Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Clinical Rheumatology 4/2009

01-04-2009 | Original Article

Adalimumab response in patients with early versus established rheumatoid arthritis: DE019 randomized controlled trial subanalysis

Authors: Shahin Jamal, Kaushik Patra, Edward C. Keystone

Published in: Clinical Rheumatology | Issue 4/2009

Login to get access

Abstract

In recent years, there has been a shift in the therapeutic approach to rheumatoid arthritis (RA), with emphasis on early therapy. The DE019 trial demonstrated adalimumab efficacy in patients with RA. This subanalysis compares response to adalimumab based on clinical, functional, and radiographic outcomes in patients with early versus established RA. Patients enrolled in the DE019 trial were divided into two groups based on disease duration (≤3 years = early RA; >3 years = established RA). Data from 407 patients with RA were included, with 78 early (41 adalimumab, 37 placebo) and 329 established (166 adalimumab, 163 placebo) patients. Patients with early disease achieved slightly greater American College of Rheumatology 20 (20% or more improvement or ACR20), 50, and 70 responses of 61%, 46.3%, and 24.4%, respectively, at 52 weeks, compared with those with established disease, with ACR20, 50, and 70 responses of 56%, 37.3%, and 19.9%, respectively. The Health Assessment Questionnaire score improvement between adalimumab and placebo in patients with early disease (0.44) was greater than that for those with established disease (0.25). With adalimumab treatment, there was a statistically significant mean reduction in total Sharp score progression relative to placebo (5.32) in early disease compared with established disease (2.06). While adalimumab is effective for RA of all disease durations, there is a trend toward superior clinical, functional, and radiographic outcomes in patients with early disease.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Geletka R, St Clair EW (2003) Treatment of early rheumatoid arthritis. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 17:791–809PubMedCrossRef Geletka R, St Clair EW (2003) Treatment of early rheumatoid arthritis. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 17:791–809PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Pincus T, Callahan LF (1993) What is the natural history of rheumatoid arthritis. Rheum Dis Clin North Am 19:123–151PubMed Pincus T, Callahan LF (1993) What is the natural history of rheumatoid arthritis. Rheum Dis Clin North Am 19:123–151PubMed
3.
go back to reference van der Heijde DM (1995) Joint erosions and patients with early rheumatoid arthritis. Br J Rheumatol 34(suppl 2):74–78PubMed van der Heijde DM (1995) Joint erosions and patients with early rheumatoid arthritis. Br J Rheumatol 34(suppl 2):74–78PubMed
4.
go back to reference Fuchs HA, Kaye JJ, Callahan LF, Nance EP, Pincus T (1989) Evidence of significant radiographic damage in rheumatoid arthritis within the first 2 years of disease. J Rheumatol 16:585–591PubMed Fuchs HA, Kaye JJ, Callahan LF, Nance EP, Pincus T (1989) Evidence of significant radiographic damage in rheumatoid arthritis within the first 2 years of disease. J Rheumatol 16:585–591PubMed
5.
go back to reference Tsakonas E, Fitzgerald AA, Fitzcharles MA et al (2000) Consequences of delayed therapy with second-line agents in rheumatoid arthritis: a 3 year followup on the hydroxychloroquine in early rheumatoid arthritis (HERA) study. J Rheumatol 27:623–629PubMed Tsakonas E, Fitzgerald AA, Fitzcharles MA et al (2000) Consequences of delayed therapy with second-line agents in rheumatoid arthritis: a 3 year followup on the hydroxychloroquine in early rheumatoid arthritis (HERA) study. J Rheumatol 27:623–629PubMed
6.
go back to reference Mottonen T, Hannonen P, Leirisalo-Repo M et al (1999) Comparison of combination therapy with single-drug therapy in early rheumatoid arthritis: a randomised trial. FIN-RACo trial group. Lancet 353:1568–1573PubMedCrossRef Mottonen T, Hannonen P, Leirisalo-Repo M et al (1999) Comparison of combination therapy with single-drug therapy in early rheumatoid arthritis: a randomised trial. FIN-RACo trial group. Lancet 353:1568–1573PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Anderson JJ, Wells G, Verhoeven AC, Felson DT (2000) Factors predicting response to treatment in rheumatoid arthritis: the importance of disease duration. Arthritis Rheum 43:22–29PubMedCrossRef Anderson JJ, Wells G, Verhoeven AC, Felson DT (2000) Factors predicting response to treatment in rheumatoid arthritis: the importance of disease duration. Arthritis Rheum 43:22–29PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Quinn MA, Conaghan PG, Emery P (2001) The therapeutic approach of early intervention for rheumatoid arthritis: what is the evidence. Rheumatology 40:1211–1220PubMedCrossRef Quinn MA, Conaghan PG, Emery P (2001) The therapeutic approach of early intervention for rheumatoid arthritis: what is the evidence. Rheumatology 40:1211–1220PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Hochberg MC (1999) Early aggressive DMARD therapy: the key to slowing disease progression in rheumatoid arthritis. Scand J Rheumatol 112(suppl):3–7CrossRef Hochberg MC (1999) Early aggressive DMARD therapy: the key to slowing disease progression in rheumatoid arthritis. Scand J Rheumatol 112(suppl):3–7CrossRef
10.
go back to reference American College of Rheumatology Subcommittee on Rheumatoid Arthritis Guidelines (2002) Guidelines for the management of rheumatoid arthritis: 2002 update. Arthritis Rheum 46:328–346CrossRef American College of Rheumatology Subcommittee on Rheumatoid Arthritis Guidelines (2002) Guidelines for the management of rheumatoid arthritis: 2002 update. Arthritis Rheum 46:328–346CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Baumgartner SW, Fleischmann RM, Moreland LW, Schiff MH, Markenson J, Whitmore JB (2004) Etanercept (Enbrel) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis with recent onset versus established disease: improvement in disability. J Rheumatol 31(8):1532–1537PubMed Baumgartner SW, Fleischmann RM, Moreland LW, Schiff MH, Markenson J, Whitmore JB (2004) Etanercept (Enbrel) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis with recent onset versus established disease: improvement in disability. J Rheumatol 31(8):1532–1537PubMed
12.
go back to reference Breedveld FC, Emery P, Keystone E et al (2004) Infliximab in active early rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 63:149–155PubMedCrossRef Breedveld FC, Emery P, Keystone E et al (2004) Infliximab in active early rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 63:149–155PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Keystone EC, Kavanaugh AF, Sharp JT et al (2004) Radiographic, clinical, and functional outcomes of treatment with adalimumab (a human anti-tumor necrosis factor monoclonal antibody) in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis receiving concomitant methotrexate therapy: a randomized, placebo-controlled, 52-week trial. Arthritis Rheum 50:1400–1411PubMedCrossRef Keystone EC, Kavanaugh AF, Sharp JT et al (2004) Radiographic, clinical, and functional outcomes of treatment with adalimumab (a human anti-tumor necrosis factor monoclonal antibody) in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis receiving concomitant methotrexate therapy: a randomized, placebo-controlled, 52-week trial. Arthritis Rheum 50:1400–1411PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Arnett FC, Edworthy SM, Bloch DA et al (1988) The American Rheumatism Association 1987 revised criteria for the classification of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 31:315–324PubMedCrossRef Arnett FC, Edworthy SM, Bloch DA et al (1988) The American Rheumatism Association 1987 revised criteria for the classification of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 31:315–324PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Sharp JT, Young DY, Bluhm GB et al (1985) How many joints in the hands and wrists should be included in a score of radiologic abnormalities used to assess rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 28:1326–1335PubMedCrossRef Sharp JT, Young DY, Bluhm GB et al (1985) How many joints in the hands and wrists should be included in a score of radiologic abnormalities used to assess rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 28:1326–1335PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Sharp JT, Lidsky MD, Collins LC, Moreland J (1971) Methods of scoring the progression of radiologic changes in rheumatoid arthritis: correlation of radiologic, clinical and laboratory abnormalities. Arthritis Rheum 14:706–720PubMedCrossRef Sharp JT, Lidsky MD, Collins LC, Moreland J (1971) Methods of scoring the progression of radiologic changes in rheumatoid arthritis: correlation of radiologic, clinical and laboratory abnormalities. Arthritis Rheum 14:706–720PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Plant MJ, Saklatvala J, Borg AA, Jones PW, Dawes PT (1994) Measurement and prediction of radiological progression in early rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol 21:1808–1813PubMed Plant MJ, Saklatvala J, Borg AA, Jones PW, Dawes PT (1994) Measurement and prediction of radiological progression in early rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol 21:1808–1813PubMed
