Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Trials 1/2017

Open Access 01-12-2017 | Study protocol

SCORE: Shared care of Colorectal cancer survivors: protocol for a randomised controlled trial

Authors: Michael Jefford, Jon Emery, Eva Grunfeld, Andrew Martin, Paula Rodger, Alexandra M. Murray, Richard De Abreu Lourenco, Alexander Heriot, Jo Phipps-Nelson, Lisa Guccione, Dorothy King, Karolina Lisy, Niall Tebbutt, Adele Burgess, Ian Faragher, Rodney Woods, Penelope Schofield

Published in: Trials | Issue 1/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the most common cancer affecting both men and women. Survivors of CRC often experience various physical and psychological effects arising from CRC and its treatment. These effects may last for many years and adversely affect QoL, and they may not be adequately addressed by standard specialist-based follow-up. Optimal management of these effects should harness the expertise of both primary care and specialist care. Shared models of care (involving both the patient’s primary care physician [PCP] and specialist) have the potential to better support survivors and enhance health system efficiency.

Methods/design

SCORE (Shared care of Colorectal cancer survivors) is a multisite randomised controlled trial designed to optimise and operationalise a shared care model for survivors of CRC, to evaluate the acceptability of the intervention and study processes, and to collect preliminary data regarding the effects of shared care compared with usual care on a range of patient-reported outcomes. The primary outcome is QoL measured using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30 questionnaire. Secondary outcomes are satisfaction with care, unmet needs, continuity of care and health resource use. The shared care model involves replacement of two routine specialist follow-up visits with PCP visits, as well as the provision of a tailored survivorship care plan and a survivorship booklet and DVD for CRC survivors. All consenting patients will be randomised 1:1 to either shared care or usual care and will complete questionnaires at three time points over a 12-month period (baseline and at 6 and 12 months). Health care resource use data will also be collected and used to evaluate costs.

Discussion

The evaluation and implementation of models of care that are responsive to the holistic needs of cancer survivors while reducing the burden on acute care settings is an international priority. Shared care between specialists and PCPs has the potential to enhance patient care and outcomes for CRC survivors while offering improvements in health care resource efficiency. If the findings of the present study show that the shared care intervention is acceptable and feasible for CRC survivors, the intervention may be readily expanded to other groups of cancer survivors.

Trial registration

Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, ACTRN12617000004​369p. Registered on 3 January 2017; protocol version 4 approved 24 February 2017.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
2.
go back to reference Miller KD, et al. Cancer treatment and survivorship statistics, 2016. CA Cancer J Clin. 2016;66(4):271–89.CrossRefPubMed Miller KD, et al. Cancer treatment and survivorship statistics, 2016. CA Cancer J Clin. 2016;66(4):271–89.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Arndt V, et al. Quality of life in patients with colorectal cancer 1 year after diagnosis compared with the general population: a population-based study. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22(23):4829–36.CrossRefPubMed Arndt V, et al. Quality of life in patients with colorectal cancer 1 year after diagnosis compared with the general population: a population-based study. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22(23):4829–36.CrossRefPubMed
4.
5.
go back to reference Kopp I, Bauhofer A, Koller M. Understanding quality of life in patients with colorectal cancer: comparison of data from a randomised controlled trial, a population based cohort study and the norm reference population. Inflamm Res. 2004;53 Suppl 2:S130–5.PubMed Kopp I, Bauhofer A, Koller M. Understanding quality of life in patients with colorectal cancer: comparison of data from a randomised controlled trial, a population based cohort study and the norm reference population. Inflamm Res. 2004;53 Suppl 2:S130–5.PubMed
6.
