intervention to improve health literacy and decision making about supporting self-care among older Australians: a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
Authors
Caroline A. Smith
Esther Chang
Gisselle Gallego
Lynda G. Balneaves
Publication date
01-12-2017
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Trials / Issue 1/2017
Electronic ISSN: 1745-6215
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-017-2182-2

Other articles of this Issue 1/2017

Trials 1/2017 Go to the issue

Methodology

Simulating therapeutic drug monitoring results for dose individualisation to maintain investigator blinding in a randomised controlled trial

Study protocol

Effectiveness of an intervention to improve supportive care for family caregivers of patients with lung cancer: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Study protocol

SCORE: Shared care of Colorectal cancer survivors: protocol for a randomised controlled trial

Study protocol

Evaluating a multi-component, community-based program to improve adherence and retention in care among adolescents living with HIV in Zimbabwe: study protocol for a cluster randomized controlled trial

Research

A randomized, multi-center, prospective study comparing best medical treatment versus best medical treatment plus renal artery stenting in patients with hemodynamically relevant atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis (RADAR) – one-year results of a pre-maturely terminated study

Study protocol

The Kusamala Program for primary caregivers of children 6–59 months of age hospitalized with severe acute malnutrition in Malawi: study protocol for a cluster-randomized controlled trial