Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Digestive Diseases and Sciences 12/2018

01-12-2018 | Original Article

An Additional 30-s Observation of the Right-Sided Colon with Narrow Band Imaging Decreases Missed Polyps: A Pilot Study

Authors: Naohisa Yoshida, Ken Inoue, Ritsu Yasuda, Ryohei Hirose, Osamu Dohi, Yuji Naito, Takaaki Murakami, Yutaka Inada, Kiyoshi Ogiso, Yukiko Morinaga, Mitsuo Kishimoto, Rafiz Abdul Rani, Yoshito Itoh

Published in: Digestive Diseases and Sciences | Issue 12/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

Previous narrow-band imaging (NBI) was dark and reported not to be useful for polyp detection. In this study, we analyzed the efficacy of an additional 30-s observation of the right-sided colon with the recent bright high-resolution NBI.

Methods

We enrolled patients undergoing colonoscopy from February 2015 to May 2017 in two institutions. All procedures were performed with the latest system (EVIS LUCERA ELITE, Olympus). The cecum and ascending colon were first observed with white light imaging (WLI) in both the NBI and WLI group. Then, the colonoscope was re-inserted, and the cecum and ascending colon were observed for an additional 30 s. In this second observation, NBI was performed for the first 130 patients in the NBI group and WLI for the next 130 in the WLI group. The number of adenoma and sessile serrated polyps (ASPs) in the second observation were examined in both groups. According to our initial pilot study, the sample size was estimated at 126.

Results

In the first observation, the number of ASPs was 72 in the NBI group and 72 in the WLI group (p = 1.0). In the second observation, the number of ASPs was 23 in the NBI group and 10 in the WLI group (p = 0.02). The polyp and adenoma detection rates in the second observation were 16.2% and 12.3% in the NBI group and 7.7% (p = 0.03) and 6.2% (p = 0.09) in the WLI group.

Conclusions

The additional 30-s observation with recent NBI decreased missed polyps in the right-sided colon.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Nishihara R, Wu K, Lochhead P, et al. Long-term colorectal-cancer incidence and mortality after lower endoscopy. N Engl J Med. 2013;369:1095–1105.CrossRef Nishihara R, Wu K, Lochhead P, et al. Long-term colorectal-cancer incidence and mortality after lower endoscopy. N Engl J Med. 2013;369:1095–1105.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, Ho MN, et al. Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy. N Engl J Med. 1993;329:1977–1981.CrossRef Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, Ho MN, et al. Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy. N Engl J Med. 1993;329:1977–1981.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Zauber AG, Winawer SJ, O’Brien MJ, et al. Colonoscopic polypectomy and long-term prevention of colorectal-cancer deaths. N Engl J Med. 2012;366:687–696.CrossRef Zauber AG, Winawer SJ, O’Brien MJ, et al. Colonoscopic polypectomy and long-term prevention of colorectal-cancer deaths. N Engl J Med. 2012;366:687–696.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Heresbach D, Barrioz T, Lapalus MG, et al. Miss rate for colorectal neoplastic polyps: a prospective multicenter study of back-to-back video colonoscopies. Endoscopy. 2008;40:284–290.CrossRef Heresbach D, Barrioz T, Lapalus MG, et al. Miss rate for colorectal neoplastic polyps: a prospective multicenter study of back-to-back video colonoscopies. Endoscopy. 2008;40:284–290.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Rex DK, Cutler CS, Lemmel GT, et al. Colonoscopic miss rates of adenomas determined by back-to-back colonoscopies. Gastroenterology. 1997;112:24–28.CrossRef Rex DK, Cutler CS, Lemmel GT, et al. Colonoscopic miss rates of adenomas determined by back-to-back colonoscopies. Gastroenterology. 1997;112:24–28.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Kim NH, Jung YS, Jeong WS, et al. Miss rate of colorectal neoplastic polyps and risk factors for missed polyps in consecutive colonoscopies. Intest Res. 2017;15:411–418.CrossRef Kim NH, Jung YS, Jeong WS, et al. Miss rate of colorectal neoplastic polyps and risk factors for missed polyps in consecutive colonoscopies. Intest Res. 2017;15:411–418.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Lee J, Park SW, Kim YS, et al. Risk factors of missed colorectal lesions after colonoscopy. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017;96:e7468.CrossRef Lee J, Park SW, Kim YS, et al. Risk factors of missed colorectal lesions after colonoscopy. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017;96:e7468.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Sano Y, Muto M, Tajiri H, et al. Optical/digital chromoendoscopy during colonoscopy using narrow-band image system. Dig Endosc. 2005;17:S43–S48.CrossRef Sano Y, Muto M, Tajiri H, et al. Optical/digital chromoendoscopy during colonoscopy using narrow-band image system. Dig Endosc. 2005;17:S43–S48.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Ogiso K, Yoshida N, Siah KTH, et al. New generation narrow band imaging improves visibility of polyps: a colonoscopy video evaluation study. J Gastroenterol. 2016;51:883–890.CrossRef Ogiso K, Yoshida N, Siah KTH, et al. New generation narrow band imaging improves visibility of polyps: a colonoscopy video evaluation study. J Gastroenterol. 2016;51:883–890.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Adler A, Aschenbeck J, Yenerim T, et al. Narrow-band versus white-light high definition television endoscopic imaging for screening colonoscopy: a prospective randomized trial. Gastroenterology. 2009;136:410–416.CrossRef Adler A, Aschenbeck J, Yenerim T, et al. Narrow-band versus white-light high definition television endoscopic imaging for screening colonoscopy: a prospective randomized trial. Gastroenterology. 2009;136:410–416.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Rastogi A, Early DS, Gupta N, et al. Randomized, controlled trial of standard-definition white-light, high-definition white-light, and narrow-band imaging colonoscopy for the detection of colon polyps and prediction of polyp histology. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011;74:593–602.CrossRef Rastogi A, Early DS, Gupta N, et al. Randomized, controlled trial of standard-definition white-light, high-definition white-light, and narrow-band imaging colonoscopy for the detection of colon polyps and prediction of polyp histology. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011;74:593–602.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Ikematsu H, Saito Y, Tanaka S, et al. The impact of narrow band imaging for colon polyp detection: a multicenter randomized controlled trial by tandem colonoscopy. J Gastroenterol. 2012;47:1099–1107.CrossRef Ikematsu H, Saito Y, Tanaka S, et al. The impact of narrow band imaging for colon polyp detection: a multicenter randomized controlled trial by tandem colonoscopy. J Gastroenterol. 2012;47:1099–1107.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Rex DK, Helbig C. High yields of small and flat adenomas with high-definition colonoscopes using either white light or narrow band imaging. Gastroenterology. 2007;133:42–47.CrossRef Rex DK, Helbig C. High yields of small and flat adenomas with high-definition colonoscopes using either white light or narrow band imaging. Gastroenterology. 2007;133:42–47.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Ikematsu H, Matsuda T, Osera S, et al. Usefulness of narrow-band imaging with dual-focus magnification for differential diagnosis of small colorectal polyps. Surg Endosc. 2015;29:844–850.CrossRef Ikematsu H, Matsuda T, Osera S, et al. Usefulness of narrow-band imaging with dual-focus magnification for differential diagnosis of small colorectal polyps. Surg Endosc. 2015;29:844–850.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Horimatsu T, Sano Y, Tanaka S, et al. Next-generation narrow band imaging system for colonic polyp detection: a prospective multicenter randomized trial. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2015;30:947–954.CrossRef Horimatsu T, Sano Y, Tanaka S, et al. Next-generation narrow band imaging system for colonic polyp detection: a prospective multicenter randomized trial. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2015;30:947–954.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Ishaq S, Siau K, Harrison E, et al. Technological advances for improving adenoma detection rates: the changing face of colonoscopy. Dig Liver Dis. 2017;49:721–727.CrossRef Ishaq S, Siau K, Harrison E, et al. Technological advances for improving adenoma detection rates: the changing face of colonoscopy. Dig Liver Dis. 2017;49:721–727.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Sano Y, Tanaka S, Kudo SE, et al. Narrow-band imaging (NBI) magnifying endoscopic classification of colorectal tumors proposed by the Japan NBI Expert Team. Dig Endosc. 2016;28:526–533.CrossRef Sano Y, Tanaka S, Kudo SE, et al. Narrow-band imaging (NBI) magnifying endoscopic classification of colorectal tumors proposed by the Japan NBI Expert Team. Dig Endosc. 2016;28:526–533.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Yamashina T, Takeuchi Y, Uedo N, et al. Diagnostic features of sessile serrated adenoma/polyps on magnifying narrow band imaging: a prospective study of diagnostic accuracy. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015;30:117–123.CrossRef Yamashina T, Takeuchi Y, Uedo N, et al. Diagnostic features of sessile serrated adenoma/polyps on magnifying narrow band imaging: a prospective study of diagnostic accuracy. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015;30:117–123.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Participants in the Paris workshop. The Paris endoscopic classification of superficial neoplastic lesions: esophagus, stomach, and colon-November 30 to December 1, 2002. Gastrointest Endosc. 2003;58:S3–S43.CrossRef Participants in the Paris workshop. The Paris endoscopic classification of superficial neoplastic lesions: esophagus, stomach, and colon-November 30 to December 1, 2002. Gastrointest Endosc. 2003;58:S3–S43.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Hamilton SR, Aaltonen LA, eds. World Health Organization classification of tumors. Pathology and genetics of tumours of the digestive system. Lyon: IARC Press; 2010:104–109. Hamilton SR, Aaltonen LA, eds. World Health Organization classification of tumors. Pathology and genetics of tumours of the digestive system. Lyon: IARC Press; 2010:104–109.
21.
go back to reference Shida Y, Ichikawa K, Fujimori T, et al. Differentiation between sessile serrated adenoma/polyp and non-sessile serrated adenoma/polyp in large hyperplastic polyp: a Japanese collaborative study. Mol Clin Oncol. 2013;1:53–59.CrossRef Shida Y, Ichikawa K, Fujimori T, et al. Differentiation between sessile serrated adenoma/polyp and non-sessile serrated adenoma/polyp in large hyperplastic polyp: a Japanese collaborative study. Mol Clin Oncol. 2013;1:53–59.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Froehlich F, Wietlisbach V, Gonvers JJ, et al. Impact of colonic cleansing on quality and diagnostic yield of colonoscopy: the European Panel of Appropriateness of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy European multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2005;6:378–384.CrossRef Froehlich F, Wietlisbach V, Gonvers JJ, et al. Impact of colonic cleansing on quality and diagnostic yield of colonoscopy: the European Panel of Appropriateness of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy European multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2005;6:378–384.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Harewood GC, Sharma VK, de Garmo P. Impact of colonoscopy preparation quality on detection of suspected colonic neoplasia. Gastrointest Endosc. 2003;58:76–79.CrossRef Harewood GC, Sharma VK, de Garmo P. Impact of colonoscopy preparation quality on detection of suspected colonic neoplasia. Gastrointest Endosc. 2003;58:76–79.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Pasha SF, Leighton JA, Das A, et al. Comparison of the yield and miss rate of narrow band imaging and white light endoscopy in patients undergoing screening or surveillance colonoscopy: a meta-analysis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2012;107:363–370.CrossRef Pasha SF, Leighton JA, Das A, et al. Comparison of the yield and miss rate of narrow band imaging and white light endoscopy in patients undergoing screening or surveillance colonoscopy: a meta-analysis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2012;107:363–370.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Matsuda T, Ono A, Sekiguchi M, et al. Advances in image enhancement in colonoscopy for detection of adenomas. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017;14:305–314.CrossRef Matsuda T, Ono A, Sekiguchi M, et al. Advances in image enhancement in colonoscopy for detection of adenomas. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017;14:305–314.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Mir FA, Boumitri C, Ashraf I, et al. Cap-assisted colonoscopy versus standard colonoscopy: is the cap beneficial? A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Ann Gastroenterol. 2017;30:640–648.PubMedPubMedCentral Mir FA, Boumitri C, Ashraf I, et al. Cap-assisted colonoscopy versus standard colonoscopy: is the cap beneficial? A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Ann Gastroenterol. 2017;30:640–648.PubMedPubMedCentral
28.
go back to reference He Q, Li JD, An SL, et al. Cap-assisted colonoscopy versus conventional colonoscopy: systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2013;28:279–281.CrossRef He Q, Li JD, An SL, et al. Cap-assisted colonoscopy versus conventional colonoscopy: systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2013;28:279–281.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Rzouq F, Gupta N, Wani S, et al. Cap assisted colonoscopy for the detection of serrated polyps: a post hoc analysis. BMC Gastroenterol. 2015;15:11.CrossRef Rzouq F, Gupta N, Wani S, et al. Cap assisted colonoscopy for the detection of serrated polyps: a post hoc analysis. BMC Gastroenterol. 2015;15:11.CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Floer M, Biecker E, Fitzlaff R, et al. Higher adenoma detection rates with endocuff-assisted colonoscopy—a randomized controlled multicenter trial. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e114267.CrossRef Floer M, Biecker E, Fitzlaff R, et al. Higher adenoma detection rates with endocuff-assisted colonoscopy—a randomized controlled multicenter trial. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e114267.CrossRef
