Top

Breast Cancer Research and Treatment

Published in:

01-01-2018 | Review

A systematic review of flap fixation techniques in reducing seroma formation and its sequelae after mastectomy

Authors: J. van Bastelaar, L. van Roozendaal, R. Granzier, G. Beets, Y. Vissers

Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment | Issue 2/2018

Abstract

Background

Seroma formation is a common complication after mastectomy. This review aims to elucidate which surgical techniques are most effective in reducing the dead space and therefore seroma formation in patients undergoing mastectomy.

Methods

A literature search was performed to identify clinical studies comparing any form of flap fixation to conventional closure technique in patients undergoing mastectomy with or without axillary clearance. Studies were eligible for inclusion if outcome was described in terms of seroma formation and/or complications of seroma formation. Studies on animal research or breast reconstruction with tissue expanders or flap harvesting (latissimus dorsi) were excluded.

Results

A total of nine articles were eligible for inclusion. Five were retrospective studies and four were prospective. Retrospective and prospective studies have demonstrated the higher incidence of seroma formation in patients not undergoing mechanical flap fixation. The incidence of seroma-related complications in these studies vary. Four out of the nine studies demonstrate that patients undergoing flap fixation, need significantly fewer seroma aspirations. There are very few studies on the use of tissue glues preventing seroma formation.

Conclusion

The scientific body of evidence favoring flap fixation after mastectomy is convincing. Mechanical flap fixation seems to reduce seroma formation and seroma aspiration after mastectomy. There are, however, no well-powered randomized controlled trials evaluating all aspects of seroma formation and its sequelae. Further research should elucidate whether flap fixation using sutures or tissue glue is superior.

Carless PA et al (2006) Systematic review and meta-analysis of the use of fibrin sealant to prevent seroma formation after breast cancer surgery. Br J Surg 93(7):810–819CrossRefPubMed

Kumar S et al (1995) Post-mastectomy seroma: a new look into the aetiology of an old problem. J R Coll Surg Edinb 40:292–294PubMed

Woodworth PA et al (2000) Seroma formation after breast cancer surgery; incidence and predicting factors. Am Surg 66(5):444–450PubMed

Tadych K et al (1987) Postmastectomy seromas and wound drainage. Surg Gynecol Obstet 165(6):483–487PubMed

Kumar S et al (1995) Post-mastectomy seroma: a new look into the aetiology of an old problem. J R Coll Surg Edinb 40:292–294PubMed

Almond LM et al (2010) Flap anchoring following primary breast cancer surgery facilitates early hospital discharge and reduces costs. Breast Care 5(2):97–101CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Petrek J et al (1990) Axillary lymphadenectomy: a prospective, randomized trial of 13 factors influencing drainage, including early or delayed arm mobilization. Arch Surg 125:378–382CrossRefPubMed

Hashemi E et al (2004) Seroma formation after surgery for breast cancer. World J Surg Oncol 9(2):44CrossRef

Gonzalez EA et al (2003) Seroma formation following breast cancer surgery. Breast J 9(5):385–388CrossRefPubMed

10.

Porter KA et al (1998) Electrocautery as a factor in seroma formation following mastectomy. Am J Surg 176:8–11CrossRefPubMed

11.

Van Bemmel AJ et al (2011) Prevention of seroma formation after axillary dissection in breast cancer: a systematic review. Eur J Surg Oncol 37(10):829–835CrossRefPubMed

12.

Pogson CJ et al (2003) Seroma following breast cancer surgery. Eur J Surg Oncol 29:711–717CrossRefPubMed

13.

Agrawal A et al (2006) Concepts of seroma formation and prevention in breast cancer surgery. ANZ J Surg 76:1088–1095CrossRefPubMed

14.

Turner EJH et al (2014) Techniques in the prevention and management of seromas after breast surgery. Future Oncol 10(6):1049–1063CrossRefPubMed

15.

Kuroi K et al (2006) Effect of mechanical closure of dead space on seroma formation after breast surgery. Breast Cancer 13:260–265CrossRefPubMed

16.

