Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Clinical Oral Investigations 6/2013

01-07-2013 | Original Article

Accuracy of peri-implant bone thickness and validity of assessing bone augmentation material using cone beam computed tomography

Authors: Dongyun Wang, Andreas Künzel, Vladimir Golubovic, Ilya Mihatovic, Gordon John, Zhuofan Chen, Jürgen Becker, Frank Schwarz

Published in: Clinical Oral Investigations | Issue 6/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Objectives

The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of measuring bone thickness surrounding dental implants and the reliability of assessing existence and completion of osseous integration of augmentation material using a cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) system.

Materials and methods

In jaws of foxhounds, artificial defects were regenerated by guided bone regeneration and then dental implants were placed. After putting down the dogs, the jaws were separated from the bodies and exposed in a CBCT system. The bone thickness was measured on both buccal and oral sides of the implants at different levels. Every examiner evaluated existence and integration of bone augmentation materials (BAM) and the completeness of marginal implant covering. The same measurements and evaluations were performed at digital images of the corresponding histological sections.

Results

The mean and the standard deviation of the differences between radiological and histological measurements of peri-implant bone thickness were −0.22 mm and 0.77 mm, respectively. Sensitivity and specificity were 0.77 and 0.60 for existence of BAM, 0.59 and 0.74 for completed integration, and 0.39 and 0.71 for full covering of the implant surface.

Conclusions

The present study indicates that the PaX Duo3D® CBCT system allows measurements of peri-implant bone thickness at an accuracy of half a millimeter, and—within limits—assessing the existence and integration of BAM. It is not possible to evaluate whether the implant is covered completely by hard tissue.