31.
go back to reference van Doorn SC, van der Vlugt M, Depla ACTM, et al. Adenoma detection with endocuff colonoscopy versus conventional colonoscopy: a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Gut. 2017;66:438–445.CrossRef van Doorn SC, van der Vlugt M, Depla ACTM, et al. Adenoma detection with endocuff colonoscopy versus conventional colonoscopy: a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Gut. 2017;66:438–445.CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Halpern Z, Gross SA, Gralnek IM, et al. Comparison of adenoma detection and miss rates between a novel balloon colonoscope and standard colonoscopy: a randomized tandem study. Endoscopy. 2015;47:238–244.CrossRef Halpern Z, Gross SA, Gralnek IM, et al. Comparison of adenoma detection and miss rates between a novel balloon colonoscope and standard colonoscopy: a randomized tandem study. Endoscopy. 2015;47:238–244.CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Papanikolaou IS, Apostolopoulos P, Tziatzios G, et al. Lower adenoma miss rate with FUSE vs. conventional colonoscopy with proximal retroflexion: a randomized back-to-back trial. Endoscopy. 2017;49:468–475.CrossRef Papanikolaou IS, Apostolopoulos P, Tziatzios G, et al. Lower adenoma miss rate with FUSE vs. conventional colonoscopy with proximal retroflexion: a randomized back-to-back trial. Endoscopy. 2017;49:468–475.CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Waye JD, Heigh RI, Fleischer DE, et al. A retrograde-viewing device improves detection of adenomas in the colon: a prospective efficacy evaluation (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc. 2010;71:551–556.CrossRef Waye JD, Heigh RI, Fleischer DE, et al. A retrograde-viewing device improves detection of adenomas in the colon: a prospective efficacy evaluation (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc. 2010;71:551–556.CrossRef
35.
go back to reference Chung SJ, Kim D, Song JH, et al. Efficacy of computed virtual chromoendoscopy on colorectal cancer screening: a prospective, randomized, back-to-back trial of Fuji intelligent color enhancement versus conventional colonoscopy to com-pare adenoma miss rates. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010;72:136–142.CrossRef Chung SJ, Kim D, Song JH, et al. Efficacy of computed virtual chromoendoscopy on colorectal cancer screening: a prospective, randomized, back-to-back trial of Fuji intelligent color enhancement versus conventional colonoscopy to com-pare adenoma miss rates. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010;72:136–142.CrossRef
36.
go back to reference Hong SN, Choe WH, Lee JH, et al. Prospective, randomized, back-to-back trial evaluating the usefulness of i-SCAN in screening colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012;75:e2.CrossRef Hong SN, Choe WH, Lee JH, et al. Prospective, randomized, back-to-back trial evaluating the usefulness of i-SCAN in screening colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012;75:e2.CrossRef
37.
go back to reference Ikematsu H, Sakamoto T, Togashi K, et al. Detectability of colorectal neoplastic lesions using a novel endoscopic system with blue laser imaging: a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Gastointest Endosc. 2017;86:386–394.CrossRef Ikematsu H, Sakamoto T, Togashi K, et al. Detectability of colorectal neoplastic lesions using a novel endoscopic system with blue laser imaging: a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Gastointest Endosc. 2017;86:386–394.CrossRef
38.
go back to reference Yoshida N, Naito Y, Murakami T, et al. Linked color imaging improves the visibility of colorectal polyps: a video study. Endosc Int Open. 2017;5:E518–E525.CrossRef Yoshida N, Naito Y, Murakami T, et al. Linked color imaging improves the visibility of colorectal polyps: a video study. Endosc Int Open. 2017;5:E518–E525.CrossRef
39.
go back to reference Paggi S, Mogavero G, Amato A, et al. Linked color imaging reduces the miss rate of neoplastic lesions in the right colon: a randomized tandem colonoscopy study. Endoscopy. 2018;50:396–402.CrossRef Paggi S, Mogavero G, Amato A, et al. Linked color imaging reduces the miss rate of neoplastic lesions in the right colon: a randomized tandem colonoscopy study. Endoscopy. 2018;50:396–402.CrossRef
40.
go back to reference Parikh ND, Chaptini L, Njei B, et al. Diagnosis of sessile serrated adenomas/polyps with image-enhanced endoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Endoscopy. 2016;48:731–739.CrossRef Parikh ND, Chaptini L, Njei B, et al. Diagnosis of sessile serrated adenomas/polyps with image-enhanced endoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Endoscopy. 2016;48:731–739.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
An Additional 30-s Observation of the Right-Sided Colon with Narrow Band Imaging Decreases Missed Polyps: A Pilot Study
Authors
Naohisa Yoshida
Ken Inoue
Ritsu Yasuda
Ryohei Hirose
Osamu Dohi
Yuji Naito
Takaaki Murakami
Yutaka Inada
Kiyoshi Ogiso
Yukiko Morinaga
Mitsuo Kishimoto
Rafiz Abdul Rani
Yoshito Itoh
Publication date
01-12-2018
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Digestive Diseases and Sciences / Issue 12/2018
Print ISSN: 0163-2116
Electronic ISSN: 1573-2568
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-018-5275-1

Other articles of this Issue 12/2018

Digestive Diseases and Sciences 12/2018 Go to the issue
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

Year in Review: Pediatric cardiology

Watch Dr. Anne Marie Valente present the last year's highlights in pediatric and congenital heart disease in the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Pulmonary vascular disease

The last year's highlights in pulmonary vascular disease are presented by Dr. Jane Leopold in this official video from ACC.24.

Year in Review: Valvular heart disease

Watch Prof. William Zoghbi present the last year's highlights in valvular heart disease from the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discuss last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.