Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 1/2014

01-05-2014 | Clinical trial

Additional value of F-18 FDG PET/CT for initial staging in breast cancer with clinically negative axillary nodes

Authors: Young Jin Jeong, Do-Young Kang, Hyun Jin Yoon, Hye Joo Son

Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment | Issue 1/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical impact of the preoperative 18F-FDG PET/CT in the initial workup of breast cancer with clinically negative axillary nodes. Whether the status of the clinical axillary nodal involvement can be considered a parameter for making a decision to omit the preoperative 18F-FDG PET/CT in the situation reported herein was also determined. A total of 178 patients who had newly diagnosed breast cancer and for whom the conventional diagnostic modalities showed no sign of axillary node metastasis were retrospectively enrolled in this study. All the patients underwent preoperative 18F-FDG PET/CT. The images and histologic results that were obtained were analyzed. 18F-FDG PET/CT detected primary lesions in 156 of the 178 patients, with an overall sensitivity of 87.6 %, and false negative results were obtained for 22 patients (12.4 %). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of 18F-FDG PET/CT in the detection of axillary nodes were 20.8, 86.9, 37.0, 74.8, and 69.1 %, respectively. Extra-axillary node metastasis was identified in two patients (1.1 %) who had internal mammary nodes. There was no distant metastasis, but coexisting primary tumor was detected in five patients (2.8 %). In total, the therapeutic plan was changed based on 18F-FDG PET/CT in seven (3.9 %) of the 178 patients, but considering only the cases confined to breast cancer, the change occurred in only two patients (1.1 %). 18F-FDG PET/CT almost did not affect the initial staging and treatment plan in breast cancer with clinically negative axillary node. If the axillary node is clinically negative in the preoperative workup of breast cancer, then 18F-FDG PET/CT can be omitted.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Norum J, Andreassen T (2000) Screening for metastatic disease in newly diagnosed breast cancer patients. What is cost-effective? Anticancer Res 20:2193–2196PubMed Norum J, Andreassen T (2000) Screening for metastatic disease in newly diagnosed breast cancer patients. What is cost-effective? Anticancer Res 20:2193–2196PubMed
2.
go back to reference Kataja V, Castiglione M (2009) Primary breast cancer: ESMO clinical recommendations for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 20(Suppl 4):10–14PubMed Kataja V, Castiglione M (2009) Primary breast cancer: ESMO clinical recommendations for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 20(Suppl 4):10–14PubMed
4.
go back to reference Choi YJ, Shin YD, Kang YH, Lee MS, Lee MK, Cho BS et al (2012) The effects of preoperative 18F-FDG PET/CT in breast cancer patients in comparison to the conventional imaging study. J Breast Cancer 15:441–448PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Choi YJ, Shin YD, Kang YH, Lee MS, Lee MK, Cho BS et al (2012) The effects of preoperative 18F-FDG PET/CT in breast cancer patients in comparison to the conventional imaging study. J Breast Cancer 15:441–448PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Segaert I, Mottaghy F, Ceyssens S, De Wever W, Stroobants S, Van Ongeval C et al (2010) Additional value of PET-CT in staging of clinical stage IIB and III breast cancer. Breast J 16:617–624PubMedCrossRef Segaert I, Mottaghy F, Ceyssens S, De Wever W, Stroobants S, Van Ongeval C et al (2010) Additional value of PET-CT in staging of clinical stage IIB and III breast cancer. Breast J 16:617–624PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Groheux D, Espié M, Giacchetti S, Hindié E (2013) Performance of FDG PET/CT in the clinical management of breast cancer. Radiology 266:388–405PubMedCrossRef Groheux D, Espié M, Giacchetti S, Hindié E (2013) Performance of FDG PET/CT in the clinical management of breast cancer. Radiology 266:388–405PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Cooper KL, Harnan S, Meng Y, Ward SE, Fitzgerald P, Papaioannou D et al (2011) Positron emission tomography (PET) for assessment of axillary lymph node status in early breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Surg Oncol 37:187–198PubMedCrossRef Cooper KL, Harnan S, Meng Y, Ward SE, Fitzgerald P, Papaioannou D et al (2011) Positron emission tomography (PET) for assessment of axillary lymph node status in early breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Surg Oncol 37:187–198PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Seok JW, Kim Y, An YS, Kim BS (2013) The clinical value of tumor FDG uptake for predicting axillary lymph node metastasis in breast cancer with clinically negative axillary lymph nodes. Ann Nucl Med 27:546–553PubMedCrossRef Seok JW, Kim Y, An YS, Kim BS (2013) The clinical value of tumor FDG uptake for predicting axillary lymph node metastasis in breast cancer with clinically negative axillary lymph nodes. Ann Nucl Med 27:546–553PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Groves