Clinical relevance

Peri-implant bone thickness is a key factor for obtaining initial implant stability. The accuracy of its measurement has clinical impact. Radiological assessment of existence and integration of BAM would be of great benefit to the evaluation of augmentation procedures.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
3.
go back to reference Fienitz T, Schwarz F, Ritter L, Dreiseidler T, Becker J, Rothamel D (2011) Accuracy of cone beam computed tomography in assessing peri-implant bone defect regeneration: a histologically controlled study in dogs. Clin Oral Implants Res. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02232.x Fienitz T, Schwarz F, Ritter L, Dreiseidler T, Becker J, Rothamel D (2011) Accuracy of cone beam computed tomography in assessing peri-implant bone defect regeneration: a histologically controlled study in dogs. Clin Oral Implants Res. doi:10.​1111/​j.​1600-0501.​2011.​02232.​x
4.
go back to reference Miyamoto Y, Obama T (2011) Dental cone beam computed tomography analyses of postoperative labial bone thickness in maxillary anterior implants: comparing immediate and delayed implant placement. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 31(3):215–225PubMed Miyamoto Y, Obama T (2011) Dental cone beam computed tomography analyses of postoperative labial bone thickness in maxillary anterior implants: comparing immediate and delayed implant placement. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 31(3):215–225PubMed
5.
go back to reference Corpas Ldos S, Jacobs R, Quirynen M, Huang Y, Naert I, Duyck J (2011) Peri-implant bone tissue assessment by comparing the outcome of intra-oral radiograph and cone beam computed tomography analyses to the histological standard. Clin Oral Implants Res 22(5):492–499. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02029.x PubMedCrossRef Corpas Ldos S, Jacobs R, Quirynen M, Huang Y, Naert I, Duyck J (2011) Peri-implant bone tissue assessment by comparing the outcome of intra-oral radiograph and cone beam computed tomography analyses to the histological standard. Clin Oral Implants Res 22(5):492–499. doi:10.​1111/​j.​1600-0501.​2010.​02029.​x PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Braut V, Bornstein MM, Belser U, Buser D (2011) Thickness of the anterior maxillary facial bone wall—a retrospective radiographic study using cone beam computed tomography. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 31(2):125–131PubMed Braut V, Bornstein MM, Belser U, Buser D (2011) Thickness of the anterior maxillary facial bone wall—a retrospective radiographic study using cone beam computed tomography. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 31(2):125–131PubMed
7.
go back to reference Dalstra M, Cattaneo PM, Melsen B (2004) Load transfer of miniscrews for orthodontic anchorage. J Orthod 1:53–62 Dalstra M, Cattaneo PM, Melsen B (2004) Load transfer of miniscrews for orthodontic anchorage. J Orthod 1:53–62
8.
go back to reference Mihatovic I, Golubovic V, Hegewald A, Becker J, Schwarz F (2012) Influence of two barrier membranes on staged guided bone regeneration and osseointegration of titanium implants in dogs. Part 2: augmentation using bone graft substitutes. Clin Oral Implants Res 23:308–315 Mihatovic I, Golubovic V, Hegewald A, Becker J, Schwarz F (2012) Influence of two barrier membranes on staged guided bone regeneration and osseointegration of titanium implants in dogs. Part 2: augmentation using bone graft substitutes. Clin Oral Implants Res 23:308–315
9.
go back to reference Schwarz F, Mihatovic I, Golubovic V, Hegewald A, Becker J (2011) Influence of two barrier membranes on staged guided bone regeneration and osseointegration of titanium implants in dogs: part 1. Augmentation using bone graft substitutes and autogenous bone. Clin Oral Implants Res. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02187.x Schwarz F, Mihatovic I, Golubovic V, Hegewald A, Becker J (2011) Influence of two barrier membranes on staged guided bone regeneration and osseointegration of titanium implants in dogs: part 1. Augmentation using bone graft substitutes and autogenous bone. Clin Oral Implants Res. doi:10.​1111/​j.​1600-0501.​2011.​02187.​x
10.
go back to reference Donath K (1985) The diagnostic value of the new method for the study of undecalcified bones and teeth with attached soft tissue (Sage–Schliff (sawing and grinding) technique). Pathol Res Pract 179(6):631–633PubMedCrossRef Donath K (1985) The diagnostic value of the new method for the study of undecalcified bones and teeth with attached soft tissue (Sage–Schliff (sawing and grinding) technique). Pathol Res Pract 179(6):631–633PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Berco M, Rigali PH, Jr., Miner RM, DeLuca S, Anderson NK, Will LA (2009) Accuracy and reliability of linear cephalometric measurements from cone-beam computed tomography scans of a dry human skull. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 136(1):17 e11–19; discussion 17–18. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.08.021 Berco M, Rigali PH, Jr., Miner RM, DeLuca S, Anderson NK, Will LA (2009) Accuracy and reliability of linear cephalometric measurements from cone-beam computed tomography scans of a dry human skull. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 136(1):17 e11–19; discussion 17–18. doi: 10.​1016/​j.​ajodo.​2008.​08.​021
12.
go back to reference Damstra J, Fourie Z, Huddleston Slater JJ, Ren Y (2010) Accuracy of linear measurements from cone-beam computed tomography-derived surface models of different voxel sizes. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 137 (1):16 e11–16; discussion 16–17. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.06.016 Damstra J, Fourie Z, Huddleston Slater JJ, Ren Y (2010) Accuracy of linear measurements from cone-beam computed tomography-derived surface models of different voxel sizes. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 137 (1):16 e11–16; discussion 16–17. doi: 10.​1016/​j.​ajodo.​2009.​06.​016
13.
go back to reference Fatemitabar SA, Nikgoo A (2010) Multichannel computed tomography versus cone-beam computed tomography: linear accuracy of in vitro measurements of the maxilla for implant placement. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 25(3):499–505PubMed Fatemitabar SA, Nikgoo A (2010) Multichannel computed tomography versus cone-beam computed tomography: linear accuracy of in vitro measurements of the maxilla for implant placement. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 25(3):499–505PubMed