Srivastava V et al (2012) Seroma formation after breast cancer surgery: what we have learned in the last two decades. J Breast Cancer 15(4):373–380CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

17.

Liberati A et al (2009) The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. PLos Med 6(7):e1000100CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

18.

Sakkary MA et al (2012) The value of mastectomy flap fixation in reducing fluid drainage and seroma formation in breast cancer patients. World J Surg Oncol 10:8CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

19.

Ten Wolde B et al (2014) Quilting prevents seroma formation following breast cancer surgery: closing the dead space by quilting prevents seroma following axillary lymph node dissection and mastectomy. Ann Surg Oncol 21:802–807CrossRefPubMed

20.

Ouldamer L et al (2015) Quilting suture of mastectomy dead space compared with conventional closure with drain. Ann Surg Oncol 22:4233–4240CrossRefPubMed

21.

Khater A et al (2015) Evaluation of the quilting technique for reduction of postmastectomy seroma: a randomized controlled study. Int J Breast Cancer 2015:287398CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

22.

Mazouni C et al (2015) Quilting sutures reduce seroma in mastectomy. Clin Breast Cancer 15(4):289–293CrossRefPubMed

23.

van Bastelaar J et al (2016) Flap fixation reduces seroma in patients undergoing mastectomy: a significant implication for clinical practice. World J Surg Oncol 8(14):66CrossRef

24.

Eichler C et al (2016) Flap adhesion and effect on postoperative complication rates using Tissuglu^® in mastectomy patients. Breast Cancer 23:486–490CrossRefPubMed

25.

van Bastelaar J et al (2017) Flap fixation using tissue glue or sutures appears to reduce seroma aspiration after mastectomy for breast cancer. Clin Breast Cancer 17(4):316–321CrossRefPubMed

26.

Taylor JC et al (2013) Breast cancer surgery without suction drainage: the impact of adopting a ‘no drains’ policy on symptomatic seroma formation rates. Eur J Surg Oncol 39(4):334–338CrossRefPubMed

27.

He XD et al (2011) Whether drainage should be used after surgery for breast cancer? A systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Med Oncol 28(1):9010–9673

28.

Divino CM et al (2000) Drains prevent seromas following lumpectomy with axillary dissection. Breast J 6(1):31–33CrossRefPubMed

29.

Somers RG et al (1992) The use of closed suction drainage after lumpectomy and axillary node dissection for breast cancer. Ann Surg 215(2):146–149CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

30.

Zavotsky J et al (1998) Evaluation of axillary lymphadenectomy without axillary drainage for patients undergoing breast-conserving therapy. Ann Surg Oncol 5(3):227–231CrossRefPubMed

31.

Cameron AE et al (1988) Suction drainage of the axilla: a prospective randomized trial. Br J Surg 75(12):1211CrossRefPubMed

32.

Sajid MS et al (2013) Fibrin glue instillation under skin flaps to prevent seroma-related morbidity following breast and axillary surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 5:009557

Title: A systematic review of flap fixation techniques in reducing seroma formation and its sequelae after mastectomy
Authors: J. van Bastelaar
L. van Roozendaal
R. Granzier
G. Beets
Y. Vissers
Publication date: 01-01-2018
Publisher: Springer US
Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment / Issue 2/2018
Print ISSN: 0167-6806
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7217
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-017-4540-x

Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Watch now

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras

Prof. Fabrice Barlesi

Developed by: Springer Medicine

At a glance: The STEP trials

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 2/2018

Phase IB trial of ixabepilone and vorinostat in metastatic breast cancer

Serum selenium levels predict survival after breast cancer

A randomized phase II study of weekly paclitaxel with or without pelareorep in patients with metastatic breast cancer: final analysis of Canadian Cancer Trials Group IND.213.

Correction to: Exercise following breast cancer: exploratory survival analyses of two randomised, controlled trials

Response letter to: Questions about Ki67 staining in luminal breast cancer

Usefulness of abbreviated breast MRI screening for women with a history of breast cancer surgery

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer