Published in:
13-12-2023 | Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm | Kidneys, Ureters, Bladder, Retroperitoneum
Automated detection of incidental abdominal aortic aneurysms on computed tomography
Authors:
Devina Chatterjee, Thomas C. Shen, Pritam Mukherjee, Sungwon Lee, John W. Garrett, Nicholas Zacharias, Perry J. Pickhardt, Ronald M. Summers
Published in:
Abdominal Radiology
|
Issue 2/2024
Login to get access
Abstract
Purpose
To detect and assess abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) on CT in a large asymptomatic adult patient population using fully-automated deep learning software.
Materials and methods
The abdominal aorta was segmented using a fully-automated deep learning model trained on 66 manually-segmented abdominal CT scans from two datasets. The axial diameters of the segmented aorta were extracted to detect the presence of AAAs—maximum axial aortic diameter greater than 3 cm were labeled as AAA positive. The trained system was then externally-validated on CT colonography scans of 9172 asymptomatic outpatients (mean age, 57 years) referred for colorectal cancer screening. Using a previously-validated automated calcified atherosclerotic plaque detector, we correlated abdominal aortic Agatston and volume scores with the presence of AAA.
Results
The deep learning software detected AAA on the external validation dataset with a sensitivity, specificity, and AUC of 96%, (95% CI 89%, 100%), 96% (96%, 97%), and 99% (98%, 99%) respectively. The Agatston and volume scores of reported AAA-positive cases were statistically significantly greater than those of reported AAA-negative cases (p < 0.0001). Using plaque alone as a AAA detector, at a threshold Agatston score of 2871, the sensitivity and specificity were 84% (73%, 94%) and 87% (86%, 87%), respectively.
Conclusion
Fully-automated detection and assessment of AAA on CT is feasible and accurate. There was a strong statistical association between the presence of AAA and the quantity of abdominal aortic calcified atherosclerotic plaque.