go back to reference Pettersson G, et al. Symptom prevalence, frequency, severity, and distress during chemotherapy for patients with colorectal cancer. Support Care Cancer. 2014;22(5):1171–9.CrossRefPubMed Pettersson G, et al. Symptom prevalence, frequency, severity, and distress during chemotherapy for patients with colorectal cancer. Support Care Cancer. 2014;22(5):1171–9.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Phipps E, et al. Quality of life and symptom attribution in long-term colon cancer survivors. J Eval Clin Pract. 2008;14(2):254–8.CrossRefPubMed Phipps E, et al. Quality of life and symptom attribution in long-term colon cancer survivors. J Eval Clin Pract. 2008;14(2):254–8.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Schag CA, et al. Quality of life in adult survivors of lung, colon and prostate cancer. Qual Life Res. 1994;3(2):127–41.CrossRefPubMed Schag CA, et al. Quality of life in adult survivors of lung, colon and prostate cancer. Qual Life Res. 1994;3(2):127–41.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Caravati-Jouvenceaux A, et al. Health-related quality of life among long-term survivors of colorectal cancer: a population-based study. Oncologist. 2011;16(11):1626–36.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Caravati-Jouvenceaux A, et al. Health-related quality of life among long-term survivors of colorectal cancer: a population-based study. Oncologist. 2011;16(11):1626–36.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
go back to reference Di Fabio F, et al. Long-term outcome after colorectal cancer resection: patients’ self-reported quality of life, sexual dysfunction and surgeons’ awareness of patients’ needs. Tumori. 2008;94(1):30–5.PubMed Di Fabio F, et al. Long-term outcome after colorectal cancer resection: patients’ self-reported quality of life, sexual dysfunction and surgeons’ awareness of patients’ needs. Tumori. 2008;94(1):30–5.PubMed
12.
go back to reference Downing A, et al. Health-related quality of life after colorectal cancer in England: a patient-reported outcomes study of individuals 12 to 36 months after diagnosis. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33(6):616–24.CrossRefPubMed Downing A, et al. Health-related quality of life after colorectal cancer in England: a patient-reported outcomes study of individuals 12 to 36 months after diagnosis. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33(6):616–24.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Emmertsen KJ, Laurberg S, Rectal Cancer Function Study Group. Impact of bowel dysfunction on quality of life after sphincter-preserving resection for rectal cancer. Br J Surg. 2013;100(10):1377–87.CrossRefPubMed Emmertsen KJ, Laurberg S, Rectal Cancer Function Study Group. Impact of bowel dysfunction on quality of life after sphincter-preserving resection for rectal cancer. Br J Surg. 2013;100(10):1377–87.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Jansen L, et al. Quality of life among long-term (≥5 years) colorectal cancer survivors – systematic review. Eur J Cancer. 2010;46(16):2879–88.CrossRefPubMed Jansen L, et al. Quality of life among long-term (≥5 years) colorectal cancer survivors – systematic review. Eur J Cancer. 2010;46(16):2879–88.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Nikoletti S, et al. Bowel problems, self-care practices, and information needs of colorectal cancer survivors at 6 to 24 months after sphincter-saving surgery. Cancer Nurs. 2008;31(5):389–98.CrossRefPubMed Nikoletti S, et al. Bowel problems, self-care practices, and information needs of colorectal cancer survivors at 6 to 24 months after sphincter-saving surgery. Cancer Nurs. 2008;31(5):389–98.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Ramsey SD, et al. Quality of life in long term survivors of colorectal cancer. Am J Gastroenterol. 2002;97(5):1228–34.CrossRefPubMed Ramsey SD, et al. Quality of life in long term survivors of colorectal cancer. Am J Gastroenterol. 2002;97(5):1228–34.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Trentham-Dietz A, et al. Health-related quality of life in female long-term colorectal cancer survivors. Oncologist. 2003;8(4):342–9.CrossRefPubMed Trentham-Dietz A, et al. Health-related quality of life in female long-term colorectal cancer survivors. Oncologist. 2003;8(4):342–9.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Gamelin E, et al. Clinical aspects and molecular basis of oxaliplatin neurotoxicity: current management and development of preventive measures. Semin Oncol. 2002;29(5 Suppl 15):21–33.CrossRefPubMed Gamelin E, et al. Clinical aspects and molecular basis of oxaliplatin neurotoxicity: current management and development of preventive measures. Semin Oncol. 2002;29(5 Suppl 15):21–33.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Chambers SK, et al. A five-year prospective study of quality of life after colorectal cancer. Qual Life Res. 2012;21(9):1551–64.CrossRefPubMed Chambers SK, et al. A five-year prospective study of quality of life after colorectal cancer. Qual Life Res. 2012;21(9):1551–64.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Graca Pereira M, Figueiredo AP, Fincham FD. Anxiety, depression, traumatic stress and quality of life in colorectal cancer after different treatments: a study with Portuguese patients and their partners. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2012;16(3):227–32.CrossRefPubMed Graca Pereira M, Figueiredo AP, Fincham FD. Anxiety, depression, traumatic stress and quality of life in colorectal cancer after different treatments: a study with Portuguese patients and their partners. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2012;16(3):227–32.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Krouse RS, et al. Health-related quality of life among long-term rectal cancer survivors with an ostomy: manifestations by sex. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(28):4664–70.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Krouse RS, et al. Health-related quality of life among long-term rectal cancer survivors with an ostomy: manifestations by sex. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(28):4664–70.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
23.
