Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Advances in Therapy 8/2019

Open Access 01-08-2019 | Acute Myeloid Leukemia | Original Research

Economic and Clinical Burden of Relapsed and/or Refractory Active Treatment Episodes in Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) in the USA: A Retrospective Analysis of a Commercial Payer Database

Authors: Bhavik J. Pandya, Chi-Chang Chen, Bruno C. Medeiros, Catherine B. McGuiness, Samuel Wilson, L. Elise Horvath Walsh, Rolin L. Wade

Published in: Advances in Therapy | Issue 8/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

This retrospective study estimated healthcare resource use (HRU), symptoms and toxicities (SxTox), and costs in relapsed/refractory (R/R) patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML), stratified by hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) status. Claims data were used to identify adult patients with AML diagnoses from 1 January 2008 to 31 March 2016 in the USA. Patients were considered R/R if they had an AML relapse ICD-9 code (205.02) or a line of therapy consistent with R/R disease. The final R/R sample (N = 707) included 476 patients with and 231 patients without HSCT. The mean total episode cost (from relapse date to death or end of study period) for all patients was $439,104 (with HSCT $524,595 and without HSCT $263,310). Inpatient visits accounted for the greatest cost component (mean $308,978) followed by intensive care unit stays (mean $221,537), non-clinician (e.g., lab tests) visits (mean $30,909), and outpatient pharmacy utilization (mean $24,640). Patients with HSCT appeared to have longer episodes of care compared with patients without HSCT (16.8 vs 11.1 months), perhaps reflecting longer survival for HSCT patients. Mean number of visits within each category and their associated costs appeared to be higher in patients with HSCT compared with patients without HSCT. Patients with HSCT appeared to experience more SxTox compared with patients without HSCT across all categories. Results of the current study suggest that there is a substantial HRU and cost burden on R/R AML patients in the USA receiving active treatments. More effective therapies with improved tolerability would meet this tremendous unmet need in the R/R AML population.
Funding: Astellas Pharma, Inc.
Literature
1.
go back to reference American Cancer Society. Cancer Facts and Figures 2018. Atlanta: American Cancer Society; 2018. American Cancer Society. Cancer Facts and Figures 2018. Atlanta: American Cancer Society; 2018.
2.
go back to reference Stirewalt DL, et al. Size of FLT3 internal tandem duplication has prognostic significance in patients with acute myeloid leukemia. Blood. 2006;107(9):3724–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Stirewalt DL, et al. Size of FLT3 internal tandem duplication has prognostic significance in patients with acute myeloid leukemia. Blood. 2006;107(9):3724–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
go back to reference Meyers J, et al. Medicare fee-for-service enrollees with primary acute myeloid leukemia: an analysis of treatment patterns, survival, and healthcare resource utilization and costs. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2013;11(3):275–86.CrossRefPubMed Meyers J, et al. Medicare fee-for-service enrollees with primary acute myeloid leukemia: an analysis of treatment patterns, survival, and healthcare resource utilization and costs. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2013;11(3):275–86.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference D’Souza A, Zhu X. Current uses and outcomes of hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT): CIBMTR summary slides, 2017; 2017. http://www.cibmtr.org. Accessed 19 Sep 2018. D’Souza A, Zhu X. Current uses and outcomes of hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT): CIBMTR summary slides, 2017; 2017. http://​www.​cibmtr.​org. Accessed 19 Sep 2018.
11.
go back to reference Irish W, et al. Acute myeloid leukemia: a retrospective claims analysis of resource utilization and expenditures for newly diagnosed patients from first-line induction to remission and relapse. Curr Med Res Opin. 2017;33(3):519–27.CrossRefPubMed Irish W, et al. Acute myeloid leukemia: a retrospective claims analysis of resource utilization and expenditures for newly diagnosed patients from first-line induction to remission and relapse. Curr Med Res Opin. 2017;33(3):519–27.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Lang K, et al. Trends in the treatment of acute myeloid leukaemia in the elderly. Drugs Aging. 2005;22(11):943–55.CrossRefPubMed Lang K, et al. Trends in the treatment of acute myeloid leukaemia in the elderly. Drugs Aging. 2005;22(11):943–55.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Aly A, et al. Economic burden of relapsed/refractory (R/R) acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in the US. Blood. 2017;130(Suppl 1):3386. Aly A, et al. Economic burden of relapsed/refractory (R/R) acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in the US. Blood. 2017;130(Suppl 1):3386.
14.
go back to reference Zeidan AM, et al. Economic burden associated with acute myeloid leukemia treatment. Expert Rev Hematol. 2016;9(1):79–89.CrossRefPubMed Zeidan AM, et al. Economic burden associated with acute myeloid leukemia treatment. Expert Rev Hematol. 2016;9(1):79–89.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Economic and Clinical Burden of Relapsed and/or Refractory Active Treatment Episodes in Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) in the USA: A Retrospective Analysis of a Commercial Payer Database
Authors
Bhavik J. Pandya
Chi-Chang Chen
Bruno C. Medeiros
Catherine B. McGuiness
Samuel Wilson
L. Elise Horvath Walsh
Rolin L. Wade
Publication date
01-08-2019
Publisher
Springer Healthcare
Published in
Advances in Therapy / Issue 8/2019
Print ISSN: 0741-238X
Electronic ISSN: 1865-8652
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12325-019-01003-7

Other articles of this Issue 8/2019

Advances in Therapy 8/2019 Go to the issue