Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 11/2012

01-11-2012

A randomized crossover trial examining low- versus high-fidelity simulation in basic laparoscopic skills training

Authors: Swee Chin Tan, Nicholas Marlow, John Field, Meryl Altree, Wendy Babidge, Peter Hewett, Guy J. Maddern

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 11/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Previous randomized studies have compared high- versus low-fidelity laparoscopic simulators; however, no proficiency criteria were defined and results have been mixed. The purpose of this research was to determine whether there were any differences in the learning outcomes of participants who had trained to proficiency on low- or high-fidelity laparoscopic surgical simulators.

Methods

We conducted a randomized, prospective crossover trial with participants recruited from New South Wales, Western Australia, and South Australia. Participants were randomized to high-fidelity (LapSim, Surgical Science) or low-fidelity (FLS, SAGES) laparoscopic simulators and trained to proficiency in a defined number of tasks. They then crossed over to the other fidelity simulator and were tested. The outcomes of interest were the crossover mean scores, the proportion of tasks passed, and percentage passes for the crossover simulator tasks.

Results

Of the 228 participants recruited, 100 were randomized to LapSim and 128 to FLS. Mean crossover score increased from baseline for both simulators, but there was no significant difference between them (11.0 % vs. 11.9 %). FLS-trained participants passed a significantly higher proportion of crossover tasks compared with LapSim-trained participants (0.26 vs. 0.20, p = 0.016). A significantly higher percentage of FLS-trained participants passed intracorporeal knot tying than LapSim-trained participants (35 % vs. 8 %, p < 0.001).