14.
go back to reference Kobayashi K, Shimoda S, Nakagawa Y, Yamamoto A (2004) Accuracy in measurement of distance using limited cone-beam computerized tomography. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 19(2):228–231PubMed Kobayashi K, Shimoda S, Nakagawa Y, Yamamoto A (2004) Accuracy in measurement of distance using limited cone-beam computerized tomography. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 19(2):228–231PubMed
15.
17.
go back to reference Lund H, Grondahl K, Grondahl HG (2009) Accuracy and precision of linear measurements in cone beam computed tomography Accuitomo tomograms obtained with different reconstruction techniques. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 38(6):379–386. doi:10.1259/dmfr/15022357 PubMedCrossRef Lund H, Grondahl K, Grondahl HG (2009) Accuracy and precision of linear measurements in cone beam computed tomography Accuitomo tomograms obtained with different reconstruction techniques. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 38(6):379–386. doi:10.​1259/​dmfr/​15022357 PubMedCrossRef
19.
20.
go back to reference Suomalainen A, Vehmas T, Kortesniemi M, Robinson S, Peltola J (2008) Accuracy of linear measurements using dental cone beam and conventional multislice computed tomography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 37(1):10–17. doi:10.1259/dmfr/14140281 PubMedCrossRef Suomalainen A, Vehmas T, Kortesniemi M, Robinson S, Peltola J (2008) Accuracy of linear measurements using dental cone beam and conventional multislice computed tomography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 37(1):10–17. doi:10.​1259/​dmfr/​14140281 PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Tsutsumi K, Chikui T, Okamura K, Yoshiura K (2011) Accuracy of linear measurement and the measurement limits of thin objects with cone beam computed tomography: effects of measurement directions and of phantom locations in the fields of view. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 26(1):91–100PubMed Tsutsumi K, Chikui T, Okamura K, Yoshiura K (2011) Accuracy of linear measurement and the measurement limits of thin objects with cone beam computed tomography: effects of measurement directions and of phantom locations in the fields of view. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 26(1):91–100PubMed
22.
go back to reference Veyre-Goulet S, Fortin T, Thierry A (2008) Accuracy of linear measurement provided by cone beam computed tomography to assess bone quantity in the posterior maxilla: a human cadaver study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 10(4):226–230. doi:10.1111/j.1708-8208.2008.00083.x PubMed Veyre-Goulet S, Fortin T, Thierry A (2008) Accuracy of linear measurement provided by cone beam computed tomography to assess bone quantity in the posterior maxilla: a human cadaver study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 10(4):226–230. doi:10.​1111/​j.​1708-8208.​2008.​00083.​x PubMed
23.
go back to reference Al-Ekrish AA, Ekram M (2011) A comparative study of the accuracy and reliability of multidetector computed tomography and cone beam computed tomography in the assessment of dental implant site dimensions. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 40(2):67–75. doi:10.1259/dmfr/27546065 PubMedCrossRef Al-Ekrish AA, Ekram M (2011) A comparative study of the accuracy and reliability of multidetector computed tomography and cone beam computed tomography in the assessment of dental implant site dimensions. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 40(2):67–75. doi:10.​1259/​dmfr/​27546065 PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Loubele M, Van Assche N, Carpentier K, Maes F, Jacobs R, van Steenberghe D, Suetens P (2008) Comparative localized linear accuracy of small-field cone-beam CT and multislice CT for alveolar bone measurements. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 105(4):512–518. doi:10.1016/j.tripleo.2007.05.004 PubMedCrossRef Loubele M, Van Assche N, Carpentier K, Maes F, Jacobs R, van Steenberghe D, Suetens P (2008) Comparative localized linear accuracy of small-field cone-beam CT and multislice CT for alveolar bone measurements. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 105(4):512–518. doi:10.​1016/​j.​tripleo.​2007.​05.​004 PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Tomasi C, Bressan E, Corazza B, Mazzoleni S, Stellini E, Lith A (2011) Reliability and reproducibility of linear mandible measurements with the use of a cone-beam computed tomography and two object inclinations. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 40(4):244–250. doi:10.1259/dmfr/1742330 PubMedCrossRef Tomasi C, Bressan E, Corazza B, Mazzoleni S, Stellini E, Lith A (2011) Reliability and reproducibility of linear mandible measurements with the use of a cone-beam computed tomography and two object inclinations. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 40(4):244–250. doi:10.​1259/​dmfr/​1742330 PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Reitz I, Hesse BM, Nill S, Tucking T, Oelfke U (2009) Enhancement of image quality with a fast iterative scatter and beam hardening correction method for kV CBCT. Z Med Phys 19(3):158–172PubMedCrossRef Reitz I, Hesse BM, Nill S, Tucking T, Oelfke U (2009) Enhancement of image quality with a fast iterative scatter and beam hardening correction method for kV CBCT. Z Med Phys 19(3):158–172PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Accuracy of peri-implant bone thickness and validity of assessing bone augmentation material using cone beam computed tomography
Authors
Dongyun Wang
Andreas Künzel
Vladimir Golubovic
Ilya Mihatovic
Gordon John
Zhuofan Chen
Jürgen Becker
Frank Schwarz
Publication date
01-07-2013
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Clinical Oral Investigations / Issue 6/2013
Print ISSN: 1432-6981
Electronic ISSN: 1436-3771
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-012-0841-y

Other articles of this Issue 6/2013

Clinical Oral Investigations 6/2013 Go to the issue