Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Oral Health 1/2023

Open Access 01-12-2023 | Aligner | Research

Perceptions of orthodontic residents toward the implementation of dental technologies in postgraduate curriculum

Authors: Theerasak Nakornnoi, Chanchawan Chantakao, Nutchanon Luangaram, Thapakorn Janbamrung, Teetouch Thitasomakul, Kawin Sipiyaruk

Published in: BMC Oral Health | Issue 1/2023

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Dental technologies have increasingly been implemented in orthodontic practice to offer better experiences for orthodontists and patients, however, there is no scientific evidence yet whether which technologies should be implemented into the postgraduate programs.

Objectives

To investigate perceptions of orthodontic residents toward the confidence and importance of dental technologies, as well as to determine their necessity in postgraduate programs.

Materials and methods

The online questionnaire was designed to collect data from residents from all accredited orthodontic postgraduate programs in Thailand. The questionnaire consisted of four sections, which were (1) demographic data, (2) self-perceived importance of orthodontic technologies, (3) self-perceived confidence toward orthodontic technologies, and (4) the necessity of orthodontic technologies in postgraduate programs. The data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, Spearman correlation, and a chi-square test.

Results

Intraoral scanner was found to be an orthodontic technology with the highest scores for both self-perceived importance (4.37 ± 0.59) and confidence (4.23 ± 0.75), followed by cone-beam computed tomography, digital treatment planning software, and lab-produced aligners. These orthodontic technologies were also considered as mandatory in orthodontic postgraduate programs. CAD/CAM technologies appeared to be least important, and their training may be arranged as short course training. There was no significant influence of training locations on the necessity of all orthodontic technologies (P > 0.05), except CBCT. Self-perceived importance and confidence in all technologies were found to have significant positive correlations (P < 0.05), except teledentistry and in-office aligners.

