Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology 4/2013

01-04-2013 | Cataract

Accuracy of wavefront aberrometer refraction vs manifest refraction in cataract patients: impact of age, ametropia and visual function

Authors: Jan O. Huelle, Toam Katz, Jan Draeger, Milena Pahlitzsch, Vasyl Druchkiv, Johannes Steinberg, Gisbert Richard, Stephan J. Linke

Published in: Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology | Issue 4/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

To evaluate accuracy of WASCA wavefront aberrometry (WA) refraction in comparison to manifest refraction (MR) in an older population awaiting cataract surgery.

Methods

Prospectively, refractive errors of 130 eyes were determined by WA and MR. Mean age was 65.9 (SD 11.81), corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) averaged 0.20 logMar (SD 0.57), mean manifest sphere was 0.23 dioptres (D, SD 3.39) and manifest astigmatism amounted to −1.25 D (SD 1.21). For further analysis, refractive values were transformed into power vector components: spherical equivalent (SE), Jackson cross cylinder at 0° and 45° (J0 and J45). The ‘limits of agreement’ approach, regression analysis, correlation analysis, and ANOVA were applied and additionally compared to 28 healthy eyes (mean VA −0.1 logMAR) of a group of young subjects (mean age 33.9).

Results

SE measures in myopia correlated highly between WA and MR (r = 0.917, p < .001). In hyperopia this correlation was moderately high (r = 0.800, p < .001). For all subjects, correlations between WA and MR for J0 and J45 were r = 0.742 (p < .001) and r = 0.760 (p < .001) respectively. WA measurements revealed larger agreement ranges with increasing myopia and astigmatism. Controlled for possible confounding variables of age, VA, and refractive state, no statistically significant effects were found. Across nearly all conditions, WA measured significantly higher myopic and astigmatic values than MR. Most effects were replicated in the reference group.

