Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer 1/2018

01-03-2018 | Original Research

An Alternative Method for Screening Gastric Cancer Based on Serum Levels of CEA, CA19-9, and CA72-4

Authors: Junxiu Yu, Wanlei Zheng

Published in: Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

The goal of this study was to create a novel method for screening gastric cancer (GC) based on serum levels of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), cancer antigen 19-9 (CA19-9), and cancer antigen 72-4 (CA72-4) tumor markers.

Methods

Retrospectively, the predictive value for GC was calculated using a logistic analysis on serum levels of CEA, CA19-9, and CA72-4 from 216 GC and 49 benign patients. The predictive value was used to make a recommendation system on whether further GC screening was necessary. Prospectively, 80 GC and 33 benign patients were used to assess the value of this method.

Results

The recommendation system to determine whether additional GC screening was necessary consisted of three grades: grade I, no proposals; grade II, proposals; grade III, strong proposals. Additional screening was suggested when the predictive value was ≤0.700 (grade I), 0.700–0.850 (grade II), and >0.850 (grade III). Of the total 216 GC patients, 20.4, 27.8, and 51.9% were classified as grades I, II, and III, respectively. Of the 49 benign cases, 57.1, 32.7, and 10.2% were classified as grades I, II, and III, respectively. Of the 80 prospective GC patients, 17.3, 28.4, and 54.3% were classified as grades I, II, and III, respectively. Of the 33 prospective benign cases, 54.6, 33.3, and 12.1% were classified as grades I, II, and III, respectively.