18.
go back to reference van der Heidje D, van Leeuwen MA, van Riel PL, van de Putte L (1995) Radiographic progression on radiographs of hands and feet during the first 3 years of rheumatoid arthritis measured according to Sharp’s method (van der Heijde modification). J Rheumatol 22:1792–1796 van der Heidje D, van Leeuwen MA, van Riel PL, van de Putte L (1995) Radiographic progression on radiographs of hands and feet during the first 3 years of rheumatoid arthritis measured according to Sharp’s method (van der Heijde modification). J Rheumatol 22:1792–1796
19.
go back to reference Felson DT, Anderson JJ, Boers M et al (1993) The American College of Rheumatology preliminary core set of disease activity measures for rheumatoid arthritis clinical trials. The Committee on Outcome Measures in Rheumatoid Arthritis Clinical Trials. Arthritis Rheum 36:729–740PubMedCrossRef Felson DT, Anderson JJ, Boers M et al (1993) The American College of Rheumatology preliminary core set of disease activity measures for rheumatoid arthritis clinical trials. The Committee on Outcome Measures in Rheumatoid Arthritis Clinical Trials. Arthritis Rheum 36:729–740PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Fries JF, Spitz PW, Young DY (1982) The dimensions of health outcomes: the health assessment questionnaire, disability and pain scales. J Rheumatol 9:789–793PubMed Fries JF, Spitz PW, Young DY (1982) The dimensions of health outcomes: the health assessment questionnaire, disability and pain scales. J Rheumatol 9:789–793PubMed
21.
go back to reference Landewe R, van der Heijde D (2004) Radiographic progression depicted by probability plots: presenting data with optimal use of individual values. Arthritis Rheum 50:699–706PubMedCrossRef Landewe R, van der Heijde D (2004) Radiographic progression depicted by probability plots: presenting data with optimal use of individual values. Arthritis Rheum 50:699–706PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference van der Heijde D, Landewe R, Klareskog L et al (2005) Presentation and analysis of data on radiographic outcome in clinical trials: experience from the TEMPO study. Arthritis Rheum 52:49–60PubMedCrossRef van der Heijde D, Landewe R, Klareskog L et al (2005) Presentation and analysis of data on radiographic outcome in clinical trials: experience from the TEMPO study. Arthritis Rheum 52:49–60PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Bruynesteyn K, Boers M, Kostense P, Van Der LS, Van Der HD (2005) Deciding on progression of joint damage in paired films of individual patients: smallest detectable difference or change. Ann Rheum Dis 64:179–182PubMedCrossRef Bruynesteyn K, Boers M, Kostense P, Van Der LS, Van Der HD (2005) Deciding on progression of joint damage in paired films of individual patients: smallest detectable difference or change. Ann Rheum Dis 64:179–182PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Adalimumab response in patients with early versus established rheumatoid arthritis: DE019 randomized controlled trial subanalysis
Authors
Shahin Jamal
Kaushik Patra
Edward C. Keystone
Publication date
01-04-2009
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Clinical Rheumatology / Issue 4/2009
Print ISSN: 0770-3198
Electronic ISSN: 1434-9949
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-008-1064-0

Other articles of this Issue 4/2009

Clinical Rheumatology 4/2009 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

Year in Review: Pediatric cardiology

Watch Dr. Anne Marie Valente present the last year's highlights in pediatric and congenital heart disease in the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Pulmonary vascular disease

The last year's highlights in pulmonary vascular disease are presented by Dr. Jane Leopold in this official video from ACC.24.

Year in Review: Valvular heart disease

Watch Prof. William Zoghbi present the last year's highlights in valvular heart disease from the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discusses last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.