Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Radiology 11/2020

01-11-2020 | Acute Pulmonary Embolism | Chest

Acute pulmonary embolism in non-hospitalized COVID-19 patients referred to CTPA by emergency department

Authors: Alban Gervaise, Caroline Bouzad, Evelyne Peroux, Carole Helissey

Published in: European Radiology | Issue 11/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Objectives

To evaluate the prevalence of acute pulmonary embolism (APE) in non-hospitalized COVID-19 patients referred to CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA) by the emergency department.

Methods

From March 14 to April 6, 2020, 72 non-hospitalized patients referred by the emergency department to CTPA for COVID-19 pneumonia were retrospectively identified. Relevant clinical and laboratory data and CT scan findings were collected for each patient. CTPA scans were reviewed by two radiologists to determinate the presence or absence of APE. Clinical classification, lung involvement of COVID-19 pneumonia, and CT total severity score were compared between APE group and non-APE group.

Results

APE was identified in 13 (18%) CTPA scans. The mean age and D-dimer of patients from the APE group were higher in comparison with those from the non-APE group (74.4 vs. 59.6 years, p = 0.008, and 7.29 vs. 3.29 μg/ml, p = 0.011). There was no significant difference between APE and non-APE groups concerning clinical type, COVID-19 pneumonia lung lesions (ground-glass opacity: 85% vs. 97%; consolidation: 69% vs. 68%; crazy paving: 38% vs. 37%; linear reticulation: 69% vs. 78%), CT severity score (6.3 vs. 7.1, p = 0.365), quality of CTPA (1.8 vs. 2.0, p = 0.518), and pleural effusion (38% vs. 19%, p = 0.146).

Conclusions

Non-hospitalized patients with COVID-19 pneumonia referred to CT scan by the emergency departments are at risk of APE. The presence of APE was not limited to severe or critical clinical type of COVID-19 pneumonia.

Key Points

• Acute pulmonary embolism was found in 18% of non-hospitalized COVID-19 patients referred by the emergency department to CTPA. Two (15%) patients had main, four (30%) lobar, and seven (55%) segmental acute pulmonary embolism.
• Five of 13 (38%) patients with acute pulmonary embolism had a moderate clinical type.
• Severity and radiological features of COVID-19 pneumonia showed no significant difference between patients with or without acute pulmonary embolism.
Literature
19.
go back to reference Sudarski S, Haubenreisser H, Henzler T et al (2019) Incidence of transient interruption of contrast (TIC) - a retrospective single-centre analysis in CT pulmonary angiography exams acquired during inspiratory breath-hold with the breathing command: “please inspire gently!”. PLoS One 14:e0210473CrossRef Sudarski S, Haubenreisser H, Henzler T et al (2019) Incidence of transient interruption of contrast (TIC) - a retrospective single-centre analysis in CT pulmonary angiography exams acquired during inspiratory breath-hold with the breathing command: “please inspire gently!”. PLoS One 14:e0210473CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Browne AM, Cronin CG, English C, NiMhuircheartaigh J, Murphy JM, Bruzzi JF (2010) Unsuspected pulmonary emboli in oncology patients undergoing routine computed tomography imaging. J Thorac Oncol 5:798–803CrossRef Browne AM, Cronin CG, English C, NiMhuircheartaigh J, Murphy JM, Bruzzi JF (2010) Unsuspected pulmonary emboli in oncology patients undergoing routine computed tomography imaging. J Thorac Oncol 5:798–803CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Wittram C, Maher MM, Yoo AJ, Kalra MK, Shepard JA, McLoud TC (2004) CT angiography of pulmonary embolism: diagnostic criteria and causes of misdiagnosis. Radiographics 24:1219–1238CrossRef Wittram C, Maher MM, Yoo AJ, Kalra MK, Shepard JA, McLoud TC (2004) CT angiography of pulmonary embolism: diagnostic criteria and causes of misdiagnosis. Radiographics 24:1219–1238CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Meinel FG, Nance JW Jr, Schoepf UJ et al (2015) Predictive value of computed tomography in acute pulmonary embolism: systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Med 128:747–59.e2CrossRef Meinel FG, Nance JW Jr, Schoepf UJ et al (2015) Predictive value of computed tomography in acute pulmonary embolism: systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Med 128:747–59.e2CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Chen N, Zhou M, Dong X et al (2020) Epidemiological and clinical characteristics of 99 cases of 2019 novel coronavirus pneumonia in Wuhan, China: a descriptive study. Lancet 395:507–513CrossRef Chen N, Zhou M, Dong X et al (2020) Epidemiological and clinical characteristics of 99 cases of 2019 novel coronavirus pneumonia in Wuhan, China: a descriptive study. Lancet 395:507–513CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Zhou F, Yu T, Du R et al (2020) Clinical course and risk factors for mortality of adult inpatients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet 395:1054–1062CrossRef Zhou F, Yu T, Du R et al (2020) Clinical course and risk factors for mortality of adult inpatients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet 395:1054–1062CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Acute pulmonary embolism in non-hospitalized COVID-19 patients referred to CTPA by emergency department
Authors
Alban Gervaise
Caroline Bouzad
Evelyne Peroux
Carole Helissey
Publication date
01-11-2020
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Radiology / Issue 11/2020
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-020-06977-5

Other articles of this Issue 11/2020

European Radiology 11/2020 Go to the issue

Imaging Informatics and Artificial Intelligence

Any unique image biomarkers associated with COVID-19?