Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 2/2021

01-02-2021 | Adenocarcinoma of the Esophagogastric Junction

Laparoscopic versus open gastrectomy for Siewert type II/III adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction: a meta-analysis

Authors: CunXiang Liao, Qing Feng, ShaoHui Xie, Jun Chen, Yan Shi

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 2/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The potential advantages of laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG) compared with open gastrectomy (OG) for Siewert type II/III adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (AEG) have not been fully clarified. The aim of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of LG for Siewert type II/III AEG, compared with OG.

Methods

A comprehensive search was performed in various medical databases up to December 30, 2018. Seven non-randomized controlled trials comparing LG and OG for Siewert type II/III AEG were included. Outcomes evaluated including operation time, estimated blood loss, number of retrieved lymph nodes (LNs), post-operation complications, postoperative hospital stay, time to first flatus, time to ambulation, and overall survival (OS).

Results

Seven studies of 1915 patients were included for meta-analysis. The estimated blood loss [weighted mean difference (WMD) = − 77.49, 95%CI − 111.84 to − 43.15; P < 0.00001] was significantly less and the postoperative hospital stay (WMD = − 1.98, 95%CI − 2.14 to − 1.83; P < 0.00001) was significantly shorter in the LG group than in the OG group, while the operation time, number of retrieved LNs, time to first flatus, and time to ambulation showed no significant difference between LG and OG groups. The overall postoperative complications [odds ratio (OR) 0.78, 95%CI 0.60–1.02; P = 0.07] in LG group were less than those in OG group, although the difference was not significant between the two groups.

Conclusion

LG can achieve short-term surgical outcomes comparable to OG, with respect to safety and efficiency in treatment of Siewert type II/III AEG.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Siewert JR, Stein HJ (1998) Classification of adenocarcinoma of the oesophagogastric junction. Br J Surg 85:1457–1459CrossRef Siewert JR, Stein HJ (1998) Classification of adenocarcinoma of the oesophagogastric junction. Br J Surg 85:1457–1459CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Balakrishnan M, George R, Sharma A et al (2017) Changing trends in stomach cancer throughout the world. Curr Gastroenterol Rep 19:36CrossRef Balakrishnan M, George R, Sharma A et al (2017) Changing trends in stomach cancer throughout the world. Curr Gastroenterol Rep 19:36CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Liu K, Yang K, Zhang W et al (2016) Changes of esophagogastric junctional adenocarcinoma and gastroesophageal reflux disease among surgical patients during 1988–2012: a single-institution, high-volume experience in China. Ann Surg 263:88–95CrossRef Liu K, Yang K, Zhang W et al (2016) Changes of esophagogastric junctional adenocarcinoma and gastroesophageal reflux disease among surgical patients during 1988–2012: a single-institution, high-volume experience in China. Ann Surg 263:88–95CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Imamura Y, Watanabe M, Toihata T et al (2019) Recent incidence trend of surgically resected esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma and microsatellite instability status in Japanese patients. Digestion 99:6–13CrossRef Imamura Y, Watanabe M, Toihata T et al (2019) Recent incidence trend of surgically resected esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma and microsatellite instability status in Japanese patients. Digestion 99:6–13CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Gong EJ, Kim DH, Ahn JY et al (2017) Comparison of long-term outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection and surgery for esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma. Gastric Cancer 20(Suppl 1):84–91CrossRef Gong EJ, Kim DH, Ahn JY et al (2017) Comparison of long-term outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection and surgery for esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma. Gastric Cancer 20(Suppl 1):84–91CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Liu K, Zhang W, Chen X et al (2015) Comparison on clinicopathological features and prognosis between esophagogastric junctional adenocarcinoma (Siewert II/III types) and distal gastric adenocarcinoma: retrospective cohort study, a single institution, high-volume experience in China. Medicine 94:e1386CrossRef Liu K, Zhang W, Chen X et al (2015) Comparison on clinicopathological features and prognosis between esophagogastric junctional adenocarcinoma (Siewert II/III types) and distal gastric adenocarcinoma: retrospective cohort study, a single institution, high-volume experience in China. Medicine 94:e1386CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Yamashita H, Seto Y, Sano T et al (2017) Results of a nation-wide retrospective study of lymphadenectomy for esophagogastric junction carcinoma. Gastric Cancer 20(Suppl 1):69–83CrossRef Yamashita H, Seto Y, Sano T et al (2017) Results of a nation-wide retrospective study of lymphadenectomy for esophagogastric junction carcinoma. Gastric Cancer 20(Suppl 1):69–83CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Sugita S, Kinoshita T, Kaito A et al (2018) Short-term outcomes after laparoscopic versus open transhiatal resection of Siewert type II adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction. Surg Endosc 32:383–390CrossRef Sugita S, Kinoshita T, Kaito A et al (2018) Short-term outcomes after laparoscopic versus open transhiatal resection of Siewert type II adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction. Surg Endosc 32:383–390CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Kitano S, Iso Y, Moriyama M et al (1994) Laparoscopyassisted Billroth I gastrectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc 4:146–148 Kitano S, Iso Y, Moriyama M et al (1994) Laparoscopyassisted Billroth I gastrectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc 4:146–148
10.
go back to reference Stang A (2010) Critical evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses. Eur J Epidemiol 25:603–605CrossRef Stang A (2010) Critical evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses. Eur J Epidemiol 25:603–605CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Tierney JF, Stewart LA, Ghersi D et al (2007) Practical methods for incorporating summary time-to-event data into meta-analysis. Trials 8:16CrossRef Tierney JF, Stewart LA, Ghersi D et al (2007) Practical methods for incorporating summary time-to-event data into meta-analysis. Trials 8:16CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Goel MK, Khanna P, Kishore J (2010) Understanding survival analysis: Kaplan-Meier estimate. Int J Ayurveda Res 1:274–278CrossRef Goel MK, Khanna P, Kishore J (2010) Understanding survival analysis: Kaplan-Meier estimate. Int J Ayurveda Res 1:274–278CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Hong L, Han Y, Jin Y et al (2013) The short-term outcome in esophagogastric junctional adenocarcinoma patients receiving total gastrectomy: laparoscopic versus open gastrectomy-a retrospective cohort study. Int J Surg 11:957–961CrossRef Hong L, Han Y, Jin Y et al (2013) The short-term outcome in esophagogastric junctional adenocarcinoma patients receiving total gastrectomy: laparoscopic versus open gastrectomy-a retrospective cohort study. Int J Surg 11:957–961CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Huang CM, Lv CB, Lin JX et al (2017) Laparoscopic-assisted versus open total gastrectomy for Siewert type II and III esophagogastric junction carcinoma: a propensity score-matched case-control study. Surg Endosc 31:3495–3503CrossRef Huang CM, Lv CB, Lin JX et al (2017) Laparoscopic-assisted versus open total gastrectomy for Siewert type II and III esophagogastric junction carcinoma: a propensity score-matched case-control study. Surg Endosc 31:3495–3503CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Shi Y, Li L, Xiao H et al (2018) (2018) Feasibility of laparoscopic gastrectomy for patients with Siewert-type II/III adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction: a propensity score matching analysis. PLoS ONE 13:e0203125CrossRef Shi Y, Li L, Xiao H et al (2018) (2018) Feasibility of laparoscopic gastrectomy for patients with Siewert-type II/III adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction: a propensity score matching analysis. PLoS ONE 13:e0203125CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Zhang YC, Wu QB, Yang XY, Yang TH, Wang ZQ, Wang ZQ, et al (2018) Laparoscopic-assisted transhiatal esophagogastrectomy without thoracic or cervical access: a series of 103 consecutive cases. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech 28(7):845–852CrossRef Zhang YC, Wu QB, Yang XY, Yang TH, Wang ZQ, Wang ZQ, et al (2018) Laparoscopic-assisted transhiatal esophagogastrectomy without thoracic or cervical access: a series of 103 consecutive cases. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech 28(7):845–852CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Zhang P, Zhang X, Xue H (2018) Long-term results of hand-assisted laparoscopic gastrectomy for advanced Siewert type II and type III esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma. Int J Surg 53:201–205CrossRef Zhang P, Zhang X, Xue H (2018) Long-term results of hand-assisted laparoscopic gastrectomy for advanced Siewert type II and type III esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma. Int J Surg 53:201–205CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Kim W, Kim HH, Han SU et al (2016) Decreased morbidity of laparoscopic distal gastrectomy compared with open distal gastrectomy for stage I gastric cancer: short-term outcomes from a multicenter randomized controlled trial (KLASS-01). Ann Surg 263:28–35CrossRef Kim W, Kim HH, Han SU et al (2016) Decreased morbidity of laparoscopic distal gastrectomy compared with open distal gastrectomy for stage I gastric cancer: short-term outcomes from a multicenter randomized controlled trial (KLASS-01). Ann Surg 263:28–35CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Hu Y, Huang C, Sun Y et al (2016) Morbidity and mortality of laparoscopic versus open D2 distal gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer: a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Oncol 34:1350–1359CrossRef Hu Y, Huang C, Sun Y et al (2016) Morbidity and mortality of laparoscopic versus open D2 distal gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer: a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Oncol 34:1350–1359CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Inaki N, Etoh T, Ohyama T et al (2015) A multi-institutional, prospective, phase II feasibility Study of laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy with D2 lymph node dissection for locally advanced gastric cancer (JLSSG0901). World J Surg 39:2734–2741CrossRef Inaki N, Etoh T, Ohyama T et al (2015) A multi-institutional, prospective, phase II feasibility Study of laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy with D2 lymph node dissection for locally advanced gastric cancer (JLSSG0901). World J Surg 39:2734–2741CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Kurokawa Y, Sasako M, Sano T et al (2015) Ten-year follow-up results of a randomized clinical trial comparing left thoracoabdominal and abdominal transhiatal approaches to total gastrectomy for adenocarcinoma of the oesophagogastric junction or gastric cardia. Br J Surg 102:341–348CrossRef Kurokawa Y, Sasako M, Sano T et al (2015) Ten-year follow-up results of a randomized clinical trial comparing left thoracoabdominal and abdominal transhiatal approaches to total gastrectomy for adenocarcinoma of the oesophagogastric junction or gastric cardia. Br J Surg 102:341–348CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Jung DH, Son SY, Park YS et al (2016) The learning curve associated with laparoscopic total gastrectomy. Gastric Cancer 19:264–272CrossRef Jung DH, Son SY, Park YS et al (2016) The learning curve associated with laparoscopic total gastrectomy. Gastric Cancer 19:264–272CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Shi Y, Xu X, Zhao Y et al (2018) Short-term surgical outcomes of a randomized controlled trial comparing laparoscopic versus open gastrectomy with D2 lymph node dissection for advanced gastric cancer. Surg Endosc 32:2427–2433CrossRef Shi Y, Xu X, Zhao Y et al (2018) Short-term surgical outcomes of a randomized controlled trial comparing laparoscopic versus open gastrectomy with D2 lymph node dissection for advanced gastric cancer. Surg Endosc 32:2427–2433CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Wu XN, Liu CQ, Tian JY et al (2017) Prognostic significance of the number of lymph nodes examined in node-negative Siewert type II esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma. Int J Surg 41:6–11CrossRef Wu XN, Liu CQ, Tian JY et al (2017) Prognostic significance of the number of lymph nodes examined in node-negative Siewert type II esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma. Int J Surg 41:6–11CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Quan Y, Huang A, Ye M et al (2016) Comparison of laparoscopic versus open gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer: an updated meta-analysis. Gastric Cancer 19:939–950CrossRef Quan Y, Huang A, Ye M et al (2016) Comparison of laparoscopic versus open gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer: an updated meta-analysis. Gastric Cancer 19:939–950CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Ding J, Sun B, Song P et al (2017) The application of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS)/fasttrack surgery in gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Oncotarget 8:75699–75711CrossRef Ding J, Sun B, Song P et al (2017) The application of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS)/fasttrack surgery in gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Oncotarget 8:75699–75711CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Mahar AL, Coburn NG, Viola RP et al (2015) Predictors of hospital stay and home care services use: a population-based, retrospective cohort study in stage IV gastric cancer. Palliat Med 29:147–156CrossRef Mahar AL, Coburn NG, Viola RP et al (2015) Predictors of hospital stay and home care services use: a population-based, retrospective cohort study in stage IV gastric cancer. Palliat Med 29:147–156CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Małczak P, Torbicz G, Rubinkiewicz M et al (2018) Comparison of totally laparoscopic and open approach in total gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy-systematic review and meta-analysis. Cancer Manag Res 10:6705–6714CrossRef Małczak P, Torbicz G, Rubinkiewicz M et al (2018) Comparison of totally laparoscopic and open approach in total gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy-systematic review and meta-analysis. Cancer Manag Res 10:6705–6714CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Wei Y, Yu D, Li Y et al (2018) Laparoscopic versus open gastrectomy for advanced gastriccancer: a meta-analysis based on high-quality retrospective studies and clinical randomized trials. Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol 42:577–590CrossRef Wei Y, Yu D, Li Y et al (2018) Laparoscopic versus open gastrectomy for advanced gastriccancer: a meta-analysis based on high-quality retrospective studies and clinical randomized trials. Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol 42:577–590CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Wang JB, Lin MQ, Li P et al (2017) The prognostic relevance of parapyloric lymph node metastasis in Siewert type II/III adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction. Eur J Surg Oncol 43:2333–2340CrossRef Wang JB, Lin MQ, Li P et al (2017) The prognostic relevance of parapyloric lymph node metastasis in Siewert type II/III adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction. Eur J Surg Oncol 43:2333–2340CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Laparoscopic versus open gastrectomy for Siewert type II/III adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction: a meta-analysis
Authors
CunXiang Liao
Qing Feng
ShaoHui Xie
Jun Chen
Yan Shi
Publication date
01-02-2021
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 2/2021
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-07458-y

Other articles of this Issue 2/2021

Surgical Endoscopy 2/2021 Go to the issue