Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

LIVE: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)
Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies
Published in: BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies 1/2020

01-12-2020 | Acupuncture | Research article

Prevalence of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) use in Brazil

Authors: Patricia de Moraes Mello Boccolini, Cristiano Siqueira Boccolini

Published in: BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies | Issue 1/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The use of medicinal plants or other alternative practices can be the only therapeutic resources for many communities and ethnic groups, especially in developing countries. In Brazil, the Ministry of Health incorporated Complementary and Alternative Medicine (CAM) as a public health policy since 2006. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of CAM use in Brazil.

Methods

This was a cross-sectional study performed as an epidemiological survey, with data from the National Health Survey, 2013 that evaluated a sample of adult Brazilians (18+ years old). The outcome was the use of CAM therapies, such as acupuncture, homeopathy, medicinal plants and herbal medicines in the last 12 months. We employed a logistic regression model (CI 95%) to evaluate the chances of CAM use.

Results

The prevalence of CAM use in Brazil was 4.5%. The subjects with higher chances to use CAM were: women (AOR = 1.42), aged > 40 years (AOR = 1.64), with higher educational levels (AOR = 2.35), and residents at North (AOR = 2.02) and South (AOR = 1.67) regions of Brazil, all with p-value < 0.001. According to the socioeconomic status, subjects from upper classes had higher chances to use acupuncture and homeopathy when compared to the other classes, and individuals from lower classes had higher chances to use medicinal plants and herbal medicines. Almost half of all individuals reporting CAM use did so outside the health care system. The Brazilian Unified Health System (SUS) was the least used funding for CAM when compared to other types of funding.

Conclusions

We recommend that the Ministry of Health invests in capacity building for health professionals who work with CAM, providing structure for those practices in health services, increasing the access of CAM therapies for SUS users, and improving the registering of information about those therapies, encouraging the use of CAM by the Brazilian population.
Literature
1.
Bulletin of the World Health Organization. Regulatory situation of herbal medicines. Geneva: A worldwide review; 1998.
2.
Onyiapat JL, Okoronkwo IL, Ogbonnaya NP. Complementary and alternative medicine use among adults in Enugu, Nigeria. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2011;11:19.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
3.
Laelago T, Yohannes T, Lemango F. Prevalence of herbal medicine use and associated factors among pregnant women attending antenatal care at public health facilities in Hossana town, Southern Ethiopia: facility based cross sectional study. Arch Public Health. 2016;74:7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
4.
Pearson H, Fleming T, Chhoun P, Tuot S, Brody C, Yi S. Prevalence of and factors associated with utilization of herbal medicines among outpatients in primary health centers in Cambodia. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2018;18(1):114.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
5.
Brazil. Ministry of Health. Health Care Secretariat. Department of Primary Health Care. National policy for complementary and integrative practices in SUS: access extension attitude/ Ministry of Health. Health Care Secretariat. Department of Primary Health Care. 2nd ed. Brasília: Ministry of Health; 2015.
6.
WHO Meeting on the Promotion and Development of Traditional Medicine (1977: Geneva) & World Health Organization. The promotion and development of traditional medicine : report of a WHO meeting report of a WHO meeting [held in Geneva from 28 November to 2 December 1977]. Geneva: World Health Organization; 1978.
7.
World Health Organization (WHO). WHO Traditional Medicine Strategy 2002–2005. Geneva: WHO; 2002.
8.
Peprah P, Agyemang-Duah W, Arthur-Holmes F, Budu HI, Abalo EM, Okwei R, Nyonyo J. ‘We are nothing without herbs’: a story of herbal remedies use during pregnancy in rural Ghana. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2019;19(1):65.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
9.
Barreto GE, Avila-Rodriguez M, Foitzick M, Aliev G, Echeverria V. Advances in medicinal plants with effects on anxiety behavior associated to mental and HealthConditions. Curr Med Chem. 2017;24(4):411–23.CrossRefPubMed
10.
MacPherson H, Vertosick EA, Foster NE, Lewith G, Linde K, Sherman KJ, Witt CM, Vickers AJ. The persistence of the effects of acupuncture after a course of treatment: a meta-analysis of patients with chronic pain. Pain. 2017;158(5):784–93.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
Goyatá SLT, Avelino CCV, Santos SVM, Souza DI Jr, Gurgel MDSL, Terra FS. Effects from acupuncture in treating anxiety: integrative review. Rev Bras Enferm. 2016;69(3):564–71.CrossRef
12.
MacLennan AH, Wilson DH, Taylor AW. Prevalence and cost of alternative medicine in Australia. Lancet. 1996;347:569–73.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Eisenberg DM, Davis RB, Ettner SL, et al. Trends inalternative medicine use in the United States, 1990–1997: results of a follow-up national survey. JAMA. 1998;280:1569–75.CrossRefPubMed
14.
Thomas K, Coleman P. Use of complementary or alternative medicine in a general population in Great Britain. Results from the National Omnibus survey. J Public Health. 2004;26:152–7.CrossRef
15.
Stickley A, Koyanagi A, Richardson E, Roberts B, Balabanova D, McKee M. Prevalence and factors associated with the use of alternative (folk) medicine practitioners in 8 countries of the former Soviet Union. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2013;13:83.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
El-Nimr NA, Wahdan IM, Wahdan AM, Kotb RE. Self-medication with drugs and complementary and alternative medicines in Alexandria, Egypt: prevalence, patterns and determinants. East Mediterr Health J. 2015;21(4):256–65.CrossRefPubMed
17.
BRAZIL. Ministry of Health. National Policy for Complementary and Integrative Practices. Ordinance n. 971. Brasília: Brazilian Federal Register, n. 84, section I; 2006. p. 20–4.
18.
Brazil. Ministry of Health. Health Care Secretariat. Ordinance n. 702, of March 21, 2018. It alters the consolidation ordinance n. 2/GM/MS, of September 28, 2017, to include new practices into the National Policy for Complementary and Integrative Practices – PNPIC Brazilian Federal Register 2018.
19.
Brazil. Ministry of Health. Revista Brasileira Saúde da Família. Complementary and Integrative Practices in Health: a reality in SUS. Brasília: MS; 2008.
20.
Souza-Junior PRB, Freitas MPS, Antonaci GA, Szwarcwald CL. Desenho da amostra da Pesquisa Nacional de Saúde 2013. Epidemiol Serv Saude. 2015;24(2):207–16.CrossRef
21.
22.
Damacena GN, Szwarcwald CL, Malta DC, Souza-Junior PRB, Vieira MLFP, Pereira CA, Morais Neto OL, Silva Júnior JB. O processo de desenvolvimento da Pesquisa Nacional de Saúde no Brasil, 2013. Epidemiol Serv Saude. 2015;24(2):197–206.CrossRef
23.
24.
Harris PE, Cooper KL, Relton C, Thomas KJ. Prevalence of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) use by the general population: a systematic review and update. Int J Clin Pract. 2012;66(10):924–39.CrossRefPubMed
25.
Barnes PM, Bloom B, Nahin RL. Complementary and alternative medicine use among adults and children: United States, 2007. Natl Health Stat Report. 2008;12:1–23.
26.
27.
World Health Organization. WHO global report on traditional and complementary medicine 2019. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2019. Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO
28.
29.
Yamashita H, Tsukayama H, Sugishita C. Popularity of complementary and alternative medicine in Japan: a telephone survey. Complement Ther Med. 2002;10:84–93.CrossRefPubMed
30.
Lim MK, Sadarangani P, Chan HL, Heng JY. Complementary and alternative medicine use in multiracial Singapore. Complement Ther Med. 2005;13:16–24.CrossRefPubMed
31.
Siti ZM, Tahir A, Farah AI, et al. Use of traditional and complementary medicine in Malaysia: a baseline study. Complement Ther Med. 2009;17:292–9.CrossRefPubMed
32.
33.
Xue CC, Zhang AL, Lin V, et al. Complementary and alternative medicine use in Australia: a national population-based survey. J Altern Complement Med. 2007;13:643–50.CrossRefPubMed
34.
35.
Steinsbekk A, Rise MB, Johnsen R. Changes among male and female visitors to practitioners of complementary and alternative medicine in a large adult Norwegian population from 1997 to 2008 (the HUNT studies). BMC Complement Altern Med. 2011;11:61.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
36.
37.
Tindle HA, Davis RB, Phillips RS, Eisenberg DM. Trends in use of complementary and alternative medicine by US adults: 1997-2002. Altern Ther Health Med. 2005;11(1):42–9.PubMed
38.
Neiberg RH, Aickin M, Grzywacz JG, Lang W, Quandt SA, Bell RA, Arcury TA. Occurrence and co-occurrence of types of complementary and alternative medicine use by age, gender, ethnicity, and education among adults in the United States: the 2002 National Health Interview Survey (NHIS). J Altern Complement Med. 2011;17(4):363–70.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
39.
Almeida G, Sarti FM, Ferreira FF, Diaz MD, Campino AC. Analysis of the evolution and determinants of income-related inequalities in the Brazilian health system, 1998–2008. Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2013;33(2):90–7 4 p preceding 90.CrossRefPubMed
40.
Boccolini CS, de Souza Junior PR. Inequities in healthcare utilization: results of the Brazilian National Health Survey, 2013. Int J Equity Health. 2016;15(1):150.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
41.
World Health Organization (WHO). WHO traditional medicine strategy: 2014-2023. Geneva: WHO; 2013.
42.
Xue CC, Zhang AL, Lin V, Myers R, Polus B, Story DF. Acupuncture, chiropractic and osteopathy use in Australia: a national population survey. BMC Public Health. 2008;8:105.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
43.
World Health Organization - WHO. Acupuncture: review and analysis of reports on controlled clinical trials. Geneva: WHO Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data; 2002.
44.
Neto JF, Faria AA, Figueiredo MF. Complementary and alternative medicine: use in Montes Claros, Minas Gerais. Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2009;55(3):296–301.CrossRef
45.
Bodeker GC, Ong C, Grundy C, Burford G, Shein K. WHO global atlas of traditional, complementary and alternative medicine. Text volume. Kobe: World Health Organisation Centre for Health Development; 2005.
46.
Relton C, Cooper K, Viksveen P, Fibert P, Thomas K. Prevalence of homeopathy use by the general population worldwide: a systematic review. Homeopathy. 2017;106(2):69–78.CrossRefPubMed
47.
Klein SD, Torchetti L, Frei-Erb M, Wolf U. Usage of complementary medicine in Switzerland: results of the Swiss health survey 2012 and development since 2007. PLoS One. 2015;10(10):e0141985.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
48.
Santos RL, Guimaraes GP, Nobre MSC, Portela AS. Análise sobre a fitoterapia como prática integrativa no Sistema Único de Saúde. Rev bras plantas med. 2011;13(4):486–91 ISSN 1516-0572.CrossRef
49.
Lima CAB, Lima ARA, Mendonça CV, Lopes CV, Heck RM. O uso das plantas medicinais e o papel da fé no cuidado familiar. Ver Gaúcha Enferm. 2016;37(esp):e68285.
50.
Aziz Z, Tey NP. Herbal medicines: prevalence and predictors of use among Malaysian adults. Complement Ther Med. 2009;17(1):44–50.CrossRefPubMed
51.
Brazil. Ministry of Health. Health Care Secretariat. Department of Primary Care. Manual for Implementation of Complementary and Integrative Practices in SUS / Ministry of Health, Health Care Secretariat, Department of Primary Care. Brasília: Ministry of Health; 2018. p. 56.
52.
Quandt SA, Verhoef MJ, Arcury TA, et al. Development of an international questionnaire to measure use of complementary and alternative medicine (ICAM-Q). J Altern Complement Med. 2009;15:331–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
53.
WHO. Guidelines on Good Agricultural and collection practices (GACP) for medicinal plantas, vol. 1. Geneve: World Health Organization Publications; 2003.
Metadata
Title
Prevalence of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) use in Brazil
Authors
Patricia de Moraes Mello Boccolini
Cristiano Siqueira Boccolini
Publication date
01-12-2020
Publisher
BioMed Central
Keyword
Acupuncture
Published in
BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies / Issue 1/2020
Electronic ISSN: 2662-7671
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12906-020-2842-8

Other articles of this Issue 1/2020

BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies 1/2020 Go to the issue

Research article

Neuroprotective effect of diosgenin in a mouse model of diabetic peripheral neuropathy involves the Nrf2/HO-1 pathway

Research article

Anti-melanogenic activity of Myristica fragrans extract against Aspergillus fumigatus using phenotypic based screening

Research article

Modified Pulsatillae decoction inhibits DSS-induced ulcerative colitis in vitro and in vivo via IL-6/STAT3 pathway

Research article

Structural modulation of gut microbiota during alleviation of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease with Gynostemma pentaphyllum in rats

Study protocol

Effect of electroacupuncture versus solifenacin for moderate and severe overactive bladder: a multi-centre, randomized controlled trial study protocol

Research article

Effectiveness of herbal oral care products in reducing dental plaque & gingivitis – a systematic review and meta-analysis