go back to reference Lynch BM, et al. Describing and predicting psychological distress after colorectal cancer. Cancer. 2008;112(6):1363–70.CrossRefPubMed Lynch BM, et al. Describing and predicting psychological distress after colorectal cancer. Cancer. 2008;112(6):1363–70.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Deimling GT, et al. Cancer-related health worries and psychological distress among older adult, long-term cancer survivors. Psychooncology. 2006;15(4):306–20.CrossRefPubMed Deimling GT, et al. Cancer-related health worries and psychological distress among older adult, long-term cancer survivors. Psychooncology. 2006;15(4):306–20.CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Simard S, et al. Fear of cancer recurrence in adult cancer survivors: a systematic review of quantitative studies. J Cancer Surviv. 2013;7(3):300–22.CrossRefPubMed Simard S, et al. Fear of cancer recurrence in adult cancer survivors: a systematic review of quantitative studies. J Cancer Surviv. 2013;7(3):300–22.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Ramsey SD, et al. Quality of life in survivors of colorectal carcinoma. Cancer. 2000;88(6):1294–303.CrossRefPubMed Ramsey SD, et al. Quality of life in survivors of colorectal carcinoma. Cancer. 2000;88(6):1294–303.CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Jefford M, et al. Evaluating a nurse-led survivorship care package (SurvivorCare) for bowel cancer survivors: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2013;14:260.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Jefford M, et al. Evaluating a nurse-led survivorship care package (SurvivorCare) for bowel cancer survivors: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2013;14:260.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
28.
go back to reference Russell L, et al. Psychological distress, quality of life, symptoms and unmet needs of colorectal cancer survivors near the end of treatment. J Cancer Surviv. 2015;9(3):462–70.CrossRefPubMed Russell L, et al. Psychological distress, quality of life, symptoms and unmet needs of colorectal cancer survivors near the end of treatment. J Cancer Surviv. 2015;9(3):462–70.CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Armes J, et al. Patients’ supportive care needs beyond the end of cancer treatment: a prospective, longitudinal survey. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(36):6172–9.CrossRefPubMed Armes J, et al. Patients’ supportive care needs beyond the end of cancer treatment: a prospective, longitudinal survey. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(36):6172–9.CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Harrison SE, et al. Primary health and supportive care needs of long-term cancer survivors: a questionnaire survey. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29(15):2091–8.CrossRefPubMed Harrison SE, et al. Primary health and supportive care needs of long-term cancer survivors: a questionnaire survey. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29(15):2091–8.CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Stovall E, Greenfield S, Hewitt M, editors. From cancer patient to cancer survivor: lost in transition. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2006;1–128. Stovall E, Greenfield S, Hewitt M, editors. From cancer patient to cancer survivor: lost in transition. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2006;1–128.
