Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Oral Health 1/2023

Open Access 01-12-2023 | Aligner | Research

Alveolar bone changes following bi-maxillary vertical molars’ movements using clear aligners

Authors: Leena Ali Al-Warafi, Naseem Ali Al-Worafi, Maged Ali Al-Aroomi, Najah Alhashimi, Majedh Abdo Ali Alsomairi, Remsh Khaled Al-Rokhami, Xi Chen, Maged Sultan Alhammadi

Published in: BMC Oral Health | Issue 1/2023

Login to get access

Abstract

Objective

This study aimed to assess the alveolar bone changes following maxillary and mandibular molars’ intrusion and extrusion movements using Clear Aligners using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT).

Materials and methods

This is a retrospective clinical study in which 24 adult patients with pre-designed selection criteria and a mean age of 31.1 + 9.9 years were enrolled. The alveolar bone changes around one hundred thirty-three maxillary and mandibular molars intruded or extruded by Clear Aligners therapy were analyzed from CBCT using Invivo 6.0 software. Intra- and inter-examiner reliability analysis was performed using the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) and Cronbach’s Alpha statistics. The paired t-test was used to analyze significant differences before and after treatment (T0-T1). The significance level was considered at P < 0.05.

Result

The patients were divided into two groups: extrusion (48.9%, n = 65 molars’ root) and intrusion (51.1%, n = 68 molars’ root) group. There was a significant decrease in the alveolar bone changes in the buccal surface of the mandibular right and left 1st molars in the extrusion group (-1.05 ± 0.97, -0.76 ± 1.12 mm, respectively) and the maxillary left 2nd molars in intrusion group (-0.42 ± 0.77 mm), and the lingual surface of intrusion of the mandibular left 1st molar (-0.64 ± 0.76 mm). Comparing the mean maxillary and mandibular changes (T0-T1) of both studied groups showed that the buccal alveolar bone changes for the left 1st and right 2nd molars showed a significant difference in extrusion and intrusion groups, respectively.

