Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 4/2016

01-08-2016 | Hepatobiliary Tumors

Aggressive Hemihepatectomy Combined with Resection and Reconstruction of Middle Hepatic Vein for Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma

Authors: Akinori Miyata, MD, Yoshihiro Sakamoto, MD, PhD, Satoshi Yamamoto, MD, PhD, Nobuhisa Akamatsu, MD, PhD, Junichi Arita, MD, PhD, Junichi Kaneko, MD, PhD, Kiyoshi Hasegawa, MD, PhD, Norihiro Kokudo, MD, PhD, FACS

Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Special Issue 4/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Major hepatectomy for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) sometimes involves resection of major hepatic veins, which might result in the future liver remnant (FLR) congestion. The necessity and efficacy of resection and reconstruction of the middle hepatic vein (MHV) during right or left hemihepatectomy for resection of ICC remains unclear.

Methods

Between 1995 and 2013, 68 patients underwent right (n = 24) or left hemihepatectomy (n = 44) for primary ICC, with (n = 27) or without (n = 41) resection of MHV. If the noncongested FLR volume was <40 % of the total liver volume, reconstruction of major hepatic veins was considered.

Results

No significant differences between the groups were observed for patients with or without resection of MHV in the pathologic findings, including negative surgical margins (81 vs. 85 %, P = 0.67) and overall survival (5-year survival rate: 18.3 vs. 33.4 %, P = 0.26). In five patients who underwent venous resection and reconstruction, the noncongested FLR increased from 37 to 74 % after reconstruction (P < 0.01); this noncongested FLR was almost similar to the patients without venous resection (72 %). Three patients undergoing venous resection without reconstruction developed postoperative hepatic failure (grade A in 2 and grade B in 1; International study group of liver surgery definition); however, there was no surgical mortality.

Conclusions

Aggressive hemihepatectomy for ICC with venous resection in the FLR resulted in acceptable long-term outcome with no mortality when considering hepatic venous reconstruction based on our criterion.
Literature
1.
2.
3.
go back to reference Morizane C, Okusaka T, Mizusawa J, et al. Randomized phase II study of gemcitabine plus S-1 versus S-1 in advanced biliary tract cancer: a Japan Clinical Oncology Group trial (JCOG 0805). Cancer Sci. 2013;104:1211–6.CrossRefPubMed Morizane C, Okusaka T, Mizusawa J, et al. Randomized phase II study of gemcitabine plus S-1 versus S-1 in advanced biliary tract cancer: a Japan Clinical Oncology Group trial (JCOG 0805). Cancer Sci. 2013;104:1211–6.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Sasaki T, Isayama H, Nakai Y, et al. A randomized phase II study of gemcitabine and S-1 combination therapy versus gemcitabine monotherapy for advanced biliary tract cancer. Cancer Chemother Pharmcol. 2013;71:973–9.CrossRef Sasaki T, Isayama H, Nakai Y, et al. A randomized phase II study of gemcitabine and S-1 combination therapy versus gemcitabine monotherapy for advanced biliary tract cancer. Cancer Chemother Pharmcol. 2013;71:973–9.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Okusaka T, Nakachi K, Fukutomi A, et al. Gemcitabine alone or in combination with cisplatin in patients with biliary tract cancer: a comparative multicentre study in Japan. Br J Cancer. 2010;103:469–74.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Okusaka T, Nakachi K, Fukutomi A, et al. Gemcitabine alone or in combination with cisplatin in patients with biliary tract cancer: a comparative multicentre study in Japan. Br J Cancer. 2010;103:469–74.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
go back to reference Valle J, Wasan H, Palmer DH, et al. Cisplatin plus gemcitabine versus gemcitabine for biliary tract cancer. N Engl J Med. 2010;362:1273–81.CrossRefPubMed Valle J, Wasan H, Palmer DH, et al. Cisplatin plus gemcitabine versus gemcitabine for biliary tract cancer. N Engl J Med. 2010;362:1273–81.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Murakami S, Ajiki T, Okazaki T, et al. Factors affecting survival after resection of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Surg Today. 2014;44:1847–54.CrossRefPubMed Murakami S, Ajiki T, Okazaki T, et al. Factors affecting survival after resection of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Surg Today. 2014;44:1847–54.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Luo X, Yuan L, Wang Y, Ge R, Sun Y, Wei G. Survival outcomes and prognostic factors of surgical therapy for all potentially resectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a large single-center cohort study. J Gastrointest Surg. 2014;18:562–72.CrossRefPubMed Luo X, Yuan L, Wang Y, Ge R, Sun Y, Wei G. Survival outcomes and prognostic factors of surgical therapy for all potentially resectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a large single-center cohort study. J Gastrointest Surg. 2014;18:562–72.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Lang H, Sotiropoulos GC, Fruhauf NR, et al. Extended hepatectomy for intrahepatic cholangiocellular carcinoma (ICC): when is it worthwhile? Single center experience with 27 resections in 50 patients over a 5-year period. Ann Surg. 2005;241:134–43.PubMedPubMedCentral Lang H, Sotiropoulos GC, Fruhauf NR, et al. Extended hepatectomy for intrahepatic cholangiocellular carcinoma (ICC): when is it worthwhile? Single center experience with 27 resections in 50 patients over a 5-year period. Ann Surg. 2005;241:134–43.PubMedPubMedCentral
10.
go back to reference Hata S, Sugawara Y, Kishi Y, et al. Volume regeneration after right liver donation. Liver Transplant. 2004;10:65–70.CrossRef Hata S, Sugawara Y, Kishi Y, et al. Volume regeneration after right liver donation. Liver Transplant. 2004;10:65–70.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Maema A, Imamura H, Takayama T, et al. Impaired volume regeneration of split livers with partial venous disruption: a latent problem in partial liver transplantation. Transplantation. 2002;73:765–9.CrossRefPubMed Maema A, Imamura H, Takayama T, et al. Impaired volume regeneration of split livers with partial venous disruption: a latent problem in partial liver transplantation. Transplantation. 2002;73:765–9.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Scatton O, Plasse M, Dondero F, Vilgrain V, Sauvanet A, Belghiti J. Impact of localized congestion related to venous deprivation after hepatectomy. Surgery. 2008;143:483–9.CrossRefPubMed Scatton O, Plasse M, Dondero F, Vilgrain V, Sauvanet A, Belghiti J. Impact of localized congestion related to venous deprivation after hepatectomy. Surgery. 2008;143:483–9.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Mise Y, Hasegawa K, Satou S, et al. Venous reconstruction based on virtual liver resection to avoid congestion in the liver remnant. Br J Surg. 2011;98:1742–51.CrossRefPubMed Mise Y, Hasegawa K, Satou S, et al. Venous reconstruction based on virtual liver resection to avoid congestion in the liver remnant. Br J Surg. 2011;98:1742–51.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004;240:205–13.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004;240:205–13.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
go back to reference Koch M, Garden OJ, Padbury R, et al. Bile leakage after hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery: a definition and grading of severity by the International Study Group of Liver Surgery. Surgery. 2011;149:680–8.CrossRefPubMed Koch M, Garden OJ, Padbury R, et al. Bile leakage after hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery: a definition and grading of severity by the International Study Group of Liver Surgery. Surgery. 2011;149:680–8.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Rahbari NN, Garden OJ, Padbury R, et al. Posthepatectomy liver failure: a definition and grading by the International Study Group of Liver Surgery (ISGLS). Surgery. 2011;149:713–24.CrossRefPubMed Rahbari NN, Garden OJ, Padbury R, et al. Posthepatectomy liver failure: a definition and grading by the International Study Group of Liver Surgery (ISGLS). Surgery. 2011;149:713–24.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Nakamura S, Tsuzuki T. Surgical anatomy of the hepatic veins and the inferior vena cava. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1981;152:43–50.PubMed Nakamura S, Tsuzuki T. Surgical anatomy of the hepatic veins and the inferior vena cava. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1981;152:43–50.PubMed
18.
go back to reference Kishi Y, Sugawara Y, Akamatsu N, et al. Sharing the middle hepatic vein between donor and recipient: left liver graft procurement preserving a large segment VIII branch in donor. Liver Transplant. 2004;10:1208–12.CrossRef Kishi Y, Sugawara Y, Akamatsu N, et al. Sharing the middle hepatic vein between donor and recipient: left liver graft procurement preserving a large segment VIII branch in donor. Liver Transplant. 2004;10:1208–12.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Sano K, Makuuchi M, Miki K, et al. Evaluation of hepatic venous congestion: proposed indication criteria for hepatic vein reconstruction. Ann Surg. 2002;236:241–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Sano K, Makuuchi M, Miki K, et al. Evaluation of hepatic venous congestion: proposed indication criteria for hepatic vein reconstruction. Ann Surg. 2002;236:241–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
20.
go back to reference Kobayashi SI, Igami T, Ebata T, et al. Long-term survival following extended hepatectomy with concomitant resection of all major hepatic veins for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: report of a case. Surg Today. 2015;45:1058–63.CrossRefPubMed Kobayashi SI, Igami T, Ebata T, et al. Long-term survival following extended hepatectomy with concomitant resection of all major hepatic veins for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: report of a case. Surg Today. 2015;45:1058–63.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Kawaguchi Y, Ishizawa T, Miyata Y, et al. Portal uptake function in veno-occlusive regions evaluated by real-time fluorescent imaging using indocyanine green. J Hepatol. 2013;58:247–53.CrossRefPubMed Kawaguchi Y, Ishizawa T, Miyata Y, et al. Portal uptake function in veno-occlusive regions evaluated by real-time fluorescent imaging using indocyanine green. J Hepatol. 2013;58:247–53.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Kaneko T, Kaneko K, Sugimoto H, et al. Intrahepatic anastomosis formation between the hepatic veins in the graft liver of the living related liver transplantation: observation by Doppler ultrasonography. Transplantation. 2000;70:982–5.CrossRefPubMed Kaneko T, Kaneko K, Sugimoto H, et al. Intrahepatic anastomosis formation between the hepatic veins in the graft liver of the living related liver transplantation: observation by Doppler ultrasonography. Transplantation. 2000;70:982–5.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Akamatsu N, Sugawara Y, Nagata R, et al. Adult right living-donor liver transplantation with special reference to reconstruction of the middle hepatic vein. Am J Transplant. 2014;14:2777–87.CrossRefPubMed Akamatsu N, Sugawara Y, Nagata R, et al. Adult right living-donor liver transplantation with special reference to reconstruction of the middle hepatic vein. Am J Transplant. 2014;14:2777–87.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Aggressive Hemihepatectomy Combined with Resection and Reconstruction of Middle Hepatic Vein for Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma
Authors
Akinori Miyata, MD
Yoshihiro Sakamoto, MD, PhD
Satoshi Yamamoto, MD, PhD
Nobuhisa Akamatsu, MD, PhD
Junichi Arita, MD, PhD
Junichi Kaneko, MD, PhD
Kiyoshi Hasegawa, MD, PhD
Norihiro Kokudo, MD, PhD, FACS
Publication date
01-08-2016
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Issue Special Issue 4/2016
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Electronic ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-016-5384-z

Other articles of this Special Issue 4/2016

Annals of Surgical Oncology 4/2016 Go to the issue