33.
go back to reference Weaver KE, et al. Follow-up care experiences and perceived quality of care among long-term survivors of breast, prostate, colorectal, and gynecologic cancers. J Oncol Pract. 2014;10(4):e231–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Weaver KE, et al. Follow-up care experiences and perceived quality of care among long-term survivors of breast, prostate, colorectal, and gynecologic cancers. J Oncol Pract. 2014;10(4):e231–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
34.
go back to reference Jorgensen ML, Young JM, Solomon MJ. Optimal delivery of colorectal cancer follow-up care: improving patient outcomes. Patient Relat Outcome Meas. 2015;6:127–38.PubMedPubMedCentral Jorgensen ML, Young JM, Solomon MJ. Optimal delivery of colorectal cancer follow-up care: improving patient outcomes. Patient Relat Outcome Meas. 2015;6:127–38.PubMedPubMedCentral
35.
go back to reference Steele SR, et al. Practice guideline for the surveillance of patients after curative treatment of colon and rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum. 2015;58(8):713–25.CrossRefPubMed Steele SR, et al. Practice guideline for the surveillance of patients after curative treatment of colon and rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum. 2015;58(8):713–25.CrossRefPubMed
36.
go back to reference Earle CC, Neville BA. Under use of necessary care among cancer survivors. Cancer. 2004;101(8):1712–9.CrossRefPubMed Earle CC, Neville BA. Under use of necessary care among cancer survivors. Cancer. 2004;101(8):1712–9.CrossRefPubMed
37.
go back to reference Yang W, et al. Projected supply of and demand for oncologists and radiation oncologists through 2025: an aging, better-insured population will result in shortage. J Oncol Pract. 2014;10(1):39–45.CrossRefPubMed Yang W, et al. Projected supply of and demand for oncologists and radiation oncologists through 2025: an aging, better-insured population will result in shortage. J Oncol Pract. 2014;10(1):39–45.CrossRefPubMed
38.
go back to reference Aziz NM, Rowland JH. Cancer survivorship research among ethnic minority and medically underserved groups. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2002;29(5):789–801.CrossRefPubMed Aziz NM, Rowland JH. Cancer survivorship research among ethnic minority and medically underserved groups. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2002;29(5):789–801.CrossRefPubMed
39.
go back to reference Grunfeld E, et al. Comparison of breast cancer patient satisfaction with follow-up in primary care versus specialist care: results from a randomized controlled trial. Br J Gen Pract. 1999;49(446):705–10.PubMedPubMedCentral Grunfeld E, et al. Comparison of breast cancer patient satisfaction with follow-up in primary care versus specialist care: results from a randomized controlled trial. Br J Gen Pract. 1999;49(446):705–10.PubMedPubMedCentral
40.
go back to reference Grunfeld E, et al. Follow-up of breast cancer in primary care vs specialist care: results of an economic evaluation. Br J Cancer. 1999;79(7-8):1227–33.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Grunfeld E, et al. Follow-up of breast cancer in primary care vs specialist care: results of an economic evaluation. Br J Cancer. 1999;79(7-8):1227–33.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
41.
go back to reference Grunfeld E, et al. Randomized trial of long-term follow-up for early-stage breast cancer: a comparison of family physician versus specialist care. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24(6):848–55.CrossRefPubMed Grunfeld E, et al. Randomized trial of long-term follow-up for early-stage breast cancer: a comparison of family physician versus specialist care. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24(6):848–55.CrossRefPubMed
42.
go back to reference Grunfeld E, et al. Evaluating primary care follow-up of breast cancer: methods and preliminary results of three studies. Ann Oncol. 1995;6 Suppl 2:47–52.CrossRefPubMed Grunfeld E, et al. Evaluating primary care follow-up of breast cancer: methods and preliminary results of three studies. Ann Oncol. 1995;6 Suppl 2:47–52.CrossRefPubMed
45.
go back to reference Wattchow DA, et al. General practice vs surgical-based follow-up for patients with colon cancer: randomised controlled trial. Br J Cancer. 2006;94(8):1116–21.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Wattchow DA, et al. General practice vs surgical-based follow-up for patients with colon cancer: randomised controlled trial. Br J Cancer. 2006;94(8):1116–21.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
46.
go back to reference Baravelli C, et al. The views of bowel cancer survivors and health care professionals regarding survivorship care plans and post treatment follow up. J Cancer Surviv. 2009;3(2):99–108.CrossRefPubMed Baravelli C, et al. The views of bowel cancer survivors and health care professionals regarding survivorship care plans and post treatment follow up. J Cancer Surviv. 2009;3(2):99–108.CrossRefPubMed
47.