Conclusion

The new screening recommendation system based on serum levels of CEA, CA19-9, and CA72-4 is an effective approach for detecting GC.
Literature
1.
3.
go back to reference Edge SB, Byrd DR, Compton CC, et al. AJCC Cancer Staging Handbook. New York: Springer; 2010. Edge SB, Byrd DR, Compton CC, et al. AJCC Cancer Staging Handbook. New York: Springer; 2010.
4.
go back to reference Marrelli D, Pedrazzani C, Morgagni P, et al. Changing clinical and pathological features of gastric cancer over time. Br J Surg. 2011;98:1273–83.CrossRefPubMed Marrelli D, Pedrazzani C, Morgagni P, et al. Changing clinical and pathological features of gastric cancer over time. Br J Surg. 2011;98:1273–83.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Ding YB, Xia TS, Wu JD, et al. Surgical outcomes for gastric cancer of a single institute in southeast China. Am J Surg. 2012;203:217–21.CrossRefPubMed Ding YB, Xia TS, Wu JD, et al. Surgical outcomes for gastric cancer of a single institute in southeast China. Am J Surg. 2012;203:217–21.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Nashimoto A, Akazawa K, Isobe Y, et al. Gastric cancer treated in 2002 in Japan: 2009 annual report of the JGCA nationwide registry. Gastric Cancer. 2013;16:1–27.CrossRefPubMed Nashimoto A, Akazawa K, Isobe Y, et al. Gastric cancer treated in 2002 in Japan: 2009 annual report of the JGCA nationwide registry. Gastric Cancer. 2013;16:1–27.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Jeong O, Park YK. Clinicopathological features and surgical treatment of gastric cancer in South Korea: the results of 2009 nationwide survey on surgically treated gastric cancer patients. J Gastric Cancer. 2011;11:69–77.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Jeong O, Park YK. Clinicopathological features and surgical treatment of gastric cancer in South Korea: the results of 2009 nationwide survey on surgically treated gastric cancer patients. J Gastric Cancer. 2011;11:69–77.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
go back to reference Lee S, Jun JK, Suh M, et al. Gastric cancer screening uptake trends in Korea: results for the national cancer screening program from 2002 to 2011: a prospective cross-sectional study. Medicine. 2015;94:e533.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Lee S, Jun JK, Suh M, et al. Gastric cancer screening uptake trends in Korea: results for the national cancer screening program from 2002 to 2011: a prospective cross-sectional study. Medicine. 2015;94:e533.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
9.
go back to reference Hamashima C, Ogoshi K, Narisawa R, et al. Impact of endoscopic screening on mortality reduction from gastric cancer. World J Gastroenterol. 2015;21:2460–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Hamashima C, Ogoshi K, Narisawa R, et al. Impact of endoscopic screening on mortality reduction from gastric cancer. World J Gastroenterol. 2015;21:2460–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
go back to reference Choi KS, Jun JK, Lee HY, et al. Performance of gastric cancer screening by endoscopy testing through the National Cancer Screening Program of Korea. Cancer Sci. 2011;102:1559–64.CrossRefPubMed Choi KS, Jun JK, Lee HY, et al. Performance of gastric cancer screening by endoscopy testing through the National Cancer Screening Program of Korea. Cancer Sci. 2011;102:1559–64.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Smith RA, Manassaram-Baptiste D, Brooks D, et al. Cancer screening in the United States, 2015: a review of current American cancer society guidelines and current issues in cancer screening. CA Cancer J Clin. 2015;65:30–54.CrossRefPubMed Smith RA, Manassaram-Baptiste D, Brooks D, et al. Cancer screening in the United States, 2015: a review of current American cancer society guidelines and current issues in cancer screening. CA Cancer J Clin. 2015;65:30–54.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Kim DH, Oh SJ, Oh CA, et al. The relationships between perioperative CEA, CA 19-9, and CA 72-4 and recurrence in gastric cancer patients after curative radical gastrectomy. J Surg Oncol. 2011;104:585–91.CrossRefPubMed Kim DH, Oh SJ, Oh CA, et al. The relationships between perioperative CEA, CA 19-9, and CA 72-4 and recurrence in gastric cancer patients after curative radical gastrectomy. J Surg Oncol. 2011;104:585–91.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Kwon OK, Yu W, Chung H. Prognostic value of postoperative CA19-9 normalization in patients with advanced gastric cancer. Hepato-Gastroenterology. 2013;60:240–3.PubMed Kwon OK, Yu W, Chung H. Prognostic value of postoperative CA19-9 normalization in patients with advanced gastric cancer. Hepato-Gastroenterology. 2013;60:240–3.PubMed
14.
go back to reference Jo JC, Ryu MH, Koo DH, et al. Serum CA 19-9 as a prognostic factor in patients with metastatic gastric cancer. Asia Pac J Clin Oncol. 2013;9:324–30.CrossRefPubMed Jo JC, Ryu MH, Koo DH, et al. Serum CA 19-9 as a prognostic factor in patients with metastatic gastric cancer. Asia Pac J Clin Oncol. 2013;9:324–30.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Choi AR, Park JC, Kim JH, et al. High level of preoperative carbohydrate antigen 19-9 is a poor survival predictor in gastric cancer. World J Gastroenterol. 2013;19:5302–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Choi AR, Park JC, Kim JH, et al. High level of preoperative carbohydrate antigen 19-9 is a poor survival predictor in gastric cancer. World J Gastroenterol. 2013;19:5302–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
17.
go back to reference He CZ, Zhang KH, Li Q, et al. Combined use of AFP, CEA, CA125 and CAl9-9 improves the sensitivity for the diagnosis of gastric cancer. BMC Gastroenterol. 2013;13:87.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral He CZ, Zhang KH, Li Q, et al. Combined use of AFP, CEA, CA125 and CAl9-9 improves the sensitivity for the diagnosis of gastric cancer. BMC Gastroenterol. 2013;13:87.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