AM, Shastry M, Ben-Haim S, Kayani I, Malhotra A, Davidson T et al (2012) Defining the role of PET-CT in staging early breast cancer. Oncologist 17:613–619PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Groves AM, Shastry M, Ben-Haim S, Kayani I, Malhotra A, Davidson T et al (2012) Defining the role of PET-CT in staging early breast cancer. Oncologist 17:613–619PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Bernsdorf M, Berthelsen AK, Wielenga VT, Kroman N, Teilum D, Binderup T et al (2012) Preoperative PET/CT in early-stage breast cancer. Ann Oncol 23:2277–2282PubMedCrossRef Bernsdorf M, Berthelsen AK, Wielenga VT, Kroman N, Teilum D, Binderup T et al (2012) Preoperative PET/CT in early-stage breast cancer. Ann Oncol 23:2277–2282PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Garami Z, Hascsi Z, Varga J, Dinya T, Tanyi M, Garai I et al (2012) The value of 18-FDG PET/CT in early-stage breast cancer compared to traditional diagnostic modalities with an emphasis on changes in disease stage designation and treatment plan. Eur J Surg Oncol 38:31–37PubMedCrossRef Garami Z, Hascsi Z, Varga J, Dinya T, Tanyi M, Garai I et al (2012) The value of 18-FDG PET/CT in early-stage breast cancer compared to traditional diagnostic modalities with an emphasis on changes in disease stage designation and treatment plan. Eur J Surg Oncol 38:31–37PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Jatoi I, Hilsenbeck SG, Clark GM, Osborne CK (1999) Significance of axillary lymph node metastasis in primary breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 17:2334–2340PubMed Jatoi I, Hilsenbeck SG, Clark GM, Osborne CK (1999) Significance of axillary lymph node metastasis in primary breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 17:2334–2340PubMed
14.
go back to reference Veronesi U, De Cicco C, Galimberti VE, Fernandez JR, Rotmensz N, Viale G et al (2007) A comparative study on the value of FDG-PET and sentinel node biopsy to identify occult axillary metastases. Ann Oncol 18:473–478PubMedCrossRef Veronesi U, De Cicco C, Galimberti VE, Fernandez JR, Rotmensz N, Viale G et al (2007) A comparative study on the value of FDG-PET and sentinel node biopsy to identify occult axillary metastases. Ann Oncol 18:473–478PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Danforth DN Jr, Aloj L, Carrasquillo JA, Bacharach SL, Chow C, Zujewski J et al (2002) The role of 18F-FDG-PET in the local/regional evaluation of women with breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 75:135–146PubMedCrossRef Danforth DN Jr, Aloj L, Carrasquillo JA, Bacharach SL, Chow C, Zujewski J et al (2002) The role of 18F-FDG-PET in the local/regional evaluation of women with breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 75:135–146PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Hodgson NC, Gulenchyn KY (2008) Is there a role for positron emission tomography in breast cancer staging? J Clin Oncol 26:712–720PubMedCrossRef Hodgson NC, Gulenchyn KY (2008) Is there a role for positron emission tomography in breast cancer staging? J Clin Oncol 26:712–720PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Koolen BB, Valdés Olmos RA, Elkhuizen PH, Vogel WV, Vrancken Peeters MJ, Rodenhuis S et al (2012) Locoregional lymph node involvement on 18F-FDG PET/CT in breast cancer patients scheduled for neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Breast Cancer Res Treat 135:231–240PubMedCrossRef Koolen BB, Valdés Olmos RA, Elkhuizen PH, Vogel WV, Vrancken Peeters MJ, Rodenhuis S et al (2012) Locoregional lymph node involvement on 18F-FDG PET/CT in breast cancer patients scheduled for neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Breast Cancer Res Treat 135:231–240PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Ng AK, Travis LB (2008) Second primary cancers: an overview. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am 22:271–289PubMedCrossRef Ng AK, Travis LB (2008) Second primary cancers: an overview. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am 22:271–289PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Avril N, Menzel M, Dose J, Schelling M, Weber W, Jänicke F et al (2001) Glucose metabolism of breast cancer assessed by 18F-FDG PET: histologic and immunohistochemical tissue analysis. J Nucl Med 42:9–16PubMed Avril N, Menzel M, Dose J, Schelling M, Weber W, Jänicke F et al (2001) Glucose metabolism of breast cancer assessed by 18F-FDG PET: histologic and immunohistochemical tissue analysis. J Nucl Med 42:9–16PubMed
Metadata
Title
Additional value of F-18 FDG PET/CT for initial staging in breast cancer with clinically negative axillary nodes
Authors
Young Jin Jeong
Do-Young Kang
Hyun Jin Yoon
Hye Joo Son
Publication date
01-05-2014
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment / Issue 1/2014
Print ISSN: 0167-6806
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7217
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-014-2924-8

Other articles of this Issue 1/2014

Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 1/2014 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine