Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Surgery 1/2022

Open Access 01-12-2022 | Research

A retrospective and prospective study to establish a preoperative difficulty predicting model for video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy and mediastinal lymph node dissection

Authors: Zixiao Wang, Yuhang Wang, Daqiang Sun

Published in: BMC Surgery | Issue 1/2022

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

In previous studies, the difficulty of surgery has rarely been used as a research object. Our study aimed to develop a predictive model to enable preoperative prediction of the technical difficulty of video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy and mediastinal lymph node dissection using retrospective data and to validate our findings prospectively.

Methods

Collected data according to the designed data table and took the operation time as the outcome variable. A nomogram to predict the difficulty of surgery was established through Lasso logistic regression. The prospective datasets were analyzed and the outcome was the operation time.

Results

This retrospective study enrolled 351 patients and 85 patients were included in the prospective datasets. The variables in the retrospective research were selected by Lasso logistic regression (only used for modeling and not screening), and four significantly related influencing factors were obtained: FEV1/FVC (forced expiratory volume in the first second/forced vital capacity) (p < 0.001, OR, odds ratio = 0.89, 95% CI, confidence interval = 0.84–0.94), FEV1/pred FEV1 (forced expiratory volume in the first second/forced expiratory volume in the first second in predicted) (p = 0.076, OR = 0.98, 95% CI = 0.95–1.00), history of lung disease (p = 0.027, OR = 4.00, 95% CI = 1.27–15.64), and mediastinal lymph node enlargement or calcification (p < 0.001, OR = 9.78, 95% CI = 5.10–19.69). We used ROC (receiver operating characteristic) curves to evaluate the model. The training set AUC (area under curve) value was 0.877, the test set’s AUC was 0.789, and the model had a good calibration curve. In a prospective study, the data obtained in the research cohort were brought into the model again for verification, and the AUC value was 0.772.