Conclusions

The buccal alveolar bone changes is considered the most affected surface following maxillary and mandibular molars’ intrusion and extrusion movements using clear aligners, with mandibular molars being more affected than the maxillary ones.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Atik E, Gorucu-Coskuner H, Akarsu-Guven B, Taner T. Evaluation of changes in the maxillary alveolar bone after incisor intrusion. korean J Orthod. 2018;48:367–76.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Atik E, Gorucu-Coskuner H, Akarsu-Guven B, Taner T. Evaluation of changes in the maxillary alveolar bone after incisor intrusion. korean J Orthod. 2018;48:367–76.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
2.
go back to reference Yousif A, Elmarhoumy SM. Alveolar bone changes after orthodontic tooth movements: a CBCT Study. Egypt Dent J. 2020;66:747–57.CrossRef Yousif A, Elmarhoumy SM. Alveolar bone changes after orthodontic tooth movements: a CBCT Study. Egypt Dent J. 2020;66:747–57.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Graber Lee W, Vanarsdall Robert L Jr, Vig Katherine WL. Orthodontics:current principles & techniques. 2012. Graber Lee W, Vanarsdall Robert L Jr, Vig Katherine WL. Orthodontics:current principles & techniques. 2012.
4.
go back to reference Sun Q, Lu W, Zhang Y, Peng L, Chen S, Han B. Morphological changes of the anterior alveolar bone due to retraction of anterior teeth: a retrospective study. Head Face Med. 2021;17:1–12.CrossRef Sun Q, Lu W, Zhang Y, Peng L, Chen S, Han B. Morphological changes of the anterior alveolar bone due to retraction of anterior teeth: a retrospective study. Head Face Med. 2021;17:1–12.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Jiang T, Wang JK, Jiang YY, Hu Z, Tang GH. How well do integrated 3D models predict alveolar defects after treatment with clear aligners? Angle Orthod. 2021;91:313–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Jiang T, Wang JK, Jiang YY, Hu Z, Tang GH. How well do integrated 3D models predict alveolar defects after treatment with clear aligners? Angle Orthod. 2021;91:313–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
go back to reference Wehrbein H, Bauer W, Diedrich P. Mandibular incisors, alveolar bone, and symphysis afterorthodontic treatment. A retrospective study. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1996;110:239–46.CrossRef Wehrbein H, Bauer W, Diedrich P. Mandibular incisors, alveolar bone, and symphysis afterorthodontic treatment. A retrospective study. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1996;110:239–46.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Southard KA, Liu WJ, Behrents RG. Extraction versus periodontal-orthodontic treatment: a case report. Quintessence Int (Berl). 1991;22. Southard KA, Liu WJ, Behrents RG. Extraction versus periodontal-orthodontic treatment: a case report. Quintessence Int (Berl). 1991;22.
8.
go back to reference Moshiri M. Product review and demonstration of the Invisalign clear aligner system. 2021. Moshiri M. Product review and demonstration of the Invisalign clear aligner system. 2021.
9.
go back to reference Womack WR, Ahn JH, Ammari Z, Castillo A. A new approach to correction of crowding. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2002;122:310–6.CrossRef Womack WR, Ahn JH, Ammari Z, Castillo A. A new approach to correction of crowding. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2002;122:310–6.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Phan X, Ling PH. Clinical limitations of Invisalign. J Can Dent Assoc (Tor). 2007;73. Phan X, Ling PH. Clinical limitations of Invisalign. J Can Dent Assoc (Tor). 2007;73.
11.
go back to reference ZACHRISSON BU. Periodontal condition in orthodontically treated and untreated individuals I. loss of attachment, gingival pocket depth and clinical crown height. Angle Orthod. 1973;43:402–11.PubMed ZACHRISSON BU. Periodontal condition in orthodontically treated and untreated individuals I. loss of attachment, gingival pocket depth and clinical crown height. Angle Orthod. 1973;43:402–11.PubMed
12.
go back to reference Janson G, Bombonatti R, Brandão AG, Henriques JFC, de Freitas MR. Comparative radiographic evaluation of the alveolar bone crest after orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2003;124:157–64.CrossRef Janson G, Bombonatti R, Brandão AG, Henriques JFC, de Freitas MR. Comparative radiographic evaluation of the alveolar bone crest after orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2003;124:157–64.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Tsao DH, Kazanoglu A, McCasland JP. Measurability of radiographic images. Am J Orthod. 1983;84:212–6.CrossRefPubMed Tsao DH, Kazanoglu A, McCasland JP. Measurability of radiographic images. Am J Orthod. 1983;84:212–6.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Guo Q, Zhang S, Liu H, Wang C, Wei F, Lv T, et al. Three-dimensional evaluation of upper anterior alveolar bone dehiscence after incisor retraction and intrusion in adult patients with bimaxillary protrusion malocclusion. J Zhejiang Univ Sci B. 2011;12:990–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Guo Q, Zhang S, Liu H, Wang C, Wei F, Lv T, et al. Three-dimensional evaluation of upper anterior alveolar bone dehiscence after incisor retraction and intrusion in adult patients with bimaxillary protrusion malocclusion. J Zhejiang Univ Sci B. 2011;12:990–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
go back to reference ZHOU D. Comparison of alveolar bone changes in maxillary anterior area secondary to different kinds of retraction method of anterior teeth: a cone-beam computed tomography study. J Shanghai Jiaotong Univ (Medical Science). 2018;:1375–80. ZHOU D. Comparison of alveolar bone changes in maxillary anterior area secondary to different kinds of retraction method of anterior teeth: a cone-beam computed tomography study. J Shanghai Jiaotong Univ (Medical Science). 2018;:1375–80.
16.
17.