Conclusion

Similar increases in participant score from baseline illustrate that training on either simulator type is beneficial. However, FLS-trained participants demonstrated a greater ability to translate their skills to successfully complete LapSim tasks. The ability of FLS-trained participants to transfer their skills to new settings suggests the benefit of this simulator type compared with the LapSim.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Semm K (1983) Die endoskopische Appendektomie. Gynakolog Prax 7:131–140 Semm K (1983) Die endoskopische Appendektomie. Gynakolog Prax 7:131–140
2.
go back to reference Keus F, de Jong JA, Gooszen HG, van Laarhoven CJ (2006) Laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy for patients with symptomatic cholecystolithiasis. Cochrane Database Syst 4:CD006231 Keus F, de Jong JA, Gooszen HG, van Laarhoven CJ (2006) Laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy for patients with symptomatic cholecystolithiasis. Cochrane Database Syst 4:CD006231
3.
go back to reference Jones DB, Brewer JD, Soper NJ (1996) The influence of three dimensional video systems on laparoscopic task performance. Surg Laparosc Endosc 6:191–192PubMedCrossRef Jones DB, Brewer JD, Soper NJ (1996) The influence of three dimensional video systems on laparoscopic task performance. Surg Laparosc Endosc 6:191–192PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Gallagher AG, McClure N, McGuigan J, Ritchie K, Sheehy NP (1998) An ergonomic analysis of the fulcrum effect in the acquisition of endoscopic skills. Endoscopy 30:617–622PubMedCrossRef Gallagher AG, McClure N, McGuigan J, Ritchie K, Sheehy NP (1998) An ergonomic analysis of the fulcrum effect in the acquisition of endoscopic skills. Endoscopy 30:617–622PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Bridges M, Diamond DL (1997) The financial impact of teaching surgical residents in the operating room. Am J Surg 177:28–32CrossRef Bridges M, Diamond DL (1997) The financial impact of teaching surgical residents in the operating room. Am J Surg 177:28–32CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Scott DJ, Valentine RJ, Bergen PC, Rege RV, Laycock R, Tesfay ST, Jones DB (2000) Evaluating surgical competency with the American Board of Surgery In-Training Examination, skill testing and intraoperative assessment. Surgery 128:613–622PubMedCrossRef Scott DJ, Valentine RJ, Bergen PC, Rege RV, Laycock R, Tesfay ST, Jones DB (2000) Evaluating surgical competency with the American Board of Surgery In-Training Examination, skill testing and intraoperative assessment. Surgery 128:613–622PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Fried GM, Feldman LS, Vassiliou MC, Fraser SA, Stanbridge D, Ghitulescu G, Andrew CG (2004) Proving the value of simulation in laparoscopic surgery. Ann Surg 240:518–528PubMedCrossRef Fried GM, Feldman LS, Vassiliou MC, Fraser SA, Stanbridge D, Ghitulescu G, Andrew CG (2004) Proving the value of simulation in laparoscopic surgery. Ann Surg 240:518–528PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Zheng B, Hur HC, Johnson S, Swanstrom LL (2010) Validity of using Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery (FLS) program to assess laparoscopic competence for gynaecologists. Surg Endosc 24:152–160PubMedCrossRef Zheng B, Hur HC, Johnson S, Swanstrom LL (2010) Validity of using Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery (FLS) program to assess laparoscopic competence for gynaecologists. Surg Endosc 24:152–160PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Duffy AJ, Hogle NJ, McCarthy H, Lew JI, Egan A, Christos P, Fowler DL (2005) Construct validity for the LAPSIM laparoscopic surgical simulator. Surg Endosc 19:401–405PubMedCrossRef Duffy AJ, Hogle NJ, McCarthy H, Lew JI, Egan A, Christos P, Fowler DL (2005) Construct validity for the LAPSIM laparoscopic surgical simulator. Surg Endosc 19:401–405PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference van Dongen KW, Tournoij E, van der Zee DC, Schijven MP, Broeders IA (2007) Construct validity of the LapSim: can the LapSim virtual reality simulator distinguish between novices and experts? Surg Endosc 21:1413–1417PubMedCrossRef van Dongen KW, Tournoij E, van der Zee DC, Schijven MP, Broeders IA (2007) Construct validity of the LapSim: can the LapSim virtual reality simulator distinguish between novices and experts? Surg Endosc 21:1413–1417PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Iwata N, Fujiwara M, Kodera Y, Tanaka C, Ohashi N, Nakayama G, Koike M, Nakao A (2011) Construct validity of the LapVR virtual-reality surgical simulator. Surg Endosc 25:423–428PubMedCrossRef Iwata N, Fujiwara M, Kodera Y, Tanaka C, Ohashi N, Nakayama G, Koike M, Nakao A (2011) Construct validity of the LapVR virtual-reality surgical simulator. Surg Endosc 25:423–428PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Hamilton EC, Scott DJ, Fleming JB, Rege RV, Laycock R, Bergen PC, Tesfay ST, Jones DB (2002) Comparison of video trainer and virtual reality training systems on acquisition of laparoscopic skills. Surg Endosc 16:406–411PubMedCrossRef Hamilton EC, Scott DJ, Fleming JB, Rege RV, Laycock R, Bergen PC, Tesfay ST, Jones DB (2002) Comparison of video trainer and virtual reality training systems on acquisition of laparoscopic