Conclusions

WA refraction can provide valuable information in previously under-researched conditions such as reduced VA (cataract-related), advanced age, and hyperopia. However, loss of optical media transparency will inherently reduce accuracy of WA. Further studies are needed to define cut-off values for automated wavefront quality grading and intra-operative application of WA in refractive surgery.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Lombardo M, Lombardo G (2009) New methods and techniques for sensing the wave aberrations of human eyes. Clin Exp Optom 92:176–186PubMedCrossRef Lombardo M, Lombardo G (2009) New methods and techniques for sensing the wave aberrations of human eyes. Clin Exp Optom 92:176–186PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Buehren J, Kohnen T (2007) Application of wavefront analysis in clinical and scientific settings. From irregular astigmatism to aberrations of a higher order —Part I: Basic principles. Ophthalmologe 104:909–923CrossRef Buehren J, Kohnen T (2007) Application of wavefront analysis in clinical and scientific settings. From irregular astigmatism to aberrations of a higher order —Part I: Basic principles. Ophthalmologe 104:909–923CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Cervino A, Hosking SL, Rai GK, Naroo SA, Gilmartin B (2006) Wavefront analyzers induce instrument myopia. J Refract Surg 22:795–803PubMed Cervino A, Hosking SL, Rai GK, Naroo SA, Gilmartin B (2006) Wavefront analyzers induce instrument myopia. J Refract Surg 22:795–803PubMed
4.
go back to reference Reinstein DZ, Archer TJ, Couch D (2006) Accuracy of the WASCA aberrometer refraction compared to manifest refraction in myopia. J Refract Surg 22:268–274PubMed Reinstein DZ, Archer TJ, Couch D (2006) Accuracy of the WASCA aberrometer refraction compared to manifest refraction in myopia. J Refract Surg 22:268–274PubMed
5.
go back to reference Rozema JJ, Van Dyck DE, Tassignon MJ (2006) Clinical comparison of 6 aberrometers. Part 2: statistical comparison in a test group. J Cataract Refract Surg 32:33–44PubMedCrossRef Rozema JJ, Van Dyck DE, Tassignon MJ (2006) Clinical comparison of 6 aberrometers. Part 2: statistical comparison in a test group. J Cataract Refract Surg 32:33–44PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Taneri S, Oehler S, Azar DT (2011) Influence of mydriatic eye drops on wavefront sensing with the Zywave aberrometer. J Refract Surg 27:678–685PubMedCrossRef Taneri S, Oehler S, Azar DT (2011) Influence of mydriatic eye drops on wavefront sensing with the Zywave aberrometer. J Refract Surg 27:678–685PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Zhu X, Dai J, Chu RLY, Zhou X, Wang L (2009) Accuracy of WASCA aberrometer refraction compared to manifest refraction in Chinese adult myopes. J Refract Surg 25:1026–1033PubMedCrossRef Zhu X, Dai J, Chu RLY, Zhou X, Wang L (2009) Accuracy of WASCA aberrometer refraction compared to manifest refraction in Chinese adult myopes. J Refract Surg 25:1026–1033PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Thibos LN, Horner D (2001) Power vector analysis of the optical outcome of refractive surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg 27:80–85PubMedCrossRef Thibos LN, Horner D (2001) Power vector analysis of the optical outcome of refractive surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg 27:80–85PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Altman DG, Bland JM (1983) Measurement in medicine: the analysis of method comparison studies. Statistician 32:307–317CrossRef Altman DG, Bland JM (1983) Measurement in medicine: the analysis of method comparison studies. Statistician 32:307–317CrossRef
10.
go back to reference McAlinden C, Khadka J, Pesudovs K (2011) Statistical methods for conducting agreement (comparison of clinical tests) and precision (repeatability or reproducibility) studies in optometry and ophthalmology. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 31:330–338PubMedCrossRef McAlinden C, Khadka J, Pesudovs K (2011) Statistical methods for conducting agreement (comparison of clinical tests) and precision (repeatability or reproducibility) studies in optometry and ophthalmology. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 31:330–338PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Mirshahi A, Bühren J, Gerhardt D, Kohnen T (2003) In vivo and in vitro repeatability of Hartmann–Shack aberrometry. J Cataract Refract Surg 29:2295–2301PubMedCrossRef Mirshahi A, Bühren J, Gerhardt D, Kohnen T (2003) In vivo and in vitro repeatability of Hartmann–Shack aberrometry. J Cataract Refract Surg 29:2295–2301PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Duane A (1912) Normal values of the accommodation at all ages. JAMA 59:1010–1012CrossRef Duane A (1912) Normal values of the accommodation at all ages. JAMA 59:1010–1012CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Artal P, Berrio E, Guirao A, Piers P (2002) Contribution of the cornea and internal surfaces to the change of ocular aberrations with age. J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis 19:137–143PubMedCrossRef Artal P, Berrio E, Guirao A, Piers P (2002) Contribution of the cornea and internal surfaces to the change of ocular aberrations with age. J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis 19:137–143PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference McLellan JS, Marcos S, Burns SA (2001) Age-related changes in monochromatic wave aberrations of the human eye. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 42:1390–1395PubMed McLellan JS, Marcos S, Burns SA (2001) Age-related changes in monochromatic wave aberrations of the human eye. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 42:1390–1395PubMed
15.
go back to reference Fujikado T, Kuroda T, Maeda N, Ninomiya S, Goto H, Tano Y, Oshika T, Hirohara Y, Mihashi T (2004) Light scattering and optical aberrations as objective parameters to predict visual deterioration in eyes with cataracts. J Cataract Refract Surg 30:1198–1208PubMedCrossRef Fujikado T, Kuroda T, Maeda N, Ninomiya S, Goto H, Tano Y, Oshika T, Hirohara Y, Mihashi T (2004) Light scattering and optical aberrations as objective parameters to predict visual deterioration in eyes with cataracts. J Cataract Refract Surg 30:1198–1208PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Applegate RA, Donnelly WJ 3rd, Marsack JD, Koenig DE, Pesudovs K (2007) Three-dimensional relationship between high-order root-mean-square wavefront error, pupil diameter, and aging. J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis 24:578–587PubMedCrossRef Applegate RA, Donnelly WJ 3rd, Marsack JD, Koenig DE, Pesudovs K (2007) Three-dimensional relationship between high-order root-mean-square wavefront error, pupil diameter, and aging. J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis 24:578–587PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference MacKenzie GE (2008) Reproducibility of sphero-cylindrical prescriptions. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 28:143–150PubMedCrossRef MacKenzie GE (2008) Reproducibility of sphero-cylindrical prescriptions. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 28:143–150PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Pesudovs K, Parker KE, Cheng H, Applegate RA (2007) The precision of wavefront refraction compared to subjective refraction and autorefraction. Optom Vis Sci 84:387–392PubMedCrossRef Pesudovs K, Parker KE, Cheng H, Applegate RA (2007) The precision of wavefront refraction compared to subjective refraction and autorefraction. Optom Vis Sci 84:387–392PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Stringham J, Pettey J, Olson JO (2012) Evaluation of variables affecting intraoperative aberrometry. J Cataract Refract Surg 38:470–474PubMedCrossRef Stringham J, Pettey J, Olson JO (2012) Evaluation of variables affecting intraoperative aberrometry. J Cataract Refract Surg 38:470–474PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Packer M (2010) Effect of intraoperative aberrometry on the rate of postoperative enhancement: retrospective study. J Cataract Refract Surg 36:747–755PubMedCrossRef Packer M (2010) Effect of intraoperative aberrometry on the rate of postoperative enhancement: retrospective study. J Cataract Refract Surg 36:747–755PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Accuracy of wavefront aberrometer refraction vs manifest refraction in cataract patients: impact of age, ametropia and visual function
Authors
Jan O. Huelle
Toam Katz
Jan Draeger
Milena Pahlitzsch
Vasyl Druchkiv
Johannes Steinberg
Gisbert Richard
Stephan J. Linke
Publication date
01-04-2013
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology / Issue 4/2013
Print ISSN: 0721-832X
Electronic ISSN: 1435-702X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-012-2246-7

Other articles of this Issue 4/2013

Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology 4/2013 Go to the issue