19.
go back to reference Shimada H, Noie T, Ohashi M, et al. Clinical significance of serum tumor markers for gastric cancer: a systematic review of literature by the Task Force of the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association. Gastric Cancer. 2014;17:26–33.CrossRefPubMed Shimada H, Noie T, Ohashi M, et al. Clinical significance of serum tumor markers for gastric cancer: a systematic review of literature by the Task Force of the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association. Gastric Cancer. 2014;17:26–33.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Bagaria B, Sood S, Sharma R, et al. Comparative study of CEA and CA19-9 in esophageal, gastric and colon cancers individually and in combination (ROC curve analysis). Cancer Biol Med. 2013;10:148–57.PubMedPubMedCentral Bagaria B, Sood S, Sharma R, et al. Comparative study of CEA and CA19-9 in esophageal, gastric and colon cancers individually and in combination (ROC curve analysis). Cancer Biol Med. 2013;10:148–57.PubMedPubMedCentral
21.
go back to reference Leja M, You W, Camargo MC, et al. Implementation of gastric cancer screening—the global experience. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2014;28:1093–106.CrossRefPubMed Leja M, You W, Camargo MC, et al. Implementation of gastric cancer screening—the global experience. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2014;28:1093–106.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Karimi P, Islami F, Anandasabapathy S, et al. Gastric cancer: descriptive epidemiology, risk factors, screening, and prevention. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2014;23:700–13.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Karimi P, Islami F, Anandasabapathy S, et al. Gastric cancer: descriptive epidemiology, risk factors, screening, and prevention. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2014;23:700–13.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
23.
go back to reference Park CH, Kim EH, Jung DH, et al. The new modified ABCD method for gastric neoplasm screening. Gastric Cancer. 2016;19:128–35. Park CH, Kim EH, Jung DH, et al. The new modified ABCD method for gastric neoplasm screening. Gastric Cancer. 2016;19:128–35.
24.
go back to reference Corso G, Pedrazzani C, Pinheiro H, et al. E-cadherin genetic screening and clinico-pathologic characteristics of early onset gastric cancer. Eur J Cancer. 2011;47:631–9.CrossRefPubMed Corso G, Pedrazzani C, Pinheiro H, et al. E-cadherin genetic screening and clinico-pathologic characteristics of early onset gastric cancer. Eur J Cancer. 2011;47:631–9.CrossRefPubMed
25.
26.
go back to reference Oliveira C, Pinheiro H, Figueiredo J, et al. Familial gastric cancer: genetic susceptibility, pathology, and implications for management. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16:e60–70.CrossRefPubMed Oliveira C, Pinheiro H, Figueiredo J, et al. Familial gastric cancer: genetic susceptibility, pathology, and implications for management. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16:e60–70.CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Gomceli I, Bostanci EB, Ozer I, et al. A novel screening biomarker in gastric cancer: serum Dickkopf-1. Hepato-Gastroenterology. 2012;59:1661–4.PubMed Gomceli I, Bostanci EB, Ozer I, et al. A novel screening biomarker in gastric cancer: serum Dickkopf-1. Hepato-Gastroenterology. 2012;59:1661–4.PubMed
28.
go back to reference Cui L, Zhang X, Ye G, et al. Gastric juice MicroRNAs as potential biomarkers for the screening of gastric cancer. Cancer. 2013;119:1618–26.CrossRefPubMed Cui L, Zhang X, Ye G, et al. Gastric juice MicroRNAs as potential biomarkers for the screening of gastric cancer. Cancer. 2013;119:1618–26.CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Leja M, Kupcinskas L, Funka K, et al. Value of gastrin-17 in detecting antral atrophy. Adv Med Sci. 2011;56:145–50.CrossRefPubMed Leja M, Kupcinskas L, Funka K, et al. Value of gastrin-17 in detecting antral atrophy. Adv Med Sci. 2011;56:145–50.CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Murphy G, Kamangar F, Dawsey SM, et al. The relationship between serum ghrelin and the risk of gastric and esophagogastric junctional adenocarcinomas. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2011;103:1123–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Murphy G, Kamangar F, Dawsey SM, et al. The relationship between serum ghrelin and the risk of gastric and esophagogastric junctional adenocarcinomas. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2011;103:1123–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
An Alternative Method for Screening Gastric Cancer Based on Serum Levels of CEA, CA19-9, and CA72-4
Authors
Junxiu Yu
Wanlei Zheng
Publication date
01-03-2018
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer / Issue 1/2018
Print ISSN: 1941-6628
Electronic ISSN: 1941-6636
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12029-016-9912-7

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer 1/2018 Go to the issue
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

Year in Review: Pediatric cardiology

Watch Dr. Anne Marie Valente present the last year's highlights in pediatric and congenital heart disease in the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Pulmonary vascular disease

The last year's highlights in pulmonary vascular disease are presented by Dr. Jane Leopold in this official video from ACC.24.

Year in Review: Valvular heart disease

Watch Prof. William Zoghbi present the last year's highlights in valvular heart disease from the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discuss last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.