Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Anesthesiology 1/2020

Open Access 01-12-2020 | Airway Management | Research article

Time to adapt in the pandemic era: a prospective randomized non –inferiority study comparing time to intubate with and without the barrier box

Authors: Praneeth Madabhushi, Sudhakar Kinthala, Abistanand Ankam, Nitin Chopra, Burdett R. Porter

Published in: BMC Anesthesiology | Issue 1/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The challenges posed by the spread of COVID-19 disease through aerosols have compelled anesthesiologists to modify their airway management practices. Devices such as barrier boxes are being considered as potential adjuncts to full PPE’s to limit the aerosol spread. Usage of the barrier box raises concerns of delay in time to intubate (TTI). We designed our study to determine if using a barrier box with glidescope delays TTI within acceptable parameters to make relevant clinical conclusions.

Methods

Seventy-eight patients were enrolled in this prospective non-inferiority controlled trial and were randomly allocated to either group C (without the barrier box) or the study group BB (using barrier box). The primary measured endpoint is time to intubate (TTI), which is defined as time taken from loss of twitches confirmed with a peripheral nerve stimulator to confirmation of end-tidal CO 2. 15 s was used as non-inferiority margin for the purpose of the study. We used an unpaired two-sample single-sided t-test to test our non- inferiority hypothesis (H 0: Mean TTI diff ≥15 s, H A: Mean TTI diff < 15 s). Secondary endpoints include the number of attempts at intubation, lowest oxygen saturation during induction, and the need for bag-mask ventilation.

Results

Mean TTI in group C was 42 s (CI 19.2 to 64.8) vs. 52.1 s (CI 26.1 to 78) in group BB. The difference in mean TTI was 10.1 s (CI -∞ to 14.9). We rejected the null hypothesis and concluded with 95% confidence that the difference of the mean TTI between the groups is less than < 15 s (95% CI -∞ to 14.9,p = 0.0461). Our induction times were comparable (67.7 vs. 65.9 s).100% of our patients were intubated on the first attempt in both groups. None of our patients needed rescue breaths.

Conclusions

We conclude that in patients with normal airway exam, scheduled for elective surgeries, our barrier box did not cause any clinically significant delay in TTI when airway manipulation is performed by well-trained providers.
The study was retrospectively registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04411056) on May 27, 2020.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
8.
go back to reference Dupont WD, Plummer WD. Power and sample size calculations. A review and computer program. Control Clin Trials. 1990;11(2):116–28.CrossRef Dupont WD, Plummer WD. Power and sample size calculations. A review and computer program. Control Clin Trials. 1990;11(2):116–28.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Ramkumar V, Umesh G, Ann PF. Preoxygenation with 20° head-up tilt provides longer duration of non-hypoxic apnea than conventional preoxygenation in non-obese healthy adults. J Anesth. 2011;25(2):189–94.CrossRef Ramkumar V, Umesh G, Ann PF. Preoxygenation with 20° head-up tilt provides longer duration of non-hypoxic apnea than conventional preoxygenation in non-obese healthy adults. J Anesth. 2011;25(2):189–94.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Weingart SD, Levitan RM. Preoxygenation and Prevention of Desaturation During Emergency Airway Management. YMEM; 2011. Weingart SD, Levitan RM. Preoxygenation and Prevention of Desaturation During Emergency Airway Management. YMEM; 2011.
13.
go back to reference Naguib M, Samarkandi AH, El-Din ME, Abdullah K, Khaled M, Alharby SW. The dose of succinylcholine required for excellent endotracheal intubating conditions. Anesth Analg. 2006;102(1):151–5.CrossRef Naguib M, Samarkandi AH, El-Din ME, Abdullah K, Khaled M, Alharby SW. The dose of succinylcholine required for excellent endotracheal intubating conditions. Anesth Analg. 2006;102(1):151–5.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Moon TS, Tai K, Kim A, Gonzales MX, Lu R, Pak T, et al. Apneic Oxygenation During Prolonged Laryngoscopy in Obese Patients: a Randomized, Double-Blinded, Controlled Trial of Nasal Cannula Oxygen Administration. Obes Surg. 2019;29(12):3992–9 Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31317460/. [cited 2020 Jun 29].CrossRef Moon TS, Tai K, Kim A, Gonzales MX, Lu R, Pak T, et al. Apneic Oxygenation During Prolonged Laryngoscopy in Obese Patients: a Randomized, Double-Blinded, Controlled Trial of Nasal Cannula Oxygen Administration. Obes Surg. 2019;29(12):3992–9 Available from: https://​pubmed.​ncbi.​nlm.​nih.​gov/​31317460/​. [cited 2020 Jun 29].CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Time to adapt in the pandemic era: a prospective randomized non –inferiority study comparing time to intubate with and without the barrier box
Authors
Praneeth Madabhushi
Sudhakar Kinthala
Abistanand Ankam
Nitin Chopra
Burdett R. Porter
Publication date
01-12-2020
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Anesthesiology / Issue 1/2020
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2253
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-020-01149-w

Other articles of this Issue 1/2020

BMC Anesthesiology 1/2020 Go to the issue