Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Prevention Science 7/2021

01-10-2021

Adding Adaptation/Modification Size and Scope to Frameworks for Classifying Changes to an Intervention

Author: Melvin M. Mark

Published in: Prevention Science | Issue 7/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Frameworks for classifying adaptations and modifications to an intervention have been developed and continue to evolve. These frameworks capture a range of attributes of adaptations and modifications. However, the size and the scope of a change, relative to the intervention’s overall size and structure, are not currently included. This omission can have negative consequences, especially for conclusions about how different kinds of changes to an intervention may influence implementation quality and intervention outcomes. Coding the relative size and scope of an adaptation or modification should be simple when the original intervention is described in detail. For interventions that are not manualized, coding may alternatively be based on rater judgments. Attending to the size and the scope of adaptations and modifications could have an ancillary benefit, generating increased conceptual and empirical work on procedures for identifying the distinct components and sub-elements of an intervention.
Literature
go back to reference Anderson, L. A., Gwaltney, M. K., Sundra, D. L., Brownson, R. C., Kane, M., Cross, A.W., et al. (2006). Using concept mapping to develop a logic model for the Prevention Research Centers Program. Preventing Chronic Disease. Anderson, L. A., Gwaltney, M. K., Sundra, D. L., Brownson, R. C., Kane, M., Cross, A.W., et al. (2006). Using concept mapping to develop a logic model for the Prevention Research Centers Program. Preventing Chronic Disease.
go back to reference Bartholomew Eldrigde, L. K., Markham, C. M., Ruiter, R. A. C., Fernàndez, M. E., Kok, G., & Parcel, G. S. (2016). Planning health promotion programs: An intervention mapping approach (4th ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. Bartholomew Eldrigde, L. K., Markham, C. M., Ruiter, R. A. C., Fernàndez, M. E., Kok, G., & Parcel, G. S. (2016). Planning health promotion programs: An intervention mapping approach (4th ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
go back to reference Bickman, L. (1985). Improving established statewide programs: A component theory of evaluation. Evaluation Review, 9, 189–208.CrossRef Bickman, L. (1985). Improving established statewide programs: A component theory of evaluation. Evaluation Review, 9, 189–208.CrossRef
go back to reference DeJong, W., & Langford, L. M. (2002). A typology for campus-based alcohol prevention: Moving toward environmental management strategies. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, Supplement, 14, 140–147.CrossRef DeJong, W., & Langford, L. M. (2002). A typology for campus-based alcohol prevention: Moving toward environmental management strategies. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, Supplement, 14, 140–147.CrossRef
go back to reference Donaldson, S. I. (2007). Program theory-driven evaluation science: Strategies and applications. Erlbaum.CrossRef Donaldson, S. I. (2007). Program theory-driven evaluation science: Strategies and applications. Erlbaum.CrossRef
go back to reference Hansen, W. B., Pankratz, M. M., Dusenbury, L., Giles, S. M., Bishop, S. C., Albritton, J., Albritton, L. P., & Strack, J. (2013). Styles of adaptation: The impact of frequency and valence of adaptation on preventing substance use. Health Education, 113, 345–363.CrossRef Hansen, W. B., Pankratz, M. M., Dusenbury, L., Giles, S. M., Bishop, S. C., Albritton, J., Albritton, L. P., & Strack, J. (2013). Styles of adaptation: The impact of frequency and valence of adaptation on preventing substance use. Health Education, 113, 345–363.CrossRef
go back to reference Hill, L. G., Maucione, K., & Hood, B. K. (2007). A focused approach to assessing program fidelity. Prevention Science, 8, 25–34.CrossRef Hill, L. G., Maucione, K., & Hood, B. K. (2007). A focused approach to assessing program fidelity. Prevention Science, 8, 25–34.CrossRef
go back to reference Kirk, M. A., Moore, J. E., Stirman, S. W., et al. (2020). Towards a comprehensive model for understanding adaptations’ impact: The model for adaptation design and impact (MADI). Implementation Science, 15, 56.CrossRef Kirk, M. A., Moore, J. E., Stirman, S. W., et al. (2020). Towards a comprehensive model for understanding adaptations’ impact: The model for adaptation design and impact (MADI). Implementation Science, 15, 56.CrossRef
go back to reference McCoy, A., Holloway, J., Healy, O., Rispoli, M., & Neely, L. (2016). A systematic review and evaluation of video modeling, role-play and computer-based instruction as social skills interventions for children and adolescents with high-functioning autism. Review Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 3, 48–67.CrossRef McCoy, A., Holloway, J., Healy, O., Rispoli, M., & Neely, L. (2016). A systematic review and evaluation of video modeling, role-play and computer-based instruction as social skills interventions for children and adolescents with high-functioning autism. Review Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 3, 48–67.CrossRef
go back to reference Miller-Day, M., Pettigrew, J., Hecht, M. L., Shin, Y., Graham, J., & Krieger, J. (2013). How prevention curricula are taught under real-world conditions: Types of and reasons for teacher curriculum adaptations. Health Education, 113, 324–344.CrossRef Miller-Day, M., Pettigrew, J., Hecht, M. L., Shin, Y., Graham, J., & Krieger, J. (2013). How prevention curricula are taught under real-world conditions: Types of and reasons for teacher curriculum adaptations. Health Education, 113, 324–344.CrossRef
go back to reference Moore, J. E., Bumbarger, B. K., & Cooper, B. R. (2013). Examining adaptations of evidence-based programs in natural contexts. Journal of Primary Prevention, 34, 147–161.CrossRef Moore, J. E., Bumbarger, B. K., & Cooper, B. R. (2013). Examining adaptations of evidence-based programs in natural contexts. Journal of Primary Prevention, 34, 147–161.CrossRef
go back to reference Movsisyan, A., Arnold, L., Evans, R., et al. (2019). Adapting evidence-informed complex population health interventions for new contexts: A systematic review of guidance. Implementation Science, 14, 105.CrossRef Movsisyan, A., Arnold, L., Evans, R., et al. (2019). Adapting evidence-informed complex population health interventions for new contexts: A systematic review of guidance. Implementation Science, 14, 105.CrossRef
go back to reference Sidani, S., & Sechrest, L. (1999). Putting program theory into operation. American Journal of Evaluation, 20, 227–238.CrossRef Sidani, S., & Sechrest, L. (1999). Putting program theory into operation. American Journal of Evaluation, 20, 227–238.CrossRef
go back to reference Story, M., Hannan, P. J., Fulkerson, J. A., Rock, B. H., Smyth, M., Arcan, C., & Himes, J. H. (2012). Bright Start: Description and main outcomes from a group-randomized obesity prevention trial in American Indian children. Obesity, 20, 2241–2249.CrossRef Story, M., Hannan, P. J., Fulkerson, J. A., Rock, B. H., Smyth, M., Arcan, C., & Himes, J. H. (2012). Bright Start: Description and main outcomes from a group-randomized obesity prevention trial in American Indian children. Obesity, 20, 2241–2249.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Adding Adaptation/Modification Size and Scope to Frameworks for Classifying Changes to an Intervention
Author
Melvin M. Mark
Publication date
01-10-2021
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Prevention Science / Issue 7/2021
Print ISSN: 1389-4986
Electronic ISSN: 1573-6695
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-021-01248-1

Other articles of this Issue 7/2021

Prevention Science 7/2021 Go to the issue