Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Digestive Diseases and Sciences 10/2015

01-10-2015 | Editorial

Adherence to Screening Colonoscopy: Can We Get Our Recommendations to Stick?

Authors: Melinda C. Rogers, Rajesh N. Keswani

Published in: Digestive Diseases and Sciences | Issue 10/2015

Login to get access

Excerpt

Although colorectal cancer (CRC) remains the second leading cause of cancer-related mortality in the USA, its incidence and mortality have decreased in men and women since 1997, a reduction attributed, in part, to the increased use of CRC screening modalities [1]. Colonoscopy, regarded by most expert advisory groups as the mainstay of CRC screening, is the only modality that both detects and removes neoplastic polyps from the entire colon. Despite its efficacy, only 20–38 % of the population is adherent to CRC screening guidelines [2, 3]. Colonoscopy at present is estimated to decrease CRC-related mortality by 53 %, with further decrements expected if a greater proportion of individuals received age-appropriate screening [4]. Given limited healthcare resources, information that enables practitioners to focus interventions on populations most likely to be non-adherent to screening colonoscopy is valuable. …
Literature
1.
go back to reference Edwards BK, Ward E, Kohler BA, et al. Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, 1975–2006, featuring colorectal cancer trends and impact of interventions (risk factors, screening, and treatment) to reduce future rates. Cancer. 2010;116:544–573.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Edwards BK, Ward E, Kohler BA, et al. Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, 1975–2006, featuring colorectal cancer trends and impact of interventions (risk factors, screening, and treatment) to reduce future rates. Cancer. 2010;116:544–573.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Inadomi JM, Vijan S, Janz NK, et al. Adherence to colorectal cancer screening: a randomized clinical trial of competing strategies. Arch Intern Med. 2012;172:575–582.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Inadomi JM, Vijan S, Janz NK, et al. Adherence to colorectal cancer screening: a randomized clinical trial of competing strategies. Arch Intern Med. 2012;172:575–582.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Swan J, Breen N, Graubard BI, et al. Data and trends in cancer screening in the United States: results from the 2005 National Health Interview Survey. Cancer. 2010;116:4872–4881.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Swan J, Breen N, Graubard BI, et al. Data and trends in cancer screening in the United States: results from the 2005 National Health Interview Survey. Cancer. 2010;116:4872–4881.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Zauber AG, Winawer SJ, O’Brien MJ, et al. Colonoscopic polypectomy and long-term prevention of colorectal-cancer deaths. N Engl J Med. 2012;366:687–696.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Zauber AG, Winawer SJ, O’Brien MJ, et al. Colonoscopic polypectomy and long-term prevention of colorectal-cancer deaths. N Engl J Med. 2012;366:687–696.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Steinwachs D, Allen JD, Barlow WE, et al. National Institutes of Health state-of-the-science conference statement: enhancing use and quality of colorectal cancer screening. Ann Intern Med. 2010;152:663–667.CrossRefPubMed Steinwachs D, Allen JD, Barlow WE, et al. National Institutes of Health state-of-the-science conference statement: enhancing use and quality of colorectal cancer screening. Ann Intern Med. 2010;152:663–667.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Klabunde CN, Cronin KA, Breen N, Waldron WR, Ambs AH, Nadel MR. Trends in colorectal cancer test use among vulnerable populations in the United States. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2011;20:1611–1621.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Klabunde CN, Cronin KA, Breen N, Waldron WR, Ambs AH, Nadel MR. Trends in colorectal cancer test use among vulnerable populations in the United States. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2011;20:1611–1621.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Greenspan M, Chehl N, Shawron K, et al. Patient non-adherence and cancellations are higher for screening colonoscopy compared with surveillance colonoscopy. Dig Dis Sci. (Epub ahead of print). doi:10.1007/s10620-015-3664-2. Greenspan M, Chehl N, Shawron K, et al. Patient non-adherence and cancellations are higher for screening colonoscopy compared with surveillance colonoscopy. Dig Dis Sci. (Epub ahead of print). doi:10.​1007/​s10620-015-3664-2.
8.
9.
go back to reference Keswani RN, Yadlapati R, Gleason KM, et al. Physician report cards and implementing standards of practice are both significantly associated with improved screening colonoscopy quality. Am J Gastroenterol. 2015. doi:10.1038/ajg.2015.103. Keswani RN, Yadlapati R, Gleason KM, et al. Physician report cards and implementing standards of practice are both significantly associated with improved screening colonoscopy quality. Am J Gastroenterol. 2015. doi:10.​1038/​ajg.​2015.​103.
10.
go back to reference Seeff LC, Nadel MR, Klabunde CN, et al. Patterns and predictors of colorectal cancer test use in the adult U.S. population. Cancer. 2004;100:2093–2103.CrossRefPubMed Seeff LC, Nadel MR, Klabunde CN, et al. Patterns and predictors of colorectal cancer test use in the adult U.S. population. Cancer. 2004;100:2093–2103.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Hendren S, Winters P, Humiston S, et al. Randomized, controlled trial of a multimodal intervention to improve cancer screening rates in a safety-net primary care practice. J Gen Intern Med. 2014;29:41–49.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Hendren S, Winters P, Humiston S, et al. Randomized, controlled trial of a multimodal intervention to improve cancer screening rates in a safety-net primary care practice. J Gen Intern Med. 2014;29:41–49.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Blumenthal DM, Singal G, Mangla SS, Macklin EA, Chung DC. Predicting non-adherence with outpatient colonoscopy using a novel electronic tool that measures prior non-adherence. J Gen Intern Med. 2015;30:724–731. Blumenthal DM, Singal G, Mangla SS, Macklin EA, Chung DC. Predicting non-adherence with outpatient colonoscopy using a novel electronic tool that measures prior non-adherence. J Gen Intern Med. 2015;30:724–731.
14.
go back to reference Meester RG, Doubeni CA, Zauber AG, et al. Public health impact of achieving 80 % colorectal cancer screening rates in the United States by 2018. Cancer. 2015. doi:10.1002/cncr.29336. Meester RG, Doubeni CA, Zauber AG, et al. Public health impact of achieving 80 % colorectal cancer screening rates in the United States by 2018. Cancer. 2015. doi:10.​1002/​cncr.​29336.
Metadata
Title
Adherence to Screening Colonoscopy: Can We Get Our Recommendations to Stick?
Authors
Melinda C. Rogers
Rajesh N. Keswani
Publication date
01-10-2015
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Digestive Diseases and Sciences / Issue 10/2015
Print ISSN: 0163-2116
Electronic ISSN: 1573-2568
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-015-3750-5

Other articles of this Issue 10/2015

Digestive Diseases and Sciences 10/2015 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

Year in Review: Pediatric cardiology

Watch Dr. Anne Marie Valente present the last year's highlights in pediatric and congenital heart disease in the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Pulmonary vascular disease

The last year's highlights in pulmonary vascular disease are presented by Dr. Jane Leopold in this official video from ACC.24.

Year in Review: Valvular heart disease

Watch Prof. William Zoghbi present the last year's highlights in valvular heart disease from the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discusses last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.