Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Oral Health 1/2023

Open Access 01-12-2023 | Aligner | Research

The application of a fully digital approach in the treatment of skeletal class III malocclusion: a preliminary study

Authors: Meng Li, Shunyao Shen, Zhiyang Zhao, Bo Wang, Hongbo Yu

Published in: BMC Oral Health | Issue 1/2023

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Skeletal malocclusion patients have facial malformations and occlusal dysfunctions that require orthodontic-orthognathic joint treatment, while the combination treatment takes time and requires close communication between surgeons and orthodontists. Thus, improving the efficiency and effectiveness of the combination treatment is necessary, and it is still a challenge. Now, digital technology provides us with an excellent alternative. Despite the widespread use of digital technology in orthognathic surgery simulation and clear aligner orthodontic therapy, it has not been fully integrated into the combined orthognathic and orthodontic treatment process, and the components remain independent.

Methods

A fully digital approach to seamlessly integrating various parts of the combined treatment through digital technology was investigated in this study in order to achieve an efficient transition. Five patients with skeletal Class III malocclusion were enrolled, and all made fully digital treatment plans at the beginning of actual implementation, which included the design of pre-surgical orthodontic, orthognathic surgery, and post-surgical orthodontic. Then, every aspect of the clinical operation was carried out in accordance with the fully digital routine. After the entire treatment process was completed, the skeleton and dentition discrepancy between virtual planning and the actual result was evaluated.

Results

All participants completed the fully digital treatment process, and no complication was observed. The linear deviation of the skeletal anatomy was less than 1 mm, and the angular deviation was less than 1 degree. Except in one case in the lower dentition, the deviation of the virtual dental design from the real alignment was less than 2 mm. Furthermore, with one exception of maxillary anterior-posterior dimension, the linear deviations of the skeleton were not statistically significant. Therefore, the simulation accuracy of the fully digital approach was clinically acceptable.