go back to reference Hewitt M, Rowland JH, Yancik R. Cancer survivors in the United States: age, health, and disability. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2003;58(1):82–91.CrossRefPubMed Hewitt M, Rowland JH, Yancik R. Cancer survivors in the United States: age, health, and disability. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2003;58(1):82–91.CrossRefPubMed
48.
go back to reference Yancik R, et al. Perspectives on comorbidity and cancer in older patients: approaches to expand the knowledge base. J Clin Oncol. 2001;19(4):1147–51.CrossRefPubMed Yancik R, et al. Perspectives on comorbidity and cancer in older patients: approaches to expand the knowledge base. J Clin Oncol. 2001;19(4):1147–51.CrossRefPubMed
49.
go back to reference Grunfeld E, Earle CC. The interface between primary and oncology specialty care: treatment through survivorship. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2010;2010(40):25–30.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Grunfeld E, Earle CC. The interface between primary and oncology specialty care: treatment through survivorship. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2010;2010(40):25–30.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
50.
go back to reference Ngune I, et al. Predicting general practice attendance for follow-up cancer care. Am J Health Behav. 2015;39(2):167–74.CrossRefPubMed Ngune I, et al. Predicting general practice attendance for follow-up cancer care. Am J Health Behav. 2015;39(2):167–74.CrossRefPubMed
51.
go back to reference Oeffinger KC, Argenbright KE, Levitt GA, McCabe MS, Anderson PR, Berry E, et al. Models of cancer survivorship health care: moving forward. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2014:205–13 Oeffinger KC, Argenbright KE, Levitt GA, McCabe MS, Anderson PR, Berry E, et al. Models of cancer survivorship health care: moving forward. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2014:205–13
52.
go back to reference Oeffinger KC, McCabe MS. Models for delivering survivorship care. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24(32):5117–24.CrossRefPubMed Oeffinger KC, McCabe MS. Models for delivering survivorship care. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24(32):5117–24.CrossRefPubMed
53.
go back to reference Rubin G, et al. The expanding role of primary care in cancer control. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16(12):1231–72.CrossRefPubMed Rubin G, et al. The expanding role of primary care in cancer control. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16(12):1231–72.CrossRefPubMed
54.
go back to reference Emery J, et al. Protocol for the ProCare Trial: a phase II randomised controlled trial of shared care for follow-up of men with prostate cancer. BMJ Open. 2014;4(3), e004972.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Emery J, et al. Protocol for the ProCare Trial: a phase II randomised controlled trial of shared care for follow-up of men with prostate cancer. BMJ Open. 2014;4(3), e004972.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
55.
go back to reference Emery JD, Jefford M, King M, Hayne D, Martin A, Doorey J, et al. ProCare Trial: a phase II randomized controlled trial of shared care for follow-up of men with prostate cancer. BJU Int. 2017;119(3):381–9.CrossRefPubMed Emery JD, Jefford M, King M, Hayne D, Martin A, Doorey J, et al. ProCare Trial: a phase II randomized controlled trial of shared care for follow-up of men with prostate cancer. BJU Int. 2017;119(3):381–9.CrossRefPubMed
56.
go back to reference Wagner EH, Austin BT, Von Korff M. Organizing care for patients with chronic illness. Milbank Q. 1996;74(4):511–44.CrossRefPubMed Wagner EH, Austin BT, Von Korff M. Organizing care for patients with chronic illness. Milbank Q. 1996;74(4):511–44.CrossRefPubMed
57.
go back to reference Bodenheimer T, Wagner EH, Grumbach K. Improving primary care for patients with chronic illness: the chronic care model, part 2. JAMA. 2002;288(15):1909–14.CrossRefPubMed Bodenheimer T, Wagner EH, Grumbach K. Improving primary care for patients with chronic illness: the chronic care model, part 2. JAMA. 2002;288(15):1909–14.CrossRefPubMed
58.