Conclusion

Our retrospective study identified four preoperative variables that are correlated with a longer surgical time and can be presumed to reflect more difficult surgical procedures. Our prospective study verified that the variables in the prediction model (including prior lung disease, FEV1/pred FEV1, FEV1/FVC, mediastinal lymph node enlargement or calcification) were related to the difficulty.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, Bray F. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71:209–49.CrossRef Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, Bray F. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71:209–49.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Ferlay J, Colombet M, Soerjomataram I, Parkin DM, Piñeros M, Znaor A, Bray F. Cancer statistics for the year 2020: an overview. Int J Cancer. 2020;2021:5. Ferlay J, Colombet M, Soerjomataram I, Parkin DM, Piñeros M, Znaor A, Bray F. Cancer statistics for the year 2020: an overview. Int J Cancer. 2020;2021:5.
3.
go back to reference Ettinger DS, Wood DE, Aggarwal C, Aisner DL, Akerley W, Bauman JR, Bharat A, Bruno DS, Chang JY, Chirieac LR, D’Amico TA, Dilling TJ, Dobelbower M, Gettinger S, Govindan R, Gubens MA, Hennon M, Horn L, Lackner RP, Lanuti M, Leal TA, Lin J, Loo BW Jr, Martins RG, Otterson GA, Patel SP, Reckamp KL, Riely GJ, Schild SE, Shapiro TA, Stevenson J, Swanson SJ, Tauer KW, Yang SC, Gregory K, Hughes M. NCCN guidelines insights: non-small cell lung cancer, Version 1.2020. J Natl Compr Cancer Netw. 2019;17:1464–72.CrossRef Ettinger DS, Wood DE, Aggarwal C, Aisner DL, Akerley W, Bauman JR, Bharat A, Bruno DS, Chang JY, Chirieac LR, D’Amico TA, Dilling TJ, Dobelbower M, Gettinger S, Govindan R, Gubens MA, Hennon M, Horn L, Lackner RP, Lanuti M, Leal TA, Lin J, Loo BW Jr, Martins RG, Otterson GA, Patel SP, Reckamp KL, Riely GJ, Schild SE, Shapiro TA, Stevenson J, Swanson SJ, Tauer KW, Yang SC, Gregory K, Hughes M. NCCN guidelines insights: non-small cell lung cancer, Version 1.2020. J Natl Compr Cancer Netw. 2019;17:1464–72.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Berfield KS, Farjah F, Mulligan MS. Video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy for lung cancer. Ann Thorac Surg. 2019;107:603–9.CrossRef Berfield KS, Farjah F, Mulligan MS. Video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy for lung cancer. Ann Thorac Surg. 2019;107:603–9.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Huang YQ, Liang CH, He L, Tian J, Liang CS, Chen X, Ma ZL, Liu ZY. Development and validation of a radiomics nomogram for preoperative prediction of lymph node metastasis in colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34(18):2157–64.CrossRef Huang YQ, Liang CH, He L, Tian J, Liang CS, Chen X, Ma ZL, Liu ZY. Development and validation of a radiomics nomogram for preoperative prediction of lymph node metastasis in colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34(18):2157–64.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Jin R, Zheng Y, Gao T, Zhang Y, Wang B, Hang J, Li H. A nomogram for preoperative prediction of prolonged air leak after pulmonary malignancy resection. Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2021;10(8):3616–26.CrossRef Jin R, Zheng Y, Gao T, Zhang Y, Wang B, Hang J, Li H. A nomogram for preoperative prediction of prolonged air leak after pulmonary malignancy resection. Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2021;10(8):3616–26.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Fernando V, Diego G-R. Is VATS lobectomy standard of care for operable non-small cell lung cancer? Lung Cancer. 2016;100:114–9.CrossRef Fernando V, Diego G-R. Is VATS lobectomy standard of care for operable non-small cell lung cancer? Lung Cancer. 2016;100:114–9.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Ibrahim Y, Radwan RW, Abdullah AAN, Sherif M, Khalid U, Ansell J, Rasheed A. A retrospective and prospective study to develop a pre-operative difficulty score for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Gastrointest Surg. 2019;23:690–5.CrossRef Ibrahim Y, Radwan RW, Abdullah AAN, Sherif M, Khalid U, Ansell J, Rasheed A. A retrospective and prospective study to develop a pre-operative difficulty score for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Gastrointest Surg. 2019;23:690–5.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Lee SY, Goh BKP, Sepideh G, Allen JC, Merkow RP, Teo JY, Chandra D, Koh YX, Tan EK, Kam JH, Cheow PC, Chow PKH, Ooi LLPJ, Chung AYF, D’Angelica MI, Jarnagin WR, Peter Kingham T, Chan CY. laparoscopic liver resection difficulty score—a validation study. J Gastrointest Surg. 2019;23:545–55.CrossRef Lee SY, Goh BKP, Sepideh G, Allen JC, Merkow RP, Teo JY, Chandra D, Koh YX, Tan EK, Kam JH, Cheow PC, Chow PKH, Ooi LLPJ, Chung AYF, D’Angelica MI, Jarnagin WR, Peter Kingham T, Chan CY. laparoscopic liver resection difficulty score—a validation study. J Gastrointest Surg. 2019;23:545–55.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Escal L, Nougaret S, Guiu B, Bertrand MM, de Forges H, Tetreau R, Thézenas S, Rouanet P. MRI-based score to predict surgical difficulty in patients with rectal cancer. Br J Surg. 2018;105:140–6.CrossRef Escal L, Nougaret S, Guiu B, Bertrand MM, de Forges H, Tetreau R, Thézenas S, Rouanet P. MRI-based score to predict surgical difficulty in patients with rectal cancer. Br J Surg. 2018;105:140–6.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Ji C, Rong Y, Wang J, Yin G, Fan J, Tang P, Jiang D, Liu W, Ge X, Yu S, Cai W. Establishment of a nomogram for predicting the surgical difficulty of anterior cervical spine surgery. BMC Surg. 2021;21:170.CrossRef Ji C, Rong Y, Wang J, Yin G, Fan J, Tang P, Jiang D, Liu W, Ge X, Yu S, Cai W. Establishment of a nomogram for predicting the surgical difficulty of anterior cervical spine surgery. BMC Surg. 2021;21:170.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Takeno S, Tanoue Y, Hamada R, Kawano F, Tashiro K, Wada T, Ikenoue M, Nanashima A, Nakamura K. Utility of thoracic cage width in assessing surgical difficulty of minimally invasive esophagectomy in left lateral decubitus position. Surg Endosc. 2020;34:3479–86.CrossRef Takeno S, Tanoue Y, Hamada R, Kawano F, Tashiro K, Wada T, Ikenoue M, Nanashima A, Nakamura K. Utility of thoracic cage width in assessing surgical difficulty of minimally invasive esophagectomy in left lateral decubitus position. Surg Endosc. 2020;34:3479–86.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Kaku K, Okabe Y, Sato Y, Hisadome Y, Mei T, Noguchi H, Nakamura M. Predicting operation time and creating a difficulty scoring system in donor nephrectomy. J Endourol. 2021;35(11):1623–30.CrossRef Kaku K, Okabe Y, Sato Y, Hisadome Y, Mei T, Noguchi H, Nakamura M. Predicting operation time and creating a difficulty scoring system in donor nephrectomy. J Endourol. 2021;35(11):1623–30.CrossRef
15.
16.
go back to reference Foo CC, Hung HT, Ho YC, Lam WWM, Law WL. Predicting the level of difficulty of the double-stapling technique in laparoscopic total mesorectal excision. Surg Endosc. 2020;34:3382–7.CrossRef Foo CC, Hung HT, Ho YC, Lam WWM, Law WL. Predicting the level of difficulty of the double-stapling technique in laparoscopic total mesorectal excision. Surg Endosc. 2020;34:3382–7.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Wolff RF, Moons KGM, Riley RD, Whiting PF, Westwood M, Collins GS, Reitsma JB, Kleijnen J, Mallett S, PROBAST Group. PROBAST: a tool to assess the risk of bias and applicability of prediction model studies. Ann Intern Med. 2019;170(1):51–8.CrossRef Wolff RF, Moons KGM, Riley RD, Whiting PF, Westwood M, Collins GS, Reitsma JB, Kleijnen J, Mallett S, PROBAST Group. PROBAST: a tool to assess the risk of bias and applicability of prediction model studies. Ann Intern Med. 2019;170(1):51–8.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
A retrospective and prospective study to establish a preoperative difficulty predicting model for video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy and mediastinal lymph node dissection
Authors
Zixiao Wang
Yuhang Wang
Daqiang Sun
Publication date
01-12-2022
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Surgery / Issue 1/2022
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2482
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-022-01566-3

Other articles of this Issue 1/2022

BMC Surgery 1/2022 Go to the issue