Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of General Internal Medicine 1/2020

01-01-2020 | Original Research

A “Tea and Cookies” Approach: Co-designing Cancer Screening Interventions with Patients Living with Low Income

Authors: Aisha K. Lofters, MD PhD, Natalie A. Baker, PhD (c), Andree Schuler, PhD, Allison Rau, MSc, Alison Baxter, MA, Nancy N. Baxter, MD, Edward Kucharski, MD, Fok-Han Leung, MD, Karen Weyman, MD, Tara Kiran, MD

Published in: Journal of General Internal Medicine | Issue 1/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

In our primary care organization, we have observed income gradients in cancer screening for our patients despite outreach. We hypothesized that outreach strategies could be improved upon to be more compelling for our patients living with low income.

Objective

To use co-design to adapt our current strategies and create new strategies to improve cancer screening uptake for patients living with low income.

Design

An exploratory, qualitative study in two phases: interviews and focus groups.

Participants

For interviews, we recruited 25 patient participants who were or had been overdue for cancer screening and had been identified by their provider as potentially living with low income. For subsequent focus groups, we recruited 14 patient participants, 11 of whom had participated in Phase I interviews.

Approach

To analyse written transcripts, we took an iterative, inductive approach using content analysis and drawing on best practices in Grounded Theory methodology. Emergent themes were expanded and clarified to create a derived model of possible strategies to improve the experience of cancer screening and encourage screening uptake for patients living with low income.

Key Results

Fear and competing priorities were two key barriers to cancer screening identified by patients. Patients believed that a warm and encouraging outreach approach would work best to increase cancer screening participation. Phone calls and group education were specifically suggested as potentially promising methods. However, these views were not universal; for example, women were more likely to be in favour of group education.

Conclusions

We used input from patients living with low income to co-design a new approach to cancer screening in our primary care organization, an approach that could be broadly applicable to other contexts and settings. We learned from our patients that a multi-modal strategy will likely be best to maximize screening uptake.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Cancer Screening in Canada: An Overview of Screening Participation for Breast, Cervical and Colorectal Cancer. Toronto: Canadian Partnership Against Cancer; 2015. Cancer Screening in Canada: An Overview of Screening Participation for Breast, Cervical and Colorectal Cancer. Toronto: Canadian Partnership Against Cancer; 2015.
7.
go back to reference Elit L, Krzyzanowska M, Saskin R, Barbera L, Razzaq A, Lofters A, et al. Sociodemographic factors associated with cervical cancer screening and follow-up of abnormal results. Can Fam Physician. 2012;58(1):e22-31.PubMedPubMedCentral Elit L, Krzyzanowska M, Saskin R, Barbera L, Razzaq A, Lofters A, et al. Sociodemographic factors associated with cervical cancer screening and follow-up of abnormal results. Can Fam Physician. 2012;58(1):e22-31.PubMedPubMedCentral
8.
go back to reference Fernandes K, Sutradhar R, Borkhoff C, Baxter N, Lofters A, Rabeneck L, et al. Cross-sectional small area variation study of cancer, glucose, and cholesterol screening in Ontario: data to motivate community and primary care strategies to improve participation. CMAJ Open. Fernandes K, Sutradhar R, Borkhoff C, Baxter N, Lofters A, Rabeneck L, et al. Cross-sectional small area variation study of cancer, glucose, and cholesterol screening in Ontario: data to motivate community and primary care strategies to improve participation. CMAJ Open.
9.
go back to reference Lofters AK, Moineddin R, Hwang SW, Glazier RH. Predictors of low cervical cancer screening among immigrant women in Ontario, Canada. BMC Womens Health. 2011;11:20.CrossRef Lofters AK, Moineddin R, Hwang SW, Glazier RH. Predictors of low cervical cancer screening among immigrant women in Ontario, Canada. BMC Womens Health. 2011;11:20.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Lofters AK, Ng R, Lobb R. Primary care physician characteristics associated with cancer screening: a retrospective cohort study in Ontario, Canada. Cancer Med. 2014. Lofters AK, Ng R, Lobb R. Primary care physician characteristics associated with cancer screening: a retrospective cohort study in Ontario, Canada. Cancer Med. 2014.
11.
go back to reference Shen SC, Lofters A, Tinmouth J, Paszat L, Rabeneck L, Glazier RH. Predictors of non-adherence to colorectal cancer screening among immigrants to Ontario, Canada: a population-based study. Prev Med. 2018;111:180-9.CrossRef Shen SC, Lofters A, Tinmouth J, Paszat L, Rabeneck L, Glazier RH. Predictors of non-adherence to colorectal cancer screening among immigrants to Ontario, Canada: a population-based study. Prev Med. 2018;111:180-9.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Borkhoff CM, Saskin R, Rabeneck L, Baxter NN, Liu Y, Tinmouth J, et al. Disparities in receipt of screening tests for cancer, diabetes and high cholesterol in Ontario, Canada: a population-based study using area-based methods. Can J Public Health. 2013;104(4):e284-90.CrossRef Borkhoff CM, Saskin R, Rabeneck L, Baxter NN, Liu Y, Tinmouth J, et al. Disparities in receipt of screening tests for cancer, diabetes and high cholesterol in Ontario, Canada: a population-based study using area-based methods. Can J Public Health. 2013;104(4):e284-90.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Income and Health: Opportunities to achieve health equity in Ontario. Toronto: Health Quality Ontario; 2016. Income and Health: Opportunities to achieve health equity in Ontario. Toronto: Health Quality Ontario; 2016.
14.
go back to reference Vahabi M, Lofters A, Kumar M, Glazier RH. Breast cancer screening disparities among urban immigrants: a population-based study in Ontario, Canada. BMC Public Health. 2015;15:679.CrossRef Vahabi M, Lofters A, Kumar M, Glazier RH. Breast cancer screening disparities among urban immigrants: a population-based study in Ontario, Canada. BMC Public Health. 2015;15:679.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Lofters AK, Schuler A, Slater M, Baxter NN, Persaud N, Pinto AD, et al. Using self-reported data on the social determinants of health in primary care to identify cancer screening disparities: opportunities and challenges. BMC Fam Pract. 2017;18(1):31.CrossRef Lofters AK, Schuler A, Slater M, Baxter NN, Persaud N, Pinto AD, et al. Using self-reported data on the social determinants of health in primary care to identify cancer screening disparities: opportunities and challenges. BMC Fam Pract. 2017;18(1):31.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Feldman J, Davie S, Kiran T. Measuring and improving cervical, breast, and colorectal cancer screening rates in a multi-site urban practice in Toronto, Canada. BMJ Qual Improv Rep. 2017;6(1).CrossRef Feldman J, Davie S, Kiran T. Measuring and improving cervical, breast, and colorectal cancer screening rates in a multi-site urban practice in Toronto, Canada. BMJ Qual Improv Rep. 2017;6(1).CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Kiran T, Davie S, Moineddin R, Lofters A. Mailed Letter Versus Phone Call to Increase Uptake of Cancer Screening: A Pragmatic, Randomized Trial. J Am Board Fam Med. 2018;31(6):857-68.CrossRef Kiran T, Davie S, Moineddin R, Lofters A. Mailed Letter Versus Phone Call to Increase Uptake of Cancer Screening: A Pragmatic, Randomized Trial. J Am Board Fam Med. 2018;31(6):857-68.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Bate P, Robert G. Experience-based design: from redesigning the system around the patient to co-designing services with the patient. Qual Saf Health Care. 2006;15(5):307-10.CrossRef Bate P, Robert G. Experience-based design: from redesigning the system around the patient to co-designing services with the patient. Qual Saf Health Care. 2006;15(5):307-10.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Trischler J, Pervan SJ, Kelly SJ, Scott DR. The value of codesign: The effect of customer involvement in service design teams. Journal of Service Research. 2017;21(1):75-100.CrossRef Trischler J, Pervan SJ, Kelly SJ, Scott DR. The value of codesign: The effect of customer involvement in service design teams. Journal of Service Research. 2017;21(1):75-100.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Israel BA, Schulz AJ, Parker EA, Becker AB, Health C-CPf. Community-based participatory research: policy recommendations for promoting a partnership approach in health research. Educ Health (Abingdon). 2001;14(2):182-97.CrossRef Israel BA, Schulz AJ, Parker EA, Becker AB, Health C-CPf. Community-based participatory research: policy recommendations for promoting a partnership approach in health research. Educ Health (Abingdon). 2001;14(2):182-97.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Sandelowski M. Whatever Happened to Qualitative Description? Research in Nursing & Health. 2000;23:334-40.CrossRef Sandelowski M. Whatever Happened to Qualitative Description? Research in Nursing & Health. 2000;23:334-40.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Strauss A, Corbin J. Basics of Qualitative Research - Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. London: Sage Publications; 1998. Strauss A, Corbin J. Basics of Qualitative Research - Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. London: Sage Publications; 1998.
24.
go back to reference Creswell JW. Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Traditions. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 1998. Creswell JW. Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Traditions. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 1998.
25.
go back to reference Bauer MW, Gaskell G. Qualitative researching with text, image and sound: A practical handbook. London: Sage Publications; 2000.CrossRef Bauer MW, Gaskell G. Qualitative researching with text, image and sound: A practical handbook. London: Sage Publications; 2000.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Kvale S. InterViews: An Introduction to Qualitative Research Interviewing. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 1996. Kvale S. InterViews: An Introduction to Qualitative Research Interviewing. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 1996.
27.
go back to reference Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology. 2006;3:77-101.CrossRef Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology. 2006;3:77-101.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Novick G. Is there a bias against telephone interviews in qualitative research? Res Nurs Health. 2008;31(4):391-8.CrossRef Novick G. Is there a bias against telephone interviews in qualitative research? Res Nurs Health. 2008;31(4):391-8.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Tessier S. From Field Notes, to Transcripts, to Tape Recordings: Evolution or Combination? International Journal of Qualitative Methods. 2012;11(4):446-60.CrossRef Tessier S. From Field Notes, to Transcripts, to Tape Recordings: Evolution or Combination? International Journal of Qualitative Methods. 2012;11(4):446-60.CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Morse JM. The significance of saturation. Qualitative Health Research. 1995;5:147-9.CrossRef Morse JM. The significance of saturation. Qualitative Health Research. 1995;5:147-9.CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Stone EG, Morton SC, Hulscher ME, Maglione MA, Roth EA, Grimshaw JM, et al. Interventions that increase use of adult immunization and cancer screening services: a meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med. 2002;136(9):641-51.CrossRef Stone EG, Morton SC, Hulscher ME, Maglione MA, Roth EA, Grimshaw JM, et al. Interventions that increase use of adult immunization and cancer screening services: a meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med. 2002;136(9):641-51.CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Baron RC, Rimer BK, Breslow RA, Coates RJ, Kerner J, Melillo S, et al. Client-directed interventions to increase community demand for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening a systematic review. Am J Prev Med. 2008;35(1 Suppl):S34-55.CrossRef Baron RC, Rimer BK, Breslow RA, Coates RJ, Kerner J, Melillo S, et al. Client-directed interventions to increase community demand for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening a systematic review. Am J Prev Med. 2008;35(1 Suppl):S34-55.CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Dunn SF, Lofters AK, Ginsburg OM, Meaney CA, Ahmad F, Moravac MC, et al. Cervical and Breast Cancer Screening After CARES: A Community Program for Immigrant and Marginalized Women. Am J Prev Med. 2017;52(5):589-97.CrossRef Dunn SF, Lofters AK, Ginsburg OM, Meaney CA, Ahmad F, Moravac MC, et al. Cervical and Breast Cancer Screening After CARES: A Community Program for Immigrant and Marginalized Women. Am J Prev Med. 2017;52(5):589-97.CrossRef
34.
35.
go back to reference Hall N, Birt L, Rees CJ, Walter FM, Elliot S, Ritchie M, et al. Concerns, perceived need and competing priorities: a qualitative exploration of decision-making and non-participation in a population-based flexible sigmoidoscopy screening programme to prevent colorectal cancer. BMJ Open. 2016;6(11):e012304.CrossRef Hall N, Birt L, Rees CJ, Walter FM, Elliot S, Ritchie M, et al. Concerns, perceived need and competing priorities: a qualitative exploration of decision-making and non-participation in a population-based flexible sigmoidoscopy screening programme to prevent colorectal cancer. BMJ Open. 2016;6(11):e012304.CrossRef
36.
go back to reference Kouyoumdjian FG, McConnon A, Herrington ERS, Fung K, Lofters A, Hwang SW. Cervical Cancer Screening Access for Women Who Experience Imprisonment in Ontario, Canada. JAMA Netw Open. 2018;1(8):e185637.CrossRef Kouyoumdjian FG, McConnon A, Herrington ERS, Fung K, Lofters A, Hwang SW. Cervical Cancer Screening Access for Women Who Experience Imprisonment in Ontario, Canada. JAMA Netw Open. 2018;1(8):e185637.CrossRef
37.
go back to reference Hudson SV, Ferrante JM, Ohman-Strickland P, Hahn KA, Shaw EK, Hemler J, et al. Physician recommendation and patient adherence for colorectal cancer screening. J Am Board Fam Med. 2012;25(6):782-91.CrossRef Hudson SV, Ferrante JM, Ohman-Strickland P, Hahn KA, Shaw EK, Hemler J, et al. Physician recommendation and patient adherence for colorectal cancer screening. J Am Board Fam Med. 2012;25(6):782-91.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
A “Tea and Cookies” Approach: Co-designing Cancer Screening Interventions with Patients Living with Low Income
Authors
Aisha K. Lofters, MD PhD
Natalie A. Baker, PhD (c)
Andree Schuler, PhD
Allison Rau, MSc
Alison Baxter, MA
Nancy N. Baxter, MD
Edward Kucharski, MD
Fok-Han Leung, MD
Karen Weyman, MD
Tara Kiran, MD
Publication date
01-01-2020
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of General Internal Medicine / Issue 1/2020
Print ISSN: 0884-8734
Electronic ISSN: 1525-1497
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-019-05400-0

Other articles of this Issue 1/2020

Journal of General Internal Medicine 1/2020 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

Year in Review: Pediatric cardiology

Watch Dr. Anne Marie Valente present the last year's highlights in pediatric and congenital heart disease in the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Pulmonary vascular disease

The last year's highlights in pulmonary vascular disease are presented by Dr. Jane Leopold in this official video from ACC.24.

Year in Review: Valvular heart disease

Watch Prof. William Zoghbi present the last year's highlights in valvular heart disease from the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discusses last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.