Conclusions

The digital treatment approach is clinically feasible and has achieved satisfactory results. The discrepancy between virtual design of the entire digital process and actual post-treatment situation was acceptable in clinic. A fully digital approach was proved effective in the treatment of skeletal Class III malocclusion, with which the efficient transition of treatment procedures was realized.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Klein KP, Kaban LB, Masoud MI. Orthognathic surgery and Orthodontics: inadequate planning leading to complications or unfavorable results. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am. 2020;32(1):71–82.CrossRefPubMed Klein KP, Kaban LB, Masoud MI. Orthognathic surgery and Orthodontics: inadequate planning leading to complications or unfavorable results. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am. 2020;32(1):71–82.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Apostolakis D, et al. The current state of computer assisted orthognathic surgery: a narrative review. J Dent. 2022;119:104052.CrossRefPubMed Apostolakis D, et al. The current state of computer assisted orthognathic surgery: a narrative review. J Dent. 2022;119:104052.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Stokbro K, et al. Virtual planning in orthognathic surgery. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014;43(8):957–65.CrossRefPubMed Stokbro K, et al. Virtual planning in orthognathic surgery. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014;43(8):957–65.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Lin HH, Lonic D, Lo LJ. 3D printing in orthognathic surgery - A literature review. J Formos Med Assoc. 2018;117(7):547–58.CrossRefPubMed Lin HH, Lonic D, Lo LJ. 3D printing in orthognathic surgery - A literature review. J Formos Med Assoc. 2018;117(7):547–58.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Xia JJ, et al. Algorithm for planning a double-jaw orthognathic surgery using a computer-aided surgical simulation (CASS) protocol. Part 1: planning sequence. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2015;44(12):1431–40.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Xia JJ, et al. Algorithm for planning a double-jaw orthognathic surgery using a computer-aided surgical simulation (CASS) protocol. Part 1: planning sequence. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2015;44(12):1431–40.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
go back to reference Xia JJ, et al. Algorithm for planning a double-jaw orthognathic surgery using a computer-aided surgical simulation (CASS) protocol. Part 2: three-dimensional cephalometry. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2015;44(12):1441–50.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Xia JJ, et al. Algorithm for planning a double-jaw orthognathic surgery using a computer-aided surgical simulation (CASS) protocol. Part 2: three-dimensional cephalometry. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2015;44(12):1441–50.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
8.
go back to reference Fujiyama K et al. Comparison of clinical outcomes between Invisalign and conventional fixed appliance therapies in adult patients with severe deep overbite treated with nonextraction. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2021. Fujiyama K et al. Comparison of clinical outcomes between Invisalign and conventional fixed appliance therapies in adult patients with severe deep overbite treated with nonextraction. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2021.
9.
go back to reference Al-Balaa M, et al. Predicted and actual outcome of anterior intrusion with Invisalign assessed with cone-beam computed tomography. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2021;159(3):e275–80.CrossRefPubMed Al-Balaa M, et al. Predicted and actual outcome of anterior intrusion with Invisalign assessed with cone-beam computed tomography. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2021;159(3):e275–80.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Azaripour A, et al. Braces versus Invisalign®: gingival parameters and patients’ satisfaction during treatment: a cross-sectional study. BMC Oral Health. 2015;15:69.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Azaripour A, et al. Braces versus Invisalign®: gingival parameters and patients’ satisfaction during treatment: a cross-sectional study. BMC Oral Health. 2015;15:69.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
go back to reference Shokeen B et al. The impact of fixed orthodontic appliances and clear aligners on the oral microbiome and the association with clinical parameters: A longitudinal comparative study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2022. Shokeen B et al. The impact of fixed orthodontic appliances and clear aligners on the oral microbiome and the association with clinical parameters: A longitudinal comparative study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2022.
12.
go back to reference Moon C et al. Postoperative Stability of Patients Undergoing Orthognathic Surgery with Orthodontic Treatment Using Clear Aligners: A Preliminary Study.Applied Sciences, 2021. 11(23). Moon C et al. Postoperative Stability of Patients Undergoing Orthognathic Surgery with Orthodontic Treatment Using Clear Aligners: A Preliminary Study.Applied Sciences, 2021. 11(23).
13.
go back to reference Zhang W, Yang H. Orthognathic surgery in Invisalign Patients. J Craniofac Surg. 2022;33(2):e112–3.CrossRefPubMed Zhang W, Yang H. Orthognathic surgery in Invisalign Patients. J Craniofac Surg. 2022;33(2):e112–3.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Stokbro K, et al. Surgical accuracy of three-dimensional virtual planning: a pilot study of bimaxillary orthognathic procedures including maxillary segmentation. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016;45(1):8–18.CrossRefPubMed Stokbro K, et al. Surgical accuracy of three-dimensional virtual planning: a pilot study of bimaxillary orthognathic procedures including maxillary segmentation. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016;45(1):8–18.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Xia JJ, et al. Accuracy of the computer-aided surgical simulation (CASS) system in the treatment of patients with complex craniomaxillofacial deformity: a pilot study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007;65(2):248–54.CrossRefPubMed Xia JJ, et al. Accuracy of the computer-aided surgical simulation (CASS) system in the treatment of patients with complex craniomaxillofacial deformity: a pilot study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007;65(2):248–54.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Park TJ, Lee SH, Lee KS. A method for mandibular dental arch superimposition using 3D cone beam CT and orthodontic 3D digital model. Korean J Orthod. 2012;42(4):169–81.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Park TJ, Lee SH, Lee KS. A method for mandibular dental arch superimposition using 3D cone beam CT and orthodontic 3D digital model. Korean J Orthod. 2012;42(4):169–81.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
17.
18.
go back to reference Cicciù M et al. 3D Digital Impression Systems Compared with Traditional Techniques in Dentistry: A Recent Data Systematic Review. Materials (Basel), 2020. 13(8). Cicciù M et al. 3D Digital Impression Systems Compared with Traditional Techniques in Dentistry: A Recent Data Systematic Review. Materials (Basel), 2020. 13(8).
19.
go back to reference Lavorgna L et al. Reliability of a Virtual Prosthodontic Project Realized through a 2D and 3D Photographic Acquisition: An Experimental Study on the Accuracy of Different Digital Systems. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 2019. 16(24). Lavorgna L et al. Reliability of a Virtual Prosthodontic Project Realized through a 2D and 3D Photographic Acquisition: An Experimental Study on the Accuracy of Different Digital Systems. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 2019. 16(24).
20.
go back to reference Hassfeld S, Mühling J. Computer assisted oral and maxillofacial surgery–a review and an assessment of technology. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2001;30(1):2–13.CrossRefPubMed Hassfeld S, Mühling J. Computer assisted oral and maxillofacial surgery–a review and an assessment of technology. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2001;30(1):2–13.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Mulier D, et al. Long-term dental stability after orthognathic surgery: a systematic review. Eur J Orthod. 2021;43(1):104–12.CrossRefPubMed Mulier D, et al. Long-term dental stability after orthognathic surgery: a systematic review. Eur J Orthod. 2021;43(1):104–12.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Yen S, et al. Orthodontic considerations for cleft orthognathic surgery. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am. 2020;32(2):249–67.CrossRefPubMed Yen S, et al. Orthodontic considerations for cleft orthognathic surgery. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am. 2020;32(2):249–67.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Kankam H, et al. Comparing outcomes in orthognathic surgery using Clear Aligners Versus Conventional fixed Appliances. J Craniofac Surg. 2019;30(5):1488–91.CrossRefPubMed Kankam H, et al. Comparing outcomes in orthognathic surgery using Clear Aligners Versus Conventional fixed Appliances. J Craniofac Surg. 2019;30(5):1488–91.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Djeu G, Shelton C, Maganzini A. Outcome assessment of Invisalign and traditional orthodontic treatment compared with the American Board of Orthodontics objective grading system. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2005. 128(3): p. 292-8; discussion 298. Djeu G, Shelton C, Maganzini A. Outcome assessment of Invisalign and traditional orthodontic treatment compared with the American Board of Orthodontics objective grading system. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2005. 128(3): p. 292-8; discussion 298.
25.
go back to reference Giancotti A, Greco M, Mampieri G. Extraction treatment using invisalign technique. Prog Orthodont. 2006;7(1):32–43. Giancotti A, Greco M, Mampieri G. Extraction treatment using invisalign technique. Prog Orthodont. 2006;7(1):32–43.
26.
go back to reference Phan X, Ling PH. Clinical limitations of invisalign. J Can Dent Assoc. 2007;73(3):263–6.PubMed Phan X, Ling PH. Clinical limitations of invisalign. J Can Dent Assoc. 2007;73(3):263–6.PubMed
Metadata
Title
The application of a fully digital approach in the treatment of skeletal class III malocclusion: a preliminary study
Authors
Meng Li
Shunyao Shen
Zhiyang Zhao
Bo Wang
Hongbo Yu
Publication date
01-12-2023
Publisher
BioMed Central
Keyword
Aligner
Published in
BMC Oral Health / Issue 1/2023
Electronic ISSN: 1472-6831
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-023-02918-y

Other articles of this Issue 1/2023

BMC Oral Health 1/2023 Go to the issue