Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy 1/2011

Open Access 01-02-2011

Achievement of Lipid Targets with the Combination of Rosuvastatin and Fenofibric Acid in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Authors: Robert S. Rosenson, Dawn M. Carlson, Maureen T. Kelly, Carolyn M. Setze, Boaz Hirshberg, James C. Stolzenbach, Laura A. Williams

Published in: Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy | Issue 1/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

Objective

The objective of this study was to assess the proportion of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) attaining individual and combined targets of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), triglycerides (TG), non-HDL-C, and apolipoprotein B (ApoB) after treatment with rosuvastatin (R) + fenofibric acid (FA) compared with corresponding-dose R monotherapy.

Methods

This post hoc analysis evaluated data from the T2DM subset of patients with mixed dyslipidemia (LDL-C ≥130 mg/dL, HDL-C <40/50 mg/dL in men/women, and TG ≥150 mg/dL) from 2 randomized studies. Patients included in the analysis (N = 456) were treated with R (5, 10, or 20 mg), FA 135 mg, or R (5, 10, or 20 mg) + FA 135 mg for 12 weeks. Attainment of LDL-C <100 mg/dL, HDL-C >40/50 mg/dL in men/women, TG <150 mg/dL, non-HDL-C <130 mg/dL, ApoB <90 mg/dL, and the combined targets of these parameters was assessed.

Results

Treatment with R + FA resulted in a significantly higher proportion of patients achieving optimal levels of HDL-C (46.8% vs. 20.8%, P = 0.009 for R 10 mg + FA), TG (60.0% vs. 34.0%, P = 0.02 for R 10 mg + FA; 54.0% vs. 26.4%, P = 0.005 for R 20 mg + FA), non-HDL-C (55.1% vs. 36.4%, P = 0.04 for R 5 mg + FA), ApoB (58.0% vs. 36.4%, P = 0.02 for R 5 mg + FA); and the combined targets of LDL-C, HDL-C, and TG (28.3% vs. 8.3%, P = 0.02 for R 10 mg + FA) and all 5 parameters (26.1% vs. 8.3%, P = 0.03 for R 10 mg + FA) than corresponding-dose R monotherapies.