go back to reference Coleman MP, et al. Cancer survival in Australia, Canada, Denmark, Norway, Sweden, and the UK, 1995–2007 (the International Cancer Benchmarking Partnership): an analysis of population-based cancer registry data. Lancet. 2011;377(9760):127–38.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Coleman MP, et al. Cancer survival in Australia, Canada, Denmark, Norway, Sweden, and the UK, 1995–2007 (the International Cancer Benchmarking Partnership): an analysis of population-based cancer registry data. Lancet. 2011;377(9760):127–38.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
59.
go back to reference Ouwens M, et al. Integrated care programmes for chronically ill patients: a review of systematic reviews. Int J Qual Health Care. 2005;17(2):141–6.CrossRefPubMed Ouwens M, et al. Integrated care programmes for chronically ill patients: a review of systematic reviews. Int J Qual Health Care. 2005;17(2):141–6.CrossRefPubMed
60.
go back to reference Jiwa M, et al. Timely cancer diagnosis and management as a chronic condition: opportunities for primary care. Med J Aust. 2008;189(2):78–82.PubMed Jiwa M, et al. Timely cancer diagnosis and management as a chronic condition: opportunities for primary care. Med J Aust. 2008;189(2):78–82.PubMed
61.
go back to reference Jefford M, et al. Tailored chemotherapy information faxed to general practitioners improves confidence in managing adverse effects and satisfaction with shared care: results from a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26(14):2272–7.CrossRefPubMed Jefford M, et al. Tailored chemotherapy information faxed to general practitioners improves confidence in managing adverse effects and satisfaction with shared care: results from a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26(14):2272–7.CrossRefPubMed
63.
go back to reference Barlow J, et al. Self-management approaches for people with chronic conditions: a review. Patient Educ Couns. 2002;48(2):177–87.CrossRefPubMed Barlow J, et al. Self-management approaches for people with chronic conditions: a review. Patient Educ Couns. 2002;48(2):177–87.CrossRefPubMed
64.
65.
go back to reference Griffin SJ, et al. Effect on health-related outcomes of interventions to alter the interaction between patients and practitioners: a systematic review of trials. Ann Fam Med. 2004;2(6):595–608.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Griffin SJ, et al. Effect on health-related outcomes of interventions to alter the interaction between patients and practitioners: a systematic review of trials. Ann Fam Med. 2004;2(6):595–608.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
66.
go back to reference Hodgkinson K, et al. The development and evaluation of a measure to assess cancer survivors’ unmet supportive care needs: the CaSUN (Cancer Survivors’ Unmet Needs measure). Psychooncology. 2007;16(9):796–804.CrossRefPubMed Hodgkinson K, et al. The development and evaluation of a measure to assess cancer survivors’ unmet supportive care needs: the CaSUN (Cancer Survivors’ Unmet Needs measure). Psychooncology. 2007;16(9):796–804.CrossRefPubMed
67.
69.
go back to reference Moher D, Schulz KF, Altman D, CONSORT Group. The CONSORT Statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomized trials 2001. Explore (NY). 2005;1(1):40–5.CrossRef Moher D, Schulz KF, Altman D, CONSORT Group. The CONSORT Statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomized trials 2001. Explore (NY). 2005;1(1):40–5.CrossRef
73.
go back to reference Aaronson NK, et al. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1993;85(5):365–76.CrossRefPubMed Aaronson NK, et al. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1993;85(5):365–76.CrossRefPubMed
74.
go back to reference Sprangers MA, te Velde A, Aaronson NK, European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Study Group on Quality of Life. The construction and testing of the EORTC colorectal cancer-specific quality of life questionnaire module (QLQ-CR38). Eur J Cancer. 1999;35(2):238–47.CrossRefPubMed Sprangers MA, te Velde A, Aaronson NK, European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Study Group on Quality of Life. The construction and testing of the EORTC colorectal cancer-specific quality of life questionnaire module (QLQ-CR38). Eur J Cancer. 1999;35(2):238–47.CrossRefPubMed
75.
go back to reference Campbell HS, et al. Development and validation of the Short-Form Survivor Unmet Needs Survey (SF-SUNS). Support Care Cancer. 2014;22(4):1071–9.CrossRefPubMed Campbell HS, et al. Development and validation of the Short-Form Survivor Unmet Needs Survey (SF-SUNS). Support Care Cancer. 2014;22(4):1071–9.CrossRefPubMed
76.
go back to reference National Research Corporation. Development and validation of the Picker Ambulatory Oncology Survey Instrument in Canada: final report. Markham, ON, Canada: National Research Corporation; 2003. National Research Corporation. Development and validation of the Picker Ambulatory Oncology Survey Instrument in Canada: final report. Markham, ON, Canada: National Research Corporation; 2003.
77.
go back to reference Marshall GN, Hays RD. The Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire short-form (PSQ-18). Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation; 1994. Marshall GN, Hays RD. The Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire short-form (PSQ-18). Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation; 1994.
78.
go back to reference Norman GR, Sloan JA, Wyrwich KW. Interpretation of changes in health-related quality of life: the remarkable universality of half a standard deviation. Med Care. 2003;41(5):582–92.PubMed Norman GR, Sloan JA, Wyrwich KW. Interpretation of changes in health-related quality of life: the remarkable universality of half a standard deviation. Med Care. 2003;41(5):582–92.PubMed
79.
go back to reference King MT, et al. QLU-C10D: a health state classification system for a multi-attribute utility measure based on the EORTC QLQ-C30. Qual Life Res. 2016;25(3):625–36.CrossRefPubMed King MT, et al. QLU-C10D: a health state classification system for a multi-attribute utility measure based on the EORTC QLQ-C30. Qual Life Res. 2016;25(3):625–36.CrossRefPubMed
80.
go back to reference Briggs AH, Claxton K, Sculpher MJ. Decision modelling for health economic evaluation. New York: Oxford University Press; 2006. Briggs AH, Claxton K, Sculpher MJ. Decision modelling for health economic evaluation. New York: Oxford University Press; 2006.
81.
82.
go back to reference Ouwens M, et al. Implementation of integrated care for patients with cancer: a systematic review of interventions and effects. Int J Qual Health Care. 2009;21(2):137–44.CrossRefPubMed Ouwens M, et al. Implementation of integrated care for patients with cancer: a systematic review of interventions and effects. Int J Qual Health Care. 2009;21(2):137–44.CrossRefPubMed
83.
go back to reference Klinkhammer-Schalke M, et al. Direct Improvement of Quality of Life in Colorectal Cancer Patients Using a Tailored Pathway with Quality of Life Diagnosis and Therapy (DIQOL): study and protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials. 2015;16(1):460–71.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Klinkhammer-Schalke M, et al. Direct Improvement of Quality of Life in Colorectal Cancer Patients Using a Tailored Pathway with Quality of Life Diagnosis and Therapy (DIQOL): study and protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials. 2015;16(1):460–71.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
84.
go back to reference Klinkhammer-Schalke M, et al. Direct improvement of quality of life using a tailored quality of life diagnosis and therapy pathway: randomised trial in 200 women with breast cancer. Br J Cancer. 2012;106(5):826–38.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Klinkhammer-Schalke M, et al. Direct improvement of quality of life using a tailored quality of life diagnosis and therapy pathway: randomised trial in 200 women with breast cancer. Br J Cancer. 2012;106(5):826–38.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
SCORE: Shared care of Colorectal cancer survivors: protocol for a randomised controlled trial
Authors
Michael Jefford
Jon Emery
Eva Grunfeld
Andrew Martin
Paula Rodger
Alexandra M. Murray
Richard De Abreu Lourenco
Alexander Heriot
Jo Phipps-Nelson
Lisa Guccione
Dorothy King
Karolina Lisy
Niall Tebbutt
Adele Burgess
Ian Faragher
Rodney Woods
Penelope Schofield
Publication date
01-12-2017
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Trials / Issue 1/2017
Electronic ISSN: 1745-6215
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-017-2245-4

Other articles of this Issue 1/2017

Trials 1/2017 Go to the issue