skills. Surg Endosc 16:406–411PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Lehmann KS, Ritz JP, Maass H, Cakmak HK, Kuehnapfel UG, Germer CT, Bretthauer G, Buhr HJ (2005) A prospective randomised study to test the transfer of basic psychomotor skills from virtual reality to physical reality in a comparable training setting. Ann Surg 241:442–449PubMedCrossRef Lehmann KS, Ritz JP, Maass H, Cakmak HK, Kuehnapfel UG, Germer CT, Bretthauer G, Buhr HJ (2005) A prospective randomised study to test the transfer of basic psychomotor skills from virtual reality to physical reality in a comparable training setting. Ann Surg 241:442–449PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Munz Y, Kumar BD, Moorthy K, Bann S, Darzi A (2004) Laparoscopic virtual reality and box trainers: is one superior to the other? Surg Endosc 18:485–494PubMedCrossRef Munz Y, Kumar BD, Moorthy K, Bann S, Darzi A (2004) Laparoscopic virtual reality and box trainers: is one superior to the other? Surg Endosc 18:485–494PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Pearson AM, Gallagher AG, Rosser JC, Satava RM (2002) Evaluation of structured and quantitative training methods for teaching intracorporeal knot tying. Surg Endosc 16:130–137PubMedCrossRef Pearson AM, Gallagher AG, Rosser JC, Satava RM (2002) Evaluation of structured and quantitative training methods for teaching intracorporeal knot tying. Surg Endosc 16:130–137PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Jordan JA, Gallagher AG, McGuigan J, McClure N (2001) Virtual reality training leads to faster adaptation to the novel psychomotor restrictions encountered by laparoscopic surgeons. Surg Endosc 15:1080–1084PubMedCrossRef Jordan JA, Gallagher AG, McGuigan J, McClure N (2001) Virtual reality training leads to faster adaptation to the novel psychomotor restrictions encountered by laparoscopic surgeons. Surg Endosc 15:1080–1084PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Kothari SN, Kaplan BJ, DeMAria EJ, Broderick TJ, Merrell RC (2002) Training in laparoscopic suturing skills using a new computer-based virtual reality simulator (MIST–VR) provides results comparable to those with an established pelvic trainer system. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech 12:167–173CrossRef Kothari SN, Kaplan BJ, DeMAria EJ, Broderick TJ, Merrell RC (2002) Training in laparoscopic suturing skills using a new computer-based virtual reality simulator (MIST–VR) provides results comparable to those with an established pelvic trainer system. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech 12:167–173CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Sharpe BA, MacHaidze Z, Ogan K (2005) Randomized comparison of standard laparoscopic trainer to novel, at-home, low-cost, camera-less laparoscopic trainer. Urology 66:50–54PubMedCrossRef Sharpe BA, MacHaidze Z, Ogan K (2005) Randomized comparison of standard laparoscopic trainer to novel, at-home, low-cost, camera-less laparoscopic trainer. Urology 66:50–54PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Korndorffer JR Jr, Hayes DJ, Dunne JB, Sierra R, Touchard CL, Markert RJ, Scott DJ (2005) Development and transferability of a cost-effective laparoscopic camera navigation simulator. Surg Endosc 19:161–167PubMedCrossRef Korndorffer JR Jr, Hayes DJ, Dunne JB, Sierra R, Touchard CL, Markert RJ, Scott DJ (2005) Development and transferability of a cost-effective laparoscopic camera navigation simulator. Surg Endosc 19:161–167PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Buzink SN, Botden SM, Heemskerk J, Goossens RH, de Ridder H, Jakimowicz JJ (2009) Camera navigation and tissue manipulation; are these laparoscopic skills related? Surg Endosc 23:750–757PubMedCrossRef Buzink SN, Botden SM, Heemskerk J, Goossens RH, de Ridder H, Jakimowicz JJ (2009) Camera navigation and tissue manipulation; are these laparoscopic skills related? Surg Endosc 23:750–757PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Kim HK, Rattner DW, Srinivasan MA (2004) Virtual-reality-based laparoscopic surgical training: the role of simulation fidelity in haptic feedback. Comput Aided Surg 9:227–234PubMed Kim HK, Rattner DW, Srinivasan MA (2004) Virtual-reality-based laparoscopic surgical training: the role of simulation fidelity in haptic feedback. Comput Aided Surg 9:227–234PubMed
22.
go back to reference Hiemstra E, Terveer EM, Chmarra MK, Dankelman J, Jansen FW (2011) Virtual reality in laparoscopic skills training: is haptic feedback replaceable? Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 20:179–184PubMedCrossRef Hiemstra E, Terveer EM, Chmarra MK, Dankelman J, Jansen FW (2011) Virtual reality in laparoscopic skills training: is haptic feedback replaceable? Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 20:179–184PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
A randomized crossover trial examining low- versus high-fidelity simulation in basic laparoscopic skills training
Authors
Swee Chin Tan
Nicholas Marlow
John Field
Meryl Altree
Wendy Babidge
Peter Hewett
Guy J. Maddern
Publication date
01-11-2012
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 11/2012
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-012-2326-0

Other articles of this Issue 11/2012

Surgical Endoscopy 11/2012 Go to the issue