Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Anesthesiology 1/2024

Open Access 01-12-2024 | Alfentanil | Research

Effective doses of ciprofol combined with alfentanil in inhibiting responses to gastroscope insertion, a prospective, single-arm, single-center study

Authors: Xiaoru Wu, Min Liao, Xingzhou Lin, Jianing Hu, Tangyuanmeng Zhao, Hu Sun

Published in: BMC Anesthesiology | Issue 1/2024

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Ciprofol is a novel intravenous sedative and anesthetic. Studies have shown that it features a rapid onset of action, a fast recovery time, slight inhibition of respiratory and cardiovascular functions, and a low incidence of adverse reactions. This study aims to explore the median effective dose (ED50) and the 95% effective dose (ED95) of ciprofol in inhibiting responses to gastroscope insertion when combined with a low dose of alfentanil, and to evaluate its safety, to provide a reference for the rational use of ciprofol in clinical practices.

Methods

We included 25 patients aged 18–64 years of either sex who underwent gastroscopy under intravenous general anesthesia, with a Body Mass Index (BMI) 18–28 kg/m2, and an American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade I or II. In this study, the dose-finding strategy of ciprofol followed a modified Dixon’s up-and-down method with an initial dose of 0.30 mg/kg and an increment of 0.02 mg/kg. Ciprofol was administered after intravenous injection of 7 µg/kg of alfentanil, and 2 min later a gastroscope was inserted. When the insertion response of one participant was positive (including body movement, coughing, and eye opening), an escalation of 0.02 mg/kg would be given to the next participant; otherwise, a de-escalation of 0.02 mg/kg would be administered. The study was terminated when negative response and positive response alternated 8 times. A Probit model was used to calculate the ED50 and ED95 of ciprofol in inhibiting responses to gastroscope insertion when combined with alfentanil. Patients’ recovery time, discharge time, vital signs and occurrence of adverse reactions were recorded.

Results

The ED50 of single-dose intravenous ciprofol injection with 7 µg/kg of alfentanil in inhibiting gastroscope insertion responses was 0.217 mg/kg, and the ED95 was 0.247 mg/kg. Patients’ recovery time and discharge time were 11.04 ± 1.49 min and 9.64 ± 2.38 min, respectively. The overall incidence of adverse reactions was 12%.

Conclusion

The ED50 of ciprofol combined with 7 µg/kg of alfentanil in inhibiting gastroscope insertion responses was 0.217 mg/kg, and the ED95 was 0.247 mg/kg. Ciprofol showed a low incidence of anesthesia-related adverse events.