Conclusions

A significantly greater proportion of T2DM patients achieved individual and combined lipid targets when treated with the combination of R + FA than corresponding-dose R monotherapies.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Steiner G. Treating lipid abnormalities in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Am J Cardiol. 2001;88(suppl):37N–40N.PubMedCrossRef Steiner G. Treating lipid abnormalities in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Am J Cardiol. 2001;88(suppl):37N–40N.PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Kendall DM. The dyslipidemia of diabetes mellitus: giving triglycerides and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol a higher priority? Endocrinol Metab Clin N Am. 2005;34:27–48.CrossRef Kendall DM. The dyslipidemia of diabetes mellitus: giving triglycerides and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol a higher priority? Endocrinol Metab Clin N Am. 2005;34:27–48.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Brunzell JD, Davidson M, Furburg CD, Goldberg RB, Howard BV, Stein JH, et al. Lipoprotein management in patients with cardiometabolic risk. Consensus statement from the American Diabetes Association and the American College of Cardiology Foundation. Diabetes Care. 2008;31:811–22.PubMedCrossRef Brunzell JD, Davidson M, Furburg CD, Goldberg RB, Howard BV, Stein JH, et al. Lipoprotein management in patients with cardiometabolic risk. Consensus statement from the American Diabetes Association and the American College of Cardiology Foundation. Diabetes Care. 2008;31:811–22.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Rosenson RS, Otvos JD, Hsia J. Effects of rosuvastatin and atorvastatin on LDL and HDL particle concentrations in patients with metabolic syndrome. Diabetes Care. 2009;32:1087–91.PubMedCrossRef Rosenson RS, Otvos JD, Hsia J. Effects of rosuvastatin and atorvastatin on LDL and HDL particle concentrations in patients with metabolic syndrome. Diabetes Care. 2009;32:1087–91.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Garvey WT, Kwon S, Zheng D, Shaughnessy S, Wallace P, Hutto A, et al. Effects of insulin resistance and type 2 diabetes on lipoprotein subclass particle size and concentration determined by nuclear magnetic resonance. Diabetes. 2003;52:453–62.PubMedCrossRef Garvey WT, Kwon S, Zheng D, Shaughnessy S, Wallace P, Hutto A, et al. Effects of insulin resistance and type 2 diabetes on lipoprotein subclass particle size and concentration determined by nuclear magnetic resonance. Diabetes. 2003;52:453–62.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Third Report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III) final report. Circulation. 2002;106:3143–3421. Third Report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III) final report. Circulation. 2002;106:3143–3421.
7.
go back to reference American Diabetes Association 2009 Executive summary: Standards of medical care in diabetes–2009. Diabetes Care. 2009;32(Suppl 1):S6–S12. American Diabetes Association 2009 Executive summary: Standards of medical care in diabetes–2009. Diabetes Care. 2009;32(Suppl 1):S6–S12.
8.
go back to reference Grundy SM, Cleeman JI, Merz CNB, Brewer Jr HB, Clark LT, Hunninghake DB, et al. Coordinating Committee of the National Cholesterol Education Program. Implications of recent clinical trials for the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III Guidelines. Circulation. 2004;110:227–39.PubMedCrossRef Grundy SM, Cleeman JI, Merz CNB, Brewer Jr HB, Clark LT, Hunninghake DB, et al. Coordinating Committee of the National Cholesterol Education Program. Implications of recent clinical trials for the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III Guidelines. Circulation. 2004;110:227–39.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Fruchart JC, Sacks FM, Hermans MP, Assmann G, Brown WV, Ceska R, et al. The residual risk reduction initiative: a call to action to reduce residual vascular risk in dyslipidaemic patient. Diab Vasc Dis Res. 2008;5:319–35.PubMedCrossRef Fruchart JC, Sacks FM, Hermans MP, Assmann G, Brown WV, Ceska R, et al. The residual risk reduction initiative: a call to action to reduce residual vascular risk in dyslipidaemic patient. Diab Vasc Dis Res. 2008;5:319–35.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Roth EM, Rosenson RS, Carlson DM, Fukumoto SM, Setze CM, Blasetto JW, et al. Efficacy and safety of rosuvastatin 5 mg in combination with fenofibric acid 135 mg in patients with mixed dyslipidemia—A phase 3 study. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 2010. doi:10.1007/s10557-010-6266-4.PubMed Roth EM, Rosenson RS, Carlson DM, Fukumoto SM, Setze CM, Blasetto JW, et al. Efficacy and safety of rosuvastatin 5 mg in combination with fenofibric acid 135 mg in patients with mixed dyslipidemia—A phase 3 study. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 2010. doi:10.​1007/​s10557-010-6266-4.PubMed
11.
go back to reference Jones PH, Davidson MH, Kashyap ML, Kelly MT, Buttler SM, Setze CM, et al. Efficacy and safety of ABT-335 (fenofibric acid) in combination with rosuvastatin in patients with mixed dyslipidemia: a phase 3 study. Atherosclerosis. 2009;204:208–15.PubMedCrossRef Jones PH, Davidson MH, Kashyap ML, Kelly MT, Buttler SM, Setze CM, et al. Efficacy and safety of ABT-335 (fenofibric acid) in combination with rosuvastatin in patients with mixed dyslipidemia: a phase 3 study. Atherosclerosis. 2009;204:208–15.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Jones PH, Bays HE, Davidson MH, Kelly MT, Buttler SM, Setze CM, et al. Evaluation of a new formulation of fenofibric acid, ABT-335, co-administered with statins: study design and rationale of a phase III clinical programme. Clin Drug Investig. 2008;28:625–34.PubMedCrossRef Jones PH, Bays HE, Davidson MH, Kelly MT, Buttler SM, Setze CM, et al. Evaluation of a new formulation of fenofibric acid, ABT-335, co-administered with statins: study design and rationale of a phase III clinical programme. Clin Drug Investig. 2008;28:625–34.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference American Heart Association. An eating plan for healthy Americans—our American Heart Association diet. Dallas (TX): AHA, 2004. AHA Publication No. 50-1481A. American Heart Association. An eating plan for healthy Americans—our American Heart Association diet. Dallas (TX): AHA, 2004. AHA Publication No. 50-1481A.
14.
go back to reference Roth EM, McKenney JM, Kelly MT, Setze CM, Carlson DM, Gold A, et al. Efficacy and safety of rosuvastatin and fenofibric acid combination therapy versus simvastatin monotherapy in patients with hypercholesterolemia and hypertriglyceridemia: a randomized, double-blind study. Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2010;10:175–86.PubMedCrossRef Roth EM, McKenney JM, Kelly MT, Setze CM, Carlson DM, Gold A, et al. Efficacy and safety of rosuvastatin and fenofibric acid combination therapy versus simvastatin monotherapy in patients with hypercholesterolemia and hypertriglyceridemia: a randomized, double-blind study. Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2010;10:175–86.PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Berne C, Siewert-Delle A; URANUS study investigators. Comparison of rosuvastatin and atorvastatin for lipid lowering in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: results from the URANUS study. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2005;4:7.PubMedCrossRef Berne C, Siewert-Delle A; URANUS study investigators. Comparison of rosuvastatin and atorvastatin for lipid lowering in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: results from the URANUS study. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2005;4:7.PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Ballantyne CM, Abate N, Yuan Z, King TR, Palmisano J. Dose-comparison study of the combination of ezetimibe and simvastatin (Vytorin) versus atorvastatin in patients with hypercholesterolemia: the Vytorin versus atorvastatin (VYVA) study. Am Heart J. 2004;149:464–73.CrossRef Ballantyne CM, Abate N, Yuan Z, King TR, Palmisano J. Dose-comparison study of the combination of ezetimibe and simvastatin (Vytorin) versus atorvastatin in patients with hypercholesterolemia: the Vytorin versus atorvastatin (VYVA) study. Am Heart J. 2004;149:464–73.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Davidson MH, Ballantyne CM, Kerzner B, Melani L, Sager PT, Lipka L, et al; Ezetimibe Study Group. Efficacy and safety of ezetimibe coadministered with statins: randomised, placebo-controlled, blinded experience in 2382 patients with primary hypercholesterolemia. Int J Clin Pract. 2005;58:746–55.CrossRef Davidson MH, Ballantyne CM, Kerzner B, Melani L, Sager PT, Lipka L, et al; Ezetimibe Study Group. Efficacy and safety of ezetimibe coadministered with statins: randomised, placebo-controlled, blinded experience in 2382 patients with primary hypercholesterolemia. Int J Clin Pract. 2005;58:746–55.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Jones PH, Davidson MH, Stein EA, Bays HE, McKenney JM, Miller E, et al; STELLAR Study Group. Comparison of the efficacy and safety of rosuvastatin versus atorvastatin, simvastatin, and pravastatin across doses (STELLAR* trial). Am J Cardiol. 2003;92:152–60.PubMedCrossRef Jones PH, Davidson MH, Stein EA, Bays HE, McKenney JM, Miller E, et al; STELLAR Study Group. Comparison of the efficacy and safety of rosuvastatin versus atorvastatin, simvastatin, and pravastatin across doses (STELLAR* trial). Am J Cardiol. 2003;92:152–60.PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference McKenney J, Ballantyne CM, Feldman TA, Brady WE, Shah A, Davies MJ, et al. LDL-C goal attainment with ezetimibe plus simvastatin coadministration vs atorvastatin or simvastatin monotherapy in patients at high risk of CHD. MedGenMed. 2005;7:3.PubMed McKenney J, Ballantyne CM, Feldman TA, Brady WE, Shah A, Davies MJ, et al. LDL-C goal attainment with ezetimibe plus simvastatin coadministration vs atorvastatin or simvastatin monotherapy in patients at high risk of CHD. MedGenMed. 2005;7:3.PubMed
21.
go back to reference McKenney JM, Jones PH, Angeli Adamczyk M, Cain VA, Bryzinski BS, et al; STELLAR Study Group. Comparison of the efficacy of rosuvastatin versus atorvastatin, simvastatin, and pravastatin in achieving lipid goals: results from the STELLAR trial. Curr Med Res Opin. 2003;19:689–98.PubMedCrossRef McKenney JM, Jones PH, Angeli Adamczyk M, Cain VA, Bryzinski BS, et al; STELLAR Study Group. Comparison of the efficacy of rosuvastatin versus atorvastatin, simvastatin, and pravastatin in achieving lipid goals: results from the STELLAR trial. Curr Med Res Opin. 2003;19:689–98.PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Stalenhoef AFH, Ballantye CM, Sarti C, Murin J, Tonstad S, Rose H, et al. A COmparative study with rosuvastatin in subjects with METabolic Syndrome: results of the COMETS study. Eur Heart J. 2005;26:2664–72.PubMedCrossRef Stalenhoef AFH, Ballantye CM, Sarti C, Murin J, Tonstad S, Rose H, et al. A COmparative study with rosuvastatin in subjects with METabolic Syndrome: results of the COMETS study. Eur Heart J. 2005;26:2664–72.PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Wolffenbuttel BHR, Franken AAM, Vincent HH, Dutch CORALL Study Group. Cholesterol-lowering effects of rosuvastatin compared with atorvastatin in patients with type 2 diabetes—CORALL study. J Intern Med. 2005;257:531–9.PubMedCrossRef Wolffenbuttel BHR, Franken AAM, Vincent HH, Dutch CORALL Study Group. Cholesterol-lowering effects of rosuvastatin compared with atorvastatin in patients with type 2 diabetes—CORALL study. J Intern Med. 2005;257:531–9.PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Lemieux I, Laperrière L, Dzavik V, Tremblay G, Bourgeois J, Després JP. A 16-week fenofibrate treatment increases LDL particle size in type IIA dyslipidemic patients. Atherosclerosis. 2002;162:363–71.PubMedCrossRef Lemieux I, Laperrière L, Dzavik V, Tremblay G, Bourgeois J, Després JP. A 16-week fenofibrate treatment increases LDL particle size in type IIA dyslipidemic patients. Atherosclerosis. 2002;162:363–71.PubMedCrossRef
25.
26.
go back to reference Rosenson RS, Wolff DA, Huskin AL, Helenowski IB, Rademaker AW. Fenofibrate therapy ameliorates fasting and postprandial lipoproteinemia, oxidative stress, and the inflammatory response in subjects with hypertriglyceridemia and the metabolic syndrome. Diabetes Care. 2007;30:1945–51.PubMedCrossRef Rosenson RS, Wolff DA, Huskin AL, Helenowski IB, Rademaker AW. Fenofibrate therapy ameliorates fasting and postprandial lipoproteinemia, oxidative stress, and the inflammatory response in subjects with hypertriglyceridemia and the metabolic syndrome. Diabetes Care. 2007;30:1945–51.PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Campos H, Genest Jr JJ, Blijlevens E, McNamara JR, Jenner JL, Ordovas JM, et al. Low density lipoprotein particle size and coronary artery disease. Arterioscler Thromb. 1992;12:187–95.PubMed Campos H, Genest Jr JJ, Blijlevens E, McNamara JR, Jenner JL, Ordovas JM, et al. Low density lipoprotein particle size and coronary artery disease. Arterioscler Thromb. 1992;12:187–95.PubMed
28.
go back to reference Campos H, Blijlevens E, McNamara JR, Ordovas JM, Posner BM, Wilson PW, et al. LDL particle size distribution. Results from the Framingham Offspring Study. Arterioscler Thromb. 1992;12:1410–9.PubMed Campos H, Blijlevens E, McNamara JR, Ordovas JM, Posner BM, Wilson PW, et al. LDL particle size distribution. Results from the Framingham Offspring Study. Arterioscler Thromb. 1992;12:1410–9.PubMed
29.
go back to reference Griffin BA, Freeman DJ, Tait GW, Thomson J, Caslake MJ, Packard CJ, et al. Role of plasma triglyceride in the regulation of plasma low density lipoprotein (LDL) subfractions: relative contribution of small, dense LDL to coronary heart disease risk. Atherosclerosis. 1994;106:241–53.PubMedCrossRef Griffin BA, Freeman DJ, Tait GW, Thomson J, Caslake MJ, Packard CJ, et al. Role of plasma triglyceride in the regulation of plasma low density lipoprotein (LDL) subfractions: relative contribution of small, dense LDL to coronary heart disease risk. Atherosclerosis. 1994;106:241–53.PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Assmann G, Schulte H. Relation of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and triglycerides to incidence of atherosclerotic coronary artery disease (the PROCAM experience). Prospective Cardiovascular Munster study. Am J Cardiol. 1992;70:733–7.PubMedCrossRef Assmann G, Schulte H. Relation of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and triglycerides to incidence of atherosclerotic coronary artery disease (the PROCAM experience). Prospective Cardiovascular Munster study. Am J Cardiol. 1992;70:733–7.PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Assmann G, Schulte H, Cullen P, Seedorf U. Assessing risk of myocardial infarction and stroke: new data from the Prospective Cardiovascular Munster (PROCAM) study. Eur J Clin Invest. 2007;37:925–32.PubMedCrossRef Assmann G, Schulte H, Cullen P, Seedorf U. Assessing risk of myocardial infarction and stroke: new data from the Prospective Cardiovascular Munster (PROCAM) study. Eur J Clin Invest. 2007;37:925–32.PubMedCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Hokanson JE, Austin MA. Plasma triglyceride level is a risk factor for cardiovascular disease independent of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol level: a meta-analysis of population-based prospective studies. J Cardiovasc Risk. 1996;3:213–9.PubMedCrossRef Hokanson JE, Austin MA. Plasma triglyceride level is a risk factor for cardiovascular disease independent of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol level: a meta-analysis of population-based prospective studies. J Cardiovasc Risk. 1996;3:213–9.PubMedCrossRef
33.
go back to reference Sarwar N, Danesh J, Eiriksdottir G, Sigurdsson G, Wareham N, Bingham S, et al. Triglycerides and the risk of coronary heart disease: 10, 158 incident cases among 262, 565 participants in 29 Western prospective studies. Circulation. 2007;115:450–8.PubMedCrossRef Sarwar N, Danesh J, Eiriksdottir G, Sigurdsson G, Wareham N, Bingham S, et al. Triglycerides and the risk of coronary heart disease: 10, 158 incident cases among 262, 565 participants in 29 Western prospective studies. Circulation. 2007;115:450–8.PubMedCrossRef
34.
go back to reference Durrington PN, Tuomilehto J, Hamann A, Kallend D, Smith K. Rosuvastatin and fenofibrate alone and in combination in type 2 diabetes patients with combined hyperlipidaemia. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2004;64:137–51.PubMedCrossRef Durrington PN, Tuomilehto J, Hamann A, Kallend D, Smith K. Rosuvastatin and fenofibrate alone and in combination in type 2 diabetes patients with combined hyperlipidaemia. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2004;64:137–51.PubMedCrossRef
35.
go back to reference The ACCORD Study Group. Effects of combination lipid therapy in type 2 diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med. 2010;362(17):1563–74.CrossRef The ACCORD Study Group. Effects of combination lipid therapy in type 2 diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med. 2010;362(17):1563–74.CrossRef
36.
go back to reference The ACCORD Study Group and ACCORD Eye Study Group. Effects of medical therapies on retinopathy progression in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2010;263:233–44. The ACCORD Study Group and ACCORD Eye Study Group. Effects of medical therapies on retinopathy progression in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2010;263:233–44.
37.
go back to reference Bays HE, Jones PH, Mohiuddin SM, Kelly MT, Sun H, Setze CM, et al. Long-term safety and efficacy of fenofibric acid in combination with statin therapy for the treatment of patients with mixed dyslipidemia. J Clin Lipidol. 2008;2:426–35.PubMedCrossRef Bays HE, Jones PH, Mohiuddin SM, Kelly MT, Sun H, Setze CM, et al. Long-term safety and efficacy of fenofibric acid in combination with statin therapy for the treatment of patients with mixed dyslipidemia. J Clin Lipidol. 2008;2:426–35.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Achievement of Lipid Targets with the Combination of Rosuvastatin and Fenofibric Acid in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
Authors
Robert S. Rosenson
Dawn M. Carlson
Maureen T. Kelly
Carolyn M. Setze
Boaz Hirshberg
James C. Stolzenbach
Laura A. Williams
Publication date
01-02-2011
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy / Issue 1/2011
Print ISSN: 0920-3206
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7241
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10557-010-6273-5

Other articles of this Issue 1/2011

Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy 1/2011 Go to the issue