go back to reference Castro LO, Castro IO, de Alencar AHG, Valladares-Neto J, Estrela C. Cone beam computed tomography evaluation of distance from cementoenamel junction to alveolar crest before and after nonextraction orthodontic treatment. Angle Orthod. 2016;86:543–9.CrossRefPubMed Castro LO, Castro IO, de Alencar AHG, Valladares-Neto J, Estrela C. Cone beam computed tomography evaluation of distance from cementoenamel junction to alveolar crest before and after nonextraction orthodontic treatment. Angle Orthod. 2016;86:543–9.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Ma J, Huang J, Jiang J. Morphological analysis of the alveolar bone of the anterior teeth in severe high-angle skeletal class II and Class III malocclusions assessed with cone-beam computed tomography. PLoS ONE. 2019;14:e0210461.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Ma J, Huang J, Jiang J. Morphological analysis of the alveolar bone of the anterior teeth in severe high-angle skeletal class II and Class III malocclusions assessed with cone-beam computed tomography. PLoS ONE. 2019;14:e0210461.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
19.
go back to reference Lund H, Gröndahl K, Gröndahl H. Cone beam computed tomography evaluations of marginal alveolar bone before and after orthodontic treatment combined with premolar extractions. Eur J Oral Sci. 2012;120:201–11.CrossRefPubMed Lund H, Gröndahl K, Gröndahl H. Cone beam computed tomography evaluations of marginal alveolar bone before and after orthodontic treatment combined with premolar extractions. Eur J Oral Sci. 2012;120:201–11.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Guo R, Zhang L, Hu M, Huang Y, Li W. Alveolar bone changes in maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth during orthodontic treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2021;24:165–79.CrossRefPubMed Guo R, Zhang L, Hu M, Huang Y, Li W. Alveolar bone changes in maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth during orthodontic treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2021;24:165–79.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Papadimitriou A, Mousoulea S, Gkantidis N, Kloukos D. Clinical effectiveness of Invisalign® orthodontic treatment: a systematic review. Prog Orthod. 2018;19:1–24.CrossRef Papadimitriou A, Mousoulea S, Gkantidis N, Kloukos D. Clinical effectiveness of Invisalign® orthodontic treatment: a systematic review. Prog Orthod. 2018;19:1–24.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Zheng M, Liu R, Ni Z, Yu Z. Efficiency, effectiveness and treatment stability of clear aligners: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2017;20:127–33.CrossRefPubMed Zheng M, Liu R, Ni Z, Yu Z. Efficiency, effectiveness and treatment stability of clear aligners: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2017;20:127–33.CrossRefPubMed
23.
24.
go back to reference Garib DG, Henriques JFC, Janson G, Freitas MR, Coelho RA. Rapid maxillary expansion—tooth tissue-borne versus tooth-borne expanders: a computed tomography evaluation of dentoskeletal effects. Angle Orthod. 2005;75:548–57.PubMed Garib DG, Henriques JFC, Janson G, Freitas MR, Coelho RA. Rapid maxillary expansion—tooth tissue-borne versus tooth-borne expanders: a computed tomography evaluation of dentoskeletal effects. Angle Orthod. 2005;75:548–57.PubMed
25.
go back to reference Morais JF, Melsen B, de Freitas KMS, Castello Branco N, Garib DG, Cattaneo PM. Evaluation of maxillary buccal alveolar bone before and after orthodontic alignment without extractions: a cone beam computed tomographic study. Angle Orthod. 2018;88:748–56.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Morais JF, Melsen B, de Freitas KMS, Castello Branco N, Garib DG, Cattaneo PM. Evaluation of maxillary buccal alveolar bone before and after orthodontic alignment without extractions: a cone beam computed tomographic study. Angle Orthod. 2018;88:748–56.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
26.
go back to reference Garlock DT, Buschang PH, Araujo EA, Behrents RG, Kim KB. Evaluation of marginal alveolar bone in the anterior mandible with pretreatment and posttreatment computed tomography in nonextraction patients. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2016;149:192–201.CrossRef Garlock DT, Buschang PH, Araujo EA, Behrents RG, Kim KB. Evaluation of marginal alveolar bone in the anterior mandible with pretreatment and posttreatment computed tomography in nonextraction patients. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2016;149:192–201.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Bimstein E, Crevoisier RA, King DL. Changes in the morphology of the buccal alveolar bone of protruded manidbular permanent incisors secondary to orthodontic alignment. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1990;97:427–30.CrossRef Bimstein E, Crevoisier RA, King DL. Changes in the morphology of the buccal alveolar bone of protruded manidbular permanent incisors secondary to orthodontic alignment. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1990;97:427–30.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Son EJ, Kim SJ, Hong C, Chan V, Sim HY, Ji S, et al. A study on the morphologic change of palatal alveolar bone shape after intrusion and retraction of maxillary incisors. Sci Rep. 2020;10:1–12.CrossRef Son EJ, Kim SJ, Hong C, Chan V, Sim HY, Ji S, et al. A study on the morphologic change of palatal alveolar bone shape after intrusion and retraction of maxillary incisors. Sci Rep. 2020;10:1–12.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Miyama W, Uchida Y, Motoyoshi M, Motozawa K, Kato M, Shimizu N. Cone-beam computed tomographic evaluation of changes in maxillary alveolar bone after orthodontic treatment. J Oral Sci. 2018;60:147–53.CrossRefPubMed Miyama W, Uchida Y, Motoyoshi M, Motozawa K, Kato M, Shimizu N. Cone-beam computed tomographic evaluation of changes in maxillary alveolar bone after orthodontic treatment. J Oral Sci. 2018;60:147–53.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Alveolar bone changes following bi-maxillary vertical molars’ movements using clear aligners
Authors
Leena Ali Al-Warafi
Naseem Ali Al-Worafi
Maged Ali Al-Aroomi
Najah Alhashimi
Majedh Abdo Ali Alsomairi
Remsh Khaled Al-Rokhami
Xi Chen
Maged Sultan Alhammadi
Publication date
01-12-2023
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Oral Health / Issue 1/2023
Electronic ISSN: 1472-6831
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-023-03028-5

Other articles of this Issue 1/2023

BMC Oral Health 1/2023 Go to the issue