Trial registration

Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Müller M, Wehrmann T. How best to approach endoscopic sedation? Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011;8(9):481–90.CrossRefPubMed Müller M, Wehrmann T. How best to approach endoscopic sedation? Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011;8(9):481–90.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Zhong J, Zhang J, Fan Y, Zhu M, Zhao X, Zuo Z, Zhou X, Miao C. Efficacy and safety of Ciprofol for procedural sedation and anesthesia in non-operating room settings. J Clin Anesth. 2023;85:111047.CrossRefPubMed Zhong J, Zhang J, Fan Y, Zhu M, Zhao X, Zuo Z, Zhou X, Miao C. Efficacy and safety of Ciprofol for procedural sedation and anesthesia in non-operating room settings. J Clin Anesth. 2023;85:111047.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Luo Z, Tu H, Zhang X, Wang X, Ouyang W, Wei X, Zou X, Zhu Z, Li Y, Shangguan W, Wu H, Wang Y, Guo Q. Efficacy and safety of HSK3486 for anesthesia/sedation in patients undergoing fiberoptic bronchoscopy: a multicenter, double-blind, propofol-controlled, randomized, phase 3 study. CNS Drugs. 2022;36(3):301–13.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Luo Z, Tu H, Zhang X, Wang X, Ouyang W, Wei X, Zou X, Zhu Z, Li Y, Shangguan W, Wu H, Wang Y, Guo Q. Efficacy and safety of HSK3486 for anesthesia/sedation in patients undergoing fiberoptic bronchoscopy: a multicenter, double-blind, propofol-controlled, randomized, phase 3 study. CNS Drugs. 2022;36(3):301–13.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
5.
go back to reference Teng Y, Ou M, Wang X, Zhang W, Liu X, Liang Y, Li K, Wang Y, Ouyang W, Weng H, Li J, Yao S, Meng J, Shangguan W, Zuo Y, Zhu T, Liu B, Liu J. Efficacy and safety of ciprofol for the sedation/anesthesia in patients undergoing colonoscopy: phase IIa and IIb multi-center clinical trials. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2021;164:105904.CrossRefPubMed Teng Y, Ou M, Wang X, Zhang W, Liu X, Liang Y, Li K, Wang Y, Ouyang W, Weng H, Li J, Yao S, Meng J, Shangguan W, Zuo Y, Zhu T, Liu B, Liu J. Efficacy and safety of ciprofol for the sedation/anesthesia in patients undergoing colonoscopy: phase IIa and IIb multi-center clinical trials. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2021;164:105904.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Ludbrook G, Li F, Sleigh J, Liang Y. Assessments of onset and duration of drug effects and pharmacokinetics by dose level of HSK3486, a new sedative-hypnotic agent, in healthy female/male subjects: a phase I multiarm randomized controlled clinical trial: retraction. Anesth Analg. 2021;133(1):e16.CrossRef Ludbrook G, Li F, Sleigh J, Liang Y. Assessments of onset and duration of drug effects and pharmacokinetics by dose level of HSK3486, a new sedative-hypnotic agent, in healthy female/male subjects: a phase I multiarm randomized controlled clinical trial: retraction. Anesth Analg. 2021;133(1):e16.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Bian Y, Zhang H, Ma S, Jiao Y, Yan P, Liu X, Ma S, Xiong Y, Gu Z, Yu Z, Huang C, Miao L. Mass balance, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of intravenous HSK3486, a novel anaesthetic, administered to healthy subjects. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2021;87(1):93–105.CrossRefPubMed Bian Y, Zhang H, Ma S, Jiao Y, Yan P, Liu X, Ma S, Xiong Y, Gu Z, Yu Z, Huang C, Miao L. Mass balance, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of intravenous HSK3486, a novel anaesthetic, administered to healthy subjects. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2021;87(1):93–105.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Wei Y, Qiu G, Lei B, Qin L, Chu H, Lu Y, Zhu G, Gao Q, Huang Q, Qian G, Liao P, Luo X, Zhang X, Zhang C, Li Y, Zheng S, Yu Y, Tang P, Ni J, Yan P, Zhou Y, Li P, Huang X, Gong A, Liu J. Oral delivery of propofol with methoxymethylphosphonic acid as the delivery vehicle. J Med Chem. 2017;60(20):8580–90.CrossRefPubMed Wei Y, Qiu G, Lei B, Qin L, Chu H, Lu Y, Zhu G, Gao Q, Huang Q, Qian G, Liao P, Luo X, Zhang X, Zhang C, Li Y, Zheng S, Yu Y, Tang P, Ni J, Yan P, Zhou Y, Li P, Huang X, Gong A, Liu J. Oral delivery of propofol with methoxymethylphosphonic acid as the delivery vehicle. J Med Chem. 2017;60(20):8580–90.