Conclusion

Orthodontic technologies were perceived as important in clinical workflow. Intraoral Scanners, CBCT, digital treatment planning software, lab-produced aligners, and digital modeling software appeared to be necessary for clinical practice and should be considered for orthodontic postgraduate programs, while other technologies may be arranged as short course training. Further research should investigate how to arrange and organize training sessions in orthodontic postgraduate programs.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference van der Zande MM, Gorter RC, Bruers JJM, Aartman IHA, Wismeijer D. Dentists’ opinions on using digital technologies in dental practice. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2018;46(2):143–53.PubMed van der Zande MM, Gorter RC, Bruers JJM, Aartman IHA, Wismeijer D. Dentists’ opinions on using digital technologies in dental practice. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2018;46(2):143–53.PubMed
2.
go back to reference Christopoulou I, Kaklamanos EG, Makrygiannakis MA, Bitsanis I, Tsolakis AI. Patient-reported experiences and preferences with intraoral scanners: a systematic review. Eur J Orthod. 2021;44(1):56–65. Christopoulou I, Kaklamanos EG, Makrygiannakis MA, Bitsanis I, Tsolakis AI. Patient-reported experiences and preferences with intraoral scanners: a systematic review. Eur J Orthod. 2021;44(1):56–65.
3.
go back to reference Francisco I, Ribeiro MP, Marques F, Travassos R, Nunes C, Pereira F, et al. Application of Three-Dimensional Digital Technology in Orthodontics: the state of the art. Biomimetics. 2022;7(1):23.PubMedPubMedCentral Francisco I, Ribeiro MP, Marques F, Travassos R, Nunes C, Pereira F, et al. Application of Three-Dimensional Digital Technology in Orthodontics: the state of the art. Biomimetics. 2022;7(1):23.PubMedPubMedCentral
4.
go back to reference Ronsivalle V, Ruiz F, Lo Giudice A, Carli E, Venezia P, Isola G, et al. From Reverse Engineering Software to CAD-CAM Systems: how Digital Environment has Influenced the clinical applications in Modern Dentistry and Orthodontics. Appl Sci. 2023;13(8):4986. Ronsivalle V, Ruiz F, Lo Giudice A, Carli E, Venezia P, Isola G, et al. From Reverse Engineering Software to CAD-CAM Systems: how Digital Environment has Influenced the clinical applications in Modern Dentistry and Orthodontics. Appl Sci. 2023;13(8):4986.
5.
go back to reference Sehrawat S, Kumar A, Grover S, Dogra N, Nindra J, Rathee S, et al. Study of 3D scanning technologies and scanners in orthodontics. Mater Today: Proc. 2022;56:186–93. Sehrawat S, Kumar A, Grover S, Dogra N, Nindra J, Rathee S, et al. Study of 3D scanning technologies and scanners in orthodontics. Mater Today: Proc. 2022;56:186–93.
6.
go back to reference Jacox LA, Mihas P, Cho C, Lin FC, Ko CC. Understanding technology adoption by orthodontists: a qualitative study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2019;155(3):432–42.PubMed Jacox LA, Mihas P, Cho C, Lin FC, Ko CC. Understanding technology adoption by orthodontists: a qualitative study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2019;155(3):432–42.PubMed
7.
go back to reference Impellizzeri A, Horodynski M, De Stefano A, Palaia G, Polimeni A, Romeo U, et al. CBCT and Intra-Oral scanner: the advantages of 3D Technologies in Orthodontic Treatment. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(24):9428.PubMedPubMedCentral Impellizzeri A, Horodynski M, De Stefano A, Palaia G, Polimeni A, Romeo U, et al. CBCT and Intra-Oral scanner: the advantages of 3D Technologies in Orthodontic Treatment. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(24):9428.PubMedPubMedCentral
8.
go back to reference Park JH, Lee G-H, Moon D-N, Yun K-D, Kim J-C, Lee KC. Creation of Digital virtual patient by integrating CBCT, Intraoral scan, 3D facial scan: an Approach to Methodology for Integration Accuracy. J Craniofac Surg. 2022;33(4):e396–e8.PubMed Park JH, Lee G-H, Moon D-N, Yun K-D, Kim J-C, Lee KC. Creation of Digital virtual patient by integrating CBCT, Intraoral scan, 3D facial scan: an Approach to Methodology for Integration Accuracy. J Craniofac Surg. 2022;33(4):e396–e8.PubMed
9.
go back to reference Urban R, Haluzová S, Strunga M, Surovková J, Lifková M, Tomášik J, et al. AI-Assisted CBCT Data Management in Modern Dental Practice: benefits, Limitations and Innovations. Electronics. 2023;12(7):1710. Urban R, Haluzová S, Strunga M, Surovková J, Lifková M, Tomášik J, et al. AI-Assisted CBCT Data Management in Modern Dental Practice: benefits, Limitations and Innovations. Electronics. 2023;12(7):1710.
10.
go back to reference Cattaneo PM, Cornelis MA. Digital Workflows in Orthodontic Postgraduate Training. Semin Orthod. 2023;29(1):4–10. Cattaneo PM, Cornelis MA. Digital Workflows in Orthodontic Postgraduate Training. Semin Orthod. 2023;29(1):4–10.
11.
go back to reference Graf S, Tarraf NE, Vasudavan S. Direct printed removable appliances: a new approach for the twin-block appliance. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2022;162(1):103–7.PubMed Graf S, Tarraf NE, Vasudavan S. Direct printed removable appliances: a new approach for the twin-block appliance. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2022;162(1):103–7.PubMed
12.
go back to reference Federici Canova F, Oliva G, Beretta M, Dalessandri D. Digital (R)evolution: open-source softwares for Orthodontics. J Appl Sci. 2021;11(13):6033. Federici Canova F, Oliva G, Beretta M, Dalessandri D. Digital (R)evolution: open-source softwares for Orthodontics. J Appl Sci. 2021;11(13):6033.
13.
go back to reference Brown MW, Koroluk L, Ko CC, Zhang K, Chen M, Nguyen T. Effectiveness and efficiency of a CAD/CAM orthodontic bracket system. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2015;148(6):1067–74.PubMed Brown MW, Koroluk L, Ko CC, Zhang K, Chen M, Nguyen T. Effectiveness and efficiency of a CAD/CAM orthodontic bracket system. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2015;148(6):1067–74.PubMed
14.
go back to reference Nguyen T, Jackson T. 3D technologies for precision in orthodontics. Semin Orthod. 2018;24(4):386–92. Nguyen T, Jackson T. 3D technologies for precision in orthodontics. Semin Orthod. 2018;24(4):386–92.
15.
go back to reference Khosravi R, Gidarakou I, Salazar T. Essential factors in developing an efficient in-office aligner system. Semin Orthod. 2022;28(2):45–52. Khosravi R, Gidarakou I, Salazar T. Essential factors in developing an efficient in-office aligner system. Semin Orthod. 2022;28(2):45–52.
16.
go back to reference Tsolakis IA, Gizani S, Tsolakis AI, Panayi N. Three-dimensional-printed customized Orthodontic and Pedodontic Appliances: a critical review of a new era for treatment. Children. 2022;9(8):1107.PubMedPubMedCentral Tsolakis IA, Gizani S, Tsolakis AI, Panayi N. Three-dimensional-printed customized Orthodontic and Pedodontic Appliances: a critical review of a new era for treatment. Children. 2022;9(8):1107.PubMedPubMedCentral
17.
go back to reference Goracci C, Juloski J, D’Amico C, Balestra D, Volpe A, Juloski J, et al. Clinically relevant Properties of 3D printable materials for Intraoral Use in Orthodontics: a critical review of the literature. Materials. 2023;16(6):2166.PubMedPubMedCentral Goracci C, Juloski J, D’Amico C, Balestra D, Volpe A, Juloski J, et al. Clinically relevant Properties of 3D printable materials for Intraoral Use in Orthodontics: a critical review of the literature. Materials. 2023;16(6):2166.PubMedPubMedCentral
18.
go back to reference van der Zande MM, Gorter RC, Wismeijer D. Dental practitioners and a digital future: an initial exploration of barriers and incentives to adopting digital technologies. Br Dent J. 2013;215(11):E21.PubMed van der Zande MM, Gorter RC, Wismeijer D. Dental practitioners and a digital future: an initial exploration of barriers and incentives to adopting digital technologies. Br Dent J. 2013;215(11):E21.PubMed
19.
go back to reference Rehil S, Subramani K, Sinha P, Jain S, Roberson G, Chattopadhyay A. Education using clear aligners and digital workflows in graduate orthodontic residency programs. Semin Orthod. 2022;28(2):80–4. Rehil S, Subramani K, Sinha P, Jain S, Roberson G, Chattopadhyay A. Education using clear aligners and digital workflows in graduate orthodontic residency programs. Semin Orthod. 2022;28(2):80–4.
20.
go back to reference Jacox LA, Bocklage C, Edwards T, Mihas P, Lin F-C, Ko C-C. Understanding technology adoption by orthodontists: a quantitative study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2022;161(3):364–74.PubMed Jacox LA, Bocklage C, Edwards T, Mihas P, Lin F-C, Ko C-C. Understanding technology adoption by orthodontists: a quantitative study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2022;161(3):364–74.PubMed
21.
go back to reference Leonardi RM. 3D imaging advancements and New Technologies in Clinical and Scientific Dental and Orthodontic Fields. J Clin Med. 2022;11(8):2200.PubMedPubMedCentral Leonardi RM. 3D imaging advancements and New Technologies in Clinical and Scientific Dental and Orthodontic Fields. J Clin Med. 2022;11(8):2200.PubMedPubMedCentral
22.
go back to reference Vaid NR. Digital technologies in orthodontics–An update. Semin Orthod. 2018;24(4):373–5. Vaid NR. Digital technologies in orthodontics–An update. Semin Orthod. 2018;24(4):373–5.
23.
go back to reference Tarraf NE, Ali DM. Present and the future of digital orthodontics. Semin Orthod. 2018;24(4):376–85. Tarraf NE, Ali DM. Present and the future of digital orthodontics. Semin Orthod. 2018;24(4):376–85.
24.
go back to reference Elnagar MH, Aronovich S, Kusnoto B. Digital Workflow for combined orthodontics and orthognathic surgery. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am. 2020;32(1):1–14.PubMed Elnagar MH, Aronovich S, Kusnoto B. Digital Workflow for combined orthodontics and orthognathic surgery. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am. 2020;32(1):1–14.PubMed
25.
go back to reference Kihara H, Hatakeyama W, Komine F, Takafuji K, Takahashi T, Yokota J, et al. Accuracy and practicality of intraoral scanner in dentistry: a literature review. J Prosthodont Res. 2020;64(2):109–13.PubMed Kihara H, Hatakeyama W, Komine F, Takafuji K, Takahashi T, Yokota J, et al. Accuracy and practicality of intraoral scanner in dentistry: a literature review. J Prosthodont Res. 2020;64(2):109–13.PubMed
26.
go back to reference Burzynski JA, Firestone AR, Beck FM, Fields HW Jr, Deguchi T. Comparison of digital intraoral scanners and alginate impressions: Time and patient satisfaction. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2018;153(4):534–41.PubMed Burzynski JA, Firestone AR, Beck FM, Fields HW Jr, Deguchi T. Comparison of digital intraoral scanners and alginate impressions: Time and patient satisfaction. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2018;153(4):534–41.PubMed
27.
go back to reference Aizenbud D, Hazan-Molina H, Zere E, Aizenbud N, Aizenbud Y. Intraoral iTero scanning for an infant with cleft lip and palate. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2021;160(1):4–6.PubMed Aizenbud D, Hazan-Molina H, Zere E, Aizenbud N, Aizenbud Y. Intraoral iTero scanning for an infant with cleft lip and palate. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2021;160(1):4–6.PubMed
28.
go back to reference Tran D, Nesbit M, Petridis H. Survey of UK dentists regarding the use of CAD/CAM technology. Br Dent J. 2016;221(10):639–44.PubMed Tran D, Nesbit M, Petridis H. Survey of UK dentists regarding the use of CAD/CAM technology. Br Dent J. 2016;221(10):639–44.PubMed
29.
go back to reference Ardila CM, Elorza-Durán A, Arrubla-Escobar D. Efficacy of CAD/CAM technology in interventions implemented in Orthodontics: a scoping review of clinical trials. Biomed Res Int. 2022;2022:5310555.PubMedPubMedCentral Ardila CM, Elorza-Durán A, Arrubla-Escobar D. Efficacy of CAD/CAM technology in interventions implemented in Orthodontics: a scoping review of clinical trials. Biomed Res Int. 2022;2022:5310555.PubMedPubMedCentral
30.
go back to reference Czolgosz I, Cattaneo PM, Cornelis MA. Computer-aided indirect bonding versus traditional direct bonding of orthodontic brackets: bonding time, immediate bonding failures, and cost-minimization. A randomized controlled trial. Eur J Orthod. 2020;43(2):144–51. Czolgosz I, Cattaneo PM, Cornelis MA. Computer-aided indirect bonding versus traditional direct bonding of orthodontic brackets: bonding time, immediate bonding failures, and cost-minimization. A randomized controlled trial. Eur J Orthod. 2020;43(2):144–51.
31.
go back to reference Papakostopoulou M, Hurst D. Customised fixed appliance systems and treatment duration. Evid Based Dent. 2018;19(2):50.PubMed Papakostopoulou M, Hurst D. Customised fixed appliance systems and treatment duration. Evid Based Dent. 2018;19(2):50.PubMed
32.
go back to reference Penning EW, Peerlings RHJ, Govers JDM, Rischen RJ, Zinad K, Bronkhorst EM, et al. Orthodontics with customized versus noncustomized appliances: a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial. J Dent Res. 2017;96(13):1498–504.PubMed Penning EW, Peerlings RHJ, Govers JDM, Rischen RJ, Zinad K, Bronkhorst EM, et al. Orthodontics with customized versus noncustomized appliances: a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial. J Dent Res. 2017;96(13):1498–504.PubMed
33.
go back to reference Park JH, Kim JH, Rogowski L, Al Shami S, Howell SEI. Implementation of teledentistry for orthodontic practices. J World Fed Orthod. 2021;10(1):9–13.PubMed Park JH, Kim JH, Rogowski L, Al Shami S, Howell SEI. Implementation of teledentistry for orthodontic practices. J World Fed Orthod. 2021;10(1):9–13.PubMed
34.
go back to reference Bentson C, Copple D. Opportunities in the evolving orthodontic industry–digital processes, teledentistry and group practices. Semin Orthod. 2022;28(1):37–42. Bentson C, Copple D. Opportunities in the evolving orthodontic industry–digital processes, teledentistry and group practices. Semin Orthod. 2022;28(1):37–42.
35.
go back to reference Roberson GA, Sinha PK. 3D printing in orthodontics: a practical guide to the printer technology and selection. Semin Orthod. 2022;28(2):100–6. Roberson GA, Sinha PK. 3D printing in orthodontics: a practical guide to the printer technology and selection. Semin Orthod. 2022;28(2):100–6.
36.
go back to reference Maspero C, Abate A, Cavagnetto D, El Morsi M, Fama A, Farronato M. Available Technologies, Applications and benefits of teleorthodontics. A literature review and possible applications during the COVID-19 pandemic. J Clin Med. 2020;9(6):1891.PubMedPubMedCentral Maspero C, Abate A, Cavagnetto D, El Morsi M, Fama A, Farronato M. Available Technologies, Applications and benefits of teleorthodontics. A literature review and possible applications during the COVID-19 pandemic. J Clin Med. 2020;9(6):1891.PubMedPubMedCentral
37.
go back to reference Palmer NG, Yacyshyn JR, Northcott HC, Nebbe B, Major PW. Perceptions and attitudes of canadian orthodontists regarding digital and electronic technology. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2005;128(2):163–7.PubMed Palmer NG, Yacyshyn JR, Northcott HC, Nebbe B, Major PW. Perceptions and attitudes of canadian orthodontists regarding digital and electronic technology. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2005;128(2):163–7.PubMed
38.
go back to reference Patel RN, Antonarakis GS. Factors influencing the adoption and implementation of teledentistry in the UK, with a focus on orthodontics. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2013;41(5):424–31.PubMed Patel RN, Antonarakis GS. Factors influencing the adoption and implementation of teledentistry in the UK, with a focus on orthodontics. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2013;41(5):424–31.PubMed
39.
go back to reference Jo O, Kruger E, Tennant M. Geospatial analysis of the urban and rural/remote distribution of dental services in Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland. Int Dent J. 2020;70(6):444–54.PubMedPubMedCentral Jo O, Kruger E, Tennant M. Geospatial analysis of the urban and rural/remote distribution of dental services in Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland. Int Dent J. 2020;70(6):444–54.PubMedPubMedCentral
40.
go back to reference Soegyanto AI, Wimardhani YS, Maharani DA, Tennant M. Indonesian dentists’ perception of the Use of Teledentistry. Int Dent J. 2022;72(5):674–81.PubMedPubMedCentral Soegyanto AI, Wimardhani YS, Maharani DA, Tennant M. Indonesian dentists’ perception of the Use of Teledentistry. Int Dent J. 2022;72(5):674–81.PubMedPubMedCentral
41.
go back to reference Clark JD, Robertson LJ, Harden RM. The specification of learning outcomes in dentistry. Br Dent J. 2004;196(5):289–94.PubMed Clark JD, Robertson LJ, Harden RM. The specification of learning outcomes in dentistry. Br Dent J. 2004;196(5):289–94.PubMed
42.
go back to reference Sipiyaruk K, Kaewsirirat P, Santiwong P. Technology-enhanced simulation-based learning in orthodontic education: a scoping review. Dent Press J Orthod. 2023;28(3):e2321354. Sipiyaruk K, Kaewsirirat P, Santiwong P. Technology-enhanced simulation-based learning in orthodontic education: a scoping review. Dent Press J Orthod. 2023;28(3):e2321354.
43.
go back to reference Burad M, Laowanichwith C, Kiatsukasem A, Supa-amornkul S, Sipiyaruk K. Conceptual Framework for implementation of internationalization in Dental Education with Foundations in Dental Student Life. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(20):13249.PubMedPubMedCentral Burad M, Laowanichwith C, Kiatsukasem A, Supa-amornkul S, Sipiyaruk K. Conceptual Framework for implementation of internationalization in Dental Education with Foundations in Dental Student Life. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(20):13249.PubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
Perceptions of orthodontic residents toward the implementation of dental technologies in postgraduate curriculum
Authors
Theerasak Nakornnoi
Chanchawan Chantakao
Nutchanon Luangaram
Thapakorn Janbamrung
Teetouch Thitasomakul
Kawin Sipiyaruk
Publication date
01-12-2023
Publisher
BioMed Central
Keyword
Aligner
Published in
BMC Oral Health / Issue 1/2023
Electronic ISSN: 1472-6831
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-023-03327-x

Other articles of this Issue 1/2023

BMC Oral Health 1/2023 Go to the issue