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Liu J, Wang DX, Zuo YX, Mi WD, Yao SL, Yu WF. Guidelines on clinical application of ciprofol. Chin J Anesthesiol. 2021;41(2):129–32. Liu J, Wang DX, Zuo YX, Mi WD, Yao SL, Yu WF. Guidelines on clinical application of ciprofol. Chin J Anesthesiol. 2021;41(2):129–32.
10.
go back to reference Yoon SW, Choi GJ, Lee OH, Yoon IJ, Kang H, Baek CW, Jung YH, Woo YC. Comparison of propofol monotherapy and propofol combination therapy for sedation during gastrointestinal endoscopy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Dig Endosc. 2018;30(5):580–91.CrossRefPubMed Yoon SW, Choi GJ, Lee OH, Yoon IJ, Kang H, Baek CW, Jung YH, Woo YC. Comparison of propofol monotherapy and propofol combination therapy for sedation during gastrointestinal endoscopy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Dig Endosc. 2018;30(5):580–91.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Roozekrans M, van der Schrier R, Aarts L, Sarton E, van Velzen M, Niesters M, Dahan A, Olofsen E. Benefit versus severe side effects of opioid analgesia: novel utility functions of probability of analgesia and respiratory depression. Anesthesiology. 2018;128(5):932–42.CrossRefPubMed Roozekrans M, van der Schrier R, Aarts L, Sarton E, van Velzen M, Niesters M, Dahan A, Olofsen E. Benefit versus severe side effects of opioid analgesia: novel utility functions of probability of analgesia and respiratory depression. Anesthesiology. 2018;128(5):932–42.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Chen JJ, Zhou XH, Chen J, Zhang Z, Chen MH, Quan J, Lai DY, Hu TX. Effects of different doses of alfentanil combined with propofol on painless gastroscopy. J Clin Anesthesiol. 2022;38(1):46–51. Chen JJ, Zhou XH, Chen J, Zhang Z, Chen MH, Quan J, Lai DY, Hu TX. Effects of different doses of alfentanil combined with propofol on painless gastroscopy. J Clin Anesthesiol. 2022;38(1):46–51.
13.
go back to reference Early DS, Lightdale JR, Vargo JJ 2nd, Acosta RD, Chandrasekhara V, Chathadi KV, Evans JA, Fisher DA, Fonkalsrud L, Hwang JH, Khashab MA, Muthusamy VR, Pasha SF, Saltzman JR, Shergill AK, Cash BD, DeWitt JM. Guidelines for sedation and anesthesia in GI endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2018;87(2):327–37.CrossRefPubMed Early DS, Lightdale JR, Vargo JJ 2nd, Acosta RD, Chandrasekhara V, Chathadi KV, Evans JA, Fisher DA, Fonkalsrud L, Hwang JH, Khashab MA, Muthusamy VR, Pasha SF, Saltzman JR, Shergill AK, Cash BD, DeWitt JM. Guidelines for sedation and anesthesia in GI endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2018;87(2):327–37.CrossRefPubMed
14.
15.
go back to reference Hayes J, Matava C, Pehora C, El-Beheiry H, Jarvis S, Finkelstein Y. Determination of the median effective dose of propofol in combination with different doses of ketamine during gastro-duodenoscopy in children: a randomised controlled trial. Br J Anaesth. 2018;121(2):453–61.CrossRefPubMed Hayes J, Matava C, Pehora C, El-Beheiry H, Jarvis S, Finkelstein Y. Determination of the median effective dose of propofol in combination with different doses of ketamine during gastro-duodenoscopy in children: a randomised controlled trial. Br J Anaesth. 2018;121(2):453–61.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Liou JY, Ting CK, Teng WN, Mandell MS, Tsou MY. Adaptation of non-linear mixed amount with zero amount response surface model for analysis of concentration-dependent synergism and safety with midazolam, alfentanil, and propofol sedation. Br J Anaesth. 2018;120(6):1209–18.CrossRefPubMed Liou JY, Ting CK, Teng WN, Mandell MS, Tsou MY. Adaptation of non-linear mixed amount with zero amount response surface model for analysis of concentration-dependent synergism and safety with midazolam, alfentanil, and propofol sedation. Br J Anaesth. 2018;120(6):1209–18.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Yamaguchi D, Morisaki T, Sakata Y, Mizuta Y, Nagatsuma G, Inoue S, Shimakura A, Jubashi A, Takeuchi Y, Ikeda K, Tanaka Y, Yoshioka W, Hino N, Ario K, Tsunada S, Esaki M. Usefulness of discharge standards in outpatients undergoing sedative endoscopy: a propensity score-matched study of the modified post-anesthetic discharge scoring system and the modified Aldrete score. BMC Gastroenterol. 2022;22(1):445.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Yamaguchi D, Morisaki T, Sakata Y, Mizuta Y, Nagatsuma G, Inoue S, Shimakura A, Jubashi A, Takeuchi Y, Ikeda K, Tanaka Y, Yoshioka W, Hino N, Ario K, Tsunada S, Esaki M. Usefulness of discharge standards in outpatients undergoing sedative endoscopy: a propensity score-matched study of the modified post-anesthetic discharge scoring system and the modified Aldrete score. BMC Gastroenterol. 2022;22(1):445.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
18.
go back to reference Sessler CN, Gosnell MS, Grap MJ, Brophy GM, O’Neal PV, Keane KA, Tesoro EP, Elswick RK. The Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale: validity and reliability in adult intensive care unit patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002;166(10):1338–44.CrossRefPubMed Sessler CN, Gosnell MS, Grap MJ, Brophy GM, O’Neal PV, Keane KA, Tesoro EP, Elswick RK. The Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale: validity and reliability in adult intensive care unit patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002;166(10):1338–44.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Hung FN, Xu C, Cui SS, Xia ZY, Lei SQ. Comparison of anesthetic effects between ciprofol alone and combined with low⁃dose sufentanil in painless gastroscopy. J Wuhan Univ (Medical Edition). 2023;44(5):585–9. Hung FN, Xu C, Cui SS, Xia ZY, Lei SQ. Comparison of anesthetic effects between ciprofol alone and combined with low⁃dose sufentanil in painless gastroscopy. J Wuhan Univ (Medical Edition). 2023;44(5):585–9.
20.
go back to reference Kanaya N, Gable B, Wickley PJ, Murray PA, Damron DS. Experimental conditions are important determinants of cardiac inotropic effects of propofol. Anesthesiology. 2005;103(5):1026–34.CrossRefPubMed Kanaya N, Gable B, Wickley PJ, Murray PA, Damron DS. Experimental conditions are important determinants of cardiac inotropic effects of propofol. Anesthesiology. 2005;103(5):1026–34.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Nagakawa T, Yamazaki M, Hatakeyama N, Stekiel TA. The mechanisms of propofol-mediated hyperpolarization of in situ rat mesenteric vascular smooth muscle. Anesth Analg. 2003;97(6):1639–45.CrossRefPubMed Nagakawa T, Yamazaki M, Hatakeyama N, Stekiel TA. The mechanisms of propofol-mediated hyperpolarization of in situ rat mesenteric vascular smooth muscle. Anesth Analg. 2003;97(6):1639–45.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Yi QL, Mo HZ, Hu H, Xiang M. Comparison of ciprofol and propofol in elderly patients undergoing gastroscopy. J Clin Anesth. 2022;38(07):712–5. Yi QL, Mo HZ, Hu H, Xiang M. Comparison of ciprofol and propofol in elderly patients undergoing gastroscopy. J Clin Anesth. 2022;38(07):712–5.
23.
go back to reference Martinez RA, Hurff A, DeGeorge KC, DeGeorge BR Jr. How to minimize the pain of local anesthetic administration. J Fam Pract. 2020;69(4):172–8.PubMed Martinez RA, Hurff A, DeGeorge KC, DeGeorge BR Jr. How to minimize the pain of local anesthetic administration. J Fam Pract. 2020;69(4):172–8.PubMed
24.
go back to reference McIntosh MP, Rajewski RA. Comparative canine pharmacokinetics-pharmacodynamics of fospropofol disodium injection, propofol emulsion, and cyclodextrin-enabled propofol solution following bolus parenteral administration. J Pharm Sci. 2012;101(9):3547–52.CrossRefPubMed McIntosh MP, Rajewski RA. Comparative canine pharmacokinetics-pharmacodynamics of fospropofol disodium injection, propofol emulsion, and cyclodextrin-enabled propofol solution following bolus parenteral administration. J Pharm Sci. 2012;101(9):3547–52.CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Jalota L, Kalira V, George E, Shi YY, Hornuss C, Radke O, Pace NL, Apfel CC. Prevention of pain on injection of propofol: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2011;342:d1110.CrossRefPubMed Jalota L, Kalira V, George E, Shi YY, Hornuss C, Radke O, Pace NL, Apfel CC. Prevention of pain on injection of propofol: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2011;342:d1110.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Moore GD, Walker AM, MacLaren R. Fospropofol: a new sedative-hypnotic agent for monitored anesthesia care. Ann Pharmacother. 2009;43(11):1802–8.CrossRefPubMed Moore GD, Walker AM, MacLaren R. Fospropofol: a new sedative-hypnotic agent for monitored anesthesia care. Ann Pharmacother. 2009;43(11):1802–8.CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Pace NL, Stylianou MP. Advances in and limitations of up-and-down methodology: a précis of clinical use, study design, and dose estimation in anesthesia research. Anesthesiology. 2007;107(1):144–52.CrossRefPubMed Pace NL, Stylianou MP. Advances in and limitations of up-and-down methodology: a précis of clinical use, study design, and dose estimation in anesthesia research. Anesthesiology. 2007;107(1):144–52.CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Zhao TY, Chen D, Sun H, Xu ZX, Lyu S, Wang T, Liu LL. Moderate sedation with single-dose remimazolam tosilate in elderly male patients undergoing transurethral resection of the prostate with spinal anesthesia: a prospective, single-arm, single-centre clinical trial. BMC Anesthesiol. 2022;22(1):247.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Zhao TY, Chen D, Sun H, Xu ZX, Lyu S, Wang T, Liu LL. Moderate sedation with single-dose remimazolam tosilate in elderly male patients undergoing transurethral resection of the prostate with spinal anesthesia: a prospective, single-arm, single-centre clinical trial. BMC Anesthesiol. 2022;22(1):247.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
29.
go back to reference Li X, Yang D, Li Q, Wang H, Wang M, Yan P, Wu N, Li F, Ma S, Ding Y, Liu J, Wang H. Safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of a single bolus of the γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) receptor potentiator HSK3486 in healthy Chinese elderly and non-elderly. Front Pharmacol. 2021;12:735700.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Li X, Yang D, Li Q, Wang H, Wang M, Yan P, Wu N, Li F, Ma S, Ding Y, Liu J, Wang H. Safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of a single bolus of the γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) receptor potentiator HSK3486 in healthy Chinese elderly and non-elderly. Front Pharmacol. 2021;12:735700.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
30.
go back to reference Vuyk J, Oostwouder CJ, Vletter AA, Burm AG, Bovill JG. Gender differences in the pharmacokinetics of propofol in elderly patients during and after continuous infusion. Br J Anaesth. 2001;86(2):183–8.CrossRefPubMed Vuyk J, Oostwouder CJ, Vletter AA, Burm AG, Bovill JG. Gender differences in the pharmacokinetics of propofol in elderly patients during and after continuous infusion. Br J Anaesth. 2001;86(2):183–8.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Effective doses of ciprofol combined with alfentanil in inhibiting responses to gastroscope insertion, a prospective, single-arm, single-center study
Authors
Xiaoru Wu
Min Liao
Xingzhou Lin
Jianing Hu
Tangyuanmeng Zhao
Hu Sun
Publication date
01-12-2024
Publisher
BioMed Central
Keyword
Alfentanil
Published in
BMC Anesthesiology / Issue 1/2024
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2253
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-023-02387-4

Other articles of this Issue 1/2024

BMC Anesthesiology